Tussocks density, root and stubble mass of Quênia and Tamani guineagrass.

The forage use in animal production is functional and can be consider a strongly feed resource in the Brazilian livestock systems. Since grazing management has been studied, the understanding of organic reserves in forage plants is a challenge. The regrowth speed and longevity are function of recovery plant capacity after defoliation, what is highly influenced by harvest management. The objective with this study was to evaluate tussocks density, root and stubble mass Panicum maximum BRS Quenia and BRS Tamani. Pastures were submitted to intermittent grazing (95% of light interception) with two grazing intensities defined by postgrazing height: 20 and 35 cm for Quenia, and 15 and 25 cm for Tamani. The experiment was carried out at Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril, Sinop/MT, from March/15 to Dez/16, following a randomized complete block design, with tree replications. During the spring of 2016, after grazing, 3 tussocks were collect per experimental unit. Each tussock was fractionated in stubble (above soil) and root, washed and dried at 105 ° C for 1.5 hours and later at 55° for 72 hours. The tussocks quantification was done in 10 points per plot, using a frame of 1m². The data was analyzed using PROC MIXED of SAS statistical software. Treatments means were estimated by ?LSMEANS? compared by the probability of the difference (?pdiff?) at 5%. There is no cultivar and grazing intensity for root and stubble mass, and tussock density (P>0.05). Root mass was 1590 and 1915 kg ha-1 for Quenia and Tamani, respectively. The tussock density was, an average, 6.9 tussocks m-2, for both cultivars. Under lower intensity, the root and stubble mass were 1826 and 1293 kg ha-1, respectively. It did not differ in pastures under higher intensity, where 1683 and 1747 kg ha-1 were registered. Thus, Quenia and Tamani have well regrowth potential under different grazing intensity. The trigger for define the grazing end point for Tamani should be from 25 to 15 cm, and for Quenia from 35 to 20 cm,respectively.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: TESK, C. R. M., CAVALLI, J., PEREIRA, D. H., CARVALHO, P., ALMEIDA, R. M. de, FARIA, A. C. de, RAMOS, T. A., PEDREIRA, B. C. e
Other Authors: CÁTIA R. M. TESK, UFMT-SINOP; JOSIANA CAVALLI, UFMT-SINOP; DALTON H. PEREIRA, UFMT-SINOP; PERIVALDO CARVALHO, UFMT-CUIABA; RONNY M. DE ALMEIDA, UFMT-SINOP; ARTUR C. DE FARIA, UFMT-SINOP; THAYS A. RAMOS, UFMT-SINOP; BRUNO CARNEIRO E PEDREIRA, CPAMT.
Format: Separatas biblioteca
Language:English
eng
Published: 2018-01-25
Subjects:Forage plants, Grazing intensities, Forage, Grazing management,
Online Access:http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1086383
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-alice-doc-1086383
record_format koha
spelling dig-alice-doc-10863832018-01-25T23:40:20Z Tussocks density, root and stubble mass of Quênia and Tamani guineagrass. TESK, C. R. M. CAVALLI, J. PEREIRA, D. H. CARVALHO, P. ALMEIDA, R. M. de FARIA, A. C. de RAMOS, T. A. PEDREIRA, B. C. e CÁTIA R. M. TESK, UFMT-SINOP; JOSIANA CAVALLI, UFMT-SINOP; DALTON H. PEREIRA, UFMT-SINOP; PERIVALDO CARVALHO, UFMT-CUIABA; RONNY M. DE ALMEIDA, UFMT-SINOP; ARTUR C. DE FARIA, UFMT-SINOP; THAYS A. RAMOS, UFMT-SINOP; BRUNO CARNEIRO E PEDREIRA, CPAMT. Forage plants Grazing intensities Forage Grazing management The forage use in animal production is functional and can be consider a strongly feed resource in the Brazilian livestock systems. Since grazing management has been studied, the understanding of organic reserves in forage plants is a challenge. The regrowth speed and longevity are function of recovery plant capacity after defoliation, what is highly influenced by harvest management. The objective with this study was to evaluate tussocks density, root and stubble mass Panicum maximum BRS Quenia and BRS Tamani. Pastures were submitted to intermittent grazing (95% of light interception) with two grazing intensities defined by postgrazing height: 20 and 35 cm for Quenia, and 15 and 25 cm for Tamani. The experiment was carried out at Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril, Sinop/MT, from March/15 to Dez/16, following a randomized complete block design, with tree replications. During the spring of 2016, after grazing, 3 tussocks were collect per experimental unit. Each tussock was fractionated in stubble (above soil) and root, washed and dried at 105 ° C for 1.5 hours and later at 55° for 72 hours. The tussocks quantification was done in 10 points per plot, using a frame of 1m². The data was analyzed using PROC MIXED of SAS statistical software. Treatments means were estimated by ?LSMEANS? compared by the probability of the difference (?pdiff?) at 5%. There is no cultivar and grazing intensity for root and stubble mass, and tussock density (P>0.05). Root mass was 1590 and 1915 kg ha-1 for Quenia and Tamani, respectively. The tussock density was, an average, 6.9 tussocks m-2, for both cultivars. Under lower intensity, the root and stubble mass were 1826 and 1293 kg ha-1, respectively. It did not differ in pastures under higher intensity, where 1683 and 1747 kg ha-1 were registered. Thus, Quenia and Tamani have well regrowth potential under different grazing intensity. The trigger for define the grazing end point for Tamani should be from 25 to 15 cm, and for Quenia from 35 to 20 cm,respectively. 2018-01-25T23:40:14Z 2018-01-25T23:40:14Z 2018-01-25 2017 2018-01-25T23:40:14Z Separatas In: REUNIÃO ANUAL DA SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE ZOOTECNIA, 54., 2017, Foz do Iguaçu. A new view of animal science: challenges and perspectives: Proceedings. Foz do Iguaçu: SBZ, 2017. p. 728. 1983-4357 http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1086383 en eng openAccess
institution EMBRAPA
collection DSpace
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-alice
tag biblioteca
region America del Sur
libraryname Sistema de bibliotecas de EMBRAPA
language English
eng
topic Forage plants
Grazing intensities
Forage
Grazing management
Forage plants
Grazing intensities
Forage
Grazing management
spellingShingle Forage plants
Grazing intensities
Forage
Grazing management
Forage plants
Grazing intensities
Forage
Grazing management
TESK, C. R. M.
CAVALLI, J.
PEREIRA, D. H.
CARVALHO, P.
ALMEIDA, R. M. de
FARIA, A. C. de
RAMOS, T. A.
PEDREIRA, B. C. e
Tussocks density, root and stubble mass of Quênia and Tamani guineagrass.
description The forage use in animal production is functional and can be consider a strongly feed resource in the Brazilian livestock systems. Since grazing management has been studied, the understanding of organic reserves in forage plants is a challenge. The regrowth speed and longevity are function of recovery plant capacity after defoliation, what is highly influenced by harvest management. The objective with this study was to evaluate tussocks density, root and stubble mass Panicum maximum BRS Quenia and BRS Tamani. Pastures were submitted to intermittent grazing (95% of light interception) with two grazing intensities defined by postgrazing height: 20 and 35 cm for Quenia, and 15 and 25 cm for Tamani. The experiment was carried out at Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril, Sinop/MT, from March/15 to Dez/16, following a randomized complete block design, with tree replications. During the spring of 2016, after grazing, 3 tussocks were collect per experimental unit. Each tussock was fractionated in stubble (above soil) and root, washed and dried at 105 ° C for 1.5 hours and later at 55° for 72 hours. The tussocks quantification was done in 10 points per plot, using a frame of 1m². The data was analyzed using PROC MIXED of SAS statistical software. Treatments means were estimated by ?LSMEANS? compared by the probability of the difference (?pdiff?) at 5%. There is no cultivar and grazing intensity for root and stubble mass, and tussock density (P>0.05). Root mass was 1590 and 1915 kg ha-1 for Quenia and Tamani, respectively. The tussock density was, an average, 6.9 tussocks m-2, for both cultivars. Under lower intensity, the root and stubble mass were 1826 and 1293 kg ha-1, respectively. It did not differ in pastures under higher intensity, where 1683 and 1747 kg ha-1 were registered. Thus, Quenia and Tamani have well regrowth potential under different grazing intensity. The trigger for define the grazing end point for Tamani should be from 25 to 15 cm, and for Quenia from 35 to 20 cm,respectively.
author2 CÁTIA R. M. TESK, UFMT-SINOP; JOSIANA CAVALLI, UFMT-SINOP; DALTON H. PEREIRA, UFMT-SINOP; PERIVALDO CARVALHO, UFMT-CUIABA; RONNY M. DE ALMEIDA, UFMT-SINOP; ARTUR C. DE FARIA, UFMT-SINOP; THAYS A. RAMOS, UFMT-SINOP; BRUNO CARNEIRO E PEDREIRA, CPAMT.
author_facet CÁTIA R. M. TESK, UFMT-SINOP; JOSIANA CAVALLI, UFMT-SINOP; DALTON H. PEREIRA, UFMT-SINOP; PERIVALDO CARVALHO, UFMT-CUIABA; RONNY M. DE ALMEIDA, UFMT-SINOP; ARTUR C. DE FARIA, UFMT-SINOP; THAYS A. RAMOS, UFMT-SINOP; BRUNO CARNEIRO E PEDREIRA, CPAMT.
TESK, C. R. M.
CAVALLI, J.
PEREIRA, D. H.
CARVALHO, P.
ALMEIDA, R. M. de
FARIA, A. C. de
RAMOS, T. A.
PEDREIRA, B. C. e
format Separatas
topic_facet Forage plants
Grazing intensities
Forage
Grazing management
author TESK, C. R. M.
CAVALLI, J.
PEREIRA, D. H.
CARVALHO, P.
ALMEIDA, R. M. de
FARIA, A. C. de
RAMOS, T. A.
PEDREIRA, B. C. e
author_sort TESK, C. R. M.
title Tussocks density, root and stubble mass of Quênia and Tamani guineagrass.
title_short Tussocks density, root and stubble mass of Quênia and Tamani guineagrass.
title_full Tussocks density, root and stubble mass of Quênia and Tamani guineagrass.
title_fullStr Tussocks density, root and stubble mass of Quênia and Tamani guineagrass.
title_full_unstemmed Tussocks density, root and stubble mass of Quênia and Tamani guineagrass.
title_sort tussocks density, root and stubble mass of quênia and tamani guineagrass.
publishDate 2018-01-25
url http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1086383
work_keys_str_mv AT teskcrm tussocksdensityrootandstubblemassofqueniaandtamaniguineagrass
AT cavallij tussocksdensityrootandstubblemassofqueniaandtamaniguineagrass
AT pereiradh tussocksdensityrootandstubblemassofqueniaandtamaniguineagrass
AT carvalhop tussocksdensityrootandstubblemassofqueniaandtamaniguineagrass
AT almeidarmde tussocksdensityrootandstubblemassofqueniaandtamaniguineagrass
AT fariaacde tussocksdensityrootandstubblemassofqueniaandtamaniguineagrass
AT ramosta tussocksdensityrootandstubblemassofqueniaandtamaniguineagrass
AT pedreirabce tussocksdensityrootandstubblemassofqueniaandtamaniguineagrass
_version_ 1756024318585733120