Reflections on and suggestions for reporting vulnerability research: How can peer reviewed articles reflect complex practice in low consensus fields such that they better support review and synthesis?
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Published: |
2019-05-10T14:24:46Z
|
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/101245 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
dig-cgspace-10568-101245 |
---|---|
record_format |
koha |
spelling |
dig-cgspace-10568-1012452024-07-18T09:14:27Z Reflections on and suggestions for reporting vulnerability research: How can peer reviewed articles reflect complex practice in low consensus fields such that they better support review and synthesis? Tamas, Peter A. Delaney, Aogán Crane, Todd A. Hengeveld, Geerten M. 2019-05-10T14:24:46Z 2019-05-10T14:24:46Z https://hdl.handle.net/10568/101245 |
institution |
CGIAR |
collection |
DSpace |
country |
Francia |
countrycode |
FR |
component |
Bibliográfico |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
dig-cgspace |
tag |
biblioteca |
region |
Europa del Oeste |
libraryname |
Biblioteca del CGIAR |
author |
Tamas, Peter A. Delaney, Aogán Crane, Todd A. Hengeveld, Geerten M. |
spellingShingle |
Tamas, Peter A. Delaney, Aogán Crane, Todd A. Hengeveld, Geerten M. Reflections on and suggestions for reporting vulnerability research: How can peer reviewed articles reflect complex practice in low consensus fields such that they better support review and synthesis? |
author_facet |
Tamas, Peter A. Delaney, Aogán Crane, Todd A. Hengeveld, Geerten M. |
author_sort |
Tamas, Peter A. |
title |
Reflections on and suggestions for reporting vulnerability research: How can peer reviewed articles reflect complex practice in low consensus fields such that they better support review and synthesis? |
title_short |
Reflections on and suggestions for reporting vulnerability research: How can peer reviewed articles reflect complex practice in low consensus fields such that they better support review and synthesis? |
title_full |
Reflections on and suggestions for reporting vulnerability research: How can peer reviewed articles reflect complex practice in low consensus fields such that they better support review and synthesis? |
title_fullStr |
Reflections on and suggestions for reporting vulnerability research: How can peer reviewed articles reflect complex practice in low consensus fields such that they better support review and synthesis? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Reflections on and suggestions for reporting vulnerability research: How can peer reviewed articles reflect complex practice in low consensus fields such that they better support review and synthesis? |
title_sort |
reflections on and suggestions for reporting vulnerability research: how can peer reviewed articles reflect complex practice in low consensus fields such that they better support review and synthesis? |
publishDate |
2019-05-10T14:24:46Z |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10568/101245 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT tamaspetera reflectionsonandsuggestionsforreportingvulnerabilityresearchhowcanpeerreviewedarticlesreflectcomplexpracticeinlowconsensusfieldssuchthattheybettersupportreviewandsynthesis AT delaneyaogan reflectionsonandsuggestionsforreportingvulnerabilityresearchhowcanpeerreviewedarticlesreflectcomplexpracticeinlowconsensusfieldssuchthattheybettersupportreviewandsynthesis AT cranetodda reflectionsonandsuggestionsforreportingvulnerabilityresearchhowcanpeerreviewedarticlesreflectcomplexpracticeinlowconsensusfieldssuchthattheybettersupportreviewandsynthesis AT hengeveldgeertenm reflectionsonandsuggestionsforreportingvulnerabilityresearchhowcanpeerreviewedarticlesreflectcomplexpracticeinlowconsensusfieldssuchthattheybettersupportreviewandsynthesis |
_version_ |
1807169601145929728 |