Capacity gaps in land-based mitigation technologies and practices: A first stock take
Land-based mitigation technologies and practices (LMTs) reduce GHG emissions associated with land use and/or enhance terrestrial GHG sinks. This article investigates capacity gaps to successfully facilitate LMT adoption and/or scaling in the regions of Latin America, Europe, North America, sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia. We look at LMTs such as agricultural land management, agroforestry, bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS), biochar, forest management, and peat/wetland management. We used a triangulation method based on literature review, an online survey, and semi-structured interviews with experts from Academia, Industry, NGOs, Local Communities and Government, to capture and analyze the most prominent capacity gaps by LMT and according to regional contexts. This approach identified ‘understanding’, ‘awareness’ and ‘economic/finance’ as the most important capacity gaps when it comes to LMT adoption and scaling across the aforementioned regions. A recommended first step for increased LMT adoption would be to address the knowledge and understanding capacity gaps, which, in turn, could help make LMTs more attractive to stakeholders. Policymakers in cooper- ation with other stakeholders might reflect on dedicated support policies and regulatory frameworks that level the playing field for LMTs (as compared to mitigation technologies and practices in energy and other sectors). Other good practice examples include market building for LMTs, using emerging carbon markets, designing bottom-up implementation plans in cooperation with local and Indigenous Peoples, increased ecosystems ser- vices payments and taking into consideration local and traditional knowledge for successful LMT adoption and scaling.
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal Article biblioteca |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2023-11
|
| Subjects: | climate change mitigation, techniques, land use, capacity assessment, capacity development, greenhouse gas emissions, carbon dioxide, land management, |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/131921 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106888 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| id |
dig-cgspace-10568-131921 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
koha |
| spelling |
dig-cgspace-10568-1319212023-12-08T19:36:04Z Capacity gaps in land-based mitigation technologies and practices: A first stock take Bößner, Stefan Xylia, Maria Bilbao, Bibiana Indriani, Siti N. Laub, Moritz Rahn, Eric Virla, Luis D. Johnson, Francis X. climate change mitigation techniques land use capacity assessment capacity development greenhouse gas emissions carbon dioxide land management Land-based mitigation technologies and practices (LMTs) reduce GHG emissions associated with land use and/or enhance terrestrial GHG sinks. This article investigates capacity gaps to successfully facilitate LMT adoption and/or scaling in the regions of Latin America, Europe, North America, sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia. We look at LMTs such as agricultural land management, agroforestry, bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS), biochar, forest management, and peat/wetland management. We used a triangulation method based on literature review, an online survey, and semi-structured interviews with experts from Academia, Industry, NGOs, Local Communities and Government, to capture and analyze the most prominent capacity gaps by LMT and according to regional contexts. This approach identified ‘understanding’, ‘awareness’ and ‘economic/finance’ as the most important capacity gaps when it comes to LMT adoption and scaling across the aforementioned regions. A recommended first step for increased LMT adoption would be to address the knowledge and understanding capacity gaps, which, in turn, could help make LMTs more attractive to stakeholders. Policymakers in cooper- ation with other stakeholders might reflect on dedicated support policies and regulatory frameworks that level the playing field for LMTs (as compared to mitigation technologies and practices in energy and other sectors). Other good practice examples include market building for LMTs, using emerging carbon markets, designing bottom-up implementation plans in cooperation with local and Indigenous Peoples, increased ecosystems ser- vices payments and taking into consideration local and traditional knowledge for successful LMT adoption and scaling. 2023-11 2023-09-21T08:57:32Z 2023-09-21T08:57:32Z Journal Article Bößner, S.; Xylia, M.; Bilbao, B.; Indriani, S.N.; Laub, M.; Rahn, E.; Virla, L.D.; Johnson, F.X. (2023) Capacity gaps in land-based mitigation technologies and practices: A first stock take. Land Use Policy 134: 106888. ISSN: 0264-8377 0264-8377 https://hdl.handle.net/10568/131921 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106888 en CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0 Open Access 106888 application/pdf Elsevier Land Use Policy |
