Support for Integrated Ecosystem Assessments of NOAA’s National Estuarine Research Reserves System (NERRS), Volume II: Assessment of Ecological Condition and Stressor Impacts in Subtidal Waters of the North Carolina NERRS
A study was conducted to assess the status of ecological condition and potential human-health risks in subtidal estuarine waters throughout the North Carolina National Estuarine Research Reserve System (NERRS) (Currituck Sound, Rachel Carson, Masonboro Island, and Zeke’s Island). Field work was conducted in September 2006 and incorporated multiple indicators of ecosystem condition including measures of water quality (dissolved oxygen, salinity,temperature, pH, nutrients and chlorophyll, suspended solids), sediment quality (granulometry, organic matter content, chemical contaminant concentrations), biological condition (diversity and abundances of benthic fauna, fish contaminant levels and pathologies), and human dimensions (fish-tissue contaminant levels relative to human-health consumption limits, various aesthetic properties). A probabilistic sampling design permitted statistical estimation of the spatial extent of degraded versus non-degraded condition across these estuaries relative tospecified threshold levels of the various indicators (where possible). With some exceptions, the status of these reserves appeared to be in relatively good to fair ecological condition overall, with the majority of the area (about 54%) having various water quality, sediment quality, and biological (benthic) condition indicators rated in the healthy to intermediate range of corresponding guideline thresholds. Only three stations, representing 10.5% of the area, had one or more of these indicators rated as poor/degraded in all three categories. While such aconclusion is encouraging from a coastal management perspective, it should be viewed with some caution. For example, although co-occurrences of adverse biological and abiotic environmental conditions were limited, at least one indicator of ecological condition rated in the poor/degraded range was observed over a broader area (35.5%) represented by 11 of the 30 stations sampled. In addition, the fish-tissue contaminant data were not included in these overall spatial estimates; however, the majority of samples (77% of fish that were analyzed, from 79%, of stations where fish were caught) contained inorganic arsenic above the consumption limits for human cancer risks, though most likely derived from natural sources. Similarly, aesthetic indicators are not reflected in these spatial estimates of ecological condition, though there was evidence of noxious odors in sediments at many of the stations. Such symptoms reflect a growing realization that North Carolina estuaries are under multiple pressures from a variety of natural and human influences. These data also suggest that, while the current status of overallecological condition appears to be good to fair, long-term monitoring is warranted to track potential changes in the future. This study establishes an important baseline of overall ecological condition within NC NERRS that can be used to evaluate any such future changes and to triggerappropriate management actions in this rapidly evolving coastal environment. (PDF contains 76 pages)
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | monograph biblioteca |
Language: | English |
Published: |
NOAA/NOS/National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science/Center for Coastal Environmental Health and Biomolecular Research
2008
|
Subjects: | Ecology, Management, North Carolina NERRS, Southeastern estuaries, Ecological condition, Benthic communities, Sediment and tissue contaminants, Integrated Ecosystem Assessments, |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/1834/19933 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
dig-aquadocs-1834-19933 |
---|---|
record_format |
koha |
spelling |
dig-aquadocs-1834-199332021-07-12T02:05:04Z Support for Integrated Ecosystem Assessments of NOAA’s National Estuarine Research Reserves System (NERRS), Volume II: Assessment of Ecological Condition and Stressor Impacts in Subtidal Waters of the North Carolina NERRS Cooksey, Cynthia Hyland, Jeff Wirth, Ed Balthis, W. Leonard Fulton, Mike Whitall, David White, Susan Ecology Management North Carolina NERRS Southeastern estuaries Ecological condition Benthic communities Sediment and tissue contaminants Integrated Ecosystem Assessments A study was conducted to assess the status of ecological condition and potential human-health risks in subtidal estuarine waters throughout the North Carolina National Estuarine Research Reserve System (NERRS) (Currituck Sound, Rachel Carson, Masonboro Island, and Zeke’s Island). Field work was conducted in September 2006 and incorporated multiple indicators of ecosystem condition including measures of water quality (dissolved oxygen, salinity,temperature, pH, nutrients and chlorophyll, suspended solids), sediment quality (granulometry, organic matter content, chemical contaminant concentrations), biological condition (diversity and abundances of benthic fauna, fish contaminant levels and pathologies), and human dimensions (fish-tissue contaminant levels relative to human-health consumption limits, various aesthetic properties). A probabilistic sampling design permitted