Support for Integrated Ecosystem Assessments of NOAA’s National Estuarine Research Reserves System (NERRS), Volume II: Assessment of Ecological Condition and Stressor Impacts in Subtidal Waters of the North Carolina NERRS

A study was conducted to assess the status of ecological condition and potential human-health risks in subtidal estuarine waters throughout the North Carolina National Estuarine Research Reserve System (NERRS) (Currituck Sound, Rachel Carson, Masonboro Island, and Zeke’s Island). Field work was conducted in September 2006 and incorporated multiple indicators of ecosystem condition including measures of water quality (dissolved oxygen, salinity,temperature, pH, nutrients and chlorophyll, suspended solids), sediment quality (granulometry, organic matter content, chemical contaminant concentrations), biological condition (diversity and abundances of benthic fauna, fish contaminant levels and pathologies), and human dimensions (fish-tissue contaminant levels relative to human-health consumption limits, various aesthetic properties). A probabilistic sampling design permitted statistical estimation of the spatial extent of degraded versus non-degraded condition across these estuaries relative tospecified threshold levels of the various indicators (where possible). With some exceptions, the status of these reserves appeared to be in relatively good to fair ecological condition overall, with the majority of the area (about 54%) having various water quality, sediment quality, and biological (benthic) condition indicators rated in the healthy to intermediate range of corresponding guideline thresholds. Only three stations, representing 10.5% of the area, had one or more of these indicators rated as poor/degraded in all three categories. While such aconclusion is encouraging from a coastal management perspective, it should be viewed with some caution. For example, although co-occurrences of adverse biological and abiotic environmental conditions were limited, at least one indicator of ecological condition rated in the poor/degraded range was observed over a broader area (35.5%) represented by 11 of the 30 stations sampled. In addition, the fish-tissue contaminant data were not included in these overall spatial estimates; however, the majority of samples (77% of fish that were analyzed, from 79%, of stations where fish were caught) contained inorganic arsenic above the consumption limits for human cancer risks, though most likely derived from natural sources. Similarly, aesthetic indicators are not reflected in these spatial estimates of ecological condition, though there was evidence of noxious odors in sediments at many of the stations. Such symptoms reflect a growing realization that North Carolina estuaries are under multiple pressures from a variety of natural and human influences. These data also suggest that, while the current status of overallecological condition appears to be good to fair, long-term monitoring is warranted to track potential changes in the future. This study establishes an important baseline of overall ecological condition within NC NERRS that can be used to evaluate any such future changes and to triggerappropriate management actions in this rapidly evolving coastal environment. (PDF contains 76 pages)

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cooksey, Cynthia, Hyland, Jeff, Wirth, Ed, Balthis, W. Leonard, Fulton, Mike, Whitall, David, White, Susan
Format: monograph biblioteca
Language:English
Published: NOAA/NOS/National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science/Center for Coastal Environmental Health and Biomolecular Research 2008
Subjects:Ecology, Management, North Carolina NERRS, Southeastern estuaries, Ecological condition, Benthic communities, Sediment and tissue contaminants, Integrated Ecosystem Assessments,
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1834/19933
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-aquadocs-1834-19933
record_format koha
spelling dig-aquadocs-1834-199332021-07-12T02:05:04Z Support for Integrated Ecosystem Assessments of NOAA’s National Estuarine Research Reserves System (NERRS), Volume II: Assessment of Ecological Condition and Stressor Impacts in Subtidal Waters of the North Carolina NERRS Cooksey, Cynthia Hyland, Jeff Wirth, Ed Balthis, W. Leonard Fulton, Mike Whitall, David White, Susan Ecology Management North Carolina NERRS Southeastern estuaries Ecological condition Benthic communities Sediment and tissue contaminants Integrated Ecosystem Assessments A study was conducted to assess the status of ecological condition and potential human-health risks in subtidal estuarine waters throughout the North Carolina National Estuarine Research Reserve System (NERRS) (Currituck Sound, Rachel Carson, Masonboro Island, and Zeke’s Island). Field work was conducted in September 2006 and incorporated multiple indicators of ecosystem condition including measures of water quality (dissolved oxygen, salinity,temperature, pH, nutrients and chlorophyll, suspended solids), sediment quality (granulometry, organic matter content, chemical contaminant concentrations), biological condition (diversity and abundances of benthic fauna, fish contaminant levels and pathologies), and human dimensions (fish-tissue contaminant