The Opposite Mirrors [electronic resource] : An Essay on the Conventionalist Theory of Institutions /

How do social institutions exist? How do they direct our conduct? The Opposite Mirrors defends the thesis that the existence of institutions is a conventional matter. Ultimately they exist because we believe in their existence, and because they play a role in our practical reasoning. Human action necessarily has an unpredictable aspect; human institutions perform an important task by reducing uncertainty in our interactions. The author applies this thesis to the most important institutions: the law and the monetary system. In his analysis he connects many traditional topics of the philosophy of law, social philosophy and the philosophy of social sciences in a new way. He discusses the nature of rules, authority, and power and analyzes the Hobbesian presuppositions which have been dominant in legal theory and in the economic analyses of the state. The book is written for legal theorists as well as for political and social philosophers, and theoretically oriented social scientists.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lagerspetz, Eerik. author., SpringerLink (Online service)
Format: Texto biblioteca
Language:eng
Published: Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands : Imprint: Springer, 1995
Subjects:Philosophy., Modern philosophy., Political science., Philosophy and social sciences., Law, Law., Philosophy of Law., Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History., Criminology and Criminal Justice, general., Philosophy, general., Philosophy of the Social Sciences., Modern Philosophy.,
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3409-7
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id KOHA-OAI-TEST:187376
record_format koha
spelling KOHA-OAI-TEST:1873762018-07-30T23:10:35ZThe Opposite Mirrors [electronic resource] : An Essay on the Conventionalist Theory of Institutions / Lagerspetz, Eerik. author. SpringerLink (Online service) textDordrecht : Springer Netherlands : Imprint: Springer,1995.engHow do social institutions exist? How do they direct our conduct? The Opposite Mirrors defends the thesis that the existence of institutions is a conventional matter. Ultimately they exist because we believe in their existence, and because they play a role in our practical reasoning. Human action necessarily has an unpredictable aspect; human institutions perform an important task by reducing uncertainty in our interactions. The author applies this thesis to the most important institutions: the law and the monetary system. In his analysis he connects many traditional topics of the philosophy of law, social philosophy and the philosophy of social sciences in a new way. He discusses the nature of rules, authority, and power and analyzes the Hobbesian presuppositions which have been dominant in legal theory and in the economic analyses of the state. The book is written for legal theorists as well as for political and social philosophers, and theoretically oriented social scientists.1. Methodological Remarks -- 2. Game Theory and Mutual Beliefs -- 3. An Example: Money -- 4. The Concept of Authority -- 5. Authority and Coordination -- 6. The Foundations of Legal Systems -- 7. Conventionalism and Law -- 8. Efficacy and Obligation -- 9. The Role of Force -- 10. Conclusions -- Index of Names.How do social institutions exist? How do they direct our conduct? The Opposite Mirrors defends the thesis that the existence of institutions is a conventional matter. Ultimately they exist because we believe in their existence, and because they play a role in our practical reasoning. Human action necessarily has an unpredictable aspect; human institutions perform an important task by reducing uncertainty in our interactions. The author applies this thesis to the most important institutions: the law and the monetary system. In his analysis he connects many traditional topics of the philosophy of law, social philosophy and the philosophy of social sciences in a new way. He discusses the nature of rules, authority, and power and analyzes the Hobbesian presuppositions which have been dominant in legal theory and in the economic analyses of the state. The book is written for legal theorists as well as for political and social philosophers, and theoretically oriented social scientists.Philosophy.Modern philosophy.Political science.Philosophy and social sciences.LawLaw.Philosophy.Philosophy of Law.Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History.Criminology and Criminal Justice, general.Philosophy, general.Philosophy of the Social Sciences.Modern Philosophy.Springer eBookshttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3409-7URN:ISBN:9789401734097
institution COLPOS
collection Koha
country México
countrycode MX
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
En linea
databasecode cat-colpos
tag biblioteca
region America del Norte
libraryname Departamento de documentación y biblioteca de COLPOS
language eng
topic Philosophy.