statistical estimation of the spatial extent of degraded versus non-degraded condition across these estuaries relative tospecified threshold levels of the various indicators (where possible). With some exceptions, the status of these reserves appeared to be in relatively good to fair ecological condition overall, with the majority of the area (about 54%) having various water quality, sediment quality, and biological (benthic) condition indicators rated in the healthy to intermediate range of corresponding guideline thresholds. Only three stations, representing 10.5% of the area, had one or more of these indicators rated as poor/degraded in all three categories. While such aconclusion is encouraging from a coastal management perspective, it should be viewed with some caution. For example, although co-occurrences of adverse biological and abiotic environmental conditions were limited, at least one indicator of ecological condition rated in the poor/degraded range was observed over a broader area (35.5%) represented by 11 of the 30 stations sampled. In addition, the fish-tissue contaminant data were not included in these overall spatial estimates; however, the majority of samples (77% of fish that were analyzed, from 79%, of stations where fish were caught) contained inorganic arsenic above the consumption limits for human cancer risks, though most likely derived from natural sources. Similarly, aesthetic indicators are not reflected in these spatial estimates of ecological condition, though there was evidence of noxious odors in sediments at many of the stations. Such symptoms reflect a growing realization that North Carolina estuaries are under multiple pressures from a variety of natural and human influences. These data also suggest that, while the current status of overallecological condition appears to be good to fair, long-term monitoring is warranted to track potential changes in the future. This study establishes an important baseline of overall ecological condition within NC NERRS that can be used to evaluate any such future changes and to triggerappropriate management actions in this rapidly evolving coastal environment. (PDF contains 76 pages) 2021-06-24T15:16:06Z 2021-06-24T15:16:06Z 2008 monograph http://hdl.handle.net/1834/19933 en NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS NCCOS application/pdf application/pdf NOAA/NOS/National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science/Center for Coastal Environmental Health and Biomolecular Research Charleston, SC http://aquaticcommons.org/id/eprint/2113 403 2014-02-21 01:54:59 2113 United States National Ocean Service |
institution |
UNESCO |
collection |
DSpace |
country |
Francia |
countrycode |
FR |
component |
Bibliográfico |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
dig-aquadocs |
tag |
biblioteca |
region |
Europa del Oeste |
libraryname |
Repositorio AQUADOCS |
language |
English |
topic |
Ecology Management North Carolina NERRS Southeastern estuaries Ecological condition Benthic communities Sediment and tissue contaminants Integrated Ecosystem Assessments Ecology Management North Carolina NERRS Southeastern estuaries Ecological condition Benthic communities Sediment and tissue contaminants Integrated Ecosystem Assessments |
spellingShingle |
Ecology Management North Carolina NERRS Southeastern estuaries Ecological condition Benthic communities Sediment and tissue contaminants Integrated Ecosystem Assessments Ecology Management North Carolina NERRS Southeastern estuaries Ecological condition Benthic communities Sediment and tissue contaminants Integrated Ecosystem Assessments Cooksey, Cynthia Hyland, Jeff Wirth, Ed Balthis, W. Leonard Fulton, Mike Whitall, David White, Susan Support for Integrated Ecosystem Assessments of NOAA’s National Estuarine Research Reserves System (NERRS), Volume II: Assessment of Ecological Condition and Stressor Impacts in Subtidal Waters of the North Carolina NERRS |
description |
A study was conducted to assess the status of ecological condition and potential human-health risks in subtidal estuarine waters throughout the North Carolina National Estuarine Research Reserve System (NERRS) (Currituck Sound, Rachel Carson, Masonboro Island, and Zeke’s Island). Field work was conducted in September 2006 and incorporated multiple indicators of ecosystem condition including measures of water quality (dissolved oxygen, salinity,temperature, pH, nutrients and chlorophyll, suspended solids), sediment quality (granulometry, organic matter content, chemical contaminant concentrations), biological condition (diversity and abundances of benthic fauna, fish contaminant levels and pathologies), and human dimensions (fish-tissue contaminant levels relative to human-health consumption limits, various aesthetic properties). A probabilistic sampling design permitted statistical estimation of the spatial extent of degraded versus non-degraded condition across these estuaries relative tospecified threshold levels of the various indicators (where possible). With some exceptions, the status of these reserves appeared to be in relatively good to fair ecological condition overall, with the majority of the area (about 54%) having various water quality, sediment quality, and biological (benthic) condition indicators rated in the healthy to intermediate