Parameters in Old French Syntax: Infinitival Complements [electronic resource] /

1.1. AIMS AND ASSUMPTIONS This book presents an analysis of infinitival complement constructions in Old French (OF) from the perspective of the Government-Binding (GB) framework. It aims, therefore, to establish within the terms of the GB framework just how the OF constructions are to be characterized and in just what sense they can or cannot be compared with the corresponding constructions in other Romance languages. The GB framework is an articulated theory about the structure of language which is based on the view that the aim of research into language is to construct a description of language which accurately reflects its essential nature. Whilst we know that individual languages may appear to be superficially very different, we also know that all languages are capable of expressing complex concepts and that all children acquire mastery of the language or languages to which they are exposed. The task, therefore, is to determine both the properties which languages have in common and the bounds within which they may differ. In the pursuit of these aims, the study of various languages of the Romance family has provided a rich source of material for the develop­ ment of the descriptive apparatus. Evidence of the contribution supplied by such work is apparent in references to Romance material in Chomsky (1981, 1982), in volumes such as Jaeggli (1982), Rizzi (1982a), Kayne (1984b), Burzio (1986), and in numerous papers devoted to particular constructions in a variety of Romance languages.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pearce, Elizabeth. author., SpringerLink (Online service)
Format: Texto biblioteca
Language:eng
Published: Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands, 1990
Subjects:Linguistics., Historical linguistics., Romance languages., Syntax., Romance Languages., Historical Linguistics.,
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1884-9
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id KOHA-OAI-TEST:195359
record_format koha
institution COLPOS
collection Koha
country México
countrycode MX
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
En linea
databasecode cat-colpos
tag biblioteca
region America del Norte
libraryname Departamento de documentación y biblioteca de COLPOS
language eng
topic Linguistics.
Historical linguistics.
Romance languages.
Syntax.
Linguistics.
Syntax.
Romance Languages.
Historical Linguistics.
Linguistics.
Historical linguistics.
Romance languages.
Syntax.
Linguistics.
Syntax.
Romance Languages.
Historical Linguistics.
spellingShingle Linguistics.
Historical linguistics.
Romance languages.
Syntax.
Linguistics.
Syntax.
Romance Languages.
Historical Linguistics.
Linguistics.
Historical linguistics.
Romance languages.
Syntax.
Linguistics.
Syntax.
Romance Languages.
Historical Linguistics.
Pearce, Elizabeth. author.
SpringerLink (Online service)
Parameters in Old French Syntax: Infinitival Complements [electronic resource] /
description 1.1. AIMS AND ASSUMPTIONS This book presents an analysis of infinitival complement constructions in Old French (OF) from the perspective of the Government-Binding (GB) framework. It aims, therefore, to establish within the terms of the GB framework just how the OF constructions are to be characterized and in just what sense they can or cannot be compared with the corresponding constructions in other Romance languages. The GB framework is an articulated theory about the structure of language which is based on the view that the aim of research into language is to construct a description of language which accurately reflects its essential nature. Whilst we know that individual languages may appear to be superficially very different, we also know that all languages are capable of expressing complex concepts and that all children acquire mastery of the language or languages to which they are exposed. The task, therefore, is to determine both the properties which languages have in common and the bounds within which they may differ. In the pursuit of these aims, the study of various languages of the Romance family has provided a rich source of material for the develop­ ment of the descriptive apparatus. Evidence of the contribution supplied by such work is apparent in references to Romance material in Chomsky (1981, 1982), in volumes such as Jaeggli (1982), Rizzi (1982a), Kayne (1984b), Burzio (1986), and in numerous papers devoted to particular constructions in a variety of Romance languages.
format Texto
topic_facet Linguistics.
Historical linguistics.
Romance languages.
Syntax.
Linguistics.
Syntax.
Romance Languages.
Historical Linguistics.
author Pearce, Elizabeth. author.
SpringerLink (Online service)
author_facet Pearce, Elizabeth. author.
SpringerLink (Online service)
author_sort Pearce, Elizabeth. author.
title Parameters in Old French Syntax: Infinitival Complements [electronic resource] /
title_short Parameters in Old French Syntax: Infinitival Complements [electronic resource] /
title_full Parameters in Old French Syntax: Infinitival Complements [electronic resource] /
title_fullStr Parameters in Old French Syntax: Infinitival Complements [electronic resource] /
title_full_unstemmed Parameters in Old French Syntax: Infinitival Complements [electronic resource] /
title_sort parameters in old french syntax: infinitival complements [electronic resource] /
publisher Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands,
publishDate 1990
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1884-9
work_keys_str_mv AT pearceelizabethauthor parametersinoldfrenchsyntaxinfinitivalcomplementselectronicresource
AT springerlinkonlineservice parametersinoldfrenchsyntaxinfinitivalcomplementselectronicresource
_version_ 1756266731664310272
spelling KOHA-OAI-TEST:1953592018-07-30T23:21:11ZParameters in Old French Syntax: Infinitival Complements [electronic resource] / Pearce, Elizabeth. author. SpringerLink (Online service) textDordrecht : Springer Netherlands,1990.eng1.1. AIMS AND ASSUMPTIONS This book presents an analysis of infinitival complement constructions in Old French (OF) from the perspective of the Government-Binding (GB) framework. It aims, therefore, to establish within the terms of the GB framework just how the OF constructions are to be characterized and in just what sense they can or cannot be compared with the corresponding constructions in other Romance languages. The GB framework is an articulated theory about the structure of language which is based on the view that the aim of research into language is to construct a description of language which accurately reflects its essential nature. Whilst we know that individual languages may appear to be superficially very different, we also know that all languages are capable of expressing complex concepts and that all children acquire mastery of the language or languages to which they are exposed. The task, therefore, is to determine both the properties which languages have in common and the bounds within which they may differ. In the pursuit of these aims, the study of various languages of the Romance family has provided a rich source of material for the develop­ ment of the descriptive apparatus. Evidence of the contribution supplied by such work is apparent in references to Romance material in Chomsky (1981, 1982), in volumes such as Jaeggli (1982), Rizzi (1982a), Kayne (1984b), Burzio (1986), and in numerous papers devoted to particular constructions in a variety of Romance languages.1: Introduction -- 1.1. Aims and Assumptions -- 1.2. Infinitival Complements in Old French -- 1.3. Government-Binding Theory -- 1.4. Old French -- 1.5. Outline -- Notes -- 2: Romance Infinitival Complements -- 2.0. Introduction -- 2.1. Comparable Characteristics of Infinitivals in Old French, Modern Italian and Modern Spanish -- 2.2. “Reduced Clause” Analyses -- Notes -- 3: The Romance Causative -- 3.0. Introduction -- 3.1. Fare S versus Fare VP -- 3.2. The Extension of Fare VP -- 3.3. Against an Objection to Fare [+V] -- 3.4. Summary and Implications -- Notes -- 4: Non-Causative Pro-MV-Inf Constructions -- 4.0 Introduction -- 4.1. [+V] Complements in Pro-MV-Inf Constructions -- 4.2. Case Assignment and ?-roles -- 4.3. Burzio’s S Complement Account -- 4.4. ?-roles and Pro-MV-Inf Constructions -- 4.5. The Assignment of Essere -- 4.6. Constructions with Ne -- 4.7. Some Diachronic Implications -- 4.8. Summary -- Notes -- 5: Causatives in Old French -- 5.0. Introduction -- 5.1. Romance Causatives -- 5.2. The Causative Construction in Old French -- 5.3. Analysis of Old French Data -- 5.4. Syntactic Properties of Causative Type Complements in Old French -- 5.5. Case Assignment and Impersonal Verbs -- 5.6. The Causative Faire -- 5.7. Summary -- Notes -- 6: Non-Causative Infinitival Complements in Old French -- 6.0. Introduction -- 6.1. Infinitival Complements in Old French -- 6.2. Pronouns as Indicators of Structure -- 6.3. Ordering of Weak Pronouns -- 6.4. INFL, Verb Raising and Clitic Movement -- 6.5. Summary -- Notes -- Appendix A -- Appendix B -- References -- (a) Texts -- (b) Studies -- Index of Names -- Index of Subjects.1.1. AIMS AND ASSUMPTIONS This book presents an analysis of infinitival complement constructions in Old French (OF) from the perspective of the Government-Binding (GB) framework. It aims, therefore, to establish within the terms of the GB framework just how the OF constructions are to be characterized and in just what sense they can or cannot be compared with the corresponding constructions in other Romance languages. The GB framework is an articulated theory about the structure of language which is based on the view that the aim of research into language is to construct a description of language which accurately reflects its essential nature. Whilst we know that individual languages may appear to be superficially very different, we also know that all languages are capable of expressing complex concepts and that all children acquire mastery of the language or languages to which they are exposed. The task, therefore, is to determine both the properties which languages have in common and the bounds within which they may differ. In the pursuit of these aims, the study of various languages of the Romance family has provided a rich source of material for the develop­ ment of the descriptive apparatus. Evidence of the contribution supplied by such work is apparent in references to Romance material in Chomsky (1981, 1982), in volumes such as Jaeggli (1982), Rizzi (1982a), Kayne (1984b), Burzio (1986), and in numerous papers devoted to particular constructions in a variety of Romance languages.Linguistics.Historical linguistics.Romance languages.Syntax.Linguistics.Syntax.Romance Languages.Historical Linguistics.Springer eBookshttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1884-9URN:ISBN:9789400918849