The Structure of Being in Aristotle’s Metaphysics [electronic resource] /

In his Metaphysics, Aristotle claims that he is seeking to establish a science of being. Being, at the most general level, is divided by Aristotle into the following four types: 1. Accidental being 2. Being as truth 3. Potential/actual being l 4. Per se being Per se (kath hauto) being can also be translated as "being in its own right" or "intrinsic being". This type of being has been referred to by Aristotle in different ways. The list of per se beings includes substance, quantity, quality, place, time, etc. , and this is also the list ofcategories. At Meta. ix. l, 1045b28 Aristotle calls this list the "categories of being" (hai kategoriai tou ontos). At Meta. vi. 2, 1026a36 and ix. 1O, 1051a33-b2 per se being is called "being with reference to the figures ofpredication" (ta schemata tes kategorias, or "figures ofcategories,,). 2 Of these four types of being, accidental being is briefly treated in Meta. vi. 2-3 and there Aristotle claims that the study of accidental being can be dismissed on the grounds that accidental being is indeterminate and cannot be 3 the object ofknowledge. He also does not pay much attention to being as truth and treats it briefly in two short texts: Meta. viA and ix. 1O.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yu, Jiyuan. author., SpringerLink (Online service)
Format: Texto biblioteca
Language:eng
Published: Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands : Imprint: Springer, 2003
Subjects:Philosophy., Philosophy, Ancient., Metaphysics., Philosophy, general., Classical Philosophy., History of Philosophy.,
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0055-0
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id KOHA-OAI-TEST:211689
record_format koha
institution COLPOS
collection Koha
country México
countrycode MX
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
En linea
databasecode cat-colpos
tag biblioteca
region America del Norte
libraryname Departamento de documentación y biblioteca de COLPOS
language eng
topic Philosophy.
Philosophy, Ancient.
Metaphysics.
Philosophy.
Philosophy, general.
Classical Philosophy.
History of Philosophy.
Metaphysics.
Philosophy.
Philosophy, Ancient.
Metaphysics.
Philosophy.
Philosophy, general.
Classical Philosophy.
History of Philosophy.
Metaphysics.
spellingShingle Philosophy.
Philosophy, Ancient.
Metaphysics.
Philosophy.
Philosophy, general.
Classical Philosophy.
History of Philosophy.
Metaphysics.
Philosophy.
Philosophy, Ancient.
Metaphysics.
Philosophy.
Philosophy, general.
Classical Philosophy.
History of Philosophy.
Metaphysics.
Yu, Jiyuan. author.
SpringerLink (Online service)
The Structure of Being in Aristotle’s Metaphysics [electronic resource] /
description In his Metaphysics, Aristotle claims that he is seeking to establish a science of being. Being, at the most general level, is divided by Aristotle into the following four types: 1. Accidental being 2. Being as truth 3. Potential/actual being l 4. Per se being Per se (kath hauto) being can also be translated as "being in its own right" or "intrinsic being". This type of being has been referred to by Aristotle in different ways. The list of per se beings includes substance, quantity, quality, place, time, etc. , and this is also the list ofcategories. At Meta. ix. l, 1045b28 Aristotle calls this list the "categories of being" (hai kategoriai tou ontos). At Meta. vi. 2, 1026a36 and ix. 1O, 1051a33-b2 per se being is called "being with reference to the figures ofpredication" (ta schemata tes kategorias, or "figures ofcategories,,). 2 Of these four types of being, accidental being is briefly treated in Meta. vi. 2-3 and there Aristotle claims that the study of accidental being can be dismissed on the grounds that accidental being is indeterminate and cannot be 3 the object ofknowledge. He also does not pay much attention to being as truth and treats it briefly in two short texts: Meta. viA and ix. 1O.
format Texto
topic_facet Philosophy.
Philosophy, Ancient.
Metaphysics.
Philosophy.
Philosophy, general.
Classical Philosophy.
History of Philosophy.
Metaphysics.
author Yu, Jiyuan. author.
SpringerLink (Online service)
author_facet Yu, Jiyuan. author.
SpringerLink (Online service)
author_sort Yu, Jiyuan. author.
title The Structure of Being in Aristotle’s Metaphysics [electronic resource] /
title_short The Structure of Being in Aristotle’s Metaphysics [electronic resource] /
title_full The Structure of Being in Aristotle’s Metaphysics [electronic resource] /
title_fullStr The Structure of Being in Aristotle’s Metaphysics [electronic resource] /
title_full_unstemmed The Structure of Being in Aristotle’s Metaphysics [electronic resource] /
title_sort structure of being in aristotle’s metaphysics [electronic resource] /
publisher Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands : Imprint: Springer,
publishDate 2003
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0055-0
work_keys_str_mv AT yujiyuanauthor thestructureofbeinginaristotlesmetaphysicselectronicresource
AT springerlinkonlineservice thestructureofbeinginaristotlesmetaphysicselectronicresource
AT yujiyuanauthor structureofbeinginaristotlesmetaphysicselectronicresource
AT springerlinkonlineservice structureofbeinginaristotlesmetaphysicselectronicresource
_version_ 1756268966680985600
spelling KOHA-OAI-TEST:2116892018-07-30T23:44:27ZThe Structure of Being in Aristotle’s Metaphysics [electronic resource] / Yu, Jiyuan. author. SpringerLink (Online service) textDordrecht : Springer Netherlands : Imprint: Springer,2003.engIn his Metaphysics, Aristotle claims that he is seeking to establish a science of being. Being, at the most general level, is divided by Aristotle into the following four types: 1. Accidental being 2. Being as truth 3. Potential/actual being l 4. Per se being Per se (kath hauto) being can also be translated as "being in its own right" or "intrinsic being". This type of being has been referred to by Aristotle in different ways. The list of per se beings includes substance, quantity, quality, place, time, etc. , and this is also the list ofcategories. At Meta. ix. l, 1045b28 Aristotle calls this list the "categories of being" (hai kategoriai tou ontos). At Meta. vi. 2, 1026a36 and ix. 1O, 1051a33-b2 per se being is called "being with reference to the figures ofpredication" (ta schemata tes kategorias, or "figures ofcategories,,). 2 Of these four types of being, accidental being is briefly treated in Meta. vi. 2-3 and there Aristotle claims that the study of accidental being can be dismissed on the grounds that accidental being is indeterminate and cannot be 3 the object ofknowledge. He also does not pay much attention to being as truth and treats it briefly in two short texts: Meta. viA and ix. 1O.1 Per se Being and Potential/actual Being -- i. Per se being -- ii. Potential/actual being -- iii. The scope of the focal structure of being -- 2 From Being to Substance -- i. The focal connection of per se beings -- ii. Potential/actual being and substance -- iii. The science of being -- 3 Hylomorphism and Its Two Approaches -- i. The composition of substance -- ii. Two hylomorphic approaches -- iii. The new start of Metaphysics vii. 17 -- iv. Re-grouping the central books -- 4 Subject, Form, and Essence -- i. Substance and subject -- ii. Form and subject -- iii. Substance and essence -- iv. The identity of form and essence -- 5 Form: Tode ti and Toionde -- i. Primary reality and knowledge -- ii. Separation, tode ti, and toionde -- iii. Tode ti, particularity, and individuality -- iv. Separation -- v. Tode ti and definition -- vi. Form as toionde -- vii. The universal and toionde -- viii. The ending of Metaphysics vii -- 6 Substantial Potentiality and Actuality -- i. Kin?sis and energeia -- ii. Substantial generation -- iii. Substantial activity -- iv. Substantial unity -- 7 Actuality and the Prime Mover -- i. From actual form to the Prime Mover -- ii. The Prime Mover and eternity -- iii. The Prime Mover and the world order -- 8 The Unity of Aristotle’s Metaphysics -- Index of Passages -- Name Index.In his Metaphysics, Aristotle claims that he is seeking to establish a science of being. Being, at the most general level, is divided by Aristotle into the following four types: 1. Accidental being 2. Being as truth 3. Potential/actual being l 4. Per se being Per se (kath hauto) being can also be translated as "being in its own right" or "intrinsic being". This type of being has been referred to by Aristotle in different ways. The list of per se beings includes substance, quantity, quality, place, time, etc. , and this is also the list ofcategories. At Meta. ix. l, 1045b28 Aristotle calls this list the "categories of being" (hai kategoriai tou ontos). At Meta. vi. 2, 1026a36 and ix. 1O, 1051a33-b2 per se being is called "being with reference to the figures ofpredication" (ta schemata tes kategorias, or "figures ofcategories,,). 2 Of these four types of being, accidental being is briefly treated in Meta. vi. 2-3 and there Aristotle claims that the study of accidental being can be dismissed on the grounds that accidental being is indeterminate and cannot be 3 the object ofknowledge. He also does not pay much attention to being as truth and treats it briefly in two short texts: Meta. viA and ix. 1O.Philosophy.Philosophy, Ancient.Metaphysics.Philosophy.Philosophy, general.Classical Philosophy.History of Philosophy.Metaphysics.Springer eBookshttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0055-0URN:ISBN:9789401000550