Evaluation of the economic costs and benefits of methods for reducing nutrient loads to the Gulf of Mexico: Topic 6 Report for the Integrated Assessment on Hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico.

In this report we analyze the Topic 5 report’s recommendations for reducing nitrogen losses to the Gulf ofMexico (Mitsch et al. 1999). We indicate the relative costs and cost-effectiveness of different control measures, and potential benefits within the Mississippi River Basin. For major nonpoint sources, such as agriculture, we examine both national and basin costs and benefits.Based on the Topic 2 economic analysis (Diaz and Solow 1999), the direct measurable dollar benefits to Gulf fisheries of reducing nitrogen loads from the Mississippi River Basin are very limited at best. Although restoring the ecological communities in the Gulf may be significant over the long term, we do not currently have information available to estimate the benefits of such measures to restore the Gulf’s long-term health. For these reasons, we assume that measures to reduce nitrogen losses to the Gulf will ultimately prove beneficial, and we concentrate on analyzing the cost-effectiveness of alternative reduction strategies.We recognize that important public decisions are seldom made on the basis of strict benefit–cost analysis, especially when complete benefits cannot be estimated. We look at different approaches and different levels of these approaches to identify those that are cost-effective and those that have limited undesirable secondary effects, such as reduced exports, which may result in lost market share.We concentrate on the measures highlighted in the Topic 5 report, and also are guided by the source identification information in the Topic 3 report (Goolsby et al. 1999). Nonpoint sources that are responsible for the bulk of the nitrogen receive most of our attention. We consider restrictions on nitrogen fertilizer levels, and restoration of wetlands and riparian buffers for denitrification. We also examine giving more emphasis to nitrogen control in regions contributing a greater share of the nitrogen load.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Doering, Otto C., Diaz-Hermelo, Francisco, Howard, Crystal, Heimlich, Ralph, Hitzhusen, Fred, Kazmierczak, Richard, Lee, John, Libby, Larry, Milon, Walter, Prato, Tony, Ribaudo, Marc
Format: monograph biblioteca
Language:English
Published: NOAA/National Centers for Coastal Ocean Service 1999
Subjects:Ecology, Environment, Fisheries, Management,
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1834/30515
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-aquadocs-1834-30515
record_format koha
spelling dig-aquadocs-1834-305152021-06-30T02:54:36Z Evaluation of the economic costs and benefits of methods for reducing nutrient loads to the Gulf of Mexico: Topic 6 Report for the Integrated Assessment on Hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico. Doering, Otto C. Diaz-Hermelo, Francisco Howard, Crystal Heimlich, Ralph Hitzhusen, Fred Kazmierczak, Richard Lee, John Libby, Larry Milon, Walter Prato, Tony Ribaudo, Marc Ecology Environment Fisheries Management In this report we analyze the Topic 5 report’s recommendations for reducing nitrogen losses to the Gulf ofMexico (Mitsch et al. 1999). We indicate the relative costs and cost-effectiveness of different control measures, and potential benefits within the Mississippi River Basin. For major nonpoint sources, such as agriculture, we examine both national and basin costs and benefits.Based on the Topic 2 economic analysis (Diaz and Solow 1999), the direct measurable dollar benefits to Gulf fisheries of reducing nitrogen loads from the Mississippi River Basin are very limited at best. Although restoring the ecological communities in the Gulf may be significant over the long term, we do not currently have information available to estimate the benefits of such measures to restore the Gulf’s long-term health. For these reasons, we assume that measures to reduce nitrogen losses to the Gulf will ultimately prove beneficial, and we concentrate on analyzing the cost-effectiveness of alternative reduction strategies.We recognize that important public decisions are seldom made on the basis of strict benefit–cost analysis, especially when complete benefits cannot be estimated. We look at different approaches and different levels of these approaches to identify those that are cost-effective and those that have limited undesirable secondary effects, such as reduced exports, which may result in lost market share.We concentrate on the measures highlighted in the Topic 5 report, and also are guided by the source identification information in the Topic 3 report (Goolsby et al. 1999). Nonpoint sources that are responsible for the bulk of the nitrogen receive most of our attention. We consider restrictions on nitrogen fertilizer levels, and restoration of wetlands and riparian buffers for denitrification. We also examine giving more emphasis to nitrogen control in regions contributing a greater share of the nitrogen load. 2021-06-24T16:52:38Z 2021-06-24T16:52:38Z 1999 monograph http://hdl.handle.net/1834/30515 en NOAA Coastal Ocean Program Decision Analysis Series http://oceanservice.noaa.gov/products/hypox_t6final.pdf http://oceanservice.noaa.gov/products/pubs_hypox.html application/pdf application/pdf 115 NOAA/National Centers for Coastal Ocean Service Silver Spring, MD http://aquaticcommons.org/id/eprint/14638 403 2014-02-23 00:19:54 14638 United States National Ocean Service
institution UNESCO
collection DSpace
country Francia
countrycode FR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-aquadocs
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Oeste
libraryname Repositorio AQUADOCS
language English
topic Ecology
Environment
Fisheries
Management
Ecology
Environment
Fisheries
Management
spellingShingle Ecology
Environment
Fisheries
Management
Ecology
Environment
Fisheries
Management
Doering, Otto C.
Diaz-Hermelo, Francisco
Howard, Crystal
Heimlich, Ralph
Hitzhusen, Fred
Kazmierczak, Richard
Lee, John
Libby, Larry
Milon, Walter
Prato, Tony
Ribaudo, Marc
Evaluation of the economic costs and benefits of methods for reducing nutrient loads to the Gulf of Mexico: Topic 6 Report for the Integrated Assessment on Hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico.
description In this report we analyze the Topic 5 report’s recommendations for reducing nitrogen losses to the Gulf ofMexico (Mitsch et al. 1999). We indicate the relative costs and cost-effectiveness of different control measures, and potential benefits within the Mississippi River Basin. For major nonpoint sources, such as agriculture, we examine both national and basin costs and benefits.Based on the Topic 2 economic analysis (Diaz and Solow 1999), the direct measurable dollar benefits to Gulf fisheries of reducing nitrogen loads from the Mississippi River Basin are very limited at best. Although restoring the ecological communities in the Gulf may be significant over the long term, we do not currently have information available to estimate the benefits of such measures to restore the Gulf’s long-term health. For these reasons, we assume that measures to reduce nitrogen losses to the Gulf will ultimately prove beneficial, and we concentrate on analyzing the cost-effectiveness of alternative reduction strategies.We recognize that important public decisions are seldom made on the basis of strict benefit–cost analysis, especially when complete benefits cannot be estimated. We look at different approaches and different levels of these approaches to identify those that are cost-effective and those that have limited undesirable secondary effects, such as reduced exports, which may result in lost market share.We concentrate on the measures highlighted in the Topic 5 report, and also are guided by the source identification information in the Topic 3 report (Goolsby et al. 1999). Nonpoint sources that are responsible for the bulk of the nitrogen receive most of our attention. We consider restrictions on nitrogen fertilizer levels, and restoration of wetlands and riparian buffers for denitrification. We also examine giving more emphasis to nitrogen control in regions contributing a greater share of the nitrogen load.
format monograph
topic_facet Ecology
Environment
Fisheries
Management
author Doering, Otto C.
Diaz-Hermelo, Francisco
Howard, Crystal
Heimlich, Ralph
Hitzhusen, Fred
Kazmierczak, Richard
Lee, John
Libby, Larry
Milon, Walter
Prato, Tony
Ribaudo, Marc
author_facet Doering, Otto C.
Diaz-Hermelo, Francisco
Howard, Crystal
Heimlich, Ralph
Hitzhusen, Fred
Kazmierczak, Richard
Lee, John
Libby, Larry
Milon, Walter
Prato, Tony
Ribaudo, Marc
author_sort Doering, Otto C.
title Evaluation of the economic costs and benefits of methods for reducing nutrient loads to the Gulf of Mexico: Topic 6 Report for the Integrated Assessment on Hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico.
title_short Evaluation of the economic costs and benefits of methods for reducing nutrient loads to the Gulf of Mexico: Topic 6 Report for the Integrated Assessment on Hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico.
title_full Evaluation of the economic costs and benefits of methods for reducing nutrient loads to the Gulf of Mexico: Topic 6 Report for the Integrated Assessment on Hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico.
title_fullStr Evaluation of the economic costs and benefits of methods for reducing nutrient loads to the Gulf of Mexico: Topic 6 Report for the Integrated Assessment on Hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico.
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the economic costs and benefits of methods for reducing nutrient loads to the Gulf of Mexico: Topic 6 Report for the Integrated Assessment on Hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico.
title_sort evaluation of the economic costs and benefits of methods for reducing nutrient loads to the gulf of mexico: topic 6 report for the integrated assessment on hypoxia in the gulf of mexico.
publisher NOAA/National Centers for Coastal Ocean Service
publishDate 1999
url http://hdl.handle.net/1834/30515
work_keys_str_mv AT doeringottoc evaluationoftheeconomiccostsandbenefitsofmethodsforreducingnutrientloadstothegulfofmexicotopic6reportfortheintegratedassessmentonhypoxiainthegulfofmexico
AT diazhermelofrancisco evaluationoftheeconomiccostsandbenefitsofmethodsforreducingnutrientloadstothegulfofmexicotopic6reportfortheintegratedassessmentonhypoxiainthegulfofmexico
AT howardcrystal evaluationoftheeconomiccostsandbenefitsofmethodsforreducingnutrientloadstothegulfofmexicotopic6reportfortheintegratedassessmentonhypoxiainthegulfofmexico
AT heimlichralph evaluationoftheeconomiccostsandbenefitsofmethodsforreducingnutrientloadstothegulfofmexicotopic6reportfortheintegratedassessmentonhypoxiainthegulfofmexico
AT hitzhusenfred evaluationoftheeconomiccostsandbenefitsofmethodsforreducingnutrientloadstothegulfofmexicotopic6reportfortheintegratedassessmentonhypoxiainthegulfofmexico
AT kazmierczakrichard evaluationoftheeconomiccostsandbenefitsofmethodsforreducingnutrientloadstothegulfofmexicotopic6reportfortheintegratedassessmentonhypoxiainthegulfofmexico
AT leejohn evaluationoftheeconomiccostsandbenefitsofmethodsforreducingnutrientloadstothegulfofmexicotopic6reportfortheintegratedassessmentonhypoxiainthegulfofmexico
AT libbylarry evaluationoftheeconomiccostsandbenefitsofmethodsforreducingnutrientloadstothegulfofmexicotopic6reportfortheintegratedassessmentonhypoxiainthegulfofmexico
AT milonwalter evaluationoftheeconomiccostsandbenefitsofmethodsforreducingnutrientloadstothegulfofmexicotopic6reportfortheintegratedassessmentonhypoxiainthegulfofmexico
AT pratotony evaluationoftheeconomiccostsandbenefitsofmethodsforreducingnutrientloadstothegulfofmexicotopic6reportfortheintegratedassessmentonhypoxiainthegulfofmexico
AT ribaudomarc evaluationoftheeconomiccostsandbenefitsofmethodsforreducingnutrientloadstothegulfofmexicotopic6reportfortheintegratedassessmentonhypoxiainthegulfofmexico
_version_ 1756078703479095296