Temporal considerations for an effective sampling of personal protective equipment litter derived from the COVID-19 pandemic

Personal protective equipment (PPE) has become a new pollutant derived from the COVID-19 pandemic. Much of the efforts to characterize PPE litter has focused on its spatial distribution (i.e., trying to identify hotspots of PPE litter), however, such efforts have been limited in the temporal domain, which might result in under- or overestimations in annual projections. Here, using 55 continuous days of sampling in an urban and tropical neighborhood in south east Mexico, I show that in order to have a robust and defensible average and variance values it is needed at least 22 days of random sampling. Nonetheless, this minimum number might change in different ecosystems and land use areas of the built environment due to the temporal variability of the human behavior and activities related to the surveyed areas, as well as the influence of weather conditions that might affect the mobility of people. Furthermore, I discuss how it is recommended to report the daily average density of PPE litter (items m−² day−¹) and its variability (i.e., 95 % confidence intervals), rather than only the density of PPE litter (items m−²) in order to facilitate annual estimates of PPE litter disposal.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Cueva, Alejandro autor
Format: Texto biblioteca
Language:eng
Subjects:Contaminación, Mascarillas, Equipo de protección personal, Infecciones por coronavirus, Pandemias, Artfrosur,
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160047
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id KOHA-OAI-ECOSUR:63175
record_format koha
spelling KOHA-OAI-ECOSUR:631752022-11-30T09:11:08ZTemporal considerations for an effective sampling of personal protective equipment litter derived from the COVID-19 pandemic Cueva, Alejandro autor textengPersonal protective equipment (PPE) has become a new pollutant derived from the COVID-19 pandemic. Much of the efforts to characterize PPE litter has focused on its spatial distribution (i.e., trying to identify hotspots of PPE litter), however, such efforts have been limited in the temporal domain, which might result in under- or overestimations in annual projections. Here, using 55 continuous days of sampling in an urban and tropical neighborhood in south east Mexico, I show that in order to have a robust and defensible average and variance values it is needed at least 22 days of random sampling. Nonetheless, this minimum number might change in different ecosystems and land use areas of the built environment due to the temporal variability of the human behavior and activities related to the surveyed areas, as well as the influence of weather conditions that might affect the mobility of people. Furthermore, I discuss how it is recommended to report the daily average density of PPE litter (items m−² day−¹) and its variability (i.e., 95 % confidence intervals), rather than only the density of PPE litter (items m−²) in order to facilitate annual estimates of PPE litter disposal.Personal protective equipment (PPE) has become a new pollutant derived from the COVID-19 pandemic. Much of the efforts to characterize PPE litter has focused on its spatial distribution (i.e., trying to identify hotspots of PPE litter), however, such efforts have been limited in the temporal domain, which might result in under- or overestimations in annual projections. Here, using 55 continuous days of sampling in an urban and tropical neighborhood in south east Mexico, I show that in order to have a robust and defensible average and variance values it is needed at least 22 days of random sampling. Nonetheless, this minimum number might change in different ecosystems and land use areas of the built environment due to the temporal variability of the human behavior and activities related to the surveyed areas, as well as the influence of weather conditions that might affect the mobility of people. Furthermore, I discuss how it is recommended to report the daily average density of PPE litter (items m−² day−¹) and its variability (i.e., 95 % confidence intervals), rather than only the density of PPE litter (items m−²) in order to facilitate annual estimates of PPE litter disposal.ContaminaciónMascarillasEquipo de protección personalInfecciones por coronavirusPandemiasArtfrosurScience of The Total Environmenthttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160047Acceso en línea sin restricciones
institution ECOSUR
collection Koha
country México
countrycode MX
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
En linea
databasecode cat-ecosur
tag biblioteca
region America del Norte
libraryname Sistema de Información Bibliotecario de ECOSUR (SIBE)
language eng
topic Contaminación
Mascarillas
Equipo de protección personal
Infecciones por coronavirus
Pandemias
Artfrosur
Contaminación
Mascarillas
Equipo de protección personal
Infecciones por coronavirus
Pandemias
Artfrosur
spellingShingle Contaminación
Mascarillas
Equipo de protección personal
Infecciones por coronavirus
Pandemias
Artfrosur
Contaminación
Mascarillas
Equipo de protección personal
Infecciones por coronavirus
Pandemias
Artfrosur
Cueva, Alejandro autor
Temporal considerations for an effective sampling of personal protective equipment litter derived from the COVID-19 pandemic
description Personal protective equipment (PPE) has become a new pollutant derived from the COVID-19 pandemic. Much of the efforts to characterize PPE litter has focused on its spatial distribution (i.e., trying to identify hotspots of PPE litter), however, such efforts have been limited in the temporal domain, which might result in under- or overestimations in annual projections. Here, using 55 continuous days of sampling in an urban and tropical neighborhood in south east Mexico, I show that in order to have a robust and defensible average and variance values it is needed at least 22 days of random sampling. Nonetheless, this minimum number might change in different ecosystems and land use areas of the built environment due to the temporal variability of the human behavior and activities related to the surveyed areas, as well as the influence of weather conditions that might affect the mobility of people. Furthermore, I discuss how it is recommended to report the daily average density of PPE litter (items m−² day−¹) and its variability (i.e., 95 % confidence intervals), rather than only the density of PPE litter (items m−²) in order to facilitate annual estimates of PPE litter disposal.
format Texto
topic_facet Contaminación
Mascarillas
Equipo de protección personal
Infecciones por coronavirus
Pandemias
Artfrosur
author Cueva, Alejandro autor
author_facet Cueva, Alejandro autor
author_sort Cueva, Alejandro autor
title Temporal considerations for an effective sampling of personal protective equipment litter derived from the COVID-19 pandemic
title_short Temporal considerations for an effective sampling of personal protective equipment litter derived from the COVID-19 pandemic
title_full Temporal considerations for an effective sampling of personal protective equipment litter derived from the COVID-19 pandemic
title_fullStr Temporal considerations for an effective sampling of personal protective equipment litter derived from the COVID-19 pandemic
title_full_unstemmed Temporal considerations for an effective sampling of personal protective equipment litter derived from the COVID-19 pandemic
title_sort temporal considerations for an effective sampling of personal protective equipment litter derived from the covid-19 pandemic
url https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160047
work_keys_str_mv AT cuevaalejandroautor temporalconsiderationsforaneffectivesamplingofpersonalprotectiveequipmentlitterderivedfromthecovid19pandemic
_version_ 1756229018392199168