Regime Consequences [electronic resource] : Methodological Challenges and Research Strategies /

This volume has a long and distinguished pedigree. It is the product of an effort to devise clear and unambiguous methods for demonstrating that international regimes make a difference stretching back at least to the early 1990s. What has transpired in the meantime is the development of a suite of useful techniques of analysis rather than the creation of a single, correct methodology for use in this field of study. Our assumption is that we can be relatively confident regarding assessments of the consequences of individual regimes when those employing a variety of methods converge on the same conclusions. When different methods yield divergent conclusions, on the other hand, we can take this as a signal that more work is needed to arrive at convincing judgments regarding the consequences of the regimes in question. Along the way, we came to understand that there is an important distinction between what we describe in this book as simple effectiveness and broader consequences. Most analyses of the effectiveness of international regimes focus on individual cases and seek to assess the performance of regimes on a case-by-case basis. This is entirely understandable. Yet it is now clear that individual regimes not only interact with one another but also operate in and affect broader settings. The study of these broader consequences is less mature than research on the effectiveness of individual regimes.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Underdal, Arild. author., Young, Oran R. author., SpringerLink (Online service)
Format: Texto biblioteca
Language:eng
Published: Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands : Imprint: Springer, 2004
Subjects:Political science., Private international law., Conflict of laws., International law., Comparative law., Environmental law., Environmental policy., Social sciences., Political Science and International Relations., Political Science., Private International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law., Environmental Law/Policy/Ecojustice., Social Sciences, general.,
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2208-1
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id KOHA-OAI-TEST:171132
record_format koha
institution COLPOS
collection Koha
country México
countrycode MX
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
En linea
databasecode cat-colpos
tag biblioteca
region America del Norte
libraryname Departamento de documentación y biblioteca de COLPOS
language eng
topic Political science.
Private international law.
Conflict of laws.
International law.
Comparative law.
Environmental law.
Environmental policy.
Social sciences.
Political Science and International Relations.
Political Science.
Private International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law.
Environmental Law/Policy/Ecojustice.
Social Sciences, general.
Political science.
Private international law.
Conflict of laws.
International law.
Comparative law.
Environmental law.
Environmental policy.
Social sciences.
Political Science and International Relations.
Political Science.
Private International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law.
Environmental Law/Policy/Ecojustice.
Social Sciences, general.
spellingShingle Political science.
Private international law.
Conflict of laws.
International law.
Comparative law.
Environmental law.
Environmental policy.
Social sciences.
Political Science and International Relations.
Political Science.
Private International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law.
Environmental Law/Policy/Ecojustice.
Social Sciences, general.
Political science.
Private international law.
Conflict of laws.
International law.
Comparative law.
Environmental law.
Environmental policy.
Social sciences.
Political Science and International Relations.
Political Science.
Private International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law.
Environmental Law/Policy/Ecojustice.
Social Sciences, general.
Underdal, Arild. author.
Young, Oran R. author.
SpringerLink (Online service)
Regime Consequences [electronic resource] : Methodological Challenges and Research Strategies /
description This volume has a long and distinguished pedigree. It is the product of an effort to devise clear and unambiguous methods for demonstrating that international regimes make a difference stretching back at least to the early 1990s. What has transpired in the meantime is the development of a suite of useful techniques of analysis rather than the creation of a single, correct methodology for use in this field of study. Our assumption is that we can be relatively confident regarding assessments of the consequences of individual regimes when those employing a variety of methods converge on the same conclusions. When different methods yield divergent conclusions, on the other hand, we can take this as a signal that more work is needed to arrive at convincing judgments regarding the consequences of the regimes in question. Along the way, we came to understand that there is an important distinction between what we describe in this book as simple effectiveness and broader consequences. Most analyses of the effectiveness of international regimes focus on individual cases and seek to assess the performance of regimes on a case-by-case basis. This is entirely understandable. Yet it is now clear that individual regimes not only interact with one another but also operate in and affect broader settings. The study of these broader consequences is less mature than research on the effectiveness of individual regimes.
format Texto
topic_facet Political science.
Private international law.
Conflict of laws.
International law.
Comparative law.
Environmental law.
Environmental policy.
Social sciences.
Political Science and International Relations.
Political Science.
Private International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law.
Environmental Law/Policy/Ecojustice.
Social Sciences, general.
author Underdal, Arild. author.
Young, Oran R. author.
SpringerLink (Online service)
author_facet Underdal, Arild. author.
Young, Oran R. author.
