Governance and the capacity to manage resilience in regional social-ecological systems

The sustainability of regional development can be usefully explored through several different lenses. In situations in which uncertainties and change are key features of the ecological landscape and social organization, critical factors for sustainability are resilience, the capacity to cope and adapt, and the conservation of sources of innovation and renewal. However, interventions in social-ecological systems with the aim of altering resilience immediately confront issues of governance. Who decides what should be made resilient to what? For whom is resilience to be managed, and for what purpose? In this paper we draw on the insights from a diverse set of case studies from around the world in which members of the Resilience Alliance have observed or engaged with sustainability problems at regional scales. Our central question is: How do certain attributes of governance function in society to enhance the capacity to manage resilience? Three specific propositions were explored: (1) participation builds trust, and deliberation leads to the shared understanding needed to mobilize and self-organize; (2) polycentric and multilayered institutions improve the fit between knowledge, action, and social-ecological contexts in ways that allow societies to respond more adaptively at appropriate levels; and (3) accountable authorities that also pursue just distributions of benefits and involuntary risks enhance the adaptive capacity of vulnerable groups and society as a whole. Some support was found for parts of all three propositions. In exploring the sustainability of regional social-ecological systems, we are usually faced with a set of ecosystem goods and services that interact with a collection of users with different technologies, interests, and levels of power. In this situation in our roles as analysts, facilitators, change agents, or stakeholders, we not only need to ask: The resilience of what, to what? We must also ask: For whom?

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lebel, L., Anderies, J.M., Campbell, Bruce M., Folke, C., Hatfield-Dodds, S., Hughes, T.P., Wilson, J.
Format: Journal Article biblioteca
Language:English
Published: 2006
Subjects:regional development, change, governance, institutions, flexibility, adaptation, capacity, participation,
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/19561
https://www.cifor.org/knowledge/publication/2149
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-cgspace-10568-19561
record_format koha
spelling dig-cgspace-10568-195612016-05-30T17:48:28Z Governance and the capacity to manage resilience in regional social-ecological systems Lebel, L. Anderies, J.M. Campbell, Bruce M. Folke, C. Hatfield-Dodds, S. Hughes, T.P. Wilson, J. regional development change governance institutions flexibility adaptation capacity participation The sustainability of regional development can be usefully explored through several different lenses. In situations in which uncertainties and change are key features of the ecological landscape and social organization, critical factors for sustainability are resilience, the capacity to cope and adapt, and the conservation of sources of innovation and renewal. However, interventions in social-ecological systems with the aim of altering resilience immediately confront issues of governance. Who decides what should be made resilient to what? For whom is resilience to be managed, and for what purpose? In this paper we draw on the insights from a diverse set of case studies from around the world in which members of the Resilience Alliance have observed or engaged with sustainability problems at regional scales. Our central question is: How do certain attributes of governance function in society to enhance the capacity to manage resilience? Three specific propositions were explored: (1) participation builds trust, and deliberation leads to the shared understanding needed to mobilize and self-organize; (2) polycentric and multilayered institutions improve the fit between knowledge, action, and social-ecological contexts in ways that allow societies to respond more adaptively at appropriate levels; and (3) accountable authorities that also pursue just distributions of benefits and involuntary risks enhance the adaptive capacity of vulnerable groups and society as a whole. Some support was found for parts of all three propositions. In exploring the sustainability of regional social-ecological systems, we are usually faced with a set of ecosystem goods and services that interact with a collection of users with different technologies, interests, and levels of power. In this situation in our roles as analysts, facilitators, change agents, or stakeholders, we not only need to ask: The resilience of what, to what? We must also ask: For whom? 2006 2012-06-04T09:12:30Z 2012-06-04T09:12:30Z Journal Article Lebel, L., Anderies, J.M., Campbell, B.M., Folke, C., Hatfield-Dodds, S., Hughes, T.P., Wilson, J. 2006. Governance and the capacity to manage resilience in regional social-ecological systems . Ecology and Society 11 (1) :19. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art19/. ISSN: 1708-3087. 1708-3087 https://hdl.handle.net/10568/19561 https://www.cifor.org/knowledge/publication/2149 en Ecology and Society
institution CGIAR
collection DSpace
country Francia
countrycode FR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-cgspace
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Oeste
libraryname Biblioteca del CGIAR
language English
topic regional development
change
governance
institutions
flexibility
adaptation
capacity
participation
regional development
change
governance
institutions
flexibility
adaptation
capacity
participation
spellingShingle regional development
change
governance
institutions
flexibility
adaptation
capacity
participation
regional development
change
governance
institutions
flexibility
adaptation
capacity
participation
Lebel, L.
