Field evaluation of photothermal models for predicting the date of flowering and maturity in cover legumes using photothermal models

Lack of information about the specific environmental adaptation of cover crop species remains a serious constraint in the efficient design of agronomic experiments examining options for more suitable and more sustainable management of hillside farming systems in the tropics. Predictive models of crop phenology for cover crop species exist but how robust these are for legume cover crop species is largely unproven. We determined the predictive ability of phenological models, derived from glasshouse studies and driven by temperature and photoperiod, across a diverse range of cover crop genotypes and tropical hillside environments. The models were designed to predict the duration from germination to first flowering, and from first flowering to first pod maturity. Seeds of eleven legume species of cover and/or green manure crops collected from different hillside locations world-wide were sown in two groups of nurseries (tropical short-day plants in early summer and sub-tropical long-day plants in early winter) at Kabale and Namulonge in Uganda, Godavari and Lumie in Nepal, Cochabamba in Bolivia, Zamorano in Honduras, and Valenca in Brazil. Dates of sowing, first flowering and first pod maturity were taken and daily temperature data were recorded at each site. Similar observations for the same genotypes were available from independent experiments conducted at Islamabad, Pakistan, Hattiban, Nepal and at three locations in Cyprus. Model predictions were compared with field observations. The proportion of variation accounted for in the period from sowing to first pod maturity was 88% and 89% for the short-day and the long-day groups of genotypes, respectively. Likewise, the average difference from sowing to pod maturity between the model predictions and the field observations was 6.3% and 7.9% for the combined short-day species and the combined long-day species, respectively. It is clear that the model predictions, for this dataset at least, are sufficiently robust to serve as a filter for determining the environmental suitability of germplasm.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Qi, A., Keatinge, J.D.H., Wheeler, T.R., Musitwa, F., Shah, P.B., Subedi, M., Papastylianou, I., Cespedes, E., Bening, C., Ellis, R.E., Summerfield, R.J.
Format: Journal Article biblioteca
Language:English
Published: 2000
Subjects:models, legumes, fields, crops, genotypes, temperature, maturity,
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/109301
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-cgspace-10568-109301
record_format koha
spelling dig-cgspace-10568-1093012023-02-15T06:50:27Z Field evaluation of photothermal models for predicting the date of flowering and maturity in cover legumes using photothermal models Qi, A. Keatinge, J.D.H. Wheeler, T.R. Musitwa, F. Shah, P.B. Subedi, M. Papastylianou, I. Cespedes, E. Bening, C. Ellis, R.E. Summerfield, R.J. models legumes fields crops genotypes temperature maturity Lack of information about the specific environmental adaptation of cover crop species remains a serious constraint in the efficient design of agronomic experiments examining options for more suitable and more sustainable management of hillside farming systems in the tropics. Predictive models of crop phenology for cover crop species exist but how robust these are for legume cover crop species is largely unproven. We determined the predictive ability of phenological models, derived from glasshouse studies and driven by temperature and photoperiod, across a diverse range of cover crop genotypes and tropical hillside environments. The models were designed to predict the duration from germination to first flowering, and from first flowering to first pod maturity. Seeds of eleven legume species of cover and/or green manure crops collected from different hillside locations world-wide were sown in two groups of nurseries (tropical short-day plants in early summer and sub-tropical long-day plants in early winter) at Kabale and Namulonge in Uganda, Godavari and Lumie in Nepal, Cochabamba in Bolivia, Zamorano in Honduras, and Valenca in Brazil. Dates of sowing, first flowering and first pod maturity were taken and daily temperature data were recorded at each site. Similar observations for the same genotypes were available from independent experiments conducted at Islamabad, Pakistan, Hattiban, Nepal and at three locations in Cyprus. Model predictions were compared with field observations. The proportion of variation accounted for in the period from sowing to first pod maturity was 88% and 89% for the short-day and the long-day groups of genotypes, respectively. Likewise, the average difference from sowing to pod maturity between the model predictions and the field observations was 6.3% and 7.9% for the combined short-day species and the combined long-day species, respectively. It is clear that the model predictions, for this dataset at least, are sufficiently robust to serve as a filter for determining the environmental suitability of germplasm. 2000 2020-09-08T06:57:37Z 2020-09-08T06:57:37Z Journal Article Qi, A., Keatinge, J.D.H., Wheeler, T.R., Musitwa, F., Shah, P.B., Subedi, M., … & Summerfield, R.J. (2000). Field evaluation of photothermal models for predicting the date of flowering and maturity in cover legumes using photothermal models. Biological Agriculture and Horticulture, 17, 349-365. 0144-8765 https://hdl.handle.net/10568/109301 en Limited Access 349-365 Biological Agriculture and Horticulture
institution CGIAR
collection DSpace
country Francia
countrycode FR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-cgspace
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Oeste
libraryname Biblioteca del CGIAR
language English
topic models
legumes
fields
crops
genotypes
temperature
maturity
models
legumes
fields
crops
genotypes
temperature
maturity
spellingShingle models
legumes
fields
crops
genotypes
temperature
maturity
models
legumes
fields
crops
genotypes
temperature
maturity
Qi, A.