levels relative to human-health consumption limits, various aesthetic properties). A probabilistic sampling design permitted statistical estimation of the spatial extent of degraded versus non-degraded condition across these estuaries relative tospecified threshold levels of the various indicators (where possible). With some exceptions, the status of these reserves appeared to be in relatively good to fair ecological condition overall, with the majority of the area (about 54%) having various water quality, sediment quality, and biological (benthic) condition indicators rated in the healthy to intermediate range of corresponding guideline thresholds. Only three stations, representing 10.5% of the area, had one or more of these indicators rated as poor/degraded in all three categories. While such aconclusion is encouraging from a coastal management perspective, it should be viewed with some caution. For example, although co-occurrences of adverse biological and abiotic environmental conditions were limited, at least one indicator of ecological condition rated in the poor/degraded range was observed over a broader area (35.5%) represented by 11 of the 30 stations sampled. In addition, the fish-tissue contaminant data were not included in these overall spatial estimates; however, the majority of samples (77% of fish that were analyzed, from 79%, of stations where fish were caught) contained inorganic arsenic above the consumption limits for human cancer risks, though most likely derived from natural sources. Similarly, aesthetic indicators are not reflected in these spatial estimates of ecological condition, though there was evidence of noxious odors in sediments at many of the stations. Such symptoms reflect a growing realization that North Carolina estuaries are under multiple pressures from a variety of natural and human influences. These data also suggest that, while the current status of overallecological condition appears to be good to fair, long-term monitoring is warranted to track potential changes in the future. This study establishes an important baseline of overall ecological condition within NC NERRS that can be used to evaluate any such future changes and to triggerappropriate management actions in this rapidly evolving coastal environment. (PDF contains 76 pages) 2021-06-24T15:16:06Z 2021-06-24T15:16:06Z 2008 monograph http://hdl.handle.net/1834/19933 en NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS NCCOS application/pdf application/pdf NOAA/NOS/National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science/Center for Coastal Environmental Health and Biomolecular Research Charleston, SC http://aquaticcommons.org/id/eprint/2113 403 2014-02-21 01:54:59 2113 United States National Ocean Service
institution UNESCO
collection DSpace
country Francia
countrycode FR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-aquadocs
tag biblioteca
region Europa del Oeste
libraryname Repositorio AQUADOCS
language English
topic Ecology
Management
North Carolina NERRS
Southeastern estuaries
Ecological condition
Benthic communities
Sediment and tissue contaminants
Integrated Ecosystem Assessments
Ecology
Management
North Carolina NERRS
Southeastern estuaries
Ecological condition
Benthic communities
Sediment and tissue contaminants
Integrated Ecosystem Assessments
spellingShingle Ecology
Management
North Carolina NERRS
Southeastern estuaries
Ecological condition
Benthic communities
Sediment and tissue contaminants
Integrated Ecosystem Assessments
Ecology
Management
North Carolina NERRS
Southeastern estuaries
Ecological condition
Benthic communities
Sediment and tissue contaminants
Integrated Ecosystem Assessments
Cooksey, Cynthia
Hyland, Jeff
Wirth, Ed
Balthis, W. Leonard
Fulton, Mike
Whitall, David
White, Susan
Support for Integrated Ecosystem Assessments of NOAA’s National Estuarine Research Reserves System (NERRS), Volume II: Assessment of Ecological Condition and Stressor Impacts in Subtidal Waters of the North Carolina NERRS
description A study was conducted to assess the status of ecological condition and potential human-health risks in subtidal estuarine waters throughout the North Carolina National Estuarine Research Reserve System (NERRS) (Currituck Sound, Rachel Carson, Masonboro Island, and Zeke’s Island). Field work was conducted in September 2006 and incorporated multiple indicators of ecosystem condition including measures of water quality (dissolved oxygen, salinity,temperature, pH, nutrients and chlorophyll, suspended solids), sediment quality (granulometry, organic matter content, chemical contaminant concentrations), biological condition (diversity and abundances of benthic fauna, fish contaminant levels and pathologies), and human dimensions (fish-tissue contaminant levels relative to human-health consumption limits, various aesthetic properties). A probabilistic sampling design permitted statistical estimation of the spatial extent of degraded versus non-degraded condition across these estuaries relative tospecified threshold levels of the various indicators (where possible). With some exceptions, the status of these reserves appeared to be in relatively good to fair ecological condition overall, with the majority of the area (about 54%) having various water quality, sediment quality, and