A comparison of damage due to logging under different forms of resource access in East Kalimantan, Indonesia

Recent changes in forest resource access arrangements have important implications for the future extent and quality of natural forest in Indonesia. This study quantified and compared total harvested and damaged trees after logging operations carried out in East Kalimantan, Indonesia under two types of arrangements: 20-year commercial selective logging concessions, known as Hak Pengusahaan Hutan (HPH) and 1-year harvest permits intended for local communities, known as Ijin Pemungutan dan Pemanfaatan Kayu (IPPK). Sample plots of 20 ha were established in areas previously harvested by HPH and IPPK. Harvest levels were lower than those documented in other logging studies in Borneo, although it is possible that missing and therefore uncounted stumps of harvested trees in cleared areas (i.e. log landings and roads) and larger plots size may have underestimated harvest levels. Significant differences were found between HPH selective logging and IPPK permit holders (1 trees ha−1 and 4 trees ha−1, respectively). It was found that IPPK permit holders harvested a larger percentage of trees below 50 cm dbh than did HPH logging (>25% as compared to 3%, respectively). IPPK permit holders operations also damaged twice as many residual trees below 50 cm dbh per unit area as did HPH harvests. However, HPH produced higher levels of damage per unit volume and number trees harvested, in terms of skid trail length, number of trees damaged, and canopy opening. The sum of the harvested and damaged trees, which may be lost from future harvest due to rot and mortality after harvesting, was significantly different under short-term permit holders and selective logging concessionaires (28 trees ha−1 versus 9 trees ha−1 in primary forest; 39 trees ha−1 versus 28 trees ha−1 in logged-over forest). Future harvest potential of the forest may be significantly lower with the influence of IPPK logging system, