![A Parameter-Setting Model of L2 Acquisition [electronic resource] : Experimental Studies in Anaphora /](/search/themes/bootstrap3/images/libros.png)
A Parameter-Setting Model of L2 Acquisition [electronic resource] : Experimental Studies in Anaphora /
Recent developments in linguistic theory have led to an important reorientation of research in related fields of linguistic inquiry as well as in linguistics itself. The developments I have in mind, viewed from the point of view of government-binding theory, have to do with the character ization of Universal Grammar (UG) as a set of subtheories, each with its set of central principles (perhaps just one principle central to each subtheory) and parameters (perhaps just one for each principle) according to which a principle can vary between an unmarked ('-') and a marked ('+') para metric value (Chomsky, 1985; 1986). For example, let us assume that there is an X-bar theory in explanation of those features of phrase structure irreducible to other subtheo ries of UG. Within X-bar theory variation among languages is then allowed only with respect to the position the head of a phrase occupies in rela t ion to its complemen ts such that the phrases of a language will be either right- or left-headed. Thus languages will vary between being right-headed in this respect (as in Japanese phrase structure) and being left-headed (as in English phrase structure). Everything else about the phrase structure of particular languages will be fixed within X-bar theory itself or else it will fallout from other subtheories of UG: Case theory; 0-theory, etc. (Chomsky, 1985:161-62; Chomsky, 1986:2-4; and references cited there). Hatters are the same in other modules of grammar.
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Texto biblioteca |
| Language: | eng |
| Published: |
Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands,
1987
|
| Subjects: | Linguistics., Psycholinguistics., |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3747-5 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| id |
KOHA-OAI-TEST:205637 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
koha |
| institution |
COLPOS |
| collection |
Koha |
| country |
México |
| countrycode |
MX |
| component |
Bibliográfico |
| access |
En linea En linea |
| databasecode |
cat-colpos |
| tag |
biblioteca |
| region |
America del Norte |
| libraryname |
Departamento de documentación y biblioteca de COLPOS |
| language |
eng |
| topic |
Linguistics. Psycholinguistics. Linguistics. Psycholinguistics. Linguistics. Psycholinguistics. Linguistics. Psycholinguistics. |
| spellingShingle |
Linguistics. Psycholinguistics. Linguistics. Psycholinguistics. Linguistics. Psycholinguistics. Linguistics. Psycholinguistics. Flynn, Suzanne. author. SpringerLink (Online service) A Parameter-Setting Model of L2 Acquisition [electronic resource] : Experimental Studies in Anaphora / |
| description |
Recent developments in linguistic theory have led to an important reorientation of research in related fields of linguistic inquiry as well as in linguistics itself. The developments I have in mind, viewed from the point of view of government-binding theory, have to do with the character ization of Universal Grammar (UG) as a set of subtheories, each with its set of central principles (perhaps just one principle central to each subtheory) and parameters (perhaps just one for each principle) according to which a principle can vary between an unmarked ('-') and a marked ('+') para metric value (Chomsky, 1985; 1986). For example, let us assume that there is an X-bar theory in explanation of those features of phrase structure irreducible to other subtheo ries of UG. Within X-bar theory variation among languages is then allowed only with respect to the position the head of a phrase occupies in rela t ion to its complemen ts such that the phrases of a language will be either right- or left-headed. Thus languages will vary between being right-headed in this respect (as in Japanese phrase structure) and being left-headed (as in English phrase structure). Everything else about the phrase structure of particular languages will be fixed within X-bar theory itself or else it will fallout from other subtheories of UG: Case theory; 0-theory, etc. (Chomsky, 1985:161-62; Chomsky, 1986:2-4; and references cited there). Hatters are the same in other modules of grammar. |
| format |
Texto |
| topic_facet |
Linguistics. Psycholinguistics. Linguistics. Psycholinguistics. |
| author |
Flynn, Suzanne. author. SpringerLink (Online service) |
| author_facet |
Flynn, Suzanne. author. SpringerLink (Online service) |
| author_sort |
Flynn, Suzanne. author. |
| title |
A Parameter-Setting Model of L2 Acquisition [electronic resource] : Experimental Studies in Anaphora / |
| title_short |
A Parameter-Setting Model of L2 Acquisition [electronic resource] : Experimental Studies in Anaphora / |
| title_full |
A Parameter-Setting Model of L2 Acquisition [electronic resource] : Experimental Studies in Anaphora / |
| title_fullStr |
A Parameter-Setting Model of L2 Acquisition [electronic resource] : Experimental Studies in Anaphora / |
| title_full_unstemmed |
A Parameter-Setting Model of L2 Acquisition [electronic resource] : Experimental Studies in Anaphora / |
| title_sort |
parameter-setting model of l2 acquisition [electronic resource] : experimental studies in anaphora / |
| publisher |
Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands, |
| publishDate |
1987 |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3747-5 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT flynnsuzanneauthor aparametersettingmodelofl2acquisitionelectronicresourceexperimentalstudiesinanaphora AT springerlinkonlineservice aparametersettingmodelofl2acquisitionelectronicresourceexperimentalstudiesinanaphora AT flynnsuzanneauthor parametersettingmodelofl2acquisitionelectronicresourceexperimentalstudiesinanaphora AT springerlinkonlineservice parametersettingmodelofl2acquisitionelectronicresourceexperimentalstudiesinanaphora |
| _version_ |
1756268139240226816 |
| spelling |
KOHA-OAI-TEST:2056372018-07-30T23:35:06ZA Parameter-Setting Model of L2 Acquisition [electronic resource] : Experimental Studies in Anaphora / Flynn, Suzanne. author. SpringerLink (Online service) textDordrecht : Springer Netherlands,1987.engRecent developments in linguistic theory have led to an important reorientation of research in related fields of linguistic inquiry as well as in linguistics itself. The developments I have in mind, viewed from the point of view of government-binding theory, have to do with the character ization of Universal Grammar (UG) as a set of subtheories, each with its set of central principles (perhaps just one principle central to each subtheory) and parameters (perhaps just one for each principle) according to which a principle can vary between an unmarked ('-') and a marked ('+') para metric value (Chomsky, 1985; 1986). For example, let us assume that there is an X-bar theory in explanation of those features of phrase structure irreducible to other subtheo ries of UG. Within X-bar theory variation among languages is then allowed only with respect to the position the head of a phrase occupies in rela t ion to its complemen ts such that the phrases of a language will be either right- or left-headed. Thus languages will vary between being right-headed in this respect (as in Japanese phrase structure) and being left-headed (as in English phrase structure). Everything else about the phrase structure of particular languages will be fixed within X-bar theory itself or else it will fallout from other subtheories of UG: Case theory; 0-theory, etc. (Chomsky, 1985:161-62; Chomsky, 1986:2-4; and references cited there). Hatters are the same in other modules of grammar.1. Introduction -- 1.1 L2 Acquisition: The Problems and Traditional Answers -- 1.2 Universal Grammar -- 1.3 Basis for an Alternative Theory of L2 Acquisition -- 1.4 Outline of the Book -- 2. Traditional Theories of L2 Acquisition -- 2.1 Theory of Contrastive Analysis (CA) -- 2.2 Theory of Creative Construction (CC) -- 2.3 Bases for an Explanatory Theory of L2 Acquisition -- 2.4 Preliminary Conclusions -- Notes to Chapter Two -- 3. Universal Grammar -- 3.1 Universal Grammar -- 3.2 Universal Grammar as a Theory of Grammar -- 3.3 Linguistic Focus of Book -- 3.4 Relevant Linguistic Concepts for Experimental Tests of Pronoun and Null Anaphors -- 3.5 Universal Grammar as a Theory of Language Acquisition -- 3.6 Overview: UG and L2 Acquisition -- 3.7 Summary -- Notes to Chapter Three -- 4. A Typological Comparison Of Japanese and Spanish -- 4.1 Word Order, Configurationality, and Head-Initial/Head-Final Parameter -- 4.2 Anaphora -- 4.3 Adjunct Adverbial Subordinate Clauses -- 4.4 Summary of Cross-Linguistic Facts -- Notes to Chapter Four -- 5. Rationale and Design -- 5.1 General Hypotheses to be Tested -- 5.2 Overview: Experimental Design -- 5.3 Experimental Design and Hypotheses -- 5.4 Basic Controls on Experimental Design -- Notes to Chapter Five -- 6 Methodology -- 6.1 Subjects (Ss) -- 6.2 General Procedures -- 6.3 Materials -- 6.4 ESL Proficiency Test: Standardized Levels -- 6.5 Specific Experimental Task Procedures -- 6.6 Procedures for Data Transcription -- 6.7 Procedures for Scoring of the Data -- 7. Results -- 7.1 Results for Experimental Controls -- 7.2 Amount Correct: Results for Production Tests -- 7.3 Error Analyses: Results for Production Tests 1 to 3 -- 7.4 Amount Correct: Results for Comprehension Test 4 -- 7.5 Coreference Judgements (CRJs) -- 7.6 General Summary and Conclusions -- Notes to Chapter Seven -- 8. Some Conclusions -- 8.1 General Summary -- 8.2 Similarities in L2 Acquisition for Spanish and Japanese Speakers -- 8.3 Dissimilarities in L2 Acquisition for Spanish and Japanese Speakers -- 8.4 Implications for an Alternative Theory of L2 Acquisition -- 8.5 Some Differences Between L1 and L2 Acquisition -- 8.6 Possible Alternative Explanations of the Data -- 8.7 Importance for a Theory of UG -- 8.8 Implications for Future Research -- Appendices -- Author Index.Recent developments in linguistic theory have led to an important reorientation of research in related fields of linguistic inquiry as well as in linguistics itself. The developments I have in mind, viewed from the point of view of government-binding theory, have to do with the character ization of Universal Grammar (UG) as a set of subtheories, each with its set of central principles (perhaps just one principle central to each subtheory) and parameters (perhaps just one for each principle) according to which a principle can vary between an unmarked ('-') and a marked ('+') para metric value (Chomsky, 1985; 1986). For example, let us assume that there is an X-bar theory in explanation of those features of phrase structure irreducible to other subtheo ries of UG. Within X-bar theory variation among languages is then allowed only with respect to the position the head of a phrase occupies in rela t ion to its complemen ts such that the phrases of a language will be either right- or left-headed. Thus languages will vary between being right-headed in this respect (as in Japanese phrase structure) and being left-headed (as in English phrase structure). Everything else about the phrase structure of particular languages will be fixed within X-bar theory itself or else it will fallout from other subtheories of UG: Case theory; 0-theory, etc. (Chomsky, 1985:161-62; Chomsky, 1986:2-4; and references cited there). Hatters are the same in other modules of grammar.Linguistics.Psycholinguistics.Linguistics.Psycholinguistics.Springer eBookshttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3747-5URN:ISBN:9789400937475 |