biological (benthic) condition indicators rated in the healthy to intermediate range of corresponding guideline thresholds. Only three stations, representing 10.5% of the area, had one or more of these indicators rated as poor/degraded in all three categories. While such aconclusion is encouraging from a coastal management perspective, it should be viewed with some caution. For example, although co-occurrences of adverse biological and abiotic environmental conditions were limited, at least one indicator of ecological condition rated in the poor/degraded range was observed over a broader area (35.5%) represented by 11 of the 30 stations sampled. In addition, the fish-tissue contaminant data were not included in these overall spatial estimates; however, the majority of samples (77% of fish that were analyzed, from 79%, of stations where fish were caught) contained inorganic arsenic above the consumption limits for human cancer risks, though most likely derived from natural sources. Similarly, aesthetic indicators are not reflected in these spatial estimates of ecological condition, though there was evidence of noxious odors in sediments at many of the stations. Such symptoms reflect a growing realization that North Carolina estuaries are under multiple pressures from a variety of natural and human influences. These data also suggest that, while the current status of overallecological condition appears to be good to fair, long-term monitoring is warranted to track potential changes in the future. This study establishes an important baseline of overall ecological condition within NC NERRS that can be used to evaluate any such future changes and to triggerappropriate management actions in this rapidly evolving coastal environment. (PDF contains 76 pages)
format monograph
topic_facet Ecology
Management
North Carolina NERRS
Southeastern estuaries
Ecological condition
Benthic communities
Sediment and tissue contaminants
Integrated Ecosystem Assessments
author Cooksey, Cynthia
Hyland, Jeff
Wirth, Ed
Balthis, W. Leonard
Fulton, Mike
Whitall, David
White, Susan
author_facet Cooksey, Cynthia
Hyland, Jeff
Wirth, Ed
Balthis, W. Leonard
Fulton, Mike
Whitall, David
White, Susan
author_sort Cooksey, Cynthia
title Support for Integrated Ecosystem Assessments of NOAA’s National Estuarine Research Reserves System (NERRS), Volume II: Assessment of Ecological Condition and Stressor Impacts in Subtidal Waters of the North Carolina NERRS
title_short Support for Integrated Ecosystem Assessments of NOAA’s National Estuarine Research Reserves System (NERRS), Volume II: Assessment of Ecological Condition and Stressor Impacts in Subtidal Waters of the North Carolina NERRS
title_full Support for Integrated Ecosystem Assessments of NOAA’s National Estuarine Research Reserves System (NERRS), Volume II: Assessment of Ecological Condition and Stressor Impacts in Subtidal Waters of the North Carolina NERRS
title_fullStr Support for Integrated Ecosystem Assessments of NOAA’s National Estuarine Research Reserves System (NERRS), Volume II: Assessment of Ecological Condition and Stressor Impacts in Subtidal Waters of the North Carolina NERRS
title_full_unstemmed Support for Integrated Ecosystem Assessments of NOAA’s National Estuarine Research Reserves System (NERRS), Volume II: Assessment of Ecological Condition and Stressor Impacts in Subtidal Waters of the North Carolina NERRS
title_sort support for integrated ecosystem assessments of noaa’s national estuarine research reserves system (nerrs), volume ii: assessment of ecological condition and stressor impacts in subtidal waters of the north carolina nerrs
publisher NOAA/NOS/National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science/Center for Coastal Environmental Health and Biomolecular Research
publishDate 2008
url http://hdl.handle.net/1834/19933
work_keys_str_mv AT cookseycynthia supportforintegratedecosystemassessmentsofnoaasnationalestuarineresearchreservessystemnerrsvolumeiiassessmentofecologicalconditionandstressorimpactsinsubtidalwatersofthenorthcarolinanerrs
AT hylandjeff supportforintegratedecosystemassessmentsofnoaasnationalestuarineresearchreservessystemnerrsvolumeiiassessmentofecologicalconditionandstressorimpactsinsubtidalwatersofthenorthcarolinanerrs
AT wirthed supportforintegratedecosystemassessmentsofnoaasnationalestuarineresearchreservessystemnerrsvolumeiiassessmentofecologicalconditionandstressorimpactsinsubtidalwatersofthenorthcarolinanerrs
AT balthiswleonard supportforintegratedecosystemassessmentsofnoaasnationalestuarineresearchreservessystemnerrsvolumeiiassessmentofecologicalconditionandstressorimpactsinsubtidalwatersofthenorthcarolinanerrs
AT fultonmike supportforintegratedecosystemassessmentsofnoaasnationalestuarineresearchreservessystemnerrsvolumeiiassessmentofecologicalconditionandstressorimpactsinsubtidalwatersofthenorthcarolinanerrs
AT whitalldavid supportforintegratedecosystemassessmentsofnoaasnationalestuarineresearchreservessystemnerrsvolumeiiassessmentofecologicalconditionandstressorimpactsinsubtidalwatersofthenorthcarolinanerrs
AT whitesusan supportforintegratedecosystemassessmentsofnoaasnationalestuarineresearchreservessystemnerrsvolumeiiassessmentofecologicalconditionandstressorimpactsinsubtidalwatersofthenorthcarolinanerrs
_version_ 1756077296623550464