ZUM ’98: The Z Formal Specification Notation [electronic resource] : 11th International Conference of Z Users, Berlin, Germany, September 24-26, 1998. Proceedings /

1 In a number of recent presentations – most notably at FME’96 –oneofthe foremost scientists in the ?eld of formal methods, C.A.R. Hoare,has highlighted the fact that formal methods are not the only technique for producing reliable software. This seems to have caused some controversy,not least amongst formal methods practitioners. How can one of the founding fathers of formal methods seemingly denounce the ?eld of research after over a quarter of a century of support? This is a question that has been posed recently by some formal methods skeptics. However, Prof. Hoare has not abandoned formal methods. He is reiterating, 2 albeitmoreradically,his1987view thatmorethanonetoolandnotationwillbe requiredinthepractical,industrialdevelopmentoflarge-scalecomplexcomputer systems; and not all of these tools and notations will be, or even need be, formal in nature. Formalmethods arenotasolution,butratheroneofaselectionoftechniques that have proven to be useful in the development of reliable complex systems, and to result in hardware and software systems that can be produced on-time and within a budget, while satisfying the stated requirements. After almostthree decades,the time has come to view formalmethods in the context of overall industrial-scale system development, and their relationship to othertechniquesandmethods.Weshouldnolongerconsidertheissueofwhether we are “pro-formal” or “anti-formal”, but rather the degree of formality (if any) that we need to support in system development. This is a goal of ZUM’98, the 11th International Conference of Z Users, held for the ?rst time within continental Europe in the city of Berlin, Germany.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bowen, Jonathan P. editor., Fett, Andreas. editor., Hinchey, Michael G. editor., SpringerLink (Online service)
Format: Texto biblioteca
Language:eng
Published: Berlin, Heidelberg : Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1998
Subjects:Computer science., Software engineering., Computer programming., Computer logic., Mathematical logic., Computer Science., Software Engineering/Programming and Operating Systems., Software Engineering., Logics and Meanings of Programs., Programming Techniques., Mathematical Logic and Formal Languages.,
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/b68208
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id KOHA-OAI-TEST:199144
record_format koha
institution COLPOS
collection Koha
country México
countrycode MX
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
En linea
databasecode cat-colpos
tag biblioteca
region America del Norte
libraryname Departamento de documentación y biblioteca de COLPOS
language eng
topic Computer science.
Software engineering.
Computer programming.
Computer logic.
Mathematical logic.
Computer Science.
Software Engineering/Programming and Operating Systems.
Software Engineering.
Logics and Meanings of Programs.
Programming Techniques.
Mathematical Logic and Formal Languages.
Computer science.
Software engineering.
Computer programming.
Computer logic.
Mathematical logic.
Computer Science.
Software Engineering/Programming and Operating Systems.
Software Engineering.
Logics and Meanings of Programs.
Programming Techniques.
Mathematical Logic and Formal Languages.
spellingShingle Computer science.
Software engineering.
Computer programming.
Computer logic.
Mathematical logic.
Computer Science.
Software Engineering/Programming and Operating Systems.
Software Engineering.
Logics and Meanings of Programs.
Programming Techniques.
Mathematical Logic and Formal Languages.
Computer science.
Software engineering.
Computer programming.
Computer logic.
Mathematical logic.
Computer Science.
Software Engineering/Programming and Operating Systems.
Software Engineering.
Logics and Meanings of Programs.
Programming Techniques.
Mathematical Logic and Formal Languages.
Bowen, Jonathan P. editor.
Fett, Andreas. editor.
Hinchey, Michael G. editor.
