Redesigning traditional weed management practices in faba beanfields to optimize food-feed production in the smallholder system

Duringthe main cropping season, Ethiopian farmers deliberately weed faba bean (Vicia faba L.) fields much later than recommended and use the weed herbage mass as feed. This study examined the rationale behind farmers’ practices and explored options to further improve productivity. The study involved two experiments. The first compared the overall benefit from the traditional weed management regime against the frequent weeding recommendation. Sixty farmers participated, each preparing two plots. The plots were randomly assigned to either traditional (one late weeding) or improved (two early weeding) management. The second examined the suitability of intercropping faba bean with oat (Avena sativa L.). It involved a 5 × 3 factorial experiment, three management practices (traditional, improved, and faba bean oat intercropping) and five faba bean varieties repeated over 3 yr. In the first experiment the improved weed management increased grain yield (2.49 vs. 2.12 Mg ha–1) compared to the traditional. But the traditional management produced higher (P < .01) weed forage biomass (2.12 vs. 0.27 Mg ha–1) compared to the improved. The analysis showed the opportunity costs associated with the loss in weed forage biomass were not convincingly offset by the economic gains from increased grain yields. In the second experiment, grain yield was again highest for the improved weed management and lowest for the intercropping. Analysis of economic returns revealed that the intercropping management provides greater benefit over the traditional management practice. Farmers’ decisions have a rational economic basis and building on the traditional practicewith improved forage intercropping would allow to further optimize productivity.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bezabih, Melkamu, Mekonnen, Kindu, Adie, Aberra, Tadesse, Tamene, Nurfeta, Ajebu, Dubale, Workneh, Habiso, Tesfaye, Kelkay, Tessema Z., Getnet, Million, Ergano, Kebebe, Duncan, Alan J., Thorne, Peter J.
Format: Journal Article biblioteca
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-01
Subjects:crops, animal feeding, forage, legumes, weed control, livestock,
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/114627
https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.20779
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-cgspace-10568-114627
record_format koha
spelling dig-cgspace-10568-1146272023-10-02T08:36:51Z Redesigning traditional weed management practices in faba beanfields to optimize food-feed production in the smallholder system Bezabih, Melkamu Mekonnen, Kindu Adie, Aberra Tadesse, Tamene Nurfeta, Ajebu Dubale, Workneh Habiso, Tesfaye Kelkay, Tessema Z. Getnet, Million Ergano, Kebebe Duncan, Alan J. Thorne, Peter J. crops animal feeding forage legumes weed control livestock Duringthe main cropping season, Ethiopian farmers deliberately weed faba bean (Vicia faba L.) fields much later than recommended and use the weed herbage mass as feed. This study examined the rationale behind farmers’ practices and explored options to further improve productivity. The study involved two experiments. The first compared the overall benefit from the traditional weed management regime against the frequent weeding recommendation. Sixty farmers participated, each preparing two plots. The plots were randomly assigned to either traditional (one late weeding) or improved (two early weeding) management. The second examined the suitability of intercropping faba bean with oat (Avena sativa L.). It involved a 5 × 3 factorial experiment, three management practices (traditional, improved, and faba bean oat intercropping) and five faba bean varieties repeated over 3 yr. In the first experiment the improved weed management increased grain yield (2.49 vs. 2.12 Mg ha–1) compared to the traditional. But the traditional management produced higher (P < .01) weed forage biomass (2.12 vs. 0.27 Mg ha–1) compared to the improved. The analysis showed the opportunity costs associated with the loss in weed forage biomass were not convincingly offset by the economic gains from increased grain yields. In the second experiment, grain yield was again highest for the improved weed management and lowest for the intercropping. Analysis of economic returns revealed that the intercropping management provides greater benefit over the traditional management practice. Farmers’ decisions have a rational economic basis and building on the traditional practicewith improved forage intercropping would allow to further optimize productivity. 2022-01 2021-08-12T06:52:58Z 2021-08-12T06:52:58Z Journal Article Bezabih, M., Mekonnen, K., Adie, A., Tadesse, T., Nurfeta, A., Dubale, W., Habiso, T., Kelkay, T.Z., Getnet, M., Ergano, K., Duncan, A.J. and Thorne, P. 2022. Redesigning traditional weed management practices in faba bean fields to optimize food-feed production in the smallholder system. Agronomy Journal 114(1): 248-258. 1435-0645 https://hdl.handle.net/10568/114627 https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.20779 en CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0 Open Access p. 248-258 Wiley Agronomy Journal
institution CGIAR
collection DSpace
country Francia
countrycode FR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-cgspace
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Oeste
libraryname Biblioteca del CGIAR
language English
topic crops
animal feeding
forage
legumes
weed control
livestock
crops
animal feeding
forage
legumes
weed control
livestock
spellingShingle crops
animal feeding
forage
legumes
weed control
livestock
crops
animal feeding
forage
legumes
weed control
livestock
Bezabih, Melkamu
Mekonnen, Kindu
Adie, Aberra
Tadesse, Tamene
Nurfeta, Ajebu
Dubale, Workneh
Habiso, Tesfaye
Kelkay, Tessema Z.
