Atlas of Brain Mapping [electronic resource] : Topographic Mapping of EEG and Evoked Potentials /

From its discovery in 1929 by Hans Berger until the late 1960s, when sensory visual and auditory evoked potentials were dis­ covered and became popular, the EEG was the most important method of neurophysiological examination. W-ith the advent of computer technology in the 1980s, it became possible to plot the potential fields of the EEG onto models of the scalp. This plot­ ting of information as neuroimages followed the structural and functional techniques of Cf, MRI, PET and SPECf. The success of this method, which began in the early 1980s, has led to the brain mapping of EEGs and EPs being increasingly used for di­ agnosistic purposes in neurology, psychiatry and psychopharma­ cology. The pioneers of this method believed in it and were commit­ ted to its success. However, many traditionalists felt that it gave no new information and so regarded the method with scepticism. Some found both the coloured maps and the mapping technique misleading, which led to unnecessary conflict between mappers and their chromophobic oponents. Emotions have run so high that some professional bodies have justifiably adopted guidelines and warned of the misuse of the method.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maurer, Konrad. author., Dierks, Thomas. author., SpringerLink (Online service)
Format: Texto biblioteca
Language:eng
Published: Berlin, Heidelberg : Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1991
Subjects:Medicine., Neurosciences., Neurology., Neurosurgery., Psychiatry., Medicine & Public Health.,
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-76043-3
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id KOHA-OAI-TEST:218401
record_format koha
institution COLPOS
collection Koha
country México
countrycode MX
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
En linea
databasecode cat-colpos
tag biblioteca
region America del Norte
libraryname Departamento de documentación y biblioteca de COLPOS
language eng
topic Medicine.
Neurosciences.
Neurology.
Neurosurgery.
Psychiatry.
Medicine & Public Health.
Psychiatry.
Neurology.
Neurosurgery.
Neurosciences.
Medicine.
Neurosciences.
Neurology.
Neurosurgery.
Psychiatry.
Medicine & Public Health.
Psychiatry.
Neurology.
Neurosurgery.
Neurosciences.
spellingShingle Medicine.
Neurosciences.
Neurology.
Neurosurgery.
Psychiatry.
Medicine & Public Health.
Psychiatry.
Neurology.
Neurosurgery.
Neurosciences.
Medicine.
Neurosciences.
Neurology.
Neurosurgery.
Psychiatry.
Medicine & Public Health.
Psychiatry.
Neurology.
Neurosurgery.
Neurosciences.
Maurer, Konrad. author.
Dierks, Thomas. author.
SpringerLink (Online service)
Atlas of Brain Mapping [electronic resource] : Topographic Mapping of EEG and Evoked Potentials /
description From its discovery in 1929 by Hans Berger until the late 1960s, when sensory visual and auditory evoked potentials were dis­ covered and became popular, the EEG was the most important method of neurophysiological examination. W-ith the advent of computer technology in the 1980s, it became possible to plot the potential fields of the EEG onto models of the scalp. This plot­ ting of information as neuroimages followed the structural and functional techniques of Cf, MRI, PET and SPECf. The success of this method, which began in the early 1980s, has led to the brain mapping of EEGs and EPs being increasingly used for di­ agnosistic purposes in neurology, psychiatry and psychopharma­ cology. The pioneers of this method believed in it and were commit­ ted to its success. However, many traditionalists felt that it gave no new information and so regarded the method with scepticism. Some found both the coloured maps and the mapping technique misleading, which led to unnecessary conflict between mappers and their chromophobic oponents. Emotions have run so high that some professional bodies have justifiably adopted guidelines and warned of the misuse of the method.
format Texto
topic_facet Medicine.
Neurosciences.
Neurology.
Neurosurgery.
Psychiatry.
Medicine & Public Health.
Psychiatry.
Neurology.
Neurosurgery.
Neurosciences.
author Maurer, Konrad. author.
Dierks, Thomas. author.
SpringerLink (Online service)
author_facet Maurer, Konrad. author.
Dierks, Thomas. author.
SpringerLink (Online service)
author_sort Maurer, Konrad. author.
