Reflections on and suggestions for reporting vulnerability research: How can peer reviewed articles reflect complex practice in low consensus fields such that they better support review and synthesis?

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tamas, Peter A., Delaney, Aogán, Crane, Todd A., Hengeveld, Geerten M.
Published: 2019-05-10T14:24:46Z
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/101245
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-cgspace-10568-101245
record_format koha
spelling dig-cgspace-10568-1012452024-07-18T09:14:27Z Reflections on and suggestions for reporting vulnerability research: How can peer reviewed articles reflect complex practice in low consensus fields such that they better support review and synthesis? Tamas, Peter A. Delaney, Aogán Crane, Todd A. Hengeveld, Geerten M. 2019-05-10T14:24:46Z 2019-05-10T14:24:46Z https://hdl.handle.net/10568/101245
institution CGIAR
collection DSpace
country Francia
countrycode FR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-cgspace
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Oeste
libraryname Biblioteca del CGIAR
author Tamas, Peter A.
Delaney, Aogán
Crane, Todd A.
Hengeveld, Geerten M.
spellingShingle Tamas, Peter A.
Delaney, Aogán
Crane, Todd A.
Hengeveld, Geerten M.
Reflections on and suggestions for reporting vulnerability research: How can peer reviewed articles reflect complex practice in low consensus fields such that they better support review and synthesis?
author_facet Tamas, Peter A.
Delaney, Aogán
Crane, Todd A.
Hengeveld, Geerten M.
author_sort Tamas, Peter A.
title Reflections on and suggestions for reporting vulnerability research: How can peer reviewed articles reflect complex practice in low consensus fields such that they better support review and synthesis?
title_short Reflections on and suggestions for reporting vulnerability research: How can peer reviewed articles reflect complex practice in low consensus fields such that they better support review and synthesis?
title_full Reflections on and suggestions for reporting vulnerability research: How can peer reviewed articles reflect complex practice in low consensus fields such that they better support review and synthesis?
title_fullStr Reflections on and suggestions for reporting vulnerability research: How can peer reviewed articles reflect complex practice in low consensus fields such that they better support review and synthesis?
title_full_unstemmed Reflections on and suggestions for reporting vulnerability research: How can peer reviewed articles reflect complex practice in low consensus fields such that they better support review and synthesis?
title_sort reflections on and suggestions for reporting vulnerability research: how can peer reviewed articles reflect complex practice in low consensus fields such that they better support review and synthesis?
publishDate 2019-05-10T14:24:46Z
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/101245
work_keys_str_mv AT tamaspetera reflectionsonandsuggestionsforreportingvulnerabilityresearchhowcanpeerreviewedarticlesreflectcomplexpracticeinlowconsensusfieldssuchthattheybettersupportreviewandsynthesis
AT delaneyaogan reflectionsonandsuggestionsforreportingvulnerabilityresearchhowcanpeerreviewedarticlesreflectcomplexpracticeinlowconsensusfieldssuchthattheybettersupportreviewandsynthesis
AT cranetodda reflectionsonandsuggestionsforreportingvulnerabilityresearchhowcanpeerreviewedarticlesreflectcomplexpracticeinlowconsensusfieldssuchthattheybettersupportreviewandsynthesis
AT hengeveldgeertenm reflectionsonandsuggestionsforreportingvulnerabilityresearchhowcanpeerreviewedarticlesreflectcomplexpracticeinlowconsensusfieldssuchthattheybettersupportreviewandsynthesis
_version_ 1807169601145929728