The Interpretation of Object-Oriented Programming Languages [electronic resource] /

I was extremely surprised to learn that this book was so well received; I was even more surprised when a second edition was proposed. I had realised that there was a need for a book such as this but had not thought that the need was as great; I really wrote the book for myself, in order better to organise my thoughts on object-oriented languages and better to understand them. For the second edition, I have found and corrected mistakes and have added a completely new chapter on the C# language. The chapter on mixed­ paradigm languages has been relegated to an appendix, and a new appendix on the BeCecil language has been added. - C# is extremely popular. Given its apparent role as the major competitor to Java, it was clear that a chapter was necessary in which a comparison could be made. That chapter concentrates on the language and not on the runtime and support system. C# contributes some new features to the C++ derivatives. The language has rough edges (as Java does still) . It will be interesting to watch its development and to see whether it becomes accepted more widely.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Craig, Iain. author., SpringerLink (Online service)
Format: Texto biblioteca
Language:eng
Published: London : Springer London : Imprint: Springer, 2002
Subjects:Computer science., Computer programming., Programming languages (Electronic computers)., Computer Science., Programming Techniques., Programming Languages, Compilers, Interpreters.,
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0199-4
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id KOHA-OAI-TEST:173663
record_format koha
institution COLPOS
collection Koha
country México
countrycode MX
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
En linea
databasecode cat-colpos
tag biblioteca
region America del Norte
libraryname Departamento de documentación y biblioteca de COLPOS
language eng
topic Computer science.
Computer programming.
Programming languages (Electronic computers).
Computer Science.
Programming Techniques.
Programming Languages, Compilers, Interpreters.
Computer science.
Computer programming.
Programming languages (Electronic computers).
Computer Science.
Programming Techniques.
Programming Languages, Compilers, Interpreters.
spellingShingle Computer science.
Computer programming.
Programming languages (Electronic computers).
Computer Science.
Programming Techniques.
Programming Languages, Compilers, Interpreters.
Computer science.
Computer programming.
Programming languages (Electronic computers).
Computer Science.
Programming Techniques.
Programming Languages, Compilers, Interpreters.
Craig, Iain. author.
SpringerLink (Online service)
The Interpretation of Object-Oriented Programming Languages [electronic resource] /
description I was extremely surprised to learn that this book was so well received; I was even more surprised when a second edition was proposed. I had realised that there was a need for a book such as this but had not thought that the need was as great; I really wrote the book for myself, in order better to organise my thoughts on object-oriented languages and better to understand them. For the second edition, I have found and corrected mistakes and have added a completely new chapter on the C# language. The chapter on mixed­ paradigm languages has been relegated to an appendix, and a new appendix on the BeCecil language has been added. - C# is extremely popular. Given its apparent role as the major competitor to Java, it was clear that a chapter was necessary in which a comparison could be made. That chapter concentrates on the language and not on the runtime and support system. C# contributes some new features to the C++ derivatives. The language has rough edges (as Java does still) . It will be interesting to watch its development and to see whether it becomes accepted more widely.
format Texto
topic_facet Computer science.
Computer programming.
Programming languages (Electronic computers).
Computer Science.
Programming Techniques.
Programming Languages, Compilers, Interpreters.
author Craig, Iain. author.
SpringerLink (Online service)
author_facet Craig, Iain. author.
SpringerLink (Online service)
author_sort Craig, Iain. author.
title The Interpretation of Object-Oriented Programming Languages [electronic resource] /
title_short The Interpretation of Object-Oriented Programming Languages [electronic resource] /
title_full The Interpretation of Object-Oriented Programming Languages [electronic resource] /
title_fullStr The Interpretation of Object-Oriented Programming Languages [electronic resource] /
title_full_unstemmed The Interpretation of Object-Oriented Programming Languages [electronic resource] /
title_sort interpretation of object-oriented programming languages [electronic resource] /
publisher London : Springer London : Imprint: Springer,
publishDate 2002
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0199-4
work_keys_str_mv AT craigiainauthor theinterpretationofobjectorientedprogramminglanguageselectronicresource
AT springerlinkonlineservice theinterpretationofobjectorientedprogramminglanguageselectronicresource
AT craigiainauthor interpretationofobjectorientedprogramminglanguageselectronicresource
AT springerlinkonlineservice interpretationofobjectorientedprogramminglanguageselectronicresource
_version_ 1756263756670697472
