Energy and economic efficiency of climate‑smart agriculture practices in a rice–wheat cropping system of India

Intensive tillage operations, indiscriminate use of irrigation water, chemical fertilizers, and pesticides and crop biomass burning have made the conventional rice–wheat (RW) system highly energyintensive and inefficient. In the recent past, portfolios of climate-smart agricultural practices (CSAP) have been promoted as a potential alternative to improve the energy efficiency in conventional RW system. Therefore, to evaluate the energy input–output relation, energy flow and economic efficiency in various combinations of crop management options, a 3-year (2014–2017) on-farm study was conducted at Karnal, India. Various portfolio of management practices; Sc1-Business as usual (BAU) or Conventional tillage (CT) without residue, Sc2-CT with residue, Sc3-Reduce tillage (RT) with residue + recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF), Sc4-RT/Zero tillage (ZT) with residue + RDF, Sc5-ZT with residue + RDF + GreenSeeker + Tensiometer, Sc6-Sc5 + Nutrient expert were investigated. Present study results revealed that net energy, energy use efficiency and energy productivity were 11–18, 31–51 and 29–53% higher under CSAP (mean of Sc4, Sc5 and Sc6) in RW system than Sc1, respectively. However, renewable and non-renewable energy inputs were 14 and 33% higher in Sc1 compared to CSAP (4028 and 49,547 MJ ha− 1), respectively, it showed that BAU practices mostly dependents on non-renewable energy sources whereas CSAP dependents on renewable energy sources. Similarly, the adoption of CSAP improved the biomass yield, net farm income and economic efficiency by 6–9, 18–23 and 42–58%, respectively compared to Sc1. Overall, the adoption of CSAP could be a viable alternative for improving energy use efficiency, farm profitability and eco-efficiency in the RW system.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kakraliya, SK, Jat, HS, Singh, Ishwar, Gora, MK, Kakraliya, Manish, Bijarniya, Deepak, Sharma, PC, Jat, ML
Other Authors: KALVANIA, Kailash Chandra
Language:English
Published: CIMMYT Research Data & Software Repository Network
Subjects:Agricultural Sciences,
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/11529/10548762
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dat-cimmyt-1152910548762
record_format Dataverse
spelling dat-cimmyt-11529105487622022-07-29T01:00:04ZEnergy and economic efficiency of climate‑smart agriculture practices in a rice–wheat cropping system of Indiahttps://hdl.handle.net/11529/10548762Kakraliya, SKJat, HSSingh, IshwarGora, MKKakraliya, ManishBijarniya, DeepakSharma, PCJat, MLCIMMYT Research Data & Software Repository NetworkIntensive tillage operations, indiscriminate use of irrigation water, chemical fertilizers, and pesticides and crop biomass burning have made the conventional rice–wheat (RW) system highly energyintensive and inefficient. In the recent past, portfolios of climate-smart agricultural practices (CSAP) have been promoted as a potential alternative to improve the energy efficiency in conventional RW system. Therefore, to evaluate the energy input–output relation, energy flow and economic efficiency in various combinations of crop management options, a 3-year (2014–2017) on-farm study was conducted at Karnal, India. Various portfolio of management practices; Sc1-Business as usual (BAU) or Conventional tillage (CT) without residue, Sc2-CT with residue, Sc3-Reduce tillage (RT) with residue + recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF), Sc4-RT/Zero tillage (ZT) with residue + RDF, Sc5-ZT with residue + RDF + GreenSeeker + Tensiometer, Sc6-Sc5 + Nutrient expert were investigated. Present study results revealed that net energy, energy use efficiency and energy productivity were 11–18, 31–51 and 29–53% higher under CSAP (mean of Sc4, Sc5 and Sc6) in RW system than Sc1, respectively. However, renewable and non-renewable energy inputs were 14 and 33% higher in Sc1 compared to CSAP (4028 and 49,547 MJ ha− 1), respectively, it showed that BAU practices mostly dependents on non-renewable energy sources whereas CSAP dependents on renewable energy sources. Similarly, the adoption of CSAP improved the biomass yield, net farm income and economic efficiency by 6–9, 18–23 and 42–58%, respectively compared to Sc1. Overall, the adoption of CSAP could be a viable alternative for improving energy use efficiency, farm profitability and eco-efficiency in the RW system.Agricultural SciencesEnglishKALVANIA, Kailash Chandra
institution CIMMYT
collection Dataverse
country México
countrycode MX
component Datos de investigación
access En linea
En linea
databasecode dat-cimmyt
tag biblioteca
region America del Norte
libraryname Centro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maíz y Trigo
language English
topic Agricultural Sciences
Agricultural Sciences
spellingShingle Agricultural Sciences
Agricultural Sciences
Kakraliya, SK
Jat, HS
Singh, Ishwar
Gora, MK
Kakraliya, Manish
Bijarniya, Deepak
Sharma, PC
Jat, ML
Energy and economic efficiency of climate‑smart agriculture practices in a rice–wheat cropping system of India
description Intensive tillage operations, indiscriminate use of irrigation water, chemical fertilizers, and pesticides and crop biomass burning have made the conventional rice–wheat (RW) system highly energyintensive and inefficient. In the recent past, portfolios of climate-smart agricultural practices (CSAP) have been promoted as a potential alternative to improve the energy efficiency in conventional RW system. Therefore, to evaluate the energy input–output relation, energy flow and economic efficiency in various combinations of crop management options, a 3-year (2014–2017) on-farm study was conducted at Karnal, India. Various portfolio of management practices; Sc1-Business as usual (BAU) or Conventional tillage (CT) without residue, Sc2-CT with residue, Sc3-Reduce tillage (RT) with residue + recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF), Sc4-RT/Zero tillage (ZT) with residue + RDF, Sc5-ZT with residue + RDF + GreenSeeker + Tensiometer, Sc6-Sc5 + Nutrient expert were investigated. Present study results revealed that net energy, energy use efficiency and energy productivity were 11–18, 31–51 and 29–53% higher under CSAP (mean of Sc4, Sc5 and Sc6) in RW system than Sc1, respectively. However, renewable and non-renewable energy inputs were 14 and 33% higher in Sc1 compared to CSAP (4028 and 49,547 MJ ha− 1), respectively, it showed that BAU practices mostly dependents on non-renewable energy sources whereas CSAP dependents on renewable energy sources. Similarly, the adoption of CSAP improved the biomass yield, net farm income and economic efficiency by 6–9, 18–23 and 42–58%, respectively compared to Sc1. Overall, the adoption of CSAP could be a viable alternative for improving energy use efficiency, farm profitability and eco-efficiency in the RW system.
author2 KALVANIA, Kailash Chandra
author_facet KALVANIA, Kailash Chandra
Kakraliya, SK
Jat, HS
Singh, Ishwar
Gora, MK
Kakraliya, Manish
Bijarniya, Deepak
Sharma, PC
Jat, ML
topic_facet Agricultural Sciences
author Kakraliya, SK
Jat, HS
Singh, Ishwar
Gora, MK
Kakraliya, Manish
Bijarniya, Deepak
Sharma, PC
Jat, ML
author_sort Kakraliya, SK
title Energy and economic efficiency of climate‑smart agriculture practices in a rice–wheat cropping system of India
title_short Energy and economic efficiency of climate‑smart agriculture practices in a rice–wheat cropping system of India
title_full Energy and economic efficiency of climate‑smart agriculture practices in a rice–wheat cropping system of India
title_fullStr Energy and economic efficiency of climate‑smart agriculture practices in a rice–wheat cropping system of India
title_full_unstemmed Energy and economic efficiency of climate‑smart agriculture practices in a rice–wheat cropping system of India
title_sort energy and economic efficiency of climate‑smart agriculture practices in a rice–wheat cropping system of india
publisher CIMMYT Research Data & Software Repository Network
url https://hdl.handle.net/11529/10548762
work_keys_str_mv AT kakraliyask energyandeconomicefficiencyofclimatesmartagriculturepracticesinaricewheatcroppingsystemofindia
AT jaths energyandeconomicefficiencyofclimatesmartagriculturepracticesinaricewheatcroppingsystemofindia
AT singhishwar energyandeconomicefficiencyofclimatesmartagriculturepracticesinaricewheatcroppingsystemofindia
AT goramk energyandeconomicefficiencyofclimatesmartagriculturepracticesinaricewheatcroppingsystemofindia
AT kakraliyamanish energyandeconomicefficiencyofclimatesmartagriculturepracticesinaricewheatcroppingsystemofindia
AT bijarniyadeepak energyandeconomicefficiencyofclimatesmartagriculturepracticesinaricewheatcroppingsystemofindia
AT sharmapc energyandeconomicefficiencyofclimatesmartagriculturepracticesinaricewheatcroppingsystemofindia
AT jatml energyandeconomicefficiencyofclimatesmartagriculturepracticesinaricewheatcroppingsystemofindia
_version_ 1778656988005138432