SpringerLink (Online service)
ZUM ’98: The Z Formal Specification Notation [electronic resource] : 11th International Conference of Z Users, Berlin, Germany, September 24-26, 1998. Proceedings /
description 1 In a number of recent presentations – most notably at FME’96 –oneofthe foremost scientists in the ?eld of formal methods, C.A.R. Hoare,has highlighted the fact that formal methods are not the only technique for producing reliable software. This seems to have caused some controversy,not least amongst formal methods practitioners. How can one of the founding fathers of formal methods seemingly denounce the ?eld of research after over a quarter of a century of support? This is a question that has been posed recently by some formal methods skeptics. However, Prof. Hoare has not abandoned formal methods. He is reiterating, 2 albeitmoreradically,his1987view thatmorethanonetoolandnotationwillbe requiredinthepractical,industrialdevelopmentoflarge-scalecomplexcomputer systems; and not all of these tools and notations will be, or even need be, formal in nature. Formalmethods arenotasolution,butratheroneofaselectionoftechniques that have proven to be useful in the development of reliable complex systems, and to result in hardware and software systems that can be produced on-time and within a budget, while satisfying the stated requirements. After almostthree decades,the time has come to view formalmethods in the context of overall industrial-scale system development, and their relationship to othertechniquesandmethods.Weshouldnolongerconsidertheissueofwhether we are “pro-formal” or “anti-formal”, but rather the degree of formality (if any) that we need to support in system development. This is a goal of ZUM’98, the 11th International Conference of Z Users, held for the ?rst time within continental Europe in the city of Berlin, Germany.
format Texto
topic_facet Computer science.
Software engineering.
Computer programming.
Computer logic.
Mathematical logic.
Computer Science.
Software Engineering/Programming and Operating Systems.
Software Engineering.
Logics and Meanings of Programs.
Programming Techniques.
Mathematical Logic and Formal Languages.
author Bowen, Jonathan P. editor.
Fett, Andreas. editor.
Hinchey, Michael G. editor.
SpringerLink (Online service)
author_facet Bowen, Jonathan P. editor.
Fett, Andreas. editor.
Hinchey, Michael G. editor.
SpringerLink (Online service)
author_sort Bowen, Jonathan P. editor.
title ZUM ’98: The Z Formal Specification Notation [electronic resource] : 11th International Conference of Z Users, Berlin, Germany, September 24-26, 1998. Proceedings /
title_short ZUM ’98: The Z Formal Specification Notation [electronic resource] : 11th International Conference of Z Users, Berlin, Germany, September 24-26, 1998. Proceedings /
title_full ZUM ’98: The Z Formal Specification Notation [electronic resource] : 11th International Conference of Z Users, Berlin, Germany, September 24-26, 1998. Proceedings /
title_fullStr ZUM ’98: The Z Formal Specification Notation [electronic resource] : 11th International Conference of Z Users, Berlin, Germany, September 24-26, 1998. Proceedings /
title_full_unstemmed ZUM ’98: The Z Formal Specification Notation [electronic resource] : 11th International Conference of Z Users, Berlin, Germany, September 24-26, 1998. Proceedings /
title_sort zum ’98: the z formal specification notation [electronic resource] : 11th international conference of z users, berlin, germany, september 24-26, 1998. proceedings /
publisher Berlin, Heidelberg : Springer Berlin Heidelberg,
publishDate 1998
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/b68208
work_keys_str_mv AT bowenjonathanpeditor zum98thezformalspecificationnotationelectronicresource11thinternationalconferenceofzusersberlingermanyseptember24261998proceedings
AT fettandreaseditor zum98thezformalspecificationnotationelectronicresource11thinternationalconferenceofzusersberlingermanyseptember24261998proceedings
AT hincheymichaelgeditor zum98thezformalspecificationnotationelectronicresource11thinternationalconferenceofzusersberlingermanyseptember24261998proceedings
AT springerlinkonlineservice zum98thezformalspecificationnotationelectronicresource11thinternationalconferenceofzusersberlingermanyseptember24261998proceedings
_version_ 1756267250863570944
spelling KOHA-OAI-TEST:1991442018-07-30T23:25:32ZZUM ’98: The Z Formal Specification Notation [electronic resource] : 11th International Conference of Z Users, Berlin, Germany, September 24-26, 1998. Proceedings / Bowen, Jonathan P. editor. Fett, Andreas. editor. Hinchey, Michael G. editor. SpringerLink (Online service) textBerlin, Heidelberg : Springer Berlin Heidelberg,1998.eng1 In a number of recent presentations – most notably at FME’96 –oneofthe foremost scientists in the ?eld of formal methods, C.A.R. Hoare,has highlighted the fact that formal methods are not the only technique for producing reliable software. This seems to have caused some controversy,not least amongst formal methods practitioners. How can one of the founding fathers of formal methods seemingly denounce the ?eld of research after over a quarter of a century of support? This is a question that has been posed recently by some formal methods skeptics. However, Prof. Hoare has not abandoned formal methods. He is reiterating, 2 albeitmoreradically,his1987view thatmorethanonetoolandnotationwillbe requiredinthepractical,industrialdevelopmentoflarge-scalecomplexcomputer systems; and not all of these tools and notations will be, or even need be, formal in nature. Formalmethods arenotasolution,butratheroneofaselectionoftechniques that have proven to be useful in the development of reliable complex systems, and to result in hardware and software systems that can be produced on-time and within a budget, while satisfying the stated requirements. After almostthree decades,the time has come to view formalmethods in the context of overall industrial-scale system development, and their relationship to othertechniquesandmethods.Weshouldnolongerconsidertheissueofwhether we are “pro-formal” or “anti-formal”, but rather the degree of formality (if any) that we need to support in system development. This is a goal of ZUM’98, the 11th International Conference of Z Users, held for the ?rst time within continental Europe in the city of Berlin, Germany.Industrial Issues -- Industrial Requirements for the Efficient Development of Reliable Embedded Systems -- Concurrency -- How to Combine Z with a Process Algebra -- The Specification and Refinement of an Environmental Model -- Formal Derivation of Finite State Machines for Class Testing -- Tools -- Using B to Specify, Verify and Design Hardware Circuits -- Z on the Web Using Java -- Visualizing Z Notation in HTML Documents -- Z and HOL -- On the Semantic Relation of Z and HOL -- HOL-Z in the UniForM-Workbench – A Case Study in Tool Integration for Z -- Safety-Critical and Real-Time Systems -- Designing a Requirements Specification Language for Reactive Systems -- Analyzing a Real-Time Program with Z -- Semantic Theory -- Recursive Definitions in Z -- A Logic for the Schema Calculus -- Theory and Standards -- Combining Specification Techniques for Processes, Data and Time -- Innovations in the Notation of Standard Z -- Reasoning and Consistency Issues -- Comparing Extended Z with a Heterogeneous Notation for Reasoning about Time and Space -- Inconsistency and Undefinedness in Z – A Practical Guide -- Refinement -- Compositional Specification of Controllers for Batch Process Operations -- Testing Refinements by Refining Tests -- More Powerful Z Data Refinement: Pushing the State of the Art in Industrial Refinement -- Object Orientation -- Network Topology and a Case Study in TCOZ -- Object-Oriented Specification of Hybrid Systems Using UML h and ZimOO -- Translating the OMT Dynamic Model into Object-Z -- Appendices -- Select Z Bibliography -- Comp.specification.z and Z FORUM Frequently Asked Questions.1 In a number of recent presentations – most notably at FME’96 –oneofthe foremost scientists in the ?eld of formal methods, C.A.R. Hoare,has highlighted the fact that formal methods are not the only technique for producing reliable software. This seems to have caused some controversy,not least amongst formal methods practitioners. How can one of the founding fathers of formal methods seemingly denounce the ?eld of research after over a quarter of a century of support? This is a question that has been posed recently by some formal methods skeptics. However, Prof. Hoare has not abandoned formal methods. He is reiterating, 2 albeitmoreradically,his1987view thatmorethanonetoolandnotationwillbe requiredinthepractical,industrialdevelopmentoflarge-scalecomplexcomputer systems; and not all of these tools and notations will be, or even need be, formal in nature. Formalmethods arenotasolution,butratheroneofaselectionoftechniques that have proven to be useful in the development of reliable complex systems, and to result in hardware and software systems that can be produced on-time and within a budget, while satisfying the stated requirements. After almostthree decades,the time has come to view formalmethods in the context of overall industrial-scale system development, and their relationship to othertechniquesandmethods.Weshouldnolongerconsidertheissueofwhether we are “pro-formal” or “anti-formal”, but rather the degree of formality (if any) that we need to support in system development. This is a goal of ZUM’98, the 11th International Conference of Z Users, held for the ?rst time within continental Europe in the city of Berlin, Germany.Computer science.Software engineering.Computer programming.Computer logic.Mathematical logic.Computer Science.Software Engineering/Programming and Operating Systems.Software Engineering.Logics and Meanings of Programs.Programming Techniques.Mathematical Logic and Formal Languages.Springer eBookshttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/b68208URN:ISBN:9783540496762