Access to resources in forest-rich and forest-poor contexts
This chapter examines the results from two pebble sorting methods designed to help assess important elements of human well-being, relating to access to resources and benefits from the forest (both intra and intergenerationally). The two methods were conducted in forest rich and forest poor sites in Indonesia, Cameroon and Brazil – described in detail in Annex 2 of the Introduction. Our hypotheses were a) that inequitable sharing of benefits (as perceived by local stakeholders) correlates with poor forest quality, and b) that people’s perceptions of access to resources by their grandparents, themselves and their grandchildren would reflect forest quality in their area. Instead, it was found that patterned similarities, both in intra and intergenerational sharing of benefits, were more likely to be based on regional differences than on forest quality differences.
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Book Chapter biblioteca |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Resources for the Future and CIFOR
2001
|
| Subjects: | forest resources, right of access, local population, |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/18167 https://www.cifor.org/knowledge/publication/672 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| id |
dig-cgspace-10568-18167 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
koha |
| spelling |
dig-cgspace-10568-181672023-02-15T01:19:07Z Access to resources in forest-rich and forest-poor contexts Porro R. Tiani, A.M. Tchikangwa, B. Sardjono, M.A. Salim, A. Colfer, C.J.P. Brocklesby, M.A. forest resources right of access local population This chapter examines the results from two pebble sorting methods designed to help assess important elements of human well-being, relating to access to resources and benefits from the forest (both intra and intergenerationally). The two methods were conducted in forest rich and forest poor sites in Indonesia, Cameroon and Brazil – described in detail in Annex 2 of the Introduction. Our hypotheses were a) that inequitable sharing of benefits (as perceived by local stakeholders) correlates with poor forest quality, and b) that people’s perceptions of access to resources by their grandparents, themselves and their grandchildren would reflect forest quality in their area. Instead, it was found that patterned similarities, both in intra and intergenerational sharing of benefits, were more likely to be based on regional differences than on forest quality differences. 2001 2012-06-04T09:06:09Z 2012-06-04T09:06:09Z Book Chapter Porro R., Tiani, A.M., Tchikangwa, B., Sardjono, M. A., Salim, A., Colfer, C.J.P., Brocklesby, M.A. 2001. Access to resources in forest-rich and forest-poor contexts . In: Colfer, C.J.P., Byron, Y. (eds.). People managing forests: the links between human well-being and sustainability. :250-273. Washington, DC, Resources for the Future and CIFOR. https://hdl.handle.net/10568/18167 https://www.cifor.org/knowledge/publication/672 en Resources for the Future and CIFOR |
| institution |
CGIAR |
| collection |
DSpace |
| country |
Francia |
| countrycode |
FR |
| component |
Bibliográfico |
| access |
En linea |
| databasecode |
dig-cgspace |
| tag |
biblioteca |
| region |
Europa del Oeste |
| libraryname |
Biblioteca del CGIAR |
| language |
English |
| topic |
forest resources right of access local population forest resources right of access local population |
| spellingShingle |
forest resources right of access local population forest resources right of access local population Porro R. Tiani, A.M. Tchikangwa, B. Sardjono, M.A. Salim, A. Colfer, C.J.P. Brocklesby, M.A. Access to resources in forest-rich and forest-poor contexts |
| description |
This chapter examines the results from two pebble sorting methods designed to help assess important elements of human well-being, relating to access to resources and benefits from the forest (both intra and intergenerationally). The two methods were conducted in forest rich and forest poor sites in Indonesia, Cameroon and Brazil – described in detail in Annex 2 of the Introduction. Our hypotheses were a) that inequitable sharing of benefits (as perceived by local stakeholders) correlates with poor forest quality, and b) that people’s perceptions of access to resources by their grandparents, themselves and their grandchildren would reflect forest quality in their area. Instead, it was found that patterned similarities, both in intra and intergenerational sharing of benefits, were more likely to be based on regional differences than on forest quality differences. |
| format |
Book Chapter |
| topic_facet |
forest resources right of access local population |
| author |
Porro R. Tiani, A.M. Tchikangwa, B. Sardjono, M.A. Salim, A. Colfer, C.J.P. Brocklesby, M.A. |
| author_facet |
Porro R. Tiani, A.M. Tchikangwa, B. Sardjono, M.A. Salim, A. Colfer, C.J.P. Brocklesby, M.A. |
| author_sort |
Porro R. |
| title |
Access to resources in forest-rich and forest-poor contexts |
| title_short |
Access to resources in forest-rich and forest-poor contexts |
| title_full |
Access to resources in forest-rich and forest-poor contexts |
| title_fullStr |
Access to resources in forest-rich and forest-poor contexts |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Access to resources in forest-rich and forest-poor contexts |
| title_sort |
access to resources in forest-rich and forest-poor contexts |
| publisher |
Resources for the Future and CIFOR |
| publishDate |
2001 |
| url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10568/18167 https://www.cifor.org/knowledge/publication/672 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT porror accesstoresourcesinforestrichandforestpoorcontexts AT tianiam accesstoresourcesinforestrichandforestpoorcontexts AT tchikangwab accesstoresourcesinforestrichandforestpoorcontexts AT sardjonoma accesstoresourcesinforestrichandforestpoorcontexts AT salima accesstoresourcesinforestrichandforestpoorcontexts AT colfercjp accesstoresourcesinforestrichandforestpoorcontexts AT brocklesbyma accesstoresourcesinforestrichandforestpoorcontexts |
| _version_ |
1779052047339880448 |