Comparison of tropical tree plantations with secondary forests of similar age

The structure and dynamics of small plantations of were compared with those of paired secondary forest stands of similar age and growing adjacent to each other under similar edaphic and climatic conditions. The study was conducted in the Luquillo Experimental Forest between 1980 and 1984. Comparisons included a variety of demographic, production, and nutrient cycling characteristics of stands.. Higher root densities and biomass were found in secondary forests as were greater depth of root penetration, higher nutrient concentration in roots, and more microsites where roots grow, than paired plantations. Nutrient retranslocation increased with plantation age. Plantations, particularly pine plantations, produced more litter mass per unit nutrient return than did paired secondary forests. Among the ecosystem parameters measured, nutrients in leaf fall correlated best with differences in soil nutrients across stands. Nutrient concentrations in understory species appeared to be a sensitive indicator of whole—stand nutrient use efficiency. Some of the observations of the study could be attributed to intrinsic differences between small unmanaged plantations and secondary forests, but many could be explained by species differences (i.e., timing of leaf fall), age of plantation (i.e., accumulation of biomass or species), or the relative importance of angiosperms and gymnosperms (i.e., nutritional quality of litter). The study challenges the conventional dogma with respect to differences between plantations and native successional ecosystems and underscores the dangers of generalizing about all tropical tree plantations or all natural tropical forests, or even extrapolating from one sector of the ecosystem to another.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: 88074 Lugo, Ariel E. Institute of Tropical Forestry, Puerto Rico
Format: Texto biblioteca
Language:eng
Published: Washington, DC Ecological Society of America 1992
Subjects:PINUS CARIBAEA, SWIETENIA MACROPHYLLA, PLANTACION FORESTAL, BOSQUE SECUNDARIO, BOSQUE TROPICAL, BIODIVERSIDAD, HOJARASCA, FERTILIDAD DEL SUELO, MATERIA ORGANICA DEL SUELO, BIOMASA, MEDICION, ALOMETRIA, MODELOS DE REGRESION, ECUACIONES ALOMETRICAS, BIOMASA AEREA, NUTRIENTES, FOREST PLANTATIONS, SECONDARY FORESTS, TROPICAL FORESTS, BIODIVERSITY, SOIL FERTILITY, SOIL ORGANIC MATTER, BIOMASS, MEASUREMENT, NUTRIENTS,
Online Access:http://orton.catie.ac.cr/repdoc/A11191i/A11191i.pdf
https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2307/2937169
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id KOHA-OAI-BVE:136182
record_format koha
institution IICA
collection Koha
country Costa Rica
countrycode CR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
En linea
databasecode cat-sibiica
tag biblioteca
region America Central
libraryname Sistema de Bibliotecas IICA/CATIE
language eng
topic PINUS CARIBAEA
SWIETENIA MACROPHYLLA
PLANTACION FORESTAL
BOSQUE SECUNDARIO
BOSQUE TROPICAL
BIODIVERSIDAD
HOJARASCA
FERTILIDAD DEL SUELO
MATERIA ORGANICA DEL SUELO
BIOMASA
MEDICION
ALOMETRIA
MODELOS DE REGRESION
ECUACIONES ALOMETRICAS
BIOMASA AEREA
NUTRIENTES
FOREST PLANTATIONS
SECONDARY FORESTS
TROPICAL FORESTS
BIODIVERSITY
SOIL FERTILITY
SOIL ORGANIC MATTER
BIOMASS
MEASUREMENT
NUTRIENTS
PINUS CARIBAEA
SWIETENIA MACROPHYLLA
PLANTACION FORESTAL
BOSQUE SECUNDARIO
BOSQUE TROPICAL
BIODIVERSIDAD
HOJARASCA
FERTILIDAD DEL SUELO
MATERIA ORGANICA DEL SUELO
BIOMASA
MEDICION
ALOMETRIA
MODELOS DE REGRESION
ECUACIONES ALOMETRICAS
BIOMASA AEREA
NUTRIENTES
FOREST PLANTATIONS
SECONDARY FORESTS
TROPICAL FORESTS
BIODIVERSITY
SOIL FERTILITY
SOIL ORGANIC MATTER
BIOMASS
MEASUREMENT
NUTRIENTS
spellingShingle PINUS CARIBAEA
SWIETENIA MACROPHYLLA
PLANTACION FORESTAL
BOSQUE SECUNDARIO
BOSQUE TROPICAL
BIODIVERSIDAD
HOJARASCA
FERTILIDAD DEL SUELO
MATERIA ORGANICA DEL SUELO
BIOMASA
MEDICION
ALOMETRIA
MODELOS DE REGRESION
ECUACIONES ALOMETRICAS
BIOMASA AEREA
NUTRIENTES
FOREST PLANTATIONS
SECONDARY FORESTS
TROPICAL FORESTS
BIODIVERSITY
SOIL FERTILITY
SOIL ORGANIC MATTER
BIOMASS
MEASUREMENT
NUTRIENTS
PINUS CARIBAEA
SWIETENIA MACROPHYLLA
PLANTACION FORESTAL
BOSQUE SECUNDARIO
BOSQUE TROPICAL
BIODIVERSIDAD
HOJARASCA
FERTILIDAD DEL SUELO
MATERIA ORGANICA DEL SUELO
BIOMASA
MEDICION
ALOMETRIA
MODELOS DE REGRESION
ECUACIONES ALOMETRICAS
BIOMASA AEREA
NUTRIENTES
FOREST PLANTATIONS
SECONDARY FORESTS
TROPICAL FORESTS
BIODIVERSITY
SOIL FERTILITY
SOIL ORGANIC MATTER
BIOMASS
MEASUREMENT
NUTRIENTS
88074 Lugo, Ariel E. Institute of Tropical Forestry, Puerto Rico
Comparison of tropical tree plantations with secondary forests of similar age
description The structure and dynamics of small plantations of were compared with those of paired secondary forest stands of similar age and growing adjacent to each other under similar edaphic and climatic conditions. The study was conducted in the Luquillo Experimental Forest between 1980 and 1984. Comparisons included a variety of demographic, production, and nutrient cycling characteristics of stands.. Higher root densities and biomass were found in secondary forests as were greater depth of root penetration, higher nutrient concentration in roots, and more microsites where roots grow, than paired plantations. Nutrient retranslocation increased with plantation age. Plantations, particularly pine plantations, produced more litter mass per unit nutrient return than did paired secondary forests. Among the ecosystem parameters measured, nutrients in leaf fall correlated best with differences in soil nutrients across stands. Nutrient concentrations in understory species appeared to be a sensitive indicator of whole—stand nutrient use efficiency. Some of the observations of the study could be attributed to intrinsic differences between small unmanaged plantations and secondary forests, but many could be explained by species differences (i.e., timing of leaf fall), age of plantation (i.e., accumulation of biomass or species), or the relative importance of angiosperms and gymnosperms (i.e., nutritional quality of litter). The study challenges the conventional dogma with respect to differences between plantations and native successional ecosystems and underscores the dangers of generalizing about all tropical tree plantations or all natural tropical forests, or even extrapolating from one sector of the ecosystem to another.
format Texto
topic_facet PINUS CARIBAEA
SWIETENIA MACROPHYLLA
PLANTACION FORESTAL
BOSQUE SECUNDARIO
BOSQUE TROPICAL
BIODIVERSIDAD
HOJARASCA
FERTILIDAD DEL SUELO
MATERIA ORGANICA DEL SUELO
BIOMASA
MEDICION
ALOMETRIA
MODELOS DE REGRESION
ECUACIONES ALOMETRICAS
BIOMASA AEREA
NUTRIENTES
FOREST PLANTATIONS
SECONDARY FORESTS
TROPICAL FORESTS
BIODIVERSITY
SOIL FERTILITY
SOIL ORGANIC MATTER
BIOMASS
MEASUREMENT
NUTRIENTS
author 88074 Lugo, Ariel E. Institute of Tropical Forestry, Puerto Rico
author_facet 88074 Lugo, Ariel E. Institute of Tropical Forestry, Puerto Rico
author_sort 88074 Lugo, Ariel E. Institute of Tropical Forestry, Puerto Rico
title Comparison of tropical tree plantations with secondary forests of similar age
title_short Comparison of tropical tree plantations with secondary forests of similar age
title_full Comparison of tropical tree plantations with secondary forests of similar age
title_fullStr Comparison of tropical tree plantations with secondary forests of similar age
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of tropical tree plantations with secondary forests of similar age
title_sort comparison of tropical tree plantations with secondary forests of similar age
publisher Washington, DC Ecological Society of America
publishDate 1992
url http://orton.catie.ac.cr/repdoc/A11191i/A11191i.pdf
https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2307/2937169
work_keys_str_mv AT 88074lugoarieleinstituteoftropicalforestrypuertorico comparisonoftropicaltreeplantationswithsecondaryforestsofsimilarage
_version_ 1756066212099391488
