Effects of a large fishing closure on benthic communities in the western Gulf of Maine: recovery from the effects of gillnets and otter trawls

The recovery of benthic communities inside the western Gulfof Maine fishing closure area was evaluated by comparing invertebrate assemblages at sites inside and outside of the closure four to six years after the closure was established. The major restriction imposed by the closurewas a year-round prohibition of bottom gillnets and otter trawls. A total of 163 seafloor sites (~half inside and half outside the closure) within a 515-km2 study area were sampled with some combination of Shipek grab, Wildco box corer, or underwater video. Bottom types ranged from mud (silt and clay) to boulders, and the effects of the closure on univariate measures (total density, biomass, taxonomicrichness) of benthos varied widely among sediment types. For sites with predominantly mud sediments, there were mixed effects on inside and outside infauna and no effect onepifauna. For sites with mainly sand sediments, there were higher density, biomass, and taxonomic richness for infauna inside the closure, but no significant effects on epifauna. For sites dominated by gravel (which included boulders in some areas), there were no effects on infauna but strong effects on epifaunal density and taxonomic richness. For fishing gear, the data indicated that infauna recovered insand from the impacts of otter trawls operated inside the closure but that they did not recover in mud, and that epifauna recovered on gravel bottoms from the impact of gillnets used inside the closure. The magnitudes of impact and recovery, however, cannot be inferred directly from ourdata because of a confounding factor of different fishing intensities outside the closure for a direct comparison ofpreclosure and postclosure data. The overall negative impact of trawls is likely underestimated by our data,whereas the negative impact of gillnets is likely overestimated.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Grizzle, Raymond E., Ward, Larry G., Mayer, Larry A., Malik, Mashkoor A., Cooper, Andrew B., Abeels, Holly A., Greene, Jennifer K., Brodeur, Melissa A., Rosenberg, Andrew A.
Format: article biblioteca
Language:English
Published: 2009
Subjects:Biology, Ecology, Fisheries,
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1834/25436
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-aquadocs-1834-25436
record_format koha
spelling dig-aquadocs-1834-254362021-06-27T02:29:27Z Effects of a large fishing closure on benthic communities in the western Gulf of Maine: recovery from the effects of gillnets and otter trawls Grizzle, Raymond E. Ward, Larry G. Mayer, Larry A. Malik, Mashkoor A. Cooper, Andrew B. Abeels, Holly A. Greene, Jennifer K. Brodeur, Melissa A. Rosenberg, Andrew A. Biology Ecology Fisheries The recovery of benthic communities inside the western Gulfof Maine fishing closure area was evaluated by comparing invertebrate assemblages at sites inside and outside of the closure four to six years after the closure was established. The major restriction imposed by the closurewas a year-round prohibition of bottom gillnets and otter trawls. A total of 163 seafloor sites (~half inside and half outside the closure) within a 515-km2 study area were sampled with some combination of Shipek grab, Wildco box corer, or underwater video. Bottom types ranged from mud (silt and clay) to boulders, and the effects of the closure on univariate measures (total density, biomass, taxonomicrichness) of benthos varied widely among sediment types. For sites with predominantly mud sediments, there were mixed effects on inside and outside infauna and no effect onepifauna. For sites with mainly sand sediments, there were higher density, biomass, and taxonomic richness for infauna inside the closure, but no significant effects on epifauna. For sites dominated by gravel (which included boulders in some areas), there were no effects on infauna but strong effects on epifaunal density and taxonomic richness. For fishing gear, the data indicated that infauna recovered insand from the impacts of otter trawls operated inside the closure but that they did not recover in mud, and that epifauna recovered on gravel bottoms from the impact of gillnets used inside the closure. The magnitudes of impact and recovery, however, cannot be inferred directly from ourdata because of a confounding factor of different fishing intensities outside the closure for a direct comparison ofpreclosure and postclosure data. The overall negative impact of trawls is likely underestimated by our data,whereas the negative impact of gillnets is likely overestimated. 2021-06-24T16:20:19Z 2021-06-24T16:20:19Z 2009 article TRUE 0090-0656 http://hdl.handle.net/1834/25436 en http://fishbull.noaa.gov/1073/grizzle.pdf application/pdf application/pdf 308 http://aquaticcommons.org/id/eprint/8787 403 2012-06-10 08:58:35 8787 United States National Marine Fisheries Service
institution UNESCO
collection DSpace
country Francia
countrycode FR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-aquadocs
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Oeste
libraryname Repositorio AQUADOCS
language English
topic Biology
Ecology
Fisheries
Biology
Ecology
Fisheries
spellingShingle Biology
Ecology
Fisheries
Biology
Ecology
Fisheries
Grizzle, Raymond E.
Ward, Larry G.
Mayer, Larry A.
Malik, Mashkoor A.
Cooper, Andrew B.
Abeels, Holly A.
Greene, Jennifer K.
Brodeur, Melissa A.
Rosenberg, Andrew A.
Effects of a large fishing closure on benthic communities in the western Gulf of Maine: recovery from the effects of gillnets and otter trawls
description The recovery of benthic communities inside the western Gulfof Maine fishing closure area was evaluated by comparing invertebrate assemblages at sites inside and outside of the closure four to six years after the closure was established. The major restriction imposed by the closurewas a year-round prohibition of bottom gillnets and otter trawls. A total of 163 seafloor sites (~half inside and half outside the closure) within a 515-km2 study area were sampled with some combination of Shipek grab, Wildco box corer, or underwater video. Bottom types ranged from mud (silt and clay) to boulders, and the effects of the closure on univariate measures (total density, biomass, taxonomicrichness) of benthos varied widely among sediment types. For sites with predominantly mud sediments, there were mixed effects on inside and outside infauna and no effect onepifauna. For sites with mainly sand sediments, there were higher density, biomass, and taxonomic richness for infauna inside the closure, but no significant effects on epifauna. For sites dominated by gravel (which included boulders in some areas), there were no effects on infauna but strong effects on epifaunal density and taxonomic richness. For fishing gear, the data indicated that infauna recovered insand from the impacts of otter trawls operated inside the closure but that they did not recover in mud, and that epifauna recovered on gravel bottoms from the impact of gillnets used inside the closure. The magnitudes of impact and recovery, however, cannot be inferred directly from ourdata because of a confounding factor of different fishing intensities outside the closure for a direct comparison ofpreclosure and postclosure data. The overall negative impact of trawls is likely underestimated by our data,whereas the negative impact of gillnets is likely overestimated.
format article
topic_facet Biology
Ecology
Fisheries
author Grizzle, Raymond E.
Ward, Larry G.
Mayer, Larry A.
Malik, Mashkoor A.
Cooper, Andrew B.
Abeels, Holly A.
Greene, Jennifer K.
Brodeur, Melissa A.
Rosenberg, Andrew A.
author_facet Grizzle, Raymond E.
Ward, Larry G.
Mayer, Larry A.
Malik, Mashkoor A.
Cooper, Andrew B.
Abeels, Holly A.
Greene, Jennifer K.
Brodeur, Melissa A.
Rosenberg, Andrew A.
author_sort Grizzle, Raymond E.
title Effects of a large fishing closure on benthic communities in the western Gulf of Maine: recovery from the effects of gillnets and otter trawls
title_short Effects of a large fishing closure on benthic communities in the western Gulf of Maine: recovery from the effects of gillnets and otter trawls
title_full Effects of a large fishing closure on benthic communities in the western Gulf of Maine: recovery from the effects of gillnets and otter trawls
title_fullStr Effects of a large fishing closure on benthic communities in the western Gulf of Maine: recovery from the effects of gillnets and otter trawls
title_full_unstemmed Effects of a large fishing closure on benthic communities in the western Gulf of Maine: recovery from the effects of gillnets and otter trawls
title_sort effects of a large fishing closure on benthic communities in the western gulf of maine: recovery from the effects of gillnets and otter trawls
publishDate 2009
url http://hdl.handle.net/1834/25436
work_keys_str_mv AT grizzleraymonde effectsofalargefishingclosureonbenthiccommunitiesinthewesterngulfofmainerecoveryfromtheeffectsofgillnetsandottertrawls
AT wardlarryg effectsofalargefishingclosureonbenthiccommunitiesinthewesterngulfofmainerecoveryfromtheeffectsofgillnetsandottertrawls
AT mayerlarrya effectsofalargefishingclosureonbenthiccommunitiesinthewesterngulfofmainerecoveryfromtheeffectsofgillnetsandottertrawls
AT malikmashkoora effectsofalargefishingclosureonbenthiccommunitiesinthewesterngulfofmainerecoveryfromtheeffectsofgillnetsandottertrawls
AT cooperandrewb effectsofalargefishingclosureonbenthiccommunitiesinthewesterngulfofmainerecoveryfromtheeffectsofgillnetsandottertrawls
AT abeelshollya effectsofalargefishingclosureonbenthiccommunitiesinthewesterngulfofmainerecoveryfromtheeffectsofgillnetsandottertrawls
AT greenejenniferk effectsofalargefishingclosureonbenthiccommunitiesinthewesterngulfofmainerecoveryfromtheeffectsofgillnetsandottertrawls
AT brodeurmelissaa effectsofalargefishingclosureonbenthiccommunitiesinthewesterngulfofmainerecoveryfromtheeffectsofgillnetsandottertrawls
AT rosenbergandrewa effectsofalargefishingclosureonbenthiccommunitiesinthewesterngulfofmainerecoveryfromtheeffectsofgillnetsandottertrawls
_version_ 1756078029518405632