Criteria & indicators for community forest management: building-up criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management at community level: a case in Ghana

This study was carried out in Ghana with two communities managing two forest reserves. Two sets of participatory criteria and indicators (C&I) for sustainable forest management have been defined: the communities themselves decided what their own C&I would be. This gives an example of what participatory sets could be. They are small and tractable to allow easy ownership, while covering all the major issues of sustainability. They contain a majority of indicators of results, which give more intrasigence to the assessment, necessary since communities will be in the position of both judge and jury when they will accomplish their assessment. Concerning the method, this case study tested and validated the approach of the CIFOR C&I while ideas for improvement emerged.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Louvet, S.
Format: Book biblioteca
Language:English
Published: ENGREF and CIFOR 2002
Subjects:forest management, participation, communities, selection criteria, indicators, theses,
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/18596
https://www.cifor.org/knowledge/publication/1122
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-cgspace-10568-18596
record_format koha
spelling dig-cgspace-10568-185962023-02-15T01:17:24Z Criteria & indicators for community forest management: building-up criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management at community level: a case in Ghana Louvet, S. forest management participation communities selection criteria indicators theses This study was carried out in Ghana with two communities managing two forest reserves. Two sets of participatory criteria and indicators (C&I) for sustainable forest management have been defined: the communities themselves decided what their own C&I would be. This gives an example of what participatory sets could be. They are small and tractable to allow easy ownership, while covering all the major issues of sustainability. They contain a majority of indicators of results, which give more intrasigence to the assessment, necessary since communities will be in the position of both judge and jury when they will accomplish their assessment. Concerning the method, this case study tested and validated the approach of the CIFOR C&I while ideas for improvement emerged. 2002 2012-06-04T09:08:35Z 2012-06-04T09:08:35Z Book Louvet, S. 2002. Criteria & indicators for community forest management: building-up criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management at community level: a case in Ghana . Paris, ENGREF and CIFOR. 110p. + annexes https://hdl.handle.net/10568/18596 https://www.cifor.org/knowledge/publication/1122 en ENGREF and CIFOR
institution CGIAR
collection DSpace
country Francia
countrycode FR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-cgspace
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Oeste
libraryname Biblioteca del CGIAR
language English
topic forest management
participation
communities
selection criteria
indicators
theses
forest management
participation
communities
selection criteria
indicators
theses
spellingShingle forest management
participation
communities
selection criteria
indicators
theses
forest management
participation
communities
selection criteria
indicators
theses
Louvet, S.
Criteria & indicators for community forest management: building-up criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management at community level: a case in Ghana
description This study was carried out in Ghana with two communities managing two forest reserves. Two sets of participatory criteria and indicators (C&I) for sustainable forest management have been defined: the communities themselves decided what their own C&I would be. This gives an example of what participatory sets could be. They are small and tractable to allow easy ownership, while covering all the major issues of sustainability. They contain a majority of indicators of results, which give more intrasigence to the assessment, necessary since communities will be in the position of both judge and jury when they will accomplish their assessment. Concerning the method, this case study tested and validated the approach of the CIFOR C&I while ideas for improvement emerged.
format Book
topic_facet forest management
participation
communities
selection criteria
indicators
theses
author Louvet, S.
author_facet Louvet, S.
author_sort Louvet, S.
title Criteria & indicators for community forest management: building-up criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management at community level: a case in Ghana
title_short Criteria & indicators for community forest management: building-up criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management at community level: a case in Ghana
title_full Criteria & indicators for community forest management: building-up criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management at community level: a case in Ghana
title_fullStr Criteria & indicators for community forest management: building-up criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management at community level: a case in Ghana
title_full_unstemmed Criteria & indicators for community forest management: building-up criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management at community level: a case in Ghana
title_sort criteria & indicators for community forest management: building-up criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management at community level: a case in ghana
publisher ENGREF and CIFOR
publishDate 2002
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/18596
https://www.cifor.org/knowledge/publication/1122
work_keys_str_mv AT louvets criteriaindicatorsforcommunityforestmanagementbuildingupcriteriaandindicatorsforsustainableforestmanagementatcommunitylevelacaseinghana
_version_ 1779057765981880320