The contribution of multiple use forest management to small farmers' Annual Incomes in the Eastern Amazon.

Small-scale farmers in the Brazilian Amazon collectively hold tenure over more than 12 million ha of permanent forest reserves, as required by the Forest Code. The trade-off between forest conservation and other land uses entails opportunity costs for them and for the country, which have not been sufficiently studied. We assessed the potential income generated by multiple use forest management for farmers and compared it to the income potentially derived from six other agricultural land uses. Income from the forest was from (i) logging, carried out by a logging company in partnership with farmers? associations; and (ii) harvesting the seeds of Carapa guianensis (local name andiroba) for the production of oil. We then compared the income generated by multiple-use forest management with the income from different types of agrarian systems. According to our calculations in this study, the mean annual economic benefits from multiple forest use are the same as the least productive agrarian system, but only 25% of the annual income generated by the most productive system. Although the income generated by logging may be considered low when calculated on an annual basis and compared to incomes generated by agriculture, the one-time payment after logging is significant (US$5,800 to US$33,508) and could be used to implement more intensive and productive cropping systems such as planting black pepper. The income from forest management could also be used to establish permanent fields in deforested areas for highly productive annual crops using conservation agriculture techniques. These techniques are alternatives to the traditional land use based on periodic clearing of the forest. Nevertheless, the shift in current practices towards adoption of more sustainable conservation agriculture techniques will also require the technical and legal support of the State to help small farmers apply these alternatives, which aim to integrate forest management in sustainable agricultural production systems.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: SIST, P., SABLAYROLLES, P., BARTHELON, S., SOUSA-OTA, L., KIBLER, J.-F., RUSCHEL, A., SANTOS-MELO, M., EZZINE-DE-BLAS, D.
Other Authors: Plinio Sist, CIRAD; Philippe Sablayrolles, Gret (Groupe de recherche et d'échanges technologiques); Sophie Barthelon, Gret (Groupe de recherche et d'échanges technologiques); Liz Sousa-Ota, UNESP; Jean-François Kibler, Gret (Groupe de recherche et d'échanges technologiques); ADEMIR ROBERTO RUSCHEL, CPATU; Marcelo Santos-Melo, Serviço Florestal Brasileiro MMA/SFB; Driss Ezzine-de-Blas, CIRAD.
Format: Artigo de periódico biblioteca
Language:English
eng
Published: 2014-06-27
Subjects:Manejo florestal, Uso múltiplo, Manejo florestal comunitário, Produto florestal não-madeireiro, Multiple-use forest management, Non-timber forest products, Small farming., Agricultura Familiar., Amazonia, community forestry.,
Online Access:http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/989173
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/f5071508
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-alice-doc-989173
record_format koha
spelling dig-alice-doc-9891732017-08-16T00:58:13Z The contribution of multiple use forest management to small farmers' Annual Incomes in the Eastern Amazon. SIST, P. SABLAYROLLES, P. BARTHELON, S. SOUSA-OTA, L. KIBLER, J.-F. RUSCHEL, A. SANTOS-MELO, M. EZZINE-DE-BLAS, D. Plinio Sist, CIRAD; Philippe Sablayrolles, Gret (Groupe de recherche et d'échanges technologiques); Sophie Barthelon, Gret (Groupe de recherche et d'échanges technologiques); Liz Sousa-Ota, UNESP; Jean-François Kibler, Gret (Groupe de recherche et d'échanges technologiques); ADEMIR ROBERTO RUSCHEL, CPATU; Marcelo Santos-Melo, Serviço Florestal Brasileiro MMA/SFB; Driss Ezzine-de-Blas, CIRAD. Manejo florestal Uso múltiplo Manejo florestal comunitário Produto florestal não-madeireiro Multiple-use forest management Non-timber forest products Small farming. Agricultura Familiar. Amazonia community forestry. Small-scale farmers in the Brazilian Amazon collectively hold tenure over more than 12 million ha of permanent forest reserves, as required by the Forest Code. The trade-off between forest conservation and other land uses entails opportunity costs for them and for the country, which have not been sufficiently studied. We assessed the potential income generated by multiple use forest management for farmers and compared it to the income potentially derived from six other agricultural land uses. Income from the forest was from (i) logging, carried out by a logging company in partnership with farmers? associations; and (ii) harvesting the seeds of Carapa guianensis (local name andiroba) for the production of oil. We then compared the income