spelling KOHA-OAI-BVE:1361822022-03-24T02:44:42ZComparison of tropical tree plantations with secondary forests of similar age 88074 Lugo, Ariel E. Institute of Tropical Forestry, Puerto Rico textWashington, DC Ecological Society of America1992engpdfhtmlThe structure and dynamics of small plantations of were compared with those of paired secondary forest stands of similar age and growing adjacent to each other under similar edaphic and climatic conditions. The study was conducted in the Luquillo Experimental Forest between 1980 and 1984. Comparisons included a variety of demographic, production, and nutrient cycling characteristics of stands.. Higher root densities and biomass were found in secondary forests as were greater depth of root penetration, higher nutrient concentration in roots, and more microsites where roots grow, than paired plantations. Nutrient retranslocation increased with plantation age. Plantations, particularly pine plantations, produced more litter mass per unit nutrient return than did paired secondary forests. Among the ecosystem parameters measured, nutrients in leaf fall correlated best with differences in soil nutrients across stands. Nutrient concentrations in understory species appeared to be a sensitive indicator of whole—stand nutrient use efficiency. Some of the observations of the study could be attributed to intrinsic differences between small unmanaged plantations and secondary forests, but many could be explained by species differences (i.e., timing of leaf fall), age of plantation (i.e., accumulation of biomass or species), or the relative importance of angiosperms and gymnosperms (i.e., nutritional quality of litter). The study challenges the conventional dogma with respect to differences between plantations and native successional ecosystems and underscores the dangers of generalizing about all tropical tree plantations or all natural tropical forests, or even extrapolating from one sector of the ecosystem to another.45 referencias bibliográficas 39-41.The structure and dynamics of small plantations of were compared with those of paired secondary forest stands of similar age and growing adjacent to each other under similar edaphic and climatic conditions. The study was conducted in the Luquillo Experimental Forest between 1980 and 1984. Comparisons included a variety of demographic, production, and nutrient cycling characteristics of stands.. Higher root densities and biomass were found in secondary forests as were greater depth of root penetration, higher nutrient concentration in roots, and more microsites where roots grow, than paired plantations. Nutrient retranslocation increased with plantation age. Plantations, particularly pine plantations, produced more litter mass per unit nutrient return than did paired secondary forests. Among the ecosystem parameters measured, nutrients in leaf fall correlated best with differences in soil nutrients across stands. Nutrient concentrations in understory species appeared to be a sensitive indicator of whole—stand nutrient use efficiency. Some of the observations of the study could be attributed to intrinsic differences between small unmanaged plantations and secondary forests, but many could be explained by species differences (i.e., timing of leaf fall), age of plantation (i.e., accumulation of biomass or species), or the relative importance of angiosperms and gymnosperms (i.e., nutritional quality of litter). The study challenges the conventional dogma with respect to differences between plantations and native successional ecosystems and underscores the dangers of generalizing about all tropical tree plantations or all natural tropical forests, or even extrapolating from one sector of the ecosystem to another.PINUS CARIBAEASWIETENIA MACROPHYLLAPLANTACION FORESTALBOSQUE SECUNDARIOBOSQUE TROPICALBIODIVERSIDADHOJARASCAFERTILIDAD DEL SUELOMATERIA ORGANICA DEL SUELOBIOMASAMEDICIONALOMETRIAMODELOS DE REGRESIONECUACIONES ALOMETRICASBIOMASA AEREANUTRIENTESFOREST PLANTATIONSSECONDARY FORESTSTROPICAL FORESTSBIODIVERSITYSOIL FERTILITYSOIL ORGANIC MATTERBIOMASSMEASUREMENTNUTRIENTShttp://orton.catie.ac.cr/repdoc/A11191i/A11191i.pdfhttps://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2307/2937169