| institution |
CGIAR |
| collection |
DSpace |
| country |
Francia |
| countrycode |
FR |
| component |
Bibliográfico |
| access |
En linea |
| databasecode |
dig-cgspace |
| tag |
biblioteca |
| region |
Europa del Oeste |
| libraryname |
Biblioteca del CGIAR |
| language |
English |
| topic |
climate change mitigation techniques land use capacity assessment capacity development greenhouse gas emissions carbon dioxide land management climate change mitigation techniques land use capacity assessment capacity development greenhouse gas emissions carbon dioxide land management |
| spellingShingle |
climate change mitigation techniques land use capacity assessment capacity development greenhouse gas emissions carbon dioxide land management climate change mitigation techniques land use capacity assessment capacity development greenhouse gas emissions carbon dioxide land management Bößner, Stefan Xylia, Maria Bilbao, Bibiana Indriani, Siti N. Laub, Moritz Rahn, Eric Virla, Luis D. Johnson, Francis X. Capacity gaps in land-based mitigation technologies and practices: A first stock take |
| description |
Land-based mitigation technologies and practices (LMTs) reduce GHG emissions associated with land use and/or
enhance terrestrial GHG sinks. This article investigates capacity gaps to successfully facilitate LMT adoption and/or scaling in the regions of Latin America, Europe, North America, sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia. We
look at LMTs such as agricultural land management, agroforestry, bioenergy with carbon capture and storage
(BECCS), biochar, forest management, and peat/wetland management. We used a triangulation method based on
literature review, an online survey, and semi-structured interviews with experts from Academia, Industry, NGOs,
Local Communities and Government, to capture and analyze the most prominent capacity gaps by LMT and
according to regional contexts. This approach identified ‘understanding’, ‘awareness’ and ‘economic/finance’ as
the most important capacity gaps when it comes to LMT adoption and scaling across the aforementioned regions.
A recommended first step for increased LMT adoption would be to address the knowledge and understanding
capacity gaps, which, in turn, could help make LMTs more attractive to stakeholders. Policymakers in cooper-
ation with other stakeholders might reflect on dedicated support policies and regulatory frameworks that level
the playing field for LMTs (as compared to mitigation technologies and practices in energy and other sectors).
Other good practice examples include market building for LMTs, using emerging carbon markets, designing
bottom-up implementation plans in cooperation with local and Indigenous Peoples, increased ecosystems ser-
vices payments and taking into consideration local and traditional knowledge for successful LMT adoption and
scaling. |
| format |
Journal Article |
| topic_facet |
climate change mitigation techniques land use capacity assessment capacity development greenhouse gas emissions carbon dioxide land management |
| author |
Bößner, Stefan Xylia, Maria Bilbao, Bibiana Indriani, Siti N. Laub, Moritz Rahn, Eric Virla, Luis D. Johnson, Francis X. |
| author_facet |
Bößner, Stefan Xylia, Maria Bilbao, Bibiana Indriani, Siti N. Laub, Moritz Rahn, Eric Virla, Luis D. Johnson, Francis X. |
| author_sort |
Bößner, Stefan |
| title |
Capacity gaps in land-based mitigation technologies and practices: A first stock take |
| title_short |
Capacity gaps in land-based mitigation technologies and practices: A first stock take |
| title_full |
Capacity gaps in land-based mitigation technologies and practices: A first stock take |
| title_fullStr |
Capacity gaps in land-based mitigation technologies and practices: A first stock take |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Capacity gaps in land-based mitigation technologies and practices: A first stock take |
| title_sort |
capacity gaps in land-based mitigation technologies and practices: a first stock take |
| publisher |
Elsevier |
| publishDate |
2023-11 |
| url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10568/131921 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106888 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT boßnerstefan capacitygapsinlandbasedmitigationtechnologiesandpracticesafirststocktake AT xyliamaria capacitygapsinlandbasedmitigationtechnologiesandpracticesafirststocktake AT bilbaobibiana capacitygapsinlandbasedmitigationtechnologiesandpracticesafirststocktake AT indrianisitin capacitygapsinlandbasedmitigationtechnologiesandpracticesafirststocktake AT laubmoritz capacitygapsinlandbasedmitigationtechnologiesandpracticesafirststocktake AT rahneric capacitygapsinlandbasedmitigationtechnologiesandpracticesafirststocktake AT virlaluisd capacitygapsinlandbasedmitigationtechnologiesandpracticesafirststocktake AT johnsonfrancisx capacitygapsinlandbasedmitigationtechnologiesandpracticesafirststocktake |
| _version_ |
1787231704676564992 |