The Plant Viruses [electronic resource] : Polyhedral Virions and Bipartite RNA Genomes /

The Plant Viruses [electronic resource] : Polyhedral Virions and Bipartite RNA Genomes /

Show other versions (1)

This fifth volume in the series The Plant Viruses, dealing with viruses with bipartite genomes, completes the coverage of viruses with isometric parti­ cles and genomes consisting of single-stranded, positive-sense RNA: viruses that have tripartite and monopartite genomes of this kind were dealt with in Volumes 1 and 3, respectively. How close are the affinities among the viruses within the groupings distinguished in this way? All those with tripartite genomes are considered to be sufficiently closely related to be included in the family Bromoviridae, whereas the monopartite-genome viruses covered in Volume 3 clearly are a much more diverse collection. Affinities among the viruses with bipartite genomes are considered in Chapter 1 of this volume, along with the possible origins, advantages, and disadvantages of these ge­ nomes. The conclusion reached from this assessment is that the bipartite­ genome viruses fall into four categories, those within each category having closer affinities with viruses not included in this book than with viruses in the other categories. No evidence was found that possession of a bipartite genome gives a virus overwhelming advantages over viruses of other sorts. More probably, any advantages are largely balanced by disadvantages, and bipartite genomes may be best considered simply as an alternative design for the hereditary material of a virus.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Harrison, B. D. editor., Murant, A. F. editor., SpringerLink (Online service)
Format: Texto biblioteca
Language:eng
Published: Boston, MA : Springer US : Imprint: Springer, 1996
Subjects:Life sciences., Medical microbiology., Microbial ecology., Trees., Plant science., Botany., Animal anatomy., Life Sciences., Plant Sciences., Medical Microbiology., Animal Anatomy / Morphology / Histology., Microbial Ecology., Tree Biology.,
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1772-0
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id KOHA-OAI-TEST:199190
record_format koha
institution COLPOS
collection Koha
country México
countrycode MX
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
En linea
databasecode cat-colpos
tag biblioteca
region America del Norte
libraryname Departamento de documentación y biblioteca de COLPOS
language eng
topic Life sciences.
Medical microbiology.
Microbial ecology.
Trees.
Plant science.
Botany.
Animal anatomy.
Life Sciences.
Plant Sciences.
Medical Microbiology.
Animal Anatomy / Morphology / Histology.
Microbial Ecology.
Tree Biology.
Life sciences.
Medical microbiology.
Microbial ecology.
Trees.
Plant science.
Botany.
Animal anatomy.
Life Sciences.
Plant Sciences.
Medical Microbiology.
Animal Anatomy / Morphology / Histology.
Microbial Ecology.
Tree Biology.
spellingShingle Life sciences.
Medical microbiology.
Microbial ecology.
Trees.
Plant science.
Botany.
Animal anatomy.
Life Sciences.
Plant Sciences.
Medical Microbiology.
Animal Anatomy / Morphology / Histology.
Microbial Ecology.
Tree Biology.
Life sciences.
Medical microbiology.
Microbial ecology.
Trees.
Plant science.
Botany.
Animal anatomy.
Life Sciences.
Plant Sciences.
Medical Microbiology.
Animal Anatomy / Morphology / Histology.
Microbial Ecology.
Tree Biology.
Harrison, B. D. editor.
Murant, A. F. editor.
SpringerLink (Online service)
The Plant Viruses [electronic resource] : Polyhedral Virions and Bipartite RNA Genomes /
description This fifth volume in the series The Plant Viruses, dealing with viruses with bipartite genomes, completes the coverage of viruses with isometric parti­ cles and genomes consisting of single-stranded, positive-sense RNA: viruses that have tripartite and monopartite genomes of this kind were dealt with in Volumes 1 and 3, respectively. How close are the affinities among the viruses within the groupings distinguished in this way? All those with tripartite genomes are considered to be sufficiently closely related to be included in the family Bromoviridae, whereas the monopartite-genome viruses covered in Volume 3 clearly are a much more diverse collection. Affinities among the viruses with bipartite genomes are considered in Chapter 1 of this volume, along with the possible origins, advantages, and disadvantages of these ge­ nomes. The conclusion reached from this assessment is that the bipartite­ genome viruses fall into four categories, those within each category having closer affinities with viruses not included in this book than with viruses in the other categories. No evidence was found that possession of a bipartite genome gives a virus overwhelming advantages over viruses of other sorts. More probably, any advantages are largely balanced by disadvantages, and bipartite genomes may be best considered simply as an alternative design for the hereditary material of a virus.
format Texto
topic_facet Life sciences.
Medical microbiology.
Microbial ecology.
Trees.
Plant science.
Botany.
Animal anatomy.
Life Sciences.
Plant Sciences.
Medical Microbiology.
Animal Anatomy / Morphology / Histology.
Microbial Ecology.
Tree Biology.
author Harrison, B. D. editor.
Murant, A. F. editor.
SpringerLink (Online service)
author_facet Harrison, B. D. editor.
Murant, A. F. editor.
SpringerLink (Online service)
author_sort Harrison, B. D. editor.
title The Plant Viruses [electronic resource] : Polyhedral Virions and Bipartite RNA Genomes /
title_short The Plant Viruses [electronic resource] : Polyhedral Virions and Bipartite RNA Genomes /
title_full The Plant Viruses [electronic resource] : Polyhedral Virions and Bipartite RNA Genomes /
title_fullStr The Plant Viruses [electronic resource] : Polyhedral Virions and Bipartite RNA Genomes /
title_full_unstemmed The Plant Viruses [electronic resource] : Polyhedral Virions and Bipartite RNA Genomes /
title_sort plant viruses [electronic resource] : polyhedral virions and bipartite rna genomes /
publisher Boston, MA : Springer US : Imprint: Springer,
publishDate 1996
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1772-0
work_keys_str_mv AT harrisonbdeditor theplantviruseselectronicresourcepolyhedralvirionsandbipartiternagenomes
AT murantafeditor theplantviruseselectronicresourcepolyhedralvirionsandbipartiternagenomes
AT springerlinkonlineservice theplantviruseselectronicresourcepolyhedralvirionsandbipartiternagenomes
AT harrisonbdeditor plantviruseselectronicresourcepolyhedralvirionsandbipartiternagenomes
AT murantafeditor plantviruseselectronicresourcepolyhedralvirionsandbipartiternagenomes
AT springerlinkonlineservice plantviruseselectronicresourcepolyhedralvirionsandbipartiternagenomes
_version_ 1756267257086869504
spelling KOHA-OAI-TEST:1991902018-07-30T23:25:33ZThe Plant Viruses [electronic resource] : Polyhedral Virions and Bipartite RNA Genomes / Harrison, B. D. editor. Murant, A. F. editor. SpringerLink (Online service) textBoston, MA : Springer US : Imprint: Springer,1996.engThis fifth volume in the series The Plant Viruses, dealing with viruses with bipartite genomes, completes the coverage of viruses with isometric parti­ cles and genomes consisting of single-stranded, positive-sense RNA: viruses that have tripartite and monopartite genomes of this kind were dealt with in Volumes 1 and 3, respectively. How close are the affinities among the viruses within the groupings distinguished in this way? All those with tripartite genomes are considered to be sufficiently closely related to be included in the family Bromoviridae, whereas the monopartite-genome viruses covered in Volume 3 clearly are a much more diverse collection. Affinities among the viruses with bipartite genomes are considered in Chapter 1 of this volume, along with the possible origins, advantages, and disadvantages of these ge­ nomes. The conclusion reached from this assessment is that the bipartite­ genome viruses fall into four categories, those within each category having closer affinities with viruses not included in this book than with viruses in the other categories. No evidence was found that possession of a bipartite genome gives a virus overwhelming advantages over viruses of other sorts. More probably, any advantages are largely balanced by disadvantages, and bipartite genomes may be best considered simply as an alternative design for the hereditary material of a virus.1 Plant Viruses with Bipartite RNA Genomes and Polyhedral Particles: Diversity and Affinities -- 2 Comoviruses: Identification and Diseases Caused -- 3 Comoviruses: Molecular Biology and Replication -- 4 Comoviruses: Transmission, Epidemiology, and Control -- 5 Nepoviruses: General Properties, Diseases, and Virus Identification -- 6 Nepoviruses: Molecular Biology and Replication -- 7 Nepoviruses: Transmission by Nematodes -- 8 Nepoviruses: Ecology and Control -- 9 Fabaviruses: Broad Bean Wilt and Allied Viruses -- 10 Dianthoviruses: Properties, Molecular Biology, Ecology, and Control -- 11 Raspberry Bushy Dwarf Idaeovirus -- 12 Pea Enation Mosaic Enamovirus: Properties and Aphid Transmission -- 13 Pea Enation Mosaic Enamovirus: Ecology and Control.This fifth volume in the series The Plant Viruses, dealing with viruses with bipartite genomes, completes the coverage of viruses with isometric parti­ cles and genomes consisting of single-stranded, positive-sense RNA: viruses that have tripartite and monopartite genomes of this kind were dealt with in Volumes 1 and 3, respectively. How close are the affinities among the viruses within the groupings distinguished in this way? All those with tripartite genomes are considered to be sufficiently closely related to be included in the family Bromoviridae, whereas the monopartite-genome viruses covered in Volume 3 clearly are a much more diverse collection. Affinities among the viruses with bipartite genomes are considered in Chapter 1 of this volume, along with the possible origins, advantages, and disadvantages of these ge­ nomes. The conclusion reached from this assessment is that the bipartite­ genome viruses fall into four categories, those within each category having closer affinities with viruses not included in this book than with viruses in the other categories. No evidence was found that possession of a bipartite genome gives a virus overwhelming advantages over viruses of other sorts. More probably, any advantages are largely balanced by disadvantages, and bipartite genomes may be best considered simply as an alternative design for the hereditary material of a virus.Life sciences.Medical microbiology.Microbial ecology.Trees.Plant science.Botany.Animal anatomy.Life Sciences.Plant Sciences.Medical Microbiology.Animal Anatomy / Morphology / Histology.Microbial Ecology.Tree Biology.Springer eBookshttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1772-0URN:ISBN:9781489917720

Similar Items