Models of Science Teacher Preparation [electronic resource] : Theory into Practice /

1 Wolff Michael Roth & Derrick R. Lavoie² 1 2 University of Victoria, Virtual Institute for Learning Resources The current reform in science education requires a substantive change in how science is taught. Implicit in this reform is an equally substantive change in professional devel- ment practices at all levels. (NRC, 1996,p. 56) In a continuously changing society, it is not surprising that education also undergoes continuous change. Science education is no exception, and perhaps changes are more rapid given the daily construction of new scientific knowledge. In such a c- mate of continuous change, the preparation of science teachers has to follow suit in order to be appropriate to the reforms that national organizations encourage. H- ever, whereas science teaching reform movements spawned recommendations of what teachers should know and be able to do in order for their students to concep- alize and process science (NSTA, 1997), they provide little guidance in terms of - the-classroom concrete implementation. Thus, while national science education organizations continue to refine their positions about teacher education, there is no mechanism for translating these positions and statements into science education courses that can improve the preparation and quality of p- service science teachers at both the elementary and secondary levels. (Yager & Penick, 1990. p. 670) It is therefore not surprising that there are voices that describe teacher prepa- tion as unsuccessful and as unresponsive to reform efforts (Schnur & Golby, 1995).

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lavoie, Derrick R. editor., Roth, Wolff-Michael. editor., SpringerLink (Online service)
Format: Texto biblioteca
Language:eng
Published: Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands, 2002
Subjects:Education., Curriculums (Courses of study)., Education, Science education., Teaching., Science Education., Teaching and Teacher Education., Curriculum Studies.,
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47230-9
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id KOHA-OAI-TEST:202028
record_format koha
institution COLPOS
collection Koha
country México
countrycode MX
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
En linea
databasecode cat-colpos
tag biblioteca
region America del Norte
libraryname Departamento de documentación y biblioteca de COLPOS
language eng
topic Education.
Curriculums (Courses of study).
Education
Science education.
Teaching.
Education.
Science Education.
Teaching and Teacher Education.
Curriculum Studies.
Education.
Curriculums (Courses of study).
Education
Science education.
Teaching.
Education.
Science Education.
Teaching and Teacher Education.
Curriculum Studies.
spellingShingle Education.
Curriculums (Courses of study).
Education
Science education.
Teaching.
Education.
Science Education.
Teaching and Teacher Education.
Curriculum Studies.
Education.
Curriculums (Courses of study).
Education
Science education.
Teaching.
Education.
Science Education.
Teaching and Teacher Education.
Curriculum Studies.
Lavoie, Derrick R. editor.
Roth, Wolff-Michael. editor.
SpringerLink (Online service)
Models of Science Teacher Preparation [electronic resource] : Theory into Practice /
description 1 Wolff Michael Roth & Derrick R. Lavoie² 1 2 University of Victoria, Virtual Institute for Learning Resources The current reform in science education requires a substantive change in how science is taught. Implicit in this reform is an equally substantive change in professional devel- ment practices at all levels. (NRC, 1996,p. 56) In a continuously changing society, it is not surprising that education also undergoes continuous change. Science education is no exception, and perhaps changes are more rapid given the daily construction of new scientific knowledge. In such a c- mate of continuous change, the preparation of science teachers has to follow suit in order to be appropriate to the reforms that national organizations encourage. H- ever, whereas science teaching reform movements spawned recommendations of what teachers should know and be able to do in order for their students to concep- alize and process science (NSTA, 1997), they provide little guidance in terms of - the-classroom concrete implementation. Thus, while national science education organizations continue to refine their positions about teacher education, there is no mechanism for translating these positions and statements into science education courses that can improve the preparation and quality of p- service science teachers at both the elementary and secondary levels. (Yager & Penick, 1990. p. 670) It is therefore not surprising that there are voices that describe teacher prepa- tion as unsuccessful and as unresponsive to reform efforts (Schnur & Golby, 1995).
format Texto
topic_facet Education.
Curriculums (Courses of study).
Education
Science education.
Teaching.
Education.
Science Education.
Teaching and Teacher Education.
Curriculum Studies.
author Lavoie, Derrick R. editor.
Roth, Wolff-Michael. editor.
SpringerLink (Online service)
author_facet Lavoie, Derrick R. editor.
Roth, Wolff-Michael. editor.
SpringerLink (Online service)
author_sort Lavoie, Derrick R. editor.
title Models of Science Teacher Preparation [electronic resource] : Theory into Practice /
title_short Models of Science Teacher Preparation [electronic resource] : Theory into Practice /
title_full Models of Science Teacher Preparation [electronic resource] : Theory into Practice /
title_fullStr Models of Science Teacher Preparation [electronic resource] : Theory into Practice /
title_full_unstemmed Models of Science Teacher Preparation [electronic resource] : Theory into Practice /
title_sort models of science teacher preparation [electronic resource] : theory into practice /
publisher Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands,
publishDate 2002
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47230-9
work_keys_str_mv AT lavoiederrickreditor modelsofscienceteacherpreparationelectronicresourcetheoryintopractice
AT rothwolffmichaeleditor modelsofscienceteacherpreparationelectronicresourcetheoryintopractice
AT springerlinkonlineservice modelsofscienceteacherpreparationelectronicresourcetheoryintopractice
_version_ 1756267644755902464
spelling KOHA-OAI-TEST:2020282018-07-30T23:29:21ZModels of Science Teacher Preparation [electronic resource] : Theory into Practice / Lavoie, Derrick R. editor. Roth, Wolff-Michael. editor. SpringerLink (Online service) textDordrecht : Springer Netherlands,2002.eng1 Wolff Michael Roth & Derrick R. Lavoie² 1 2 University of Victoria, Virtual Institute for Learning Resources The current reform in science education requires a substantive change in how science is taught. Implicit in this reform is an equally substantive change in professional devel- ment practices at all levels. (NRC, 1996,p. 56) In a continuously changing society, it is not surprising that education also undergoes continuous change. Science education is no exception, and perhaps changes are more rapid given the daily construction of new scientific knowledge. In such a c- mate of continuous change, the preparation of science teachers has to follow suit in order to be appropriate to the reforms that national organizations encourage. H- ever, whereas science teaching reform movements spawned recommendations of what teachers should know and be able to do in order for their students to concep- alize and process science (NSTA, 1997), they provide little guidance in terms of - the-classroom concrete implementation. Thus, while national science education organizations continue to refine their positions about teacher education, there is no mechanism for translating these positions and statements into science education courses that can improve the preparation and quality of p- service science teachers at both the elementary and secondary levels. (Yager & Penick, 1990. p. 670) It is therefore not surprising that there are voices that describe teacher prepa- tion as unsuccessful and as unresponsive to reform efforts (Schnur & Golby, 1995).Collaboration and Apprenticeship Models -- Becoming-in-the-Classroom: Learning to Teach in/as Praxis -- Teams: A Science Learning and Teaching Apprenticeship Model -- A Problem-Based Learning Approach to Science Teacher Preparation -- Linking Schools and Universities in Partnership for Science Teacher Preparation -- The Dynamics of Collaboration in a State-Wide Professional Development Program for Cience Teachers -- Special Issues-Driven Models -- Instructional Congruence to Promote Science Learning and Literacy Development for Linguistically Diverse Students -- Gender Equity and Science Teacher Preparation -- Assessment Models that Integrate Theory and Best Practice -- New Technologies and Science Teacher Preparation -- Preparing New Teachers for Integrated-Science Classrooms -- Critical Multiculturalism and Science Teacher Education Programs -- Portraits of Professional Development Models in Science Teacher Education: A Synthesis of Perspectives and Issues.1 Wolff Michael Roth & Derrick R. Lavoie² 1 2 University of Victoria, Virtual Institute for Learning Resources The current reform in science education requires a substantive change in how science is taught. Implicit in this reform is an equally substantive change in professional devel- ment practices at all levels. (NRC, 1996,p. 56) In a continuously changing society, it is not surprising that education also undergoes continuous change. Science education is no exception, and perhaps changes are more rapid given the daily construction of new scientific knowledge. In such a c- mate of continuous change, the preparation of science teachers has to follow suit in order to be appropriate to the reforms that national organizations encourage. H- ever, whereas science teaching reform movements spawned recommendations of what teachers should know and be able to do in order for their students to concep- alize and process science (NSTA, 1997), they provide little guidance in terms of - the-classroom concrete implementation. Thus, while national science education organizations continue to refine their positions about teacher education, there is no mechanism for translating these positions and statements into science education courses that can improve the preparation and quality of p- service science teachers at both the elementary and secondary levels. (Yager & Penick, 1990. p. 670) It is therefore not surprising that there are voices that describe teacher prepa- tion as unsuccessful and as unresponsive to reform efforts (Schnur & Golby, 1995).Education.Curriculums (Courses of study).EducationScience education.Teaching.Education.Science Education.Teaching and Teacher Education.Curriculum Studies.Springer eBookshttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47230-9URN:ISBN:9780306472305