The systemic nature of technological development: similarities between the neo-Schumpeterian school and Fernando Fajnzylber’s approach

This article seeks to draw connections between Fernando Fajnzylber’s approach and certain elements of the neo-Schumpeterian systemic approach to innovation, to show that there is longstanding discussion of many of the ideas underlying the development of both approaches in a variety of contexts. The results of the analysis revealed six similar features: the historical determinants of technological development; the similarity between the elements that sustain long-term technical progress; the relationship between technological development and the “non-economic spheres”; the relationship between technological development and the idiosyncrasies of each sociopolitical context; the proactive nature of government action; and the sector-level aspects of technical progress.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ipiranga, Andrey Hamilka, Bittencourt, Pablo Felipe
Format: Texto biblioteca
Language:English
Published: 2022-08
Subjects:DESARROLLO ECONOMICO, CAMBIO TECNOLOGICO, MACROECONOMIA, DESARROLLO INDUSTRIAL, HISTORIA, FAJNZYLBER, FERNANDO, ANALISIS ECONOMICO, INDUSTRIALIZACION, INNOVACIONES TECNOLOGICAS, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE, MACROECONOMICS, INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT, HISTORY, ECONOMIC ANALYSIS, INDUSTRIALIZATION, TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS,
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/11362/48586
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!