Evaluation of forest harvesting impacts on forest ecosystems

In the Guarani preservation area 100 ha of forest land was cut to evaluate harvest impact in natural subtropical forest. Two treatments were applied: “commercial logging” in which the logging contractor works in the traditional way, and “improved harvest” in which trees are selected and the skidding trails and landings planned. Forest structure and composition, seedlings and regenerations and soil physical parameters such as soil density, penetration resistance were measured before harvesting. The trees were cut by chainsaw and moved by a rubber tyred skidder to the landing area for loading on a truck. After harvesting, damage by cutting and by skidding was measured. All previous parameters were re-measured and traffic intensity in each plot calculated. The harvest yields were 9.9 m3 ha-1 for the improved harvesting and 16.4 m3 ha-1 for the commercial treatment. Trees felled were 6.8 trees ha-1 for improved harvest and 9.9 trees ha-1 for the commercial harvest. For canopy trees, commercial harvesting reduced the initial dominance 19.3%, while improved harvesting only decreased it 9.5% so forest structure is less affected by the improved harvesting. There was little change in abundance and species composition. Changes were observed in the order of importance of some species, e.g. Parapiptademia rigida was replaced by species of lesser importance. Regeneration after the commercial harvesting was less than in the improved harvesting method. Commercial harvesting had more (60%) traffic intensity (Mg km-1 ha-1) along all the skid trials in the plots.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mac Donagh, P., Gauto, O., López Cristobal, L., Vera, N., Figueredo, S., Fernández, R., Garibaldi, J., Alvez, M., Keller, H., Marek, M., Cavalin, J., Kobayashi, S.
Format: Book Chapter biblioteca
Language:English
Published: Center for International Forestry Research 2001
Subjects:evaluation, logging, selective felling, ecosystems, forest damage, regeneration, conferences,
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/18399
https://www.cifor.org/knowledge/publication/921
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-cgspace-10568-18399
record_format koha
spelling dig-cgspace-10568-183992016-05-30T17:48:39Z Evaluation of forest harvesting impacts on forest ecosystems Mac Donagh, P. Gauto, O. López Cristobal, L. Vera, N. Figueredo, S. Fernández, R. Garibaldi, J. Alvez, M. Keller, H. Marek, M. Cavalin, J. Kobayashi, S. evaluation logging selective felling ecosystems forest damage regeneration conferences In the Guarani preservation area 100 ha of forest land was cut to evaluate harvest impact in natural subtropical forest. Two treatments were applied: “commercial logging” in which the logging contractor works in the traditional way, and “improved harvest” in which trees are selected and the skidding trails and landings planned. Forest structure and composition, seedlings and regenerations and soil physical parameters such as soil density, penetration resistance were measured before harvesting. The trees were cut by chainsaw and moved by a rubber tyred skidder to the landing area for loading on a truck. After harvesting, damage by cutting and by skidding was measured. All previous parameters were re-measured and traffic intensity in each plot calculated. The harvest yields were 9.9 m3 ha-1 for the improved harvesting and 16.4 m3 ha-1 for the commercial treatment. Trees felled were 6.8 trees ha-1 for improved harvest and 9.9 trees ha-1 for the commercial harvest. For canopy trees, commercial harvesting reduced the initial dominance 19.3%, while improved harvesting only decreased it 9.5% so forest structure is less affected by the improved harvesting. There was little change in abundance and species composition. Changes were observed in the order of importance of some species, e.g. Parapiptademia rigida was replaced by species of lesser importance. Regeneration after the commercial harvesting was less than in the improved harvesting method. Commercial harvesting had more (60%) traffic intensity (Mg km-1 ha-1) along all the skid trials in the plots. 2001 2012-06-04T09:06:25Z 2012-06-04T09:06:25Z Book Chapter Mac Donagh, P., Gauto, O., Lopez Cristobal, L., Vera, N., Figueredo, S., Fernandez, R., Garibaldi, J., Alvez, M., Keller, H., Marek, M., Cavalin, J., Kobayashi, S. 2001. Evaluation of forest harvesting impacts on forest ecosystems . In: S. Kobayashi, J.W. Turnbull, T. Toma, T. Mori, N.M.N.A. Majid (eds.). Rehabilitation of degraded tropical forest ecosystems: workshop proceedings, 2-4 November 1999, Bogor, Indonesia. :69-79. Bogor, Indonesia, Bogor, Indonesia, CIFOR. CIFOR. ISBN: 979-8764-70-6.. 979-8764-70-6 https://hdl.handle.net/10568/18399 https://www.cifor.org/knowledge/publication/921 en Center for International Forestry Research
institution CGIAR
collection DSpace
country Francia
countrycode FR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-cgspace
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Oeste
libraryname Biblioteca del CGIAR
language English
topic evaluation
logging
selective felling
ecosystems
forest damage
regeneration
conferences
evaluation
logging
selective felling
ecosystems
forest damage
regeneration
conferences
spellingShingle evaluation
logging
selective felling
ecosystems
forest damage
regeneration
conferences
evaluation
logging
selective felling
ecosystems
forest damage
regeneration
conferences
Mac Donagh, P.
Gauto, O.
López Cristobal, L.
Vera, N.
Figueredo, S.
Fernández, R.
Garibaldi, J.
Alvez, M.
Keller, H.
Marek, M.
Cavalin, J.
Kobayashi, S.
Evaluation of forest harvesting impacts on forest ecosystems
description In the Guarani preservation area 100 ha of forest land was cut to evaluate harvest impact in natural subtropical forest. Two treatments were applied: “commercial logging” in which the logging contractor works in the traditional way, and “improved harvest” in which trees are selected and the skidding trails and landings planned. Forest structure and composition, seedlings and regenerations and soil physical parameters such as soil density, penetration resistance were measured before harvesting. The trees were cut by chainsaw and moved by a rubber tyred skidder to the landing area for loading on a truck. After harvesting, damage by cutting and by skidding was measured. All previous parameters were re-measured and traffic intensity in each plot calculated. The harvest yields were 9.9 m3 ha-1 for the improved harvesting and 16.4 m3 ha-1 for the commercial treatment. Trees felled were 6.8 trees ha-1 for improved harvest and 9.9 trees ha-1 for the commercial harvest. For canopy trees, commercial harvesting reduced the initial dominance 19.3%, while improved harvesting only decreased it 9.5% so forest structure is less affected by the improved harvesting. There was little change in abundance and species composition. Changes were observed in the order of importance of some species, e.g. Parapiptademia rigida was replaced by species of lesser importance. Regeneration after the commercial harvesting was less than in the improved harvesting method. Commercial harvesting had more (60%) traffic intensity (Mg km-1 ha-1) along all the skid trials in the plots.
format Book Chapter
topic_facet evaluation
logging
selective felling
ecosystems
forest damage
regeneration
conferences
author Mac Donagh, P.
Gauto, O.
López Cristobal, L.
Vera, N.
Figueredo, S.
Fernández, R.
Garibaldi, J.
Alvez, M.
Keller, H.
Marek, M.
Cavalin, J.
Kobayashi, S.
author_facet Mac Donagh, P.
Gauto, O.
López Cristobal, L.
Vera, N.
Figueredo, S.
Fernández, R.
Garibaldi, J.
Alvez, M.
Keller, H.
Marek, M.
Cavalin, J.
Kobayashi, S.
author_sort Mac Donagh, P.
title Evaluation of forest harvesting impacts on forest ecosystems
title_short Evaluation of forest harvesting impacts on forest ecosystems
title_full Evaluation of forest harvesting impacts on forest ecosystems
title_fullStr Evaluation of forest harvesting impacts on forest ecosystems
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of forest harvesting impacts on forest ecosystems
title_sort evaluation of forest harvesting impacts on forest ecosystems
publisher Center for International Forestry Research
publishDate 2001
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/18399
https://www.cifor.org/knowledge/publication/921
work_keys_str_mv AT macdonaghp evaluationofforestharvestingimpactsonforestecosystems
AT gautoo evaluationofforestharvestingimpactsonforestecosystems
AT lopezcristoball evaluationofforestharvestingimpactsonforestecosystems
AT veran evaluationofforestharvestingimpactsonforestecosystems
AT figueredos evaluationofforestharvestingimpactsonforestecosystems
AT fernandezr evaluationofforestharvestingimpactsonforestecosystems
AT garibaldij evaluationofforestharvestingimpactsonforestecosystems
AT alvezm evaluationofforestharvestingimpactsonforestecosystems
AT kellerh evaluationofforestharvestingimpactsonforestecosystems
AT marekm evaluationofforestharvestingimpactsonforestecosystems
AT cavalinj evaluationofforestharvestingimpactsonforestecosystems
AT kobayashis evaluationofforestharvestingimpactsonforestecosystems
_version_ 1779048607357337600