title Atlas of Brain Mapping [electronic resource] : Topographic Mapping of EEG and Evoked Potentials /
title_short Atlas of Brain Mapping [electronic resource] : Topographic Mapping of EEG and Evoked Potentials /
title_full Atlas of Brain Mapping [electronic resource] : Topographic Mapping of EEG and Evoked Potentials /
title_fullStr Atlas of Brain Mapping [electronic resource] : Topographic Mapping of EEG and Evoked Potentials /
title_full_unstemmed Atlas of Brain Mapping [electronic resource] : Topographic Mapping of EEG and Evoked Potentials /
title_sort atlas of brain mapping [electronic resource] : topographic mapping of eeg and evoked potentials /
publisher Berlin, Heidelberg : Springer Berlin Heidelberg,
publishDate 1991
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-76043-3
work_keys_str_mv AT maurerkonradauthor atlasofbrainmappingelectronicresourcetopographicmappingofeegandevokedpotentials
AT dierksthomasauthor atlasofbrainmappingelectronicresourcetopographicmappingofeegandevokedpotentials
AT springerlinkonlineservice atlasofbrainmappingelectronicresourcetopographicmappingofeegandevokedpotentials
_version_ 1756269884313960448
spelling KOHA-OAI-TEST:2184012018-07-30T23:55:12ZAtlas of Brain Mapping [electronic resource] : Topographic Mapping of EEG and Evoked Potentials / Maurer, Konrad. author. Dierks, Thomas. author. SpringerLink (Online service) textBerlin, Heidelberg : Springer Berlin Heidelberg,1991.engFrom its discovery in 1929 by Hans Berger until the late 1960s, when sensory visual and auditory evoked potentials were dis­ covered and became popular, the EEG was the most important method of neurophysiological examination. W-ith the advent of computer technology in the 1980s, it became possible to plot the potential fields of the EEG onto models of the scalp. This plot­ ting of information as neuroimages followed the structural and functional techniques of Cf, MRI, PET and SPECf. The success of this method, which began in the early 1980s, has led to the brain mapping of EEGs and EPs being increasingly used for di­ agnosistic purposes in neurology, psychiatry and psychopharma­ cology. The pioneers of this method believed in it and were commit­ ted to its success. However, many traditionalists felt that it gave no new information and so regarded the method with scepticism. Some found both the coloured maps and the mapping technique misleading, which led to unnecessary conflict between mappers and their chromophobic oponents. Emotions have run so high that some professional bodies have justifiably adopted guidelines and warned of the misuse of the method.1 Introduction -- 2 History -- 3 Definition and Terminology -- 4 Methodology -- 4.1 Introduction -- 4.2 General Conditions -- 4.3 Calibration -- 4.4 Electrodes -- 4.5 References -- 4.6 Baseline -- 4.7 Artifacts -- 5 Data Acquisition and Signal Analysis -- 5.1 Analog to Digital Conversion -- 5.2 Aliasing -- 5.3 Amplitude Mapping (Time Domain) -- 5.4 Frequency Mapping (Frequency Domain) -- 5.5 Map Construction (Spatial Domain) -- 5.6 Map Features -- 5.7 Mapping of Evoked Potentials -- 6 Storing of Data -- 7 Statistical Procedures -- 8 Practical Application: Findings in Normal Subjects -- 8.1 Introduction -- 8.2 EEG Features in the Time Domain -- 8.3 EEG Features in the Frequency Domain -- 8.4 EP Features -- 8.5 EEG Mapping After Sensory, Motor, and Mental Activation and due to Psychotherapeutic Interventions -- 8.6 Sleep Features -- 9 Findings in Diseases -- 9.1 Introduction -- 9.2 Evaluation of EEG and EP Maps -- 9.3 Clinical Examples -- 9.4 EEG and EP Mapping During Normal Aging -- 9.5 EEG and P300 Topography in Dementia of Alzheimer Type -- 9.6 EEG and EP Mapping in Psychoses -- 9.7 EEG and EP Mapping in Clinical Psychopharmacology -- 10 Advanced Methods -- 10.1 Dipole Source Estimation -- 10.2 Neurometrics -- 10.3 Determining Differences Between Maps -- References.From its discovery in 1929 by Hans Berger until the late 1960s, when sensory visual and auditory evoked potentials were dis­ covered and became popular, the EEG was the most important method of neurophysiological examination. W-ith the advent of computer technology in the 1980s, it became possible to plot the potential fields of the EEG onto models of the scalp. This plot­ ting of information as neuroimages followed the structural and functional techniques of Cf, MRI, PET and SPECf. The success of this method, which began in the early 1980s, has led to the brain mapping of EEGs and EPs being increasingly used for di­ agnosistic purposes in neurology, psychiatry and psychopharma­ cology. The pioneers of this method believed in it and were commit­ ted to its success. However, many traditionalists felt that it gave no new information and so regarded the method with scepticism. Some found both the coloured maps and the mapping technique misleading, which led to unnecessary conflict between mappers and their chromophobic oponents. Emotions have run so high that some professional bodies have justifiably adopted guidelines and warned of the misuse of the method.Medicine.Neurosciences.Neurology.Neurosurgery.Psychiatry.Medicine & Public Health.Psychiatry.Neurology.Neurosurgery.Neurosciences.Springer eBookshttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-76043-3URN:ISBN:9783642760433