The Consequences of COVID-19 on Livelihoods in Suriname: Evidence from a Telephone Survey
A nationally representative telephone survey on the consequences of the coronavirus pandemic in Suriname was conducted during the month of August in 2020. This paper presents a summary of the main findings of that survey and a review of the pandemic as of mid-April 2021. We found that household income was affected through employment losses, business closures and reduction of remittances. With data from the 2016/17 Suriname Survey of Living Conditions (SSLC) an additional level of analysis found that, although the shock to household income was widespread, pre-existing inequalities across income and gender groups were exacerbated.
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Inter-American Development Bank
|
Subjects: | Financial Education, Unemployment Rate, Income Distribution, Coronavirus, Pandemic, Household Income, O54 - Latin America • Caribbean H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies E6 - Macroeconomic Policy Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance and General Outlook R2 - Household Analysis D6 - Welfare Economics A1 - General Economics, Suriname;Financial literacy;COVID-19;Unemployment;COVID-19;COVID-19;COVID-19;COVID-19, |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.18235/0003212 https://publications.iadb.org/en/consequences-covid-19-livelihoods-suriname-evidence-telephone-survey |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | A nationally representative telephone survey on the consequences of the coronavirus pandemic in Suriname was conducted during the month of August in 2020. This paper presents a summary of the main findings of that survey and a review of the pandemic as of mid-April 2021. We found that household income was affected through employment losses, business closures and reduction of remittances. With data from the 2016/17 Suriname Survey of Living Conditions (SSLC) an additional level of analysis found that, although the shock to household income was widespread, pre-existing inequalities across income and gender groups were exacerbated. |
---|