Comparison of land-cover classification methods in the Brazilian Amazon Basin.

Four distinctly different classifiers were used to analyze multispectral data. Which of these classifiers is most suitable for a specific study area is not always clear. This paper provides a comparison of minimum-distance classifier (MDC), maximumlikelihood classifier (MLC), extraction and classification of homogeneous objects (ECHO), and decision-tree classifier based on linear spectral mixture analysis (DTC-LSMA). Each of the classifiers used both Landsat Thematic Mapper data and identical field-based training sample datasets in a western Brazilian Amazon study area. Seven land-cover classes? mature forest, advanced secondary succession, initial secondary succession, pasture lands, agricultural lands, bare lands, and water?were classified. Classification results indicate that the DTC-LSMA and ECHO classifiers were more accurate than were the MDC and MLC. The overall accuracy of the DTCLSMA approach was 86 percent with a 0.82 kappa coefficient and ECHO had an accuracy of 83 percent with a 0.79 kappa coefficient. The accuracy of the other classifiers ranged from 77 to 80 percent with kappa coefficients from 0.72 to 0.75.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: LU, D., MAUSEL, P., BATISTELLA, M., MORAN, E.
Other Authors: 1-2 e 4: Indiana University; 3: Embrapa Monitoramento por Satélite.
Format: Artigo de periódico biblioteca
Language:English
eng
Published: 2004-04-29
Subjects:Mapeamento, Amazonia brasileira, Amazonas., Bacia Hidrográfica, Floresta Tropical Úmida, Satélite.,
Online Access:http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/17039
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-alice-doc-17039
record_format koha
spelling dig-alice-doc-170392017-08-16T00:53:02Z Comparison of land-cover classification methods in the Brazilian Amazon Basin. LU, D. MAUSEL, P. BATISTELLA, M. MORAN, E. 1-2 e 4: Indiana University; 3: Embrapa Monitoramento por Satélite. Mapeamento Amazonia brasileira Amazonas. Bacia Hidrográfica Floresta Tropical Úmida Satélite. Four distinctly different classifiers were used to analyze multispectral data. Which of these classifiers is most suitable for a specific study area is not always clear. This paper provides a comparison of minimum-distance classifier (MDC), maximumlikelihood classifier (MLC), extraction and classification of homogeneous objects (ECHO), and decision-tree classifier based on linear spectral mixture analysis (DTC-LSMA). Each of the classifiers used both Landsat Thematic Mapper data and identical field-based training sample datasets in a western Brazilian Amazon study area. Seven land-cover classes? mature forest, advanced secondary succession, initial secondary succession, pasture lands, agricultural lands, bare lands, and water?were classified. Classification results indicate that the DTC-LSMA and ECHO classifiers were more accurate than were the MDC and MLC. The overall accuracy of the DTCLSMA approach was 86 percent with a 0.82 kappa coefficient and ECHO had an accuracy of 83 percent with a 0.79 kappa coefficient. The accuracy of the other classifiers ranged from 77 to 80 percent with kappa coefficients from 0.72 to 0.75. 2011-04-10T11:11:11Z 2011-04-10T11:11:11Z 2004-04-29 2004 2015-03-30T11:11:11Z Artigo de periódico Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, v. 70, n. 6, p. 723-731, jun. 2004. http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/17039 en eng openAccess
institution EMBRAPA
collection DSpace
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-alice
tag biblioteca
region America del Sur
libraryname Sistema de bibliotecas de EMBRAPA
language English
eng
topic Mapeamento
Amazonia brasileira
Amazonas.
Bacia Hidrográfica
Floresta Tropical Úmida
Satélite.
Mapeamento
Amazonia brasileira
Amazonas.
Bacia Hidrográfica
Floresta Tropical Úmida
Satélite.
spellingShingle Mapeamento
Amazonia brasileira
Amazonas.
Bacia Hidrográfica
Floresta Tropical Úmida
Satélite.
Mapeamento
Amazonia brasileira
Amazonas.
Bacia Hidrográfica
Floresta Tropical Úmida
Satélite.
LU, D.
MAUSEL, P.
BATISTELLA, M.
MORAN, E.
Comparison of land-cover classification methods in the Brazilian Amazon Basin.
description Four distinctly different classifiers were used to analyze multispectral data. Which of these classifiers is most suitable for a specific study area is not always clear. This paper provides a comparison of minimum-distance classifier (MDC), maximumlikelihood classifier (MLC), extraction and classification of homogeneous objects (ECHO), and decision-tree classifier based on linear spectral mixture analysis (DTC-LSMA). Each of the classifiers used both Landsat Thematic Mapper data and identical field-based training sample datasets in a western Brazilian Amazon study area. Seven land-cover classes? mature forest, advanced secondary succession, initial secondary succession, pasture lands, agricultural lands, bare lands, and water?were classified. Classification results indicate that the DTC-LSMA and ECHO classifiers were more accurate than were the MDC and MLC. The overall accuracy of the DTCLSMA approach was 86 percent with a 0.82 kappa coefficient and ECHO had an accuracy of 83 percent with a 0.79 kappa coefficient. The accuracy of the other classifiers ranged from 77 to 80 percent with kappa coefficients from 0.72 to 0.75.
author2 1-2 e 4: Indiana University; 3: Embrapa Monitoramento por Satélite.
author_facet 1-2 e 4: Indiana University; 3: Embrapa Monitoramento por Satélite.
LU, D.
MAUSEL, P.
BATISTELLA, M.
MORAN, E.
format Artigo de periódico
topic_facet Mapeamento
Amazonia brasileira
Amazonas.
Bacia Hidrográfica
Floresta Tropical Úmida
Satélite.
author LU, D.
MAUSEL, P.
BATISTELLA, M.
MORAN, E.
author_sort LU, D.
title Comparison of land-cover classification methods in the Brazilian Amazon Basin.
title_short Comparison of land-cover classification methods in the Brazilian Amazon Basin.
title_full Comparison of land-cover classification methods in the Brazilian Amazon Basin.
title_fullStr Comparison of land-cover classification methods in the Brazilian Amazon Basin.
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of land-cover classification methods in the Brazilian Amazon Basin.
title_sort comparison of land-cover classification methods in the brazilian amazon basin.
publishDate 2004-04-29
url http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/17039
work_keys_str_mv AT lud comparisonoflandcoverclassificationmethodsinthebrazilianamazonbasin
AT mauselp comparisonoflandcoverclassificationmethodsinthebrazilianamazonbasin
AT batistellam comparisonoflandcoverclassificationmethodsinthebrazilianamazonbasin
AT morane comparisonoflandcoverclassificationmethodsinthebrazilianamazonbasin
_version_ 1756019742905204736