Geographical, landscape and host associations of Trypanosoma cruzi DTUs and lineages

Background: The evolutionary history and ecological associations of Trypanosoma cruzi, the need to identify genetic markers that can distinguish parasite subpopulations, and understanding the parasite's evolutionary and selective processes have been the subject of a significant number of publications since 1998, the year when the first DNA sequence analysis for the species was published. Methods: The current analysis systematizes and re-analyzes this original research, focusing on critical methodological and analytical variables and results that have given rise to interpretations of putative patterns of genetic diversity and diversification of T. cruzi lineages, discrete typing units (DTUs), and populations, and their associations with hosts, vectors, and geographical distribution that have been interpreted as evidence for parasite subpopulation specificities. Results: Few studies use hypothesis-driven or quantitative analysis for T. cruzi phylogeny (16/58 studies) or phylogeography (10/13). Among these, only one phylogenetic and five phylogeographic studies analyzed molecular markers directly from tissues (i.e. not from isolates). Analysis of T. cruzi DTU or lineage niche and its geographical projection demonstrate extensive sympatry among all clades across the continent and no significant niche differences among DTUs. DTU beta-diversity was high, indicating diverse host assemblages across regions, while host dissimilarity was principally due to host species turnover and to a much lesser degree to nestedness. DTU-host order specificities appear related to trophic or microenvironmental interactions. Conclusions: More rigorous study designs and analyses will be required to discern evolutionary processes and the impact of landscape modification on population dynamics and risk for T. cruzi transmission to humans.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Izeta Alberdi, Amaia Doctor autor 15602, Ibarra Cerdeña, Carlos Napoleón autor 13200, Moo Llanes, David Alejandro autor 13403, Ramsey Willoquet, Janine M. Doctora autor 14239
Format: Texto biblioteca
Language:eng
Subjects:Trypanosoma cruzi, Nicho (Ecología), Mamíferos, Filogenética, Enfermedad de chagas, Zoogeografía,
Online Access:https://parasitesandvectors.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13071-016-1918-2
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id KOHA-OAI-ECOSUR:58037
record_format koha
institution ECOSUR
collection Koha
country México
countrycode MX
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
En linea
databasecode cat-ecosur
tag biblioteca
region America del Norte
libraryname Sistema de Información Bibliotecario de ECOSUR (SIBE)
language eng
topic Trypanosoma cruzi
Nicho (Ecología)
Mamíferos
Filogenética
Enfermedad de chagas
Zoogeografía
Trypanosoma cruzi
Nicho (Ecología)
Mamíferos
Filogenética
Enfermedad de chagas
Zoogeografía
spellingShingle Trypanosoma cruzi
Nicho (Ecología)
Mamíferos
Filogenética
Enfermedad de chagas
Zoogeografía
Trypanosoma cruzi
Nicho (Ecología)
Mamíferos
Filogenética
Enfermedad de chagas
Zoogeografía
Izeta Alberdi, Amaia Doctor autor 15602
Ibarra Cerdeña, Carlos Napoleón autor 13200
Moo Llanes, David Alejandro autor 13403
Ramsey Willoquet, Janine M. Doctora autor 14239
Geographical, landscape and host associations of Trypanosoma cruzi DTUs and lineages
description Background: The evolutionary history and ecological associations of Trypanosoma cruzi, the need to identify genetic markers that can distinguish parasite subpopulations, and understanding the parasite's evolutionary and selective processes have been the subject of a significant number of publications since 1998, the year when the first DNA sequence analysis for the species was published. Methods: The current analysis systematizes and re-analyzes this original research, focusing on critical methodological and analytical variables and results that have given rise to interpretations of putative patterns of genetic diversity and diversification of T. cruzi lineages, discrete typing units (DTUs), and populations, and their associations with hosts, vectors, and geographical distribution that have been interpreted as evidence for parasite subpopulation specificities. Results: Few studies use hypothesis-driven or quantitative analysis for T. cruzi phylogeny (16/58 studies) or phylogeography (10/13). Among these, only one phylogenetic and five phylogeographic studies analyzed molecular markers directly from tissues (i.e. not from isolates). Analysis of T. cruzi DTU or lineage niche and its geographical projection demonstrate extensive sympatry among all clades across the continent and no significant niche differences among DTUs. DTU beta-diversity was high, indicating diverse host assemblages across regions, while host dissimilarity was principally due to host species turnover and to a much lesser degree to nestedness. DTU-host order specificities appear related to trophic or microenvironmental interactions. Conclusions: More rigorous study designs and analyses will be required to discern evolutionary processes and the impact of landscape modification on population dynamics and risk for T. cruzi transmission to humans.
format Texto
topic_facet Trypanosoma cruzi
Nicho (Ecología)
Mamíferos
Filogenética
Enfermedad de chagas
Zoogeografía
author Izeta Alberdi, Amaia Doctor autor 15602
Ibarra Cerdeña, Carlos Napoleón autor 13200
Moo Llanes, David Alejandro autor 13403
Ramsey Willoquet, Janine M. Doctora autor 14239
author_facet Izeta Alberdi, Amaia Doctor autor 15602
Ibarra Cerdeña, Carlos Napoleón autor 13200
Moo Llanes, David Alejandro autor 13403
Ramsey Willoquet, Janine M. Doctora autor 14239
author_sort Izeta Alberdi, Amaia Doctor autor 15602
title Geographical, landscape and host associations of Trypanosoma cruzi DTUs and lineages
title_short Geographical, landscape and host associations of Trypanosoma cruzi DTUs and lineages
title_full Geographical, landscape and host associations of Trypanosoma cruzi DTUs and lineages
title_fullStr Geographical, landscape and host associations of Trypanosoma cruzi DTUs and lineages
title_full_unstemmed Geographical, landscape and host associations of Trypanosoma cruzi DTUs and lineages
title_sort geographical, landscape and host associations of trypanosoma cruzi dtus and lineages
url https://parasitesandvectors.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13071-016-1918-2
work_keys_str_mv AT izetaalberdiamaiadoctorautor15602 geographicallandscapeandhostassociationsoftrypanosomacruzidtusandlineages
AT ibarracerdenacarlosnapoleonautor13200 geographicallandscapeandhostassociationsoftrypanosomacruzidtusandlineages
AT moollanesdavidalejandroautor13403 geographicallandscapeandhostassociationsoftrypanosomacruzidtusandlineages
AT ramseywilloquetjaninemdoctoraautor14239 geographicallandscapeandhostassociationsoftrypanosomacruzidtusandlineages
_version_ 1806028074993582080
spelling KOHA-OAI-ECOSUR:580372024-07-16T11:27:10ZGeographical, landscape and host associations of Trypanosoma cruzi DTUs and lineages Izeta Alberdi, Amaia Doctor autor 15602 Ibarra Cerdeña, Carlos Napoleón autor 13200 Moo Llanes, David Alejandro autor 13403 Ramsey Willoquet, Janine M. Doctora autor 14239 textengBackground: The evolutionary history and ecological associations of Trypanosoma cruzi, the need to identify genetic markers that can distinguish parasite subpopulations, and understanding the parasite's evolutionary and selective processes have been the subject of a significant number of publications since 1998, the year when the first DNA sequence analysis for the species was published. Methods: The current analysis systematizes and re-analyzes this original research, focusing on critical methodological and analytical variables and results that have given rise to interpretations of putative patterns of genetic diversity and diversification of T. cruzi lineages, discrete typing units (DTUs), and populations, and their associations with hosts, vectors, and geographical distribution that have been interpreted as evidence for parasite subpopulation specificities. Results: Few studies use hypothesis-driven or quantitative analysis for T. cruzi phylogeny (16/58 studies) or phylogeography (10/13). Among these, only one phylogenetic and five phylogeographic studies analyzed molecular markers directly from tissues (i.e. not from isolates). Analysis of T. cruzi DTU or lineage niche and its geographical projection demonstrate extensive sympatry among all clades across the continent and no significant niche differences among DTUs. DTU beta-diversity was high, indicating diverse host assemblages across regions, while host dissimilarity was principally due to host species turnover and to a much lesser degree to nestedness. DTU-host order specificities appear related to trophic or microenvironmental interactions. Conclusions: More rigorous study designs and analyses will be required to discern evolutionary processes and the impact of landscape modification on population dynamics and risk for T. cruzi transmission to humans.Background: The evolutionary history and ecological associations of Trypanosoma cruzi, the need to identify genetic markers that can distinguish parasite subpopulations, and understanding the parasite's evolutionary and selective processes have been the subject of a significant number of publications since 1998, the year when the first DNA sequence analysis for the species was published. Methods: The current analysis systematizes and re-analyzes this original research, focusing on critical methodological and analytical variables and results that have given rise to interpretations of putative patterns of genetic diversity and diversification of T. cruzi lineages, discrete typing units (DTUs), and populations, and their associations with hosts, vectors, and geographical distribution that have been interpreted as evidence for parasite subpopulation specificities. Results: Few studies use hypothesis-driven or quantitative analysis for T. cruzi phylogeny (16/58 studies) or phylogeography (10/13). Among these, only one phylogenetic and five phylogeographic studies analyzed molecular markers directly from tissues (i.e. not from isolates). Analysis of T. cruzi DTU or lineage niche and its geographical projection demonstrate extensive sympatry among all clades across the continent and no significant niche differences among DTUs. DTU beta-diversity was high, indicating diverse host assemblages across regions, while host dissimilarity was principally due to host species turnover and to a much lesser degree to nestedness. DTU-host order specificities appear related to trophic or microenvironmental interactions. Conclusions: More rigorous study designs and analyses will be required to discern evolutionary processes and the impact of landscape modification on population dynamics and risk for T. cruzi transmission to humans.Adobe Acrobat profesional 6.0 o superiorTrypanosoma cruziNicho (Ecología)MamíferosFilogenéticaEnfermedad de chagasZoogeografíaDisponible en líneaParasites & Vectorshttps://parasitesandvectors.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13071-016-1918-2Acceso en línea sin restricciones