Getnet, Million
Ergano, Kebebe
Duncan, Alan J.
Thorne, Peter J.
Redesigning traditional weed management practices in faba beanfields to optimize food-feed production in the smallholder system
description Duringthe main cropping season, Ethiopian farmers deliberately weed faba bean (Vicia faba L.) fields much later than recommended and use the weed herbage mass as feed. This study examined the rationale behind farmers’ practices and explored options to further improve productivity. The study involved two experiments. The first compared the overall benefit from the traditional weed management regime against the frequent weeding recommendation. Sixty farmers participated, each preparing two plots. The plots were randomly assigned to either traditional (one late weeding) or improved (two early weeding) management. The second examined the suitability of intercropping faba bean with oat (Avena sativa L.). It involved a 5 × 3 factorial experiment, three management practices (traditional, improved, and faba bean oat intercropping) and five faba bean varieties repeated over 3 yr. In the first experiment the improved weed management increased grain yield (2.49 vs. 2.12 Mg ha–1) compared to the traditional. But the traditional management produced higher (P < .01) weed forage biomass (2.12 vs. 0.27 Mg ha–1) compared to the improved. The analysis showed the opportunity costs associated with the loss in weed forage biomass were not convincingly offset by the economic gains from increased grain yields. In the second experiment, grain yield was again highest for the improved weed management and lowest for the intercropping. Analysis of economic returns revealed that the intercropping management provides greater benefit over the traditional management practice. Farmers’ decisions have a rational economic basis and building on the traditional practicewith improved forage intercropping would allow to further optimize productivity.
format Journal Article
topic_facet crops
animal feeding
forage
legumes
weed control
livestock
author Bezabih, Melkamu
Mekonnen, Kindu
Adie, Aberra
Tadesse, Tamene
Nurfeta, Ajebu
Dubale, Workneh
Habiso, Tesfaye
Kelkay, Tessema Z.
Getnet, Million
Ergano, Kebebe
Duncan, Alan J.
Thorne, Peter J.
author_facet Bezabih, Melkamu
Mekonnen, Kindu
Adie, Aberra
Tadesse, Tamene
Nurfeta, Ajebu
Dubale, Workneh
Habiso, Tesfaye
Kelkay, Tessema Z.
Getnet, Million
Ergano, Kebebe
Duncan, Alan J.
Thorne, Peter J.
author_sort Bezabih, Melkamu
title Redesigning traditional weed management practices in faba beanfields to optimize food-feed production in the smallholder system
title_short Redesigning traditional weed management practices in faba beanfields to optimize food-feed production in the smallholder system
title_full Redesigning traditional weed management practices in faba beanfields to optimize food-feed production in the smallholder system
title_fullStr Redesigning traditional weed management practices in faba beanfields to optimize food-feed production in the smallholder system
title_full_unstemmed Redesigning traditional weed management practices in faba beanfields to optimize food-feed production in the smallholder system
title_sort redesigning traditional weed management practices in faba beanfields to optimize food-feed production in the smallholder system
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2022-01
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/114627
https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.20779
work_keys_str_mv AT bezabihmelkamu redesigningtraditionalweedmanagementpracticesinfababeanfieldstooptimizefoodfeedproductioninthesmallholdersystem
AT mekonnenkindu redesigningtraditionalweedmanagementpracticesinfababeanfieldstooptimizefoodfeedproductioninthesmallholdersystem
AT adieaberra redesigningtraditionalweedmanagementpracticesinfababeanfieldstooptimizefoodfeedproductioninthesmallholdersystem
AT tadessetamene redesigningtraditionalweedmanagementpracticesinfababeanfieldstooptimizefoodfeedproductioninthesmallholdersystem
AT nurfetaajebu redesigningtraditionalweedmanagementpracticesinfababeanfieldstooptimizefoodfeedproductioninthesmallholdersystem
AT dubaleworkneh redesigningtraditionalweedmanagementpracticesinfababeanfieldstooptimizefoodfeedproductioninthesmallholdersystem
AT habisotesfaye redesigningtraditionalweedmanagementpracticesinfababeanfieldstooptimizefoodfeedproductioninthesmallholdersystem
AT kelkaytessemaz redesigningtraditionalweedmanagementpracticesinfababeanfieldstooptimizefoodfeedproductioninthesmallholdersystem
AT getnetmillion redesigningtraditionalweedmanagementpracticesinfababeanfieldstooptimizefoodfeedproductioninthesmallholdersystem
AT erganokebebe redesigningtraditionalweedmanagementpracticesinfababeanfieldstooptimizefoodfeedproductioninthesmallholdersystem
AT duncanalanj redesigningtraditionalweedmanagementpracticesinfababeanfieldstooptimizefoodfeedproductioninthesmallholdersystem
AT thornepeterj redesigningtraditionalweedmanagementpracticesinfababeanfieldstooptimizefoodfeedproductioninthesmallholdersystem
_version_ 1779055800882298880