Modern philosophy.
Political science.
Philosophy and social sciences.
Law
Law.
Philosophy.
Philosophy of Law.
Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History.
Criminology and Criminal Justice, general.
Philosophy, general.
Philosophy of the Social Sciences.
Modern Philosophy.
Philosophy.
Modern philosophy.
Political science.
Philosophy and social sciences.
Law
Law.
Philosophy.
Philosophy of Law.
Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History.
Criminology and Criminal Justice, general.
Philosophy, general.
Philosophy of the Social Sciences.
Modern Philosophy.
spellingShingle Philosophy.
Modern philosophy.
Political science.
Philosophy and social sciences.
Law
Law.
Philosophy.
Philosophy of Law.
Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History.
Criminology and Criminal Justice, general.
Philosophy, general.
Philosophy of the Social Sciences.
Modern Philosophy.
Philosophy.
Modern philosophy.
Political science.
Philosophy and social sciences.
Law
Law.
Philosophy.
Philosophy of Law.
Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History.
Criminology and Criminal Justice, general.
Philosophy, general.
Philosophy of the Social Sciences.
Modern Philosophy.
Lagerspetz, Eerik. author.
SpringerLink (Online service)
The Opposite Mirrors [electronic resource] : An Essay on the Conventionalist Theory of Institutions /
description How do social institutions exist? How do they direct our conduct? The Opposite Mirrors defends the thesis that the existence of institutions is a conventional matter. Ultimately they exist because we believe in their existence, and because they play a role in our practical reasoning. Human action necessarily has an unpredictable aspect; human institutions perform an important task by reducing uncertainty in our interactions. The author applies this thesis to the most important institutions: the law and the monetary system. In his analysis he connects many traditional topics of the philosophy of law, social philosophy and the philosophy of social sciences in a new way. He discusses the nature of rules, authority, and power and analyzes the Hobbesian presuppositions which have been dominant in legal theory and in the economic analyses of the state. The book is written for legal theorists as well as for political and social philosophers, and theoretically oriented social scientists.
format Texto
topic_facet Philosophy.
Modern philosophy.
Political science.
Philosophy and social sciences.
Law
Law.
Philosophy.
Philosophy of Law.
Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History.
Criminology and Criminal Justice, general.
Philosophy, general.
Philosophy of the Social Sciences.
Modern Philosophy.
author Lagerspetz, Eerik. author.
SpringerLink (Online service)
author_facet Lagerspetz, Eerik. author.
SpringerLink (Online service)
author_sort Lagerspetz, Eerik. author.
title The Opposite Mirrors [electronic resource] : An Essay on the Conventionalist Theory of Institutions /
title_short The Opposite Mirrors [electronic resource] : An Essay on the Conventionalist Theory of Institutions /
title_full The Opposite Mirrors [electronic resource] : An Essay on the Conventionalist Theory of Institutions /
title_fullStr The Opposite Mirrors [electronic resource] : An Essay on the Conventionalist Theory of Institutions /
title_full_unstemmed The Opposite Mirrors [electronic resource] : An Essay on the Conventionalist Theory of Institutions /
title_sort opposite mirrors [electronic resource] : an essay on the conventionalist theory of institutions /
publisher Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands : Imprint: Springer,
publishDate 1995
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3409-7
work_keys_str_mv AT lagerspetzeerikauthor theoppositemirrorselectronicresourceanessayontheconventionalisttheoryofinstitutions
AT springerlinkonlineservice theoppositemirrorselectronicresourceanessayontheconventionalisttheoryofinstitutions
AT lagerspetzeerikauthor oppositemirrorselectronicresourceanessayontheconventionalisttheoryofinstitutions
AT springerlinkonlineservice oppositemirrorselectronicresourceanessayontheconventionalisttheoryofinstitutions
_version_ 1756265638636027904