spelling KOHA-OAI-TEST:1736632018-07-30T22:51:18ZThe Interpretation of Object-Oriented Programming Languages [electronic resource] / Craig, Iain. author. SpringerLink (Online service) textLondon : Springer London : Imprint: Springer,2002.engI was extremely surprised to learn that this book was so well received; I was even more surprised when a second edition was proposed. I had realised that there was a need for a book such as this but had not thought that the need was as great; I really wrote the book for myself, in order better to organise my thoughts on object-oriented languages and better to understand them. For the second edition, I have found and corrected mistakes and have added a completely new chapter on the C# language. The chapter on mixed­ paradigm languages has been relegated to an appendix, and a new appendix on the BeCecil language has been added. - C# is extremely popular. Given its apparent role as the major competitor to Java, it was clear that a chapter was necessary in which a comparison could be made. That chapter concentrates on the language and not on the runtime and support system. C# contributes some new features to the C++ derivatives. The language has rough edges (as Java does still) . It will be interesting to watch its development and to see whether it becomes accepted more widely.1. Introduction -- 1.1 Introduction -- 1.2 Essential Properties of Objects -- 1.3 Objects and Messages -- 1.4 Pure and Impure Languages -- 1.5 Mixed-Paradigm Languages -- 1.6 Organization of this Book -- 2. Class Fundamentals -- 2.1 Introduction -- 2.2 Classes -- 2.3 Instances -- 2.4 Slots and Methods -- 2.5 Slot Access -- 2.6 Visibility and Accessibility -- 2.7 Instance Creation -- 2.8 Inheritance -- 2.9 Abstract Classes -- 2.10 Iterators -- 2.11 Part Objects -- 3. Prototype and Actor Languages -- 3.1 Introduction -- 3.2 Prototype Languages -- 3.3 Methods in Prototype Languages -- 3.4 Actor Languages -- 4. Inheritance and Delegation -- 4.1 Introduction -- 4.2 Interpretations of Inheritance -- 4.3 Inheritance as Subtyping -- 4.4 Inheritance as Code Sharing -- 4.5 Single Inheritance -- 4.6 Calling More Abstract Methods -- 4.7 Multiple Inheritance -- 4.8 Multiple Inheritance Graph Shape -- 4.9 Approaches to Multiple Inheritance -- 4.10 Implemented Multiple Inheritance Techniques -- 4.11 Mixin Classes -- 4.12 Alternatives to Multiple Inheritance -- 4.13 Delegation and Prototypes -- 4.14 Aggregation -- 5. Methods -- 5.1 Introduction -- 5.2 Methods and Objects -- 5.3 Object Constructors and Methods -- 5.4 Environments and Closures -- 5.5 Methods and Inheritance -- 5.6 Static and Dynamic Binding -- 6. Types I: Types and Objects -- 6.1 Introduction -- 6.2 Inheritance and Types -- 6.3 Polymorphism -- 6.4 Genericity -- 6.5 Overloading and Overriding -- 6.6 Languages with Root Classes -- 6.7 Polyadicity and Default Parameters -- 6.8 Downcasting and Subtypes -- 6.9 Review -- 7. Types II: Types and Objects—Alternatives -- 7.1 Introduction -- 7.2 Types and Implementations -- 7.3 Hiding Implementation Details -- 7.4 Classes and Type Operations -- 7.5 Containers and Objects -- 8. Reflection -- 8.1 Introduction -- 8.2 Class and Meta Class -- 8.3 Meta Class and Reflection -- 8.4 Meta-Object Protocols -- 8.5 Self Representation, Abstract Syntax and Abstract Classes.. -- 8.6 Reflection in Java -- 8.7 Reflection in Prototype-based Languages -- 8.8 Prospects for the Future -- 9. C# -- 9.1 Introduction -- 9.2 Classes and Instances -- 9.3 Inheritance -- 9.4 Methods and Operators -- 9.5 Polymorphism and Types -- 9.6 Base Class Library -- A. BeCecil -- A.1 Programming Standard 00 Mechanisms -- A.2 Syntactic Sugar -- A.3 A Small Example -- A.4 Concluding Remarks -- B. Mixed-Paradigm Languages -- B.1 Introduction -- B.2 Functional Programming: An Overview -- B.2.1 Control Structures and Semantics -- B.2.2 Evaluation Strategies -- B.2.3 Higher-Order Functions -- B.2.4 Hindley-Milner Type Inference -- B.2.5 Syntactic Sugar -- B.3 An Impure Language -- B.3.1 The Object-Oriented Component -- B.3.2 The Functional Component -- B.4 Review -- References.I was extremely surprised to learn that this book was so well received; I was even more surprised when a second edition was proposed. I had realised that there was a need for a book such as this but had not thought that the need was as great; I really wrote the book for myself, in order better to organise my thoughts on object-oriented languages and better to understand them. For the second edition, I have found and corrected mistakes and have added a completely new chapter on the C# language. The chapter on mixed­ paradigm languages has been relegated to an appendix, and a new appendix on the BeCecil language has been added. - C# is extremely popular. Given its apparent role as the major competitor to Java, it was clear that a chapter was necessary in which a comparison could be made. That chapter concentrates on the language and not on the runtime and support system. C# contributes some new features to the C++ derivatives. The language has rough edges (as Java does still) . It will be interesting to watch its development and to see whether it becomes accepted more widely.Computer science.Computer programming.Programming languages (Electronic computers).Computer Science.Programming Techniques.Programming Languages, Compilers, Interpreters.Springer eBookshttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0199-4URN:ISBN:9781447101994