Community forestry and the stewardship of tropical forests in Asia

A heated debate has been going on for roughly three decades about who should hold stewardship over Asia’s tropical forests. This essay reviews how the debate evolved. Communal forestry advocates like NGOs point out that local groups living in remote corners of countries like Indonesia, Thailand, the Philippines, and India have been managing forests for centuries. They provide examples of successful precolonial communal management practices, which eventually gave way to commercial interests in the late nineteenth century. Postcolonial governments, backed by international organizations, continued to believe in modernist and exploitative forestry practices until the development discourse began to question the impact of economic growth on natural resources and the environment. By the 1980s, the idea emerged of putting local communities back in charge of tropical forests, both for their own livelihoods and the forests’ health. By the 1990s, community forestry coincided with the trend toward decentralization. Unfortunately, the result has often been more exploitation as newly responsible district authorities and village elites seek revenue through timber concessions and oil palm plantations. Despite positive examples—almost 3 million ha under community control in the Philippines—the larger picture is of central authorities reluctant to give up lucrative sources of income. When they do grant local responsibility, it is often over degraded or low quality forests, a burden rather than an asset to local communities. Future agendas must recognize that forests are now of value to a growing number of stakeholders. Local communities may therefore play important roles in restoring forests—if they are compensated—but the complexity of rights and interests suggests that the future lies in co-management. The struggle will shift from who should have control, to how communal stewardship can become feasible and attractive to communities, while meeting the demands of other constituencies.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jong, W. de
Format: Journal Article biblioteca
Language:English
Published: 2002
Subjects:community forestry, tropical forests, forest management,
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/18575
https://www.cifor.org/knowledge/publication/1101
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-cgspace-10568-18575
record_format koha
spelling dig-cgspace-10568-185752016-05-30T17:48:43Z Community forestry and the stewardship of tropical forests in Asia Jong, W. de community forestry tropical forests forest management A heated debate has been going on for roughly three decades about who should hold stewardship over Asia’s tropical forests. This essay reviews how the debate evolved. Communal forestry advocates like NGOs point out that local groups living in remote corners of countries like Indonesia, Thailand, the Philippines, and India have been managing forests for centuries. They provide examples of successful precolonial communal management practices, which eventually gave way to commercial interests in the late nineteenth century. Postcolonial governments, backed by international organizations, continued to believe in modernist and exploitative forestry practices until the development discourse began to question the impact of economic growth on natural resources and the environment. By the 1980s, the idea emerged of putting local communities back in charge of tropical forests, both for their own livelihoods and the forests’ health. By the 1990s, community forestry coincided with the trend toward decentralization. Unfortunately, the result has often been more exploitation as newly responsible district authorities and village elites seek revenue through timber concessions and oil palm plantations. Despite positive examples—almost 3 million ha under community control in the Philippines—the larger picture is of central authorities reluctant to give up lucrative sources of income. When they do grant local responsibility, it is often over degraded or low quality forests, a burden rather than an asset to local communities. Future agendas must recognize that forests are now of value to a growing number of stakeholders. Local communities may therefore play important roles in restoring forests—if they are compensated—but the complexity of rights and interests suggests that the future lies in co-management. The struggle will shift from who should have control, to how communal stewardship can become feasible and attractive to communities, while meeting the demands of other constituencies. 2002 2012-06-04T09:08:34Z 2012-06-04T09:08:34Z Journal Article de Jong, W. 2002. Community forestry and the stewardship of tropical forests in Asia . Kyoto Review of Southeast Asia (2) :[online] http://kyotoreview.cseas.kyoto-u.ac.jp/issue/issue1/index.html. https://hdl.handle.net/10568/18575 https://www.cifor.org/knowledge/publication/1101 en Open Access Kyoto Review of Southeast Asia
institution CGIAR
collection DSpace
country Francia
countrycode FR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-cgspace
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Oeste
libraryname Biblioteca del CGIAR
language English
topic community forestry
tropical forests
forest management
community forestry
tropical forests
forest management
spellingShingle community forestry
tropical forests
forest management
community forestry
tropical forests
forest management
Jong, W. de
Community forestry and the stewardship of tropical forests in Asia
description A heated debate has been going on for roughly three decades about who should hold stewardship over Asia’s tropical forests. This essay reviews how the debate evolved. Communal forestry advocates like NGOs point out that local groups living in remote corners of countries like Indonesia, Thailand, the Philippines, and India have been managing forests for centuries. They provide examples of successful precolonial communal management practices, which eventually gave way to commercial interests in the late nineteenth century. Postcolonial governments, backed by international organizations, continued to believe in modernist and exploitative forestry practices until the development discourse began to question the impact of economic growth on natural resources and the environment. By the 1980s, the idea emerged of putting local communities back in charge of tropical forests, both for their own livelihoods and the forests’ health. By the 1990s, community forestry coincided with the trend toward decentralization. Unfortunately, the result has often been more exploitation as newly responsible district authorities and village elites seek revenue through timber concessions and oil palm plantations. Despite positive examples—almost 3 million ha under community control in the Philippines—the larger picture is of central authorities reluctant to give up lucrative sources of income. When they do grant local responsibility, it is often over degraded or low quality forests, a burden rather than an asset to local communities. Future agendas must recognize that forests are now of value to a growing number of stakeholders. Local communities may therefore play important roles in restoring forests—if they are compensated—but the complexity of rights and interests suggests that the future lies in co-management. The struggle will shift from who should have control, to how communal stewardship can become feasible and attractive to communities, while meeting the demands of other constituencies.
format Journal Article
topic_facet community forestry
tropical forests
forest management
author Jong, W. de
author_facet Jong, W. de
author_sort Jong, W. de
title Community forestry and the stewardship of tropical forests in Asia
title_short Community forestry and the stewardship of tropical forests in Asia
title_full Community forestry and the stewardship of tropical forests in Asia
title_fullStr Community forestry and the stewardship of tropical forests in Asia
title_full_unstemmed Community forestry and the stewardship of tropical forests in Asia
title_sort community forestry and the stewardship of tropical forests in asia
publishDate 2002
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/18575
https://www.cifor.org/knowledge/publication/1101
work_keys_str_mv AT jongwde communityforestryandthestewardshipoftropicalforestsinasia
_version_ 1779062875825897472