Relevance of DNA barcodes for biomonitoring of freshwater animals

The COI gene, colloquially named the DNA barcode, is a universal marker for species identification in the animal kingdom. Nevertheless, due to the taxonomic impediment, there are various proposals for molecular operational taxonomic units (MOTUs) because high-throughput sequencers can generate millions of sequences in one run. In the case of freshwater systems, it is possible to analyze whole communities through their DNA using only water or sediment as a sample. Using DNA barcodes with these technologies is known as metabarcoding. More than 90% of studies based on eDNA work with MOTUs without previous knowledge of the biodiversity in the habitat. Despite this problem, it has been proposed as the future for biomonitoring. All these studies are biased toward the Global North and focused on freshwater macrofaunae. Few studies include other regions of the world or other communities, such as zooplankton and phytoplankton. The future of biomonitoring should be based on a standardized gene, for example, COI, the most studied gene in animals, or another secondary consensual gene. Here, we analyzed some proposals with 28S or 12S. The studies on eDNA can focus on analyses of the whole community or a particular species. The latter can be an endangered or exotic species. Any eDNA study focused on a community study should have a well-documented DNA baseline linked to vouchered specimens. Otherwise, it will be tough to discriminate between false positives and negatives. Biomonitoring routines based on eDNA can detect a change in a community due to any perturbation of the aquatic ecosystem. Also, it can track changes along the history of an epicontinental environment through the analyses of sediments. However, their implementation will be complex in most megadiverse Neotropical countries due to the lack of these baselines. It has been demonstrated that a rapid functional construction of a DNA baseline is possible, although the curation of the species can take more time. However, there is a lack of governmental interest in this kind of research and subsequent biomonitoring.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elías Gutiérrez, Manuel Doctor autor 2041, Valdez Moreno, Martha Doctora autora 2050
Format: Texto biblioteca
Language:eng
Subjects:Ecosistemas de agua dulce, Códigos de barras de ADN, Monitoreo biológico,
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1057653
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id KOHA-OAI-ECOSUR:63627
record_format koha
institution ECOSUR
collection Koha
country México
countrycode MX
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
En linea
databasecode cat-ecosur
tag biblioteca
region America del Norte
libraryname Sistema de Información Bibliotecario de ECOSUR (SIBE)
language eng
topic Ecosistemas de agua dulce
Códigos de barras de ADN
Monitoreo biológico
Ecosistemas de agua dulce
Códigos de barras de ADN
Monitoreo biológico
spellingShingle Ecosistemas de agua dulce
Códigos de barras de ADN
Monitoreo biológico
Ecosistemas de agua dulce
Códigos de barras de ADN
Monitoreo biológico
Elías Gutiérrez, Manuel Doctor autor 2041
Valdez Moreno, Martha Doctora autora 2050
Relevance of DNA barcodes for biomonitoring of freshwater animals
description The COI gene, colloquially named the DNA barcode, is a universal marker for species identification in the animal kingdom. Nevertheless, due to the taxonomic impediment, there are various proposals for molecular operational taxonomic units (MOTUs) because high-throughput sequencers can generate millions of sequences in one run. In the case of freshwater systems, it is possible to analyze whole communities through their DNA using only water or sediment as a sample. Using DNA barcodes with these technologies is known as metabarcoding. More than 90% of studies based on eDNA work with MOTUs without previous knowledge of the biodiversity in the habitat. Despite this problem, it has been proposed as the future for biomonitoring. All these studies are biased toward the Global North and focused on freshwater macrofaunae. Few studies include other regions of the world or other communities, such as zooplankton and phytoplankton. The future of biomonitoring should be based on a standardized gene, for example, COI, the most studied gene in animals, or another secondary consensual gene. Here, we analyzed some proposals with 28S or 12S. The studies on eDNA can focus on analyses of the whole community or a particular species. The latter can be an endangered or exotic species. Any eDNA study focused on a community study should have a well-documented DNA baseline linked to vouchered specimens. Otherwise, it will be tough to discriminate between false positives and negatives. Biomonitoring routines based on eDNA can detect a change in a community due to any perturbation of the aquatic ecosystem. Also, it can track changes along the history of an epicontinental environment through the analyses of sediments. However, their implementation will be complex in most megadiverse Neotropical countries due to the lack of these baselines. It has been demonstrated that a rapid functional construction of a DNA baseline is possible, although the curation of the species can take more time. However, there is a lack of governmental interest in this kind of research and subsequent biomonitoring.
format Texto
topic_facet Ecosistemas de agua dulce
Códigos de barras de ADN
Monitoreo biológico
author Elías Gutiérrez, Manuel Doctor autor 2041
Valdez Moreno, Martha Doctora autora 2050
author_facet Elías Gutiérrez, Manuel Doctor autor 2041
Valdez Moreno, Martha Doctora autora 2050
author_sort Elías Gutiérrez, Manuel Doctor autor 2041
title Relevance of DNA barcodes for biomonitoring of freshwater animals
title_short Relevance of DNA barcodes for biomonitoring of freshwater animals
title_full Relevance of DNA barcodes for biomonitoring of freshwater animals
title_fullStr Relevance of DNA barcodes for biomonitoring of freshwater animals
title_full_unstemmed Relevance of DNA barcodes for biomonitoring of freshwater animals
title_sort relevance of dna barcodes for biomonitoring of freshwater animals
url https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1057653
work_keys_str_mv AT eliasgutierrezmanueldoctorautor2041 relevanceofdnabarcodesforbiomonitoringoffreshwateranimals
AT valdezmorenomarthadoctoraautora2050 relevanceofdnabarcodesforbiomonitoringoffreshwateranimals
_version_ 1794792442698924032
spelling KOHA-OAI-ECOSUR:636272024-03-12T12:40:53ZRelevance of DNA barcodes for biomonitoring of freshwater animals Elías Gutiérrez, Manuel Doctor autor 2041 Valdez Moreno, Martha Doctora autora 2050 textengThe COI gene, colloquially named the DNA barcode, is a universal marker for species identification in the animal kingdom. Nevertheless, due to the taxonomic impediment, there are various proposals for molecular operational taxonomic units (MOTUs) because high-throughput sequencers can generate millions of sequences in one run. In the case of freshwater systems, it is possible to analyze whole communities through their DNA using only water or sediment as a sample. Using DNA barcodes with these technologies is known as metabarcoding. More than 90% of studies based on eDNA work with MOTUs without previous knowledge of the biodiversity in the habitat. Despite this problem, it has been proposed as the future for biomonitoring. All these studies are biased toward the Global North and focused on freshwater macrofaunae. Few studies include other regions of the world or other communities, such as zooplankton and phytoplankton. The future of biomonitoring should be based on a standardized gene, for example, COI, the most studied gene in animals, or another secondary consensual gene. Here, we analyzed some proposals with 28S or 12S. The studies on eDNA can focus on analyses of the whole community or a particular species. The latter can be an endangered or exotic species. Any eDNA study focused on a community study should have a well-documented DNA baseline linked to vouchered specimens. Otherwise, it will be tough to discriminate between false positives and negatives. Biomonitoring routines based on eDNA can detect a change in a community due to any perturbation of the aquatic ecosystem. Also, it can track changes along the history of an epicontinental environment through the analyses of sediments. However, their implementation will be complex in most megadiverse Neotropical countries due to the lack of these baselines. It has been demonstrated that a rapid functional construction of a DNA baseline is possible, although the curation of the species can take more time. However, there is a lack of governmental interest in this kind of research and subsequent biomonitoring.The COI gene, colloquially named the DNA barcode, is a universal marker for species identification in the animal kingdom. Nevertheless, due to the taxonomic impediment, there are various proposals for molecular operational taxonomic units (MOTUs) because high-throughput sequencers can generate millions of sequences in one run. In the case of freshwater systems, it is possible to analyze whole communities through their DNA using only water or sediment as a sample. Using DNA barcodes with these technologies is known as metabarcoding. More than 90% of studies based on eDNA work with MOTUs without previous knowledge of the biodiversity in the habitat. Despite this problem, it has been proposed as the future for biomonitoring. All these studies are biased toward the Global North and focused on freshwater macrofaunae. Few studies include other regions of the world or other communities, such as zooplankton and phytoplankton. The future of biomonitoring should be based on a standardized gene, for example, COI, the most studied gene in animals, or another secondary consensual gene. Here, we analyzed some proposals with 28S or 12S. The studies on eDNA can focus on analyses of the whole community or a particular species. The latter can be an endangered or exotic species. Any eDNA study focused on a community study should have a well-documented DNA baseline linked to vouchered specimens. Otherwise, it will be tough to discriminate between false positives and negatives. Biomonitoring routines based on eDNA can detect a change in a community due to any perturbation of the aquatic ecosystem. Also, it can track changes along the history of an epicontinental environment through the analyses of sediments. However, their implementation will be complex in most megadiverse Neotropical countries due to the lack of these baselines. It has been demonstrated that a rapid functional construction of a DNA baseline is possible, although the curation of the species can take more time. However, there is a lack of governmental interest in this kind of research and subsequent biomonitoring.Ecosistemas de agua dulceCódigos de barras de ADNMonitoreo biológicoFrontiers in Environment Sciencehttps://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1057653Acceso en línea sin restricciones