Growing cotton in Karshi Steppe, Uzbekistan: water productivity differences with three different methods of irrigation

In Uzbekistan, generally practiced methods of irrigating crops are varieties of flooding (basin, border and furrow). These practices have created problems of waterlogging, salinity and lower irrigation efficiency. Waterlogging and salinization already affect 50 percent of irrigated areas, and irrigation efficiency hardly reaches up to 50-60%. The Karshi Steppe of Kashkadarya region is among the prime cotton and wheat producing areas in Uzbekistan, using around 4.5 – 5.0 billion m3 of irrigation water within a hydrological year. About 75% of this water is abstracted from Amu Darya River in the territory of Turkmenistan and raised up to 135 meters, using a cascade of seven pumping stations to Karshi main canal. Research on implications of applying other irrigation technologies with different irrigation regimes on cotton crop are limited in Uzbekistan, especially under water scarce situations, such as in Karshi Steppe. This study targeted that knowledge gap and compared performance of cotton crop under different irrigation regimes with three technologies (furrows, gated pipes, and drip). The yield data ranged from 3.5 to 4.6 t ha-1, whereas water productivity (WP) values ranged from 0.44 to 1.20 kg m-3 and irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE) ranged from 0.51 to 1.41 kg m-3. The measured ranges of IWUE and WP are much wider compared with data available for Karshi Steppe. Due to cotton being sensitive to soil-moisture stress, lack of skillful technicians at site for irrigation scheduling has led to more water stress than was planned for, resulting in lower crop yields than expected.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Djumaboev, Kakhramon, Manthrithilake, Herath, Ayars, J., Yuldashev, Tulkun, Akramov, Bekzod, Karshiev, R., Eshmuratov, Davron
Format: Conference Paper biblioteca
Language:English
Published: 2019-01-25
Subjects:irrigation efficiency, cotton industry, water productivity, water use efficiency, pumps, irrigated land, irrigation water, irrigation methods, drip irrigation, crop yield,
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/101253
http://micro-irrigation2019.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Proceedings-13Jan.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-cgspace-10568-101253
record_format koha
spelling dig-cgspace-10568-1012532023-06-08T15:37:29Z Growing cotton in Karshi Steppe, Uzbekistan: water productivity differences with three different methods of irrigation Djumaboev, Kakhramon Manthrithilake, Herath Ayars, J. Yuldashev, Tulkun Akramov, Bekzod Karshiev, R. Eshmuratov, Davron irrigation efficiency cotton industry water productivity water use efficiency pumps irrigated land irrigation water irrigation methods drip irrigation crop yield In Uzbekistan, generally practiced methods of irrigating crops are varieties of flooding (basin, border and furrow). These practices have created problems of waterlogging, salinity and lower irrigation efficiency. Waterlogging and salinization already affect 50 percent of irrigated areas, and irrigation efficiency hardly reaches up to 50-60%. The Karshi Steppe of Kashkadarya region is among the prime cotton and wheat producing areas in Uzbekistan, using around 4.5 – 5.0 billion m3 of irrigation water within a hydrological year. About 75% of this water is abstracted from Amu Darya River in the territory of Turkmenistan and raised up to 135 meters, using a cascade of seven pumping stations to Karshi main canal. Research on implications of applying other irrigation technologies with different irrigation regimes on cotton crop are limited in Uzbekistan, especially under water scarce situations, such as in Karshi Steppe. This study targeted that knowledge gap and compared performance of cotton crop under different irrigation regimes with three technologies (furrows, gated pipes, and drip). The yield data ranged from 3.5 to 4.6 t ha-1, whereas water productivity (WP) values ranged from 0.44 to 1.20 kg m-3 and irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE) ranged from 0.51 to 1.41 kg m-3. The measured ranges of IWUE and WP are much wider compared with data available for Karshi Steppe. Due to cotton being sensitive to soil-moisture stress, lack of skillful technicians at site for irrigation scheduling has led to more water stress than was planned for, resulting in lower crop yields than expected. 2019-01-25 2019-05-13T04:54:46Z 2019-05-13T04:54:46Z Conference Paper Djumaboev, Kakhramon; Manthrithilake, Herath; Ayars, J.; Yuldashev, T.; Akramov, B.; Karshiev, R.; Eshmuratov, D. 2019. Growing cotton in Karshi Steppe, Uzbekistan: water productivity differences with three different methods of irrigation. In Indian National Committee on Surface Water (INCSW) - CWC. Proceedings of 9th International Micro Irrigation Conference (9IMIC), Aurangabad, India, 16-18 January 2019. Bangalore, India: IvyLeague. pp.391-397. https://hdl.handle.net/10568/101253 http://micro-irrigation2019.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Proceedings-13Jan.pdf en Copyrighted; Non-commercial use only Open Access p. 391-397
institution CGIAR
collection DSpace
country Francia
countrycode FR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-cgspace
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Oeste
libraryname Biblioteca del CGIAR
language English
topic irrigation efficiency
cotton industry
water productivity
water use efficiency
pumps
irrigated land
irrigation water
irrigation methods
drip irrigation
crop yield
irrigation efficiency
cotton industry
water productivity
water use efficiency
pumps
irrigated land
irrigation water
irrigation methods
drip irrigation
crop yield
spellingShingle irrigation efficiency
cotton industry
water productivity
water use efficiency
pumps
irrigated land
irrigation water
irrigation methods
drip irrigation
crop yield
irrigation efficiency
cotton industry
water productivity
water use efficiency
pumps
irrigated land
irrigation water
irrigation methods
drip irrigation
crop yield
Djumaboev, Kakhramon
Manthrithilake, Herath
Ayars, J.
Yuldashev, Tulkun
Akramov, Bekzod
Karshiev, R.
Eshmuratov, Davron
Growing cotton in Karshi Steppe, Uzbekistan: water productivity differences with three different methods of irrigation
description In Uzbekistan, generally practiced methods of irrigating crops are varieties of flooding (basin, border and furrow). These practices have created problems of waterlogging, salinity and lower irrigation efficiency. Waterlogging and salinization already affect 50 percent of irrigated areas, and irrigation efficiency hardly reaches up to 50-60%. The Karshi Steppe of Kashkadarya region is among the prime cotton and wheat producing areas in Uzbekistan, using around 4.5 – 5.0 billion m3 of irrigation water within a hydrological year. About 75% of this water is abstracted from Amu Darya River in the territory of Turkmenistan and raised up to 135 meters, using a cascade of seven pumping stations to Karshi main canal. Research on implications of applying other irrigation technologies with different irrigation regimes on cotton crop are limited in Uzbekistan, especially under water scarce situations, such as in Karshi Steppe. This study targeted that knowledge gap and compared performance of cotton crop under different irrigation regimes with three technologies (furrows, gated pipes, and drip). The yield data ranged from 3.5 to 4.6 t ha-1, whereas water productivity (WP) values ranged from 0.44 to 1.20 kg m-3 and irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE) ranged from 0.51 to 1.41 kg m-3. The measured ranges of IWUE and WP are much wider compared with data available for Karshi Steppe. Due to cotton being sensitive to soil-moisture stress, lack of skillful technicians at site for irrigation scheduling has led to more water stress than was planned for, resulting in lower crop yields than expected.
format Conference Paper
topic_facet irrigation efficiency
cotton industry
water productivity
water use efficiency
pumps
irrigated land
irrigation water
irrigation methods
drip irrigation
crop yield
author Djumaboev, Kakhramon
Manthrithilake, Herath
Ayars, J.
Yuldashev, Tulkun
Akramov, Bekzod
Karshiev, R.
Eshmuratov, Davron
author_facet Djumaboev, Kakhramon
Manthrithilake, Herath
Ayars, J.
Yuldashev, Tulkun
Akramov, Bekzod
Karshiev, R.
Eshmuratov, Davron
author_sort Djumaboev, Kakhramon
title Growing cotton in Karshi Steppe, Uzbekistan: water productivity differences with three different methods of irrigation
title_short Growing cotton in Karshi Steppe, Uzbekistan: water productivity differences with three different methods of irrigation
title_full Growing cotton in Karshi Steppe, Uzbekistan: water productivity differences with three different methods of irrigation
title_fullStr Growing cotton in Karshi Steppe, Uzbekistan: water productivity differences with three different methods of irrigation
title_full_unstemmed Growing cotton in Karshi Steppe, Uzbekistan: water productivity differences with three different methods of irrigation
title_sort growing cotton in karshi steppe, uzbekistan: water productivity differences with three different methods of irrigation
publishDate 2019-01-25
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/101253
http://micro-irrigation2019.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Proceedings-13Jan.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT djumaboevkakhramon growingcottoninkarshisteppeuzbekistanwaterproductivitydifferenceswiththreedifferentmethodsofirrigation
AT manthrithilakeherath growingcottoninkarshisteppeuzbekistanwaterproductivitydifferenceswiththreedifferentmethodsofirrigation
AT ayarsj growingcottoninkarshisteppeuzbekistanwaterproductivitydifferenceswiththreedifferentmethodsofirrigation
AT yuldashevtulkun growingcottoninkarshisteppeuzbekistanwaterproductivitydifferenceswiththreedifferentmethodsofirrigation
AT akramovbekzod growingcottoninkarshisteppeuzbekistanwaterproductivitydifferenceswiththreedifferentmethodsofirrigation
AT karshievr growingcottoninkarshisteppeuzbekistanwaterproductivitydifferenceswiththreedifferentmethodsofirrigation
AT eshmuratovdavron growingcottoninkarshisteppeuzbekistanwaterproductivitydifferenceswiththreedifferentmethodsofirrigation
_version_ 1779056578300739584