generated by multiple-use forest management with the income from different types of agrarian systems. According to our calculations in this study, the mean annual economic benefits from multiple forest use are the same as the least productive agrarian system, but only 25% of the annual income generated by the most productive system. Although the income generated by logging may be considered low when calculated on an annual basis and compared to incomes generated by agriculture, the one-time payment after logging is significant (US$5,800 to US$33,508) and could be used to implement more intensive and productive cropping systems such as planting black pepper. The income from forest management could also be used to establish permanent fields in deforested areas for highly productive annual crops using conservation agriculture techniques. These techniques are alternatives to the traditional land use based on periodic clearing of the forest. Nevertheless, the shift in current practices towards adoption of more sustainable conservation agriculture techniques will also require the technical and legal support of the State to help small farmers apply these alternatives, which aim to integrate forest management in sustainable agricultural production systems. 2014-06-27T11:11:11Z 2014-06-27T11:11:11Z 2014-06-27 2014 2015-04-07T11:11:11Z Artigo de periódico Forests, v. 5, n. 7, p. 1508-1531, 2014. http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/989173 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/f5071508 en eng openAccess
institution EMBRAPA
collection DSpace
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-alice
tag biblioteca
region America del Sur
libraryname Sistema de bibliotecas de EMBRAPA
language English
eng
topic Manejo florestal
Uso múltiplo
Manejo florestal comunitário
Produto florestal não-madeireiro
Multiple-use forest management
Non-timber forest products
Small farming.
Agricultura Familiar.
Amazonia
community forestry.
Manejo florestal
Uso múltiplo
Manejo florestal comunitário
Produto florestal não-madeireiro
Multiple-use forest management
Non-timber forest products
Small farming.
Agricultura Familiar.
Amazonia
community forestry.
spellingShingle Manejo florestal
Uso múltiplo
Manejo florestal comunitário
Produto florestal não-madeireiro
Multiple-use forest management
Non-timber forest products
Small farming.
Agricultura Familiar.
Amazonia
community forestry.
Manejo florestal
Uso múltiplo
Manejo florestal comunitário
Produto florestal não-madeireiro
Multiple-use forest management
Non-timber forest products
Small farming.
Agricultura Familiar.
Amazonia
community forestry.
SIST, P.
SABLAYROLLES, P.
BARTHELON, S.
SOUSA-OTA, L.
KIBLER, J.-F.
RUSCHEL, A.
SANTOS-MELO, M.
EZZINE-DE-BLAS, D.
The contribution of multiple use forest management to small farmers' Annual Incomes in the Eastern Amazon.
description Small-scale farmers in the Brazilian Amazon collectively hold tenure over more than 12 million ha of permanent forest reserves, as required by the Forest Code. The trade-off between forest conservation and other land uses entails opportunity costs for them and for the country, which have not been sufficiently studied. We assessed the potential income generated by multiple use forest management for farmers and compared it to the income potentially derived from six other agricultural land uses. Income from the forest was from (i) logging, carried out by a logging company in partnership with farmers? associations; and (ii) harvesting the seeds of Carapa guianensis (local name andiroba) for the production of oil. We then compared the income generated by multiple-use forest management with the income from different types of agrarian systems. According to our calculations in this study, the mean annual economic benefits from multiple forest use are the same as the least productive agrarian system, but only 25% of the annual income generated by the most productive system. Although the income generated by logging may be considered low when calculated on an annual basis and compared to incomes generated by agriculture, the one-time payment after logging is significant (US$5,800 to US$33,508) and could be used to implement more intensive and productive cropping systems such as planting black pepper. The income from forest management could also be used to establish permanent fields in deforested areas for highly productive annual crops using conservation agriculture techniques. These techniques are alternatives to the traditional land use based on periodic clearing of the forest. Nevertheless, the shift in current practices towards adoption of more sustainable conservation agriculture techniques will also require the technical and legal support of the State to help small farmers apply these alternatives, which aim to integrate forest management in sustainable agricultural production systems.