Keatinge, J.D.H.
Wheeler, T.R.
Musitwa, F.
Shah, P.B.
Subedi, M.
Papastylianou, I.
Cespedes, E.
Bening, C.
Ellis, R.E.
Summerfield, R.J.
Field evaluation of photothermal models for predicting the date of flowering and maturity in cover legumes using photothermal models
description Lack of information about the specific environmental adaptation of cover crop species remains a serious constraint in the efficient design of agronomic experiments examining options for more suitable and more sustainable management of hillside farming systems in the tropics. Predictive models of crop phenology for cover crop species exist but how robust these are for legume cover crop species is largely unproven. We determined the predictive ability of phenological models, derived from glasshouse studies and driven by temperature and photoperiod, across a diverse range of cover crop genotypes and tropical hillside environments. The models were designed to predict the duration from germination to first flowering, and from first flowering to first pod maturity. Seeds of eleven legume species of cover and/or green manure crops collected from different hillside locations world-wide were sown in two groups of nurseries (tropical short-day plants in early summer and sub-tropical long-day plants in early winter) at Kabale and Namulonge in Uganda, Godavari and Lumie in Nepal, Cochabamba in Bolivia, Zamorano in Honduras, and Valenca in Brazil. Dates of sowing, first flowering and first pod maturity were taken and daily temperature data were recorded at each site. Similar observations for the same genotypes were available from independent experiments conducted at Islamabad, Pakistan, Hattiban, Nepal and at three locations in Cyprus. Model predictions were compared with field observations. The proportion of variation accounted for in the period from sowing to first pod maturity was 88% and 89% for the short-day and the long-day groups of genotypes, respectively. Likewise, the average difference from sowing to pod maturity between the model predictions and the field observations was 6.3% and 7.9% for the combined short-day species and the combined long-day species, respectively. It is clear that the model predictions, for this dataset at least, are sufficiently robust to serve as a filter for determining the environmental suitability of germplasm.
format Journal Article
topic_facet models
legumes
fields
crops
genotypes
temperature
maturity
author Qi, A.
Keatinge, J.D.H.
Wheeler, T.R.
Musitwa, F.
Shah, P.B.
Subedi, M.
Papastylianou, I.
Cespedes, E.
Bening, C.
Ellis, R.E.
Summerfield, R.J.
author_facet Qi, A.
Keatinge, J.D.H.
Wheeler, T.R.
Musitwa, F.
Shah, P.B.
Subedi, M.
Papastylianou, I.
Cespedes, E.
Bening, C.
Ellis, R.E.
Summerfield, R.J.
author_sort Qi, A.
title Field evaluation of photothermal models for predicting the date of flowering and maturity in cover legumes using photothermal models
title_short Field evaluation of photothermal models for predicting the date of flowering and maturity in cover legumes using photothermal models
title_full Field evaluation of photothermal models for predicting the date of flowering and maturity in cover legumes using photothermal models
title_fullStr Field evaluation of photothermal models for predicting the date of flowering and maturity in cover legumes using photothermal models
title_full_unstemmed Field evaluation of photothermal models for predicting the date of flowering and maturity in cover legumes using photothermal models
title_sort field evaluation of photothermal models for predicting the date of flowering and maturity in cover legumes using photothermal models
publishDate 2000
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/109301
work_keys_str_mv AT qia fieldevaluationofphotothermalmodelsforpredictingthedateoffloweringandmaturityincoverlegumesusingphotothermalmodels
AT keatingejdh fieldevaluationofphotothermalmodelsforpredictingthedateoffloweringandmaturityincoverlegumesusingphotothermalmodels
AT wheelertr fieldevaluationofphotothermalmodelsforpredictingthedateoffloweringandmaturityincoverlegumesusingphotothermalmodels
AT musitwaf fieldevaluationofphotothermalmodelsforpredictingthedateoffloweringandmaturityincoverlegumesusingphotothermalmodels
AT shahpb fieldevaluationofphotothermalmodelsforpredictingthedateoffloweringandmaturityincoverlegumesusingphotothermalmodels
AT subedim fieldevaluationofphotothermalmodelsforpredictingthedateoffloweringandmaturityincoverlegumesusingphotothermalmodels
AT papastylianoui fieldevaluationofphotothermalmodelsforpredictingthedateoffloweringandmaturityincoverlegumesusingphotothermalmodels
AT cespedese fieldevaluationofphotothermalmodelsforpredictingthedateoffloweringandmaturityincoverlegumesusingphotothermalmodels
AT beningc fieldevaluationofphotothermalmodelsforpredictingthedateoffloweringandmaturityincoverlegumesusingphotothermalmodels
AT ellisre fieldevaluationofphotothermalmodelsforpredictingthedateoffloweringandmaturityincoverlegumesusingphotothermalmodels
AT summerfieldrj fieldevaluationofphotothermalmodelsforpredictingthedateoffloweringandmaturityincoverlegumesusingphotothermalmodels
_version_ 1779053270274146304