SpringerLink (Online service)
author_sort Underdal, Arild. author.
title Regime Consequences [electronic resource] : Methodological Challenges and Research Strategies /
title_short Regime Consequences [electronic resource] : Methodological Challenges and Research Strategies /
title_full Regime Consequences [electronic resource] : Methodological Challenges and Research Strategies /
title_fullStr Regime Consequences [electronic resource] : Methodological Challenges and Research Strategies /
title_full_unstemmed Regime Consequences [electronic resource] : Methodological Challenges and Research Strategies /
title_sort regime consequences [electronic resource] : methodological challenges and research strategies /
publisher Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands : Imprint: Springer,
publishDate 2004
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2208-1
work_keys_str_mv AT underdalarildauthor regimeconsequenceselectronicresourcemethodologicalchallengesandresearchstrategies
AT youngoranrauthor regimeconsequenceselectronicresourcemethodologicalchallengesandresearchstrategies
AT springerlinkonlineservice regimeconsequenceselectronicresourcemethodologicalchallengesandresearchstrategies
_version_ 1756263410602868736
spelling KOHA-OAI-TEST:1711322018-07-30T22:48:06ZRegime Consequences [electronic resource] : Methodological Challenges and Research Strategies / Underdal, Arild. author. Young, Oran R. author. SpringerLink (Online service) textDordrecht : Springer Netherlands : Imprint: Springer,2004.engThis volume has a long and distinguished pedigree. It is the product of an effort to devise clear and unambiguous methods for demonstrating that international regimes make a difference stretching back at least to the early 1990s. What has transpired in the meantime is the development of a suite of useful techniques of analysis rather than the creation of a single, correct methodology for use in this field of study. Our assumption is that we can be relatively confident regarding assessments of the consequences of individual regimes when those employing a variety of methods converge on the same conclusions. When different methods yield divergent conclusions, on the other hand, we can take this as a signal that more work is needed to arrive at convincing judgments regarding the consequences of the regimes in question. Along the way, we came to understand that there is an important distinction between what we describe in this book as simple effectiveness and broader consequences. Most analyses of the effectiveness of international regimes focus on individual cases and seek to assess the performance of regimes on a case-by-case basis. This is entirely understandable. Yet it is now clear that individual regimes not only interact with one another but also operate in and affect broader settings. The study of these broader consequences is less mature than research on the effectiveness of individual regimes.1 The Consequences of International Regimes -- I: Simple Effectiveness -- 2 Methodological Challenges in the Study of Regime Effectiveness -- 3 Case Studies of the Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes -- 4 Causal Mechanisms and the Study of International Environmental Regimes -- 5 Boolean Analysis, Mechanisms, and the Study of Regime Effectiveness -- 6 A Quantitative Approach to Evaluating International Environmental Regimes -- 7 Formal Theory and Regime Effectiveness: Rational Players, Irrational Regimes -- 8 Does Regime Robustness Require a Fair Distribution of The Gains from Cooperation? -- II: Broader Consequences -- 9 Methodological Issues in the Study of Broader Consequences -- 10 Exploring Regime Interaction -- 11 International Regimes And Democracy -- 12 Into the Methodological Void -- 13 Regimes and Social Transformation -- III: Conclusion -- 14 Research Strategies for the Future.This volume has a long and distinguished pedigree. It is the product of an effort to devise clear and unambiguous methods for demonstrating that international regimes make a difference stretching back at least to the early 1990s. What has transpired in the meantime is the development of a suite of useful techniques of analysis rather than the creation of a single, correct methodology for use in this field of study. Our assumption is that we can be relatively confident regarding assessments of the consequences of individual regimes when those employing a variety of methods converge on the same conclusions. When different methods yield divergent conclusions, on the other hand, we can take this as a signal that more work is needed to arrive at convincing judgments regarding the consequences of the regimes in question. Along the way, we came to understand that there is an important distinction between what we describe in this book as simple effectiveness and broader consequences. Most analyses of the effectiveness of international regimes focus on individual cases and seek to assess the performance of regimes on a case-by-case basis. This is entirely understandable. Yet it is now clear that individual regimes not only interact with one another but also operate in and affect broader settings. The study of these broader consequences is less mature than research on the effectiveness of individual regimes.Political science.Private international law.Conflict of laws.International law.Comparative law.Environmental law.Environmental policy.Social sciences.Political Science and International Relations.Political Science.Private International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law.Environmental Law/Policy/Ecojustice.Social Sciences, general.Springer eBookshttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2208-1URN:ISBN:9781402022081