author2 Plinio Sist, CIRAD; Philippe Sablayrolles, Gret (Groupe de recherche et d'échanges technologiques); Sophie Barthelon, Gret (Groupe de recherche et d'échanges technologiques); Liz Sousa-Ota, UNESP; Jean-François Kibler, Gret (Groupe de recherche et d'échanges technologiques); ADEMIR ROBERTO RUSCHEL, CPATU; Marcelo Santos-Melo, Serviço Florestal Brasileiro MMA/SFB; Driss Ezzine-de-Blas, CIRAD.
author_facet Plinio Sist, CIRAD; Philippe Sablayrolles, Gret (Groupe de recherche et d'échanges technologiques); Sophie Barthelon, Gret (Groupe de recherche et d'échanges technologiques); Liz Sousa-Ota, UNESP; Jean-François Kibler, Gret (Groupe de recherche et d'échanges technologiques); ADEMIR ROBERTO RUSCHEL, CPATU; Marcelo Santos-Melo, Serviço Florestal Brasileiro MMA/SFB; Driss Ezzine-de-Blas, CIRAD.
SIST, P.
SABLAYROLLES, P.
BARTHELON, S.
SOUSA-OTA, L.
KIBLER, J.-F.
RUSCHEL, A.
SANTOS-MELO, M.
EZZINE-DE-BLAS, D.
format Artigo de periódico
topic_facet Manejo florestal
Uso múltiplo
Manejo florestal comunitário
Produto florestal não-madeireiro
Multiple-use forest management
Non-timber forest products
Small farming.
Agricultura Familiar.
Amazonia
community forestry.
author SIST, P.
SABLAYROLLES, P.
BARTHELON, S.
SOUSA-OTA, L.
KIBLER, J.-F.
RUSCHEL, A.
SANTOS-MELO, M.
EZZINE-DE-BLAS, D.
author_sort SIST, P.
title The contribution of multiple use forest management to small farmers' Annual Incomes in the Eastern Amazon.
title_short The contribution of multiple use forest management to small farmers' Annual Incomes in the Eastern Amazon.
title_full The contribution of multiple use forest management to small farmers' Annual Incomes in the Eastern Amazon.
title_fullStr The contribution of multiple use forest management to small farmers' Annual Incomes in the Eastern Amazon.
title_full_unstemmed The contribution of multiple use forest management to small farmers' Annual Incomes in the Eastern Amazon.
title_sort contribution of multiple use forest management to small farmers' annual incomes in the eastern amazon.
publishDate 2014-06-27
url http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/989173
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/f5071508
work_keys_str_mv AT sistp thecontributionofmultipleuseforestmanagementtosmallfarmersannualincomesintheeasternamazon
AT sablayrollesp thecontributionofmultipleuseforestmanagementtosmallfarmersannualincomesintheeasternamazon
AT barthelons thecontributionofmultipleuseforestmanagementtosmallfarmersannualincomesintheeasternamazon
AT sousaotal thecontributionofmultipleuseforestmanagementtosmallfarmersannualincomesintheeasternamazon
AT kiblerjf thecontributionofmultipleuseforestmanagementtosmallfarmersannualincomesintheeasternamazon
AT ruschela thecontributionofmultipleuseforestmanagementtosmallfarmersannualincomesintheeasternamazon
AT santosmelom thecontributionofmultipleuseforestmanagementtosmallfarmersannualincomesintheeasternamazon
AT ezzinedeblasd thecontributionofmultipleuseforestmanagementtosmallfarmersannualincomesintheeasternamazon
AT sistp contributionofmultipleuseforestmanagementtosmallfarmersannualincomesintheeasternamazon
AT sablayrollesp contributionofmultipleuseforestmanagementtosmallfarmersannualincomesintheeasternamazon
AT barthelons contributionofmultipleuseforestmanagementtosmallfarmersannualincomesintheeasternamazon
AT sousaotal contributionofmultipleuseforestmanagementtosmallfarmersannualincomesintheeasternamazon
AT kiblerjf contributionofmultipleuseforestmanagementtosmallfarmersannualincomesintheeasternamazon
AT ruschela contributionofmultipleuseforestmanagementtosmallfarmersannualincomesintheeasternamazon
AT santosmelom contributionofmultipleuseforestmanagementtosmallfarmersannualincomesintheeasternamazon
AT ezzinedeblasd contributionofmultipleuseforestmanagementtosmallfarmersannualincomesintheeasternamazon
_version_ 1756019682354135040