Gender and Electoral Incentives: Evidence from Crisis Response

While there is evidence of gender differences in leaders behavior, less is known about what drives these gaps. This paper uncovers the role of electoral incentives. Using a close election regression discontinuity design in Brazil, we first show that female mayors handled the COVID-19 crisis differently over the year 2020, which ended with new municipal elections. We find that having a female mayor led to more deaths per capita at the beginning of the pandemic – a period characterized by uncertainty about the severity of the threat – but to fewer deaths per capita later in the year – a period where this uncertainty was reduced. We provide additional evidence that female mayors were less likely to close non-essential businesses early on, and more likely to do so at the end, and that residents in female-led municipalities were more likely to stay at home in the weeks surrounding the election. We then show that these results can be rationalized by a simple political agency model where politicians seek re-election and where voters assess female and male politicians actions differently. Consistent with this interpretation, we show that the gender differences we find are driven exclusively by mayors who were not term-limited and thus allowed to run for re-election, and that the effects are stronger in municipalities with greater gender discrimination. Taken together, the results suggest that female and male leaders face different electoral incentives and adapt their policy decisions to voters expectations.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Inter-American Development Bank
Other Authors: Juan Pablo Chauvin
Language:English
Published: Inter-American Development Bank
Subjects:Women, Gender, Municipal Government, Elections, Female Voting, Coronavirus, Gender Discrimination, Voting Behavior, Economy, Pandemic, D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking Lobbying Elections Legislatures and Voting Behavior, J16 - Economics of Gender • Non-labor Discrimination, I18 - Government Policy • Regulation • Public Health, Electoral incentives,
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.18235/0004458
https://publications.iadb.org/en/gender-and-electoral-incentives-evidence-crisis-response
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-bid-node-32630
record_format koha
spelling dig-bid-node-326302022-09-16T19:25:13ZGender and Electoral Incentives: Evidence from Crisis Response 2022-09-12T00:09:00+0000 http://dx.doi.org/10.18235/0004458 https://publications.iadb.org/en/gender-and-electoral-incentives-evidence-crisis-response Inter-American Development Bank Women Gender Municipal Government Elections Female Voting Coronavirus Gender Discrimination Voting Behavior Economy Pandemic D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking Lobbying Elections Legislatures and Voting Behavior J16 - Economics of Gender • Non-labor Discrimination I18 - Government Policy • Regulation • Public Health Electoral incentives While there is evidence of gender differences in leaders behavior, less is known about what drives these gaps. This paper uncovers the role of electoral incentives. Using a close election regression discontinuity design in Brazil, we first show that female mayors handled the COVID-19 crisis differently over the year 2020, which ended with new municipal elections. We find that having a female mayor led to more deaths per capita at the beginning of the pandemic – a period characterized by uncertainty about the severity of the threat – but to fewer deaths per capita later in the year – a period where this uncertainty was reduced. We provide additional evidence that female mayors were less likely to close non-essential businesses early on, and more likely to do so at the end, and that residents in female-led municipalities were more likely to stay at home in the weeks surrounding the election. We then show that these results can be rationalized by a simple political agency model where politicians seek re-election and where voters assess female and male politicians actions differently. Consistent with this interpretation, we show that the gender differences we find are driven exclusively by mayors who were not term-limited and thus allowed to run for re-election, and that the effects are stronger in municipalities with greater gender discrimination. Taken together, the results suggest that female and male leaders face different electoral incentives and adapt their policy decisions to voters expectations. Inter-American Development Bank Juan Pablo Chauvin Clemence Tricaud IDB Publications Brazil en
institution BID
collection DSpace
country Estados Unidos
countrycode US
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-bid
tag biblioteca
region America del Norte
libraryname Biblioteca Felipe Herrera del BID
language English
topic Women
Gender
Municipal Government
Elections
Female Voting
Coronavirus
Gender Discrimination
Voting Behavior
Economy
Pandemic
D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking Lobbying Elections Legislatures and Voting Behavior
J16 - Economics of Gender • Non-labor Discrimination
I18 - Government Policy • Regulation • Public Health
Electoral incentives
Women
Gender
Municipal Government
Elections
Female Voting
Coronavirus
Gender Discrimination
Voting Behavior
Economy
Pandemic
D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking Lobbying Elections Legislatures and Voting Behavior
J16 - Economics of Gender • Non-labor Discrimination
I18 - Government Policy • Regulation • Public Health
Electoral incentives
spellingShingle Women
Gender
Municipal Government
Elections
Female Voting
Coronavirus
Gender Discrimination
Voting Behavior
Economy
Pandemic
D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking Lobbying Elections Legislatures and Voting Behavior
J16 - Economics of Gender • Non-labor Discrimination
I18 - Government Policy • Regulation • Public Health
Electoral incentives
Women
Gender
Municipal Government
Elections
Female Voting
Coronavirus
Gender Discrimination
Voting Behavior
Economy
Pandemic
D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking Lobbying Elections Legislatures and Voting Behavior
J16 - Economics of Gender • Non-labor Discrimination
I18 - Government Policy • Regulation • Public Health
Electoral incentives
Inter-American Development Bank
Gender and Electoral Incentives: Evidence from Crisis Response
description While there is evidence of gender differences in leaders behavior, less is known about what drives these gaps. This paper uncovers the role of electoral incentives. Using a close election regression discontinuity design in Brazil, we first show that female mayors handled the COVID-19 crisis differently over the year 2020, which ended with new municipal elections. We find that having a female mayor led to more deaths per capita at the beginning of the pandemic – a period characterized by uncertainty about the severity of the threat – but to fewer deaths per capita later in the year – a period where this uncertainty was reduced. We provide additional evidence that female mayors were less likely to close non-essential businesses early on, and more likely to do so at the end, and that residents in female-led municipalities were more likely to stay at home in the weeks surrounding the election. We then show that these results can be rationalized by a simple political agency model where politicians seek re-election and where voters assess female and male politicians actions differently. Consistent with this interpretation, we show that the gender differences we find are driven exclusively by mayors who were not term-limited and thus allowed to run for re-election, and that the effects are stronger in municipalities with greater gender discrimination. Taken together, the results suggest that female and male leaders face different electoral incentives and adapt their policy decisions to voters expectations.
author2 Juan Pablo Chauvin
author_facet Juan Pablo Chauvin
Inter-American Development Bank
topic_facet Women
Gender
Municipal Government
Elections
Female Voting
Coronavirus
Gender Discrimination
Voting Behavior
Economy
Pandemic
D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking Lobbying Elections Legislatures and Voting Behavior
J16 - Economics of Gender • Non-labor Discrimination
I18 - Government Policy • Regulation • Public Health
Electoral incentives
author Inter-American Development Bank
author_sort Inter-American Development Bank
title Gender and Electoral Incentives: Evidence from Crisis Response
title_short Gender and Electoral Incentives: Evidence from Crisis Response
title_full Gender and Electoral Incentives: Evidence from Crisis Response
title_fullStr Gender and Electoral Incentives: Evidence from Crisis Response
title_full_unstemmed Gender and Electoral Incentives: Evidence from Crisis Response
title_sort gender and electoral incentives: evidence from crisis response
publisher Inter-American Development Bank
url http://dx.doi.org/10.18235/0004458
https://publications.iadb.org/en/gender-and-electoral-incentives-evidence-crisis-response
work_keys_str_mv AT interamericandevelopmentbank genderandelectoralincentivesevidencefromcrisisresponse
_version_ 1806237871351267328