Contribution to discussion: MegaProgram M&E, independent evaluation arrangement
The paper has three components. The first section discusses the important features of evaluation science and of research for development. The second section discusses options for the Independent Evaluation Arrangements regarding independence, other key considerations and cost. The third component discusses M&E of research for development in the new CGIAR.
Saved in:
Main Author: | CGIAR Independent Science and Partnership Council |
---|---|
Format: | Independent Commentary biblioteca |
Language: | English |
Published: |
CGIAR Independent Science and Partnership Council
2010
|
Subjects: | costs, development, components, monitoring, research, evaluation, paper, cgiar, science, accountability, |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/128975 https://iaes.cgiar.org/node/10340 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Cross-CRP Analysis of Gender and Youth in the 2017-2022 CRP2
by: CGIAR Independent Science and Partnership Council
Published: (2017-09) -
Ex-post Environmental Impact Assessment: Lessons from four CGIAR case studies
by: CGIAR Independent Science and Partnership Council
Published: (2012-01) -
Experiences of Outcome Monitoring in the CGIAR
by: Immonen, S., et al.
Published: (2012) -
Strengthening Strategy and Results Framework through Prioritization
by: CGIAR Independent Science and Partnership Council
Published: (2012-06) -
CGIAR System-Level Outcomes, their Impact Pathways and Inter-Linkages
by: CGIAR Independent Science and Partnership Council
Published: (2013-06)