The effect of the harvesting frequency on the residual forage mass in mixed pastures.

The use of different forage species in a mixed pasture is recommended to improve forage mass and soil characteristics. However, the frequency of harvest (e.g.; grazing or hay) can increase the forage removal during the off-season, and affect the residual forage mass to the following crop, especially in the non-till crop-livestock systems. We aimed to assess the harvest frequency effect in a mixed pasture compounded by Urochloa ruziziensis, pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan ?Super N?); Sunflower (Helianthus annuus), and Buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum) on the residual forage mass at the Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril, in Sinop, MT, Brazil. The mixed were planted on March 10, 2020, after the soybean harvest. The experimental design was a randomized complete block design with three replicates. The treatments were four harvest frequencies. The harvesting frequencies were: Straw ? no-harvest during the off-season; Lax - with one harvest (at 115 days after planting); Moderate - two harvests (80 and 115 days after planting); and Heavy - three harvests (45, 80, and 115 days after The plots were harvested at 20-cm stubble height and there were not fertilized. On September 30, 2020, forage mass was harvested using three quadrats (0.5 m2) per plot, at soil level, to calculate residual forage mass, which was desiccated (4 L ha-1 of glyphosate) on October 23, 2020. The soybean (BG4781, Brevant) was seeded on November 07, when 88 kg of P2O5 was applied. On December 01, 68 kg of K surface-applied. The crop management practices (e.g.; herbicide, insecticide, and fungicide) were similar to all plots, and on March 09, 2021, the soybean was harvested (data not showed). The residual forage mass was affected by the harvesting frequency (P=0.0296). The greatest residual forage mass was measured in the treatment where there was no harvesting (straw), on average 5625 kg DM ha-1. On the other hand, lax, moderate and heavy treatments presented similar residual forage mass (on average, 3000 kg DM ha-1). We concluded that although the residual forage mass was reduced when the off-season pastures were harvested, the number of harvest events did not affect the forage mass left on the field to assure the non-till cropping system. It is important to mention the soybean grain yield needs to be measured in the following crop season to understand the effect of the harvesting frequency during the off-season.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: MATOS, B. F. de, ARAÚJO, G. P. de, BEHLING NETO, A., WRUCK, F. J., OLIVEIRA JUNIOR, O. L. de, PEDREIRA, B. C. e
Other Authors: BETANIA FLORENCIO DE MATOS, UFMT, Sinop-MT; GRAZIELA PAULA DE ARAÚJO, UFMT, Sinop-MT; ARTHUR BEHLING NETO, UFMT, Sinop-MT; FLAVIO JESUS WRUCK, CPAMT; ORLANDO LUCIO DE OLIVEIRA JUNIOR, CPAMT; BRUNO CARNEIRO E PEDREIRA, CPAMT.
Format: Anais e Proceedings de eventos biblioteca
Language:Ingles
English
Published: 2021-12-06
Subjects:Colheita, Forragem, Pastagem Mista, Herbicida, Inseticida, Fungicida, Livestock, Cropping systems, Urochloa ruziziensis, Helianthus,
Online Access:http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1137189
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-alice-doc-1137189
record_format koha
spelling dig-alice-doc-11371892021-12-07T02:11:26Z The effect of the harvesting frequency on the residual forage mass in mixed pastures. MATOS, B. F. de ARAÚJO, G. P. de BEHLING NETO, A. WRUCK, F. J. OLIVEIRA JUNIOR, O. L. de PEDREIRA, B. C. e BETANIA FLORENCIO DE MATOS, UFMT, Sinop-MT; GRAZIELA PAULA DE ARAÚJO, UFMT, Sinop-MT; ARTHUR BEHLING NETO, UFMT, Sinop-MT; FLAVIO JESUS WRUCK, CPAMT; ORLANDO LUCIO DE OLIVEIRA JUNIOR, CPAMT; BRUNO CARNEIRO E PEDREIRA, CPAMT. Colheita Forragem Pastagem Mista Herbicida Inseticida Fungicida Livestock Cropping systems Urochloa ruziziensis Helianthus The use of different forage species in a mixed pasture is recommended to improve forage mass and soil characteristics. However, the frequency of harvest (e.g.; grazing or hay) can increase the forage removal during the off-season, and affect the residual forage mass to the following crop, especially in the non-till crop-livestock systems. We aimed to assess the harvest frequency effect in a mixed pasture compounded by Urochloa ruziziensis, pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan ?Super N?); Sunflower (Helianthus annuus), and Buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum) on the residual forage mass at the Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril, in Sinop, MT, Brazil. The mixed were planted on March 10, 2020, after the soybean harvest. The experimental design was a randomized complete block design with three replicates. The treatments were four harvest frequencies. The harvesting frequencies were: Straw ? no-harvest during the off-season; Lax - with one harvest (at 115 days after planting); Moderate - two harvests (80 and 115 days after planting); and Heavy - three harvests (45, 80, and 115 days after The plots were harvested at 20-cm stubble height and there were not fertilized. On September 30, 2020, forage mass was harvested using three quadrats (0.5 m2) per plot, at soil level, to calculate residual forage mass, which was desiccated (4 L ha-1 of glyphosate) on October 23, 2020. The soybean (BG4781, Brevant) was seeded on November 07, when 88 kg of P2O5 was applied. On December 01, 68 kg of K surface-applied. The crop management practices (e.g.; herbicide, insecticide, and fungicide) were similar to all plots, and on March 09, 2021, the soybean was harvested (data not showed). The residual forage mass was affected by the harvesting frequency (P=0.0296). The greatest residual forage mass was measured in the treatment where there was no harvesting (straw), on average 5625 kg DM ha-1. On the other hand, lax, moderate and heavy treatments presented similar residual forage mass (on average, 3000 kg DM ha-1). We concluded that although the residual forage mass was reduced when the off-season pastures were harvested, the number of harvest events did not affect the forage mass left on the field to assure the non-till cropping system. It is important to mention the soybean grain yield needs to be measured in the following crop season to understand the effect of the harvesting frequency during the off-season. Evento virtual. 2021-12-07T02:11:18Z 2021-12-07T02:11:18Z 2021-12-06 2021 Anais e Proceedings de eventos In: REUNIÃO ANUAL DA SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE ZOOTECNIA, 56., 2021, Florianópolis. Animal science: challenges in production and sustainability: proceedings... Brasília, DF: Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia, 2021. p. 108. http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1137189 Ingles en openAccess
institution EMBRAPA
collection DSpace
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-alice
tag biblioteca
region America del Sur
libraryname Sistema de bibliotecas de EMBRAPA
language Ingles
English
topic Colheita
Forragem
Pastagem Mista
Herbicida
Inseticida
Fungicida
Livestock
Cropping systems
Urochloa ruziziensis
Helianthus
Colheita
Forragem
Pastagem Mista
Herbicida
Inseticida
Fungicida
Livestock
Cropping systems
Urochloa ruziziensis
Helianthus
spellingShingle Colheita
Forragem
Pastagem Mista
Herbicida
Inseticida
Fungicida
Livestock
Cropping systems
Urochloa ruziziensis
Helianthus
Colheita
Forragem
Pastagem Mista
Herbicida
Inseticida
Fungicida
Livestock
Cropping systems
Urochloa ruziziensis
Helianthus
MATOS, B. F. de
ARAÚJO, G. P. de
BEHLING NETO, A.
WRUCK, F. J.
OLIVEIRA JUNIOR, O. L. de
PEDREIRA, B. C. e
The effect of the harvesting frequency on the residual forage mass in mixed pastures.
description The use of different forage species in a mixed pasture is recommended to improve forage mass and soil characteristics. However, the frequency of harvest (e.g.; grazing or hay) can increase the forage removal during the off-season, and affect the residual forage mass to the following crop, especially in the non-till crop-livestock systems. We aimed to assess the harvest frequency effect in a mixed pasture compounded by Urochloa ruziziensis, pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan ?Super N?); Sunflower (Helianthus annuus), and Buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum) on the residual forage mass at the Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril, in Sinop, MT, Brazil. The mixed were planted on March 10, 2020, after the soybean harvest. The experimental design was a randomized complete block design with three replicates. The treatments were four harvest frequencies. The harvesting frequencies were: Straw ? no-harvest during the off-season; Lax - with one harvest (at 115 days after planting); Moderate - two harvests (80 and 115 days after planting); and Heavy - three harvests (45, 80, and 115 days after The plots were harvested at 20-cm stubble height and there were not fertilized. On September 30, 2020, forage mass was harvested using three quadrats (0.5 m2) per plot, at soil level, to calculate residual forage mass, which was desiccated (4 L ha-1 of glyphosate) on October 23, 2020. The soybean (BG4781, Brevant) was seeded on November 07, when 88 kg of P2O5 was applied. On December 01, 68 kg of K surface-applied. The crop management practices (e.g.; herbicide, insecticide, and fungicide) were similar to all plots, and on March 09, 2021, the soybean was harvested (data not showed). The residual forage mass was affected by the harvesting frequency (P=0.0296). The greatest residual forage mass was measured in the treatment where there was no harvesting (straw), on average 5625 kg DM ha-1. On the other hand, lax, moderate and heavy treatments presented similar residual forage mass (on average, 3000 kg DM ha-1). We concluded that although the residual forage mass was reduced when the off-season pastures were harvested, the number of harvest events did not affect the forage mass left on the field to assure the non-till cropping system. It is important to mention the soybean grain yield needs to be measured in the following crop season to understand the effect of the harvesting frequency during the off-season.
author2 BETANIA FLORENCIO DE MATOS, UFMT, Sinop-MT; GRAZIELA PAULA DE ARAÚJO, UFMT, Sinop-MT; ARTHUR BEHLING NETO, UFMT, Sinop-MT; FLAVIO JESUS WRUCK, CPAMT; ORLANDO LUCIO DE OLIVEIRA JUNIOR, CPAMT; BRUNO CARNEIRO E PEDREIRA, CPAMT.
author_facet BETANIA FLORENCIO DE MATOS, UFMT, Sinop-MT; GRAZIELA PAULA DE ARAÚJO, UFMT, Sinop-MT; ARTHUR BEHLING NETO, UFMT, Sinop-MT; FLAVIO JESUS WRUCK, CPAMT; ORLANDO LUCIO DE OLIVEIRA JUNIOR, CPAMT; BRUNO CARNEIRO E PEDREIRA, CPAMT.
MATOS, B. F. de
ARAÚJO, G. P. de
BEHLING NETO, A.
WRUCK, F. J.
OLIVEIRA JUNIOR, O. L. de
PEDREIRA, B. C. e
format Anais e Proceedings de eventos
topic_facet Colheita
Forragem
Pastagem Mista
Herbicida
Inseticida
Fungicida
Livestock
Cropping systems
Urochloa ruziziensis
Helianthus
author MATOS, B. F. de
ARAÚJO, G. P. de
BEHLING NETO, A.
WRUCK, F. J.
OLIVEIRA JUNIOR, O. L. de
PEDREIRA, B. C. e
author_sort MATOS, B. F. de
title The effect of the harvesting frequency on the residual forage mass in mixed pastures.
title_short The effect of the harvesting frequency on the residual forage mass in mixed pastures.
title_full The effect of the harvesting frequency on the residual forage mass in mixed pastures.
title_fullStr The effect of the harvesting frequency on the residual forage mass in mixed pastures.
title_full_unstemmed The effect of the harvesting frequency on the residual forage mass in mixed pastures.
title_sort effect of the harvesting frequency on the residual forage mass in mixed pastures.
publishDate 2021-12-06
url http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1137189
work_keys_str_mv AT matosbfde theeffectoftheharvestingfrequencyontheresidualforagemassinmixedpastures
AT araujogpde theeffectoftheharvestingfrequencyontheresidualforagemassinmixedpastures
AT behlingnetoa theeffectoftheharvestingfrequencyontheresidualforagemassinmixedpastures
AT wruckfj theeffectoftheharvestingfrequencyontheresidualforagemassinmixedpastures
AT oliveirajuniorolde theeffectoftheharvestingfrequencyontheresidualforagemassinmixedpastures
AT pedreirabce theeffectoftheharvestingfrequencyontheresidualforagemassinmixedpastures
AT matosbfde effectoftheharvestingfrequencyontheresidualforagemassinmixedpastures
AT araujogpde effectoftheharvestingfrequencyontheresidualforagemassinmixedpastures
AT behlingnetoa effectoftheharvestingfrequencyontheresidualforagemassinmixedpastures
AT wruckfj effectoftheharvestingfrequencyontheresidualforagemassinmixedpastures
AT oliveirajuniorolde effectoftheharvestingfrequencyontheresidualforagemassinmixedpastures
AT pedreirabce effectoftheharvestingfrequencyontheresidualforagemassinmixedpastures
_version_ 1756027861584576512