range of corresponding guideline thresholds. Only three stations, representing 10.5% of the area, had one or more of these indicators rated as poor/degraded in all three categories. While such aconclusion is encouraging from a coastal management perspective, it should be viewed with some caution. For example, although co-occurrences of adverse biological and abiotic environmental conditions were limited, at least one indicator of ecological condition rated in the poor/degraded range was observed over a broader area (35.5%) represented by 11 of the 30 stations sampled. In addition, the fish-tissue contaminant data were not included in these overall spatial estimates; however, the majority of samples (77% of fish that were analyzed, from 79%, of stations where fish were caught) contained inorganic arsenic above the consumption limits for human cancer risks, though most likely derived from natural sources. Similarly, aesthetic indicators are not reflected in these spatial estimates of ecological condition, though there was evidence of noxious odors in sediments at many of the stations. Such symptoms reflect a growing realization that North Carolina estuaries are under multiple pressures from a variety of natural and human influences. These data also suggest that, while the current status of overallecological condition appears to be good to fair, long-term monitoring is warranted to track potential changes in the future. This study establishes an important baseline of overall ecological condition within NC NERRS that can be used to evaluate any such future changes and to triggerappropriate management actions in this rapidly evolving coastal environment. (PDF contains 76 pages) |
format |
monograph |
topic_facet |
Ecology Management North Carolina NERRS Southeastern estuaries Ecological condition Benthic communities Sediment and tissue contaminants Integrated Ecosystem Assessments |
author |
Cooksey, Cynthia Hyland, Jeff Wirth, Ed Balthis, W. Leonard Fulton, Mike Whitall, David White, Susan |
author_facet |
Cooksey, Cynthia Hyland, Jeff Wirth, Ed Balthis, W. Leonard Fulton, Mike Whitall, David White, Susan |
author_sort |
Cooksey, Cynthia |
title |
Support for Integrated Ecosystem Assessments of NOAA’s National Estuarine Research Reserves System (NERRS), Volume II: Assessment of Ecological Condition and Stressor
Impacts in Subtidal Waters of the North Carolina NERRS |
title_short |
Support for Integrated Ecosystem Assessments of NOAA’s National Estuarine Research Reserves System (NERRS), Volume II: Assessment of Ecological Condition and Stressor
Impacts in Subtidal Waters of the North Carolina NERRS |
title_full |
Support for Integrated Ecosystem Assessments of NOAA’s National Estuarine Research Reserves System (NERRS), Volume II: Assessment of Ecological Condition and Stressor
Impacts in Subtidal Waters of the North Carolina NERRS |
title_fullStr |
Support for Integrated Ecosystem Assessments of NOAA’s National Estuarine Research Reserves System (NERRS), Volume II: Assessment of Ecological Condition and Stressor
Impacts in Subtidal Waters of the North Carolina NERRS |
title_full_unstemmed |
Support for Integrated Ecosystem Assessments of NOAA’s National Estuarine Research Reserves System (NERRS), Volume II: Assessment of Ecological Condition and Stressor
Impacts in Subtidal Waters of the North Carolina NERRS |
title_sort |
support for integrated ecosystem assessments of noaa’s national estuarine research reserves system (nerrs), volume ii: assessment of ecological condition and stressor
impacts in subtidal waters of the north carolina nerrs |
publisher |
NOAA/NOS/National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science/Center for Coastal Environmental Health and Biomolecular Research |
publishDate |
2008 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/1834/19933 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT cookseycynthia supportforintegratedecosystemassessmentsofnoaasnationalestuarineresearchreservessystemnerrsvolumeiiassessmentofecologicalconditionandstressorimpactsinsubtidalwatersofthenorthcarolinanerrs AT hylandjeff supportforintegratedecosystemassessmentsofnoaasnationalestuarineresearchreservessystemnerrsvolumeiiassessmentofecologicalconditionandstressorimpactsinsubtidalwatersofthenorthcarolinanerrs AT wirthed supportforintegratedecosystemassessmentsofnoaasnationalestuarineresearchreservessystemnerrsvolumeiiassessmentofecologicalconditionandstressorimpactsinsubtidalwatersofthenorthcarolinanerrs AT balthiswleonard supportforintegratedecosystemassessmentsofnoaasnationalestuarineresearchreservessystemnerrsvolumeiiassessmentofecologicalconditionandstressorimpactsinsubtidalwatersofthenorthcarolinanerrs AT fultonmike supportforintegratedecosystemassessmentsofnoaasnationalestuarineresearchreservessystemnerrsvolumeiiassessmentofecologicalconditionandstressorimpactsinsubtidalwatersofthenorthcarolinanerrs AT whitalldavid supportforintegratedecosystemassessmentsofnoaasnationalestuarineresearchreservessystemnerrsvolumeiiassessmentofecologicalconditionandstressorimpactsinsubtidalwatersofthenorthcarolinanerrs AT whitesusan supportforintegratedecosystemassessmentsofnoaasnationalestuarineresearchreservessystemnerrsvolumeiiassessmentofecologicalconditionandstressorimpactsinsubtidalwatersofthenorthcarolinanerrs |
_version_ |
1756077296623550464 |