Forest tenure rights and REDD+: From inertia to policy solutions
In many developing countries, tenure in forests is not clear and subject to dispute. This will place limits on the effectiveness, efficiency and equity (3Es) of REDD+. In spite of the attention paid to the problem of insecure tenure to date, there has been little progress toward clarifying tenure arrangements. National governments need to take proactive steps to clarify tenure.
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Sunderlin, William D., Larson, A.M., Cronkleton, P. |
---|---|
Format: | Book Chapter biblioteca |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Center for International Forestry Research
2009
|
Subjects: | climate change, mitigation, tenure systems, governance, |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/20287 https://www.cifor.org/knowledge/publication/2908 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Rights to forests and carbon under REDD+ initiatives in Latin America
by: Larson, A.M., et al.
Published: (2010) -
Tenure: what will REDD mean for forest communities
by: Sunderlin, William D.
Published: (2010) -
The evolving landscape of REDD+ projects
by: Sills, E., et al.
Published: (2009) -
Tenure matters in REDD+: Lessons from the field [Japanese]
by: Larson, A.M., et al.
Published: (2015) -
Seeing people through the trees: mitigating and adapting to climate change without undermining rights and livelihoods
by: White, A., et al.
Published: (2010)