Anderies, J.M.
Campbell, Bruce M.
Folke, C.
Hatfield-Dodds, S.
Hughes, T.P.
Wilson, J.
Governance and the capacity to manage resilience in regional social-ecological systems
description The sustainability of regional development can be usefully explored through several different lenses. In situations in which uncertainties and change are key features of the ecological landscape and social organization, critical factors for sustainability are resilience, the capacity to cope and adapt, and the conservation of sources of innovation and renewal. However, interventions in social-ecological systems with the aim of altering resilience immediately confront issues of governance. Who decides what should be made resilient to what? For whom is resilience to be managed, and for what purpose? In this paper we draw on the insights from a diverse set of case studies from around the world in which members of the Resilience Alliance have observed or engaged with sustainability problems at regional scales. Our central question is: How do certain attributes of governance function in society to enhance the capacity to manage resilience? Three specific propositions were explored: (1) participation builds trust, and deliberation leads to the shared understanding needed to mobilize and self-organize; (2) polycentric and multilayered institutions improve the fit between knowledge, action, and social-ecological contexts in ways that allow societies to respond more adaptively at appropriate levels; and (3) accountable authorities that also pursue just distributions of benefits and involuntary risks enhance the adaptive capacity of vulnerable groups and society as a whole. Some support was found for parts of all three propositions. In exploring the sustainability of regional social-ecological systems, we are usually faced with a set of ecosystem goods and services that interact with a collection of users with different technologies, interests, and levels of power. In this situation in our roles as analysts, facilitators, change agents, or stakeholders, we not only need to ask: The resilience of what, to what? We must also ask: For whom?
format Journal Article
topic_facet regional development
change
governance
institutions
flexibility
adaptation
capacity
participation
author Lebel, L.
Anderies, J.M.
Campbell, Bruce M.
Folke, C.
Hatfield-Dodds, S.
Hughes, T.P.
Wilson, J.
author_facet Lebel, L.
Anderies, J.M.
Campbell, Bruce M.
Folke, C.
Hatfield-Dodds, S.
Hughes, T.P.
Wilson, J.
author_sort Lebel, L.
title Governance and the capacity to manage resilience in regional social-ecological systems
title_short Governance and the capacity to manage resilience in regional social-ecological systems
title_full Governance and the capacity to manage resilience in regional social-ecological systems
title_fullStr Governance and the capacity to manage resilience in regional social-ecological systems
title_full_unstemmed Governance and the capacity to manage resilience in regional social-ecological systems
title_sort governance and the capacity to manage resilience in regional social-ecological systems
publishDate 2006
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/19561
https://www.cifor.org/knowledge/publication/2149
work_keys_str_mv AT lebell governanceandthecapacitytomanageresilienceinregionalsocialecologicalsystems
AT anderiesjm governanceandthecapacitytomanageresilienceinregionalsocialecologicalsystems
AT campbellbrucem governanceandthecapacitytomanageresilienceinregionalsocialecologicalsystems
AT folkec governanceandthecapacitytomanageresilienceinregionalsocialecologicalsystems
AT hatfielddoddss governanceandthecapacitytomanageresilienceinregionalsocialecologicalsystems
AT hughestp governanceandthecapacitytomanageresilienceinregionalsocialecologicalsystems
AT wilsonj governanceandthecapacitytomanageresilienceinregionalsocialecologicalsystems
_version_ 1779057157341184000