Biodiversity coservation, yield, and alternative products in coffee agroecosystems in Sumatra, Indonesia

Agroecology and conservation must overlap to protect biodiversity and farmer livelihoods. Coffee agroecosystems with complex shade canopies protect biodiversity. Yet, few have examined biodiversity in coffee agroecosystems in Asia relative to the Americas and many question whether coffee agroecosystems can play a similar role for conservation. We examined vegetation, ant and bird diversity, coffee yields and revenues, and harvest of alternative products in coffee farms and forests in SW Sumatra, Indonesia near Bukit Barisan Selatan National Park (BBS). BBS is among the last habitats for large mammals in Sumatra and >15,000 families illegally cultivate coffee inside of BBS. As a basis for informing management recommendations, we compared the conservation potential and economic outputs from farms inside and outside of BBS. Forests had higher canopy cover, canopy depth, tree height, epiphyte loads, and more emergent trees than coffee farms. Coffee farms inside BBS had more epiphytes and trees and fewer coffee plants than farms outside BBS. Tree, ant, and bird richness was significantly greater in forests than in coffee farms, and richness did not differ in coffee farms inside and outside of BBS. Species similarity of forest and coffee trees, ants, and birds was generally low (<50%). Surprisingly, farms inside the park were significantly older, but farm size, coffee yields, and revenues from coffee did not depend on farm location. Farmers outside BBS received higher prices for their coffee and also more often produced other crops in their coffee fields such that incentives could be created to draw illegal farmers out of the park. We also discuss these results with reference to similar work in Chiapas, Mexico to compare the relative contribution of coffee fields to conservation in the two continents, and discuss implications for working with farmers in Sumatra towards conservation plans incorporating sustainable coffee production.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Philpott, Stacy M. Doctora 13454, Bichier, Peter autor/a, Rice, Robert A. autor/a, Greenberg, Russell autor/a
Format: Texto biblioteca
Language:eng
Subjects:Agroecosistemas, Aves, Conservación de la diversidad biológica, Café, Hormigas, Árboles, Artfrosur,
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id KOHA-OAI-ECOSUR:46755
record_format koha
institution ECOSUR
collection Koha
country México
countrycode MX
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode cat-ecosur
tag biblioteca
region America del Norte
libraryname Sistema de Información Bibliotecario de ECOSUR (SIBE)
language eng
topic Agroecosistemas
Aves
Conservación de la diversidad biológica
Café
Hormigas
Árboles
Artfrosur
Agroecosistemas
Aves
Conservación de la diversidad biológica
Café
Hormigas
Árboles
Artfrosur
spellingShingle Agroecosistemas
Aves
Conservación de la diversidad biológica
Café
Hormigas
Árboles
Artfrosur
Agroecosistemas
Aves
Conservación de la diversidad biológica
Café
Hormigas
Árboles
Artfrosur
Philpott, Stacy M. Doctora 13454
Bichier, Peter autor/a
Rice, Robert A. autor/a
Greenberg, Russell autor/a
Biodiversity coservation, yield, and alternative products in coffee agroecosystems in Sumatra, Indonesia
description Agroecology and conservation must overlap to protect biodiversity and farmer livelihoods. Coffee agroecosystems with complex shade canopies protect biodiversity. Yet, few have examined biodiversity in coffee agroecosystems in Asia relative to the Americas and many question whether coffee agroecosystems can play a similar role for conservation. We examined vegetation, ant and bird diversity, coffee yields and revenues, and harvest of alternative products in coffee farms and forests in SW Sumatra, Indonesia near Bukit Barisan Selatan National Park (BBS). BBS is among the last habitats for large mammals in Sumatra and >15,000 families illegally cultivate coffee inside of BBS. As a basis for informing management recommendations, we compared the conservation potential and economic outputs from farms inside and outside of BBS. Forests had higher canopy cover, canopy depth, tree height, epiphyte loads, and more emergent trees than coffee farms. Coffee farms inside BBS had more epiphytes and trees and fewer coffee plants than farms outside BBS. Tree, ant, and bird richness was significantly greater in forests than in coffee farms, and richness did not differ in coffee farms inside and outside of BBS. Species similarity of forest and coffee trees, ants, and birds was generally low (<50%). Surprisingly, farms inside the park were significantly older, but farm size, coffee yields, and revenues from coffee did not depend on farm location. Farmers outside BBS received higher prices for their coffee and also more often produced other crops in their coffee fields such that incentives could be created to draw illegal farmers out of the park. We also discuss these results with reference to similar work in Chiapas, Mexico to compare the relative contribution of coffee fields to conservation in the two continents, and discuss implications for working with farmers in Sumatra towards conservation plans incorporating sustainable coffee production.
format Texto
topic_facet Agroecosistemas
Aves
Conservación de la diversidad biológica
Café
Hormigas
Árboles
Artfrosur
author Philpott, Stacy M. Doctora 13454
Bichier, Peter autor/a
Rice, Robert A. autor/a
Greenberg, Russell autor/a
author_facet Philpott, Stacy M. Doctora 13454
Bichier, Peter autor/a
Rice, Robert A. autor/a
Greenberg, Russell autor/a
author_sort Philpott, Stacy M. Doctora 13454
title Biodiversity coservation, yield, and alternative products in coffee agroecosystems in Sumatra, Indonesia
title_short Biodiversity coservation, yield, and alternative products in coffee agroecosystems in Sumatra, Indonesia
title_full Biodiversity coservation, yield, and alternative products in coffee agroecosystems in Sumatra, Indonesia
title_fullStr Biodiversity coservation, yield, and alternative products in coffee agroecosystems in Sumatra, Indonesia
title_full_unstemmed Biodiversity coservation, yield, and alternative products in coffee agroecosystems in Sumatra, Indonesia
title_sort biodiversity coservation, yield, and alternative products in coffee agroecosystems in sumatra, indonesia
work_keys_str_mv AT philpottstacymdoctora13454 biodiversitycoservationyieldandalternativeproductsincoffeeagroecosystemsinsumatraindonesia
AT bichierpeterautora biodiversitycoservationyieldandalternativeproductsincoffeeagroecosystemsinsumatraindonesia
AT ricerobertaautora biodiversitycoservationyieldandalternativeproductsincoffeeagroecosystemsinsumatraindonesia
AT greenbergrussellautora biodiversitycoservationyieldandalternativeproductsincoffeeagroecosystemsinsumatraindonesia
_version_ 1762930627033694208
spelling KOHA-OAI-ECOSUR:467552023-02-16T17:42:32ZBiodiversity coservation, yield, and alternative products in coffee agroecosystems in Sumatra, Indonesia Philpott, Stacy M. Doctora 13454 Bichier, Peter autor/a Rice, Robert A. autor/a Greenberg, Russell autor/a textengAgroecology and conservation must overlap to protect biodiversity and farmer livelihoods. Coffee agroecosystems with complex shade canopies protect biodiversity. Yet, few have examined biodiversity in coffee agroecosystems in Asia relative to the Americas and many question whether coffee agroecosystems can play a similar role for conservation. We examined vegetation, ant and bird diversity, coffee yields and revenues, and harvest of alternative products in coffee farms and forests in SW Sumatra, Indonesia near Bukit Barisan Selatan National Park (BBS). BBS is among the last habitats for large mammals in Sumatra and >15,000 families illegally cultivate coffee inside of BBS. As a basis for informing management recommendations, we compared the conservation potential and economic outputs from farms inside and outside of BBS. Forests had higher canopy cover, canopy depth, tree height, epiphyte loads, and more emergent trees than coffee farms. Coffee farms inside BBS had more epiphytes and trees and fewer coffee plants than farms outside BBS. Tree, ant, and bird richness was significantly greater in forests than in coffee farms, and richness did not differ in coffee farms inside and outside of BBS. Species similarity of forest and coffee trees, ants, and birds was generally low (<50%). Surprisingly, farms inside the park were significantly older, but farm size, coffee yields, and revenues from coffee did not depend on farm location. Farmers outside BBS received higher prices for their coffee and also more often produced other crops in their coffee fields such that incentives could be created to draw illegal farmers out of the park. We also discuss these results with reference to similar work in Chiapas, Mexico to compare the relative contribution of coffee fields to conservation in the two continents, and discuss implications for working with farmers in Sumatra towards conservation plans incorporating sustainable coffee production.Agroecology and conservation must overlap to protect biodiversity and farmer livelihoods. Coffee agroecosystems with complex shade canopies protect biodiversity. Yet, few have examined biodiversity in coffee agroecosystems in Asia relative to the Americas and many question whether coffee agroecosystems can play a similar role for conservation. We examined vegetation, ant and bird diversity, coffee yields and revenues, and harvest of alternative products in coffee farms and forests in SW Sumatra, Indonesia near Bukit Barisan Selatan National Park (BBS). BBS is among the last habitats for large mammals in Sumatra and >15,000 families illegally cultivate coffee inside of BBS. As a basis for informing management recommendations, we compared the conservation potential and economic outputs from farms inside and outside of BBS. Forests had higher canopy cover, canopy depth, tree height, epiphyte loads, and more emergent trees than coffee farms. Coffee farms inside BBS had more epiphytes and trees and fewer coffee plants than farms outside BBS. Tree, ant, and bird richness was significantly greater in forests than in coffee farms, and richness did not differ in coffee farms inside and outside of BBS. Species similarity of forest and coffee trees, ants, and birds was generally low (<50%). Surprisingly, farms inside the park were significantly older, but farm size, coffee yields, and revenues from coffee did not depend on farm location. Farmers outside BBS received higher prices for their coffee and also more often produced other crops in their coffee fields such that incentives could be created to draw illegal farmers out of the park. We also discuss these results with reference to similar work in Chiapas, Mexico to compare the relative contribution of coffee fields to conservation in the two continents, and discuss implications for working with farmers in Sumatra towards conservation plans incorporating sustainable coffee production.AgroecosistemasAvesConservación de la diversidad biológicaCaféHormigasÁrbolesArtfrosurBiodiversity and Conservation