Conducting group interviews in developing countries

The group interview is one of the rapid, cost-effective data collection methods. It involves the use of direct probing techniques to gather information from several individuals in a group situation. Although superficially the difference between the individual and group interviews is the number of participants, this difference contributes to major variations between the two with regard to planning, nature of interview guides, probing techniques, and analysis of information. Group interviews can serve a wide range of information collection purposes. They can provide background information and help to generate ideas and hypothesis for project and program design, provide feedback from beneficiaries, and help in assessing responses to recommended innovations. They are also useful for obtaining data for monitoring and evaluation purposes and for interpreting available quantitative data. There are two main types of group interviews--focus group interviews and community interviews-- that have wide potential in developing countries. Both types should be carefully planned. The investigator should conduct a systematic review of the relevant documents, records, or studies and consult with a few key informats before venturing into the field. The main concepts should be clearly defined in order to avoid possible misunderstanding between the respondents and the interviewers

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: 84194 Kumar, K., 2527 AID, Washington, D.C. (EUA)
Format: Texto biblioteca
Language:eng
Published: Washington, D.C. (EUA) 1987
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id KOHA-OAI-BVE:15262
record_format koha
spelling KOHA-OAI-BVE:152622020-02-03T20:35:08ZConducting group interviews in developing countries 84194 Kumar, K. 2527 AID, Washington, D.C. (EUA) textWashington, D.C. (EUA)1987engThe group interview is one of the rapid, cost-effective data collection methods. It involves the use of direct probing techniques to gather information from several individuals in a group situation. Although superficially the difference between the individual and group interviews is the number of participants, this difference contributes to major variations between the two with regard to planning, nature of interview guides, probing techniques, and analysis of information. Group interviews can serve a wide range of information collection purposes. They can provide background information and help to generate ideas and hypothesis for project and program design, provide feedback from beneficiaries, and help in assessing responses to recommended innovations. They are also useful for obtaining data for monitoring and evaluation purposes and for interpreting available quantitative data. There are two main types of group interviews--focus group interviews and community interviews-- that have wide potential in developing countries. Both types should be carefully planned. The investigator should conduct a systematic review of the relevant documents, records, or studies and consult with a few key informats before venturing into the field. The main concepts should be clearly defined in order to avoid possible misunderstanding between the respondents and the interviewersThe group interview is one of the rapid, cost-effective data collection methods. It involves the use of direct probing techniques to gather information from several individuals in a group situation. Although superficially the difference between the individual and group interviews is the number of participants, this difference contributes to major variations between the two with regard to planning, nature of interview guides, probing techniques, and analysis of information. Group interviews can serve a wide range of information collection purposes. They can provide background information and help to generate ideas and hypothesis for project and program design, provide feedback from beneficiaries, and help in assessing responses to recommended innovations. They are also useful for obtaining data for monitoring and evaluation purposes and for interpreting available quantitative data. There are two main types of group interviews--focus group interviews and community interviews-- that have wide potential in developing countries. Both types should be carefully planned. The investigator should conduct a systematic review of the relevant documents, records, or studies and consult with a few key informats before venturing into the field. The main concepts should be clearly defined in order to avoid possible misunderstanding between the respondents and the interviewers
institution IICA
collection Koha
country Costa Rica
countrycode CR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode cat-sibiica
tag biblioteca
region America Central
libraryname Sistema de Bibliotecas IICA/CATIE
language eng
description The group interview is one of the rapid, cost-effective data collection methods. It involves the use of direct probing techniques to gather information from several individuals in a group situation. Although superficially the difference between the individual and group interviews is the number of participants, this difference contributes to major variations between the two with regard to planning, nature of interview guides, probing techniques, and analysis of information. Group interviews can serve a wide range of information collection purposes. They can provide background information and help to generate ideas and hypothesis for project and program design, provide feedback from beneficiaries, and help in assessing responses to recommended innovations. They are also useful for obtaining data for monitoring and evaluation purposes and for interpreting available quantitative data. There are two main types of group interviews--focus group interviews and community interviews-- that have wide potential in developing countries. Both types should be carefully planned. The investigator should conduct a systematic review of the relevant documents, records, or studies and consult with a few key informats before venturing into the field. The main concepts should be clearly defined in order to avoid possible misunderstanding between the respondents and the interviewers
format Texto
author 84194 Kumar, K.
2527 AID, Washington, D.C. (EUA)
spellingShingle 84194 Kumar, K.
2527 AID, Washington, D.C. (EUA)
Conducting group interviews in developing countries
author_facet 84194 Kumar, K.
2527 AID, Washington, D.C. (EUA)
author_sort 84194 Kumar, K.
title Conducting group interviews in developing countries
title_short Conducting group interviews in developing countries
title_full Conducting group interviews in developing countries
title_fullStr Conducting group interviews in developing countries
title_full_unstemmed Conducting group interviews in developing countries
title_sort conducting group interviews in developing countries
publisher Washington, D.C. (EUA)
publishDate 1987
work_keys_str_mv AT 84194kumark conductinggroupinterviewsindevelopingcountries
AT 2527aidwashingtondceua conductinggroupinterviewsindevelopingcountries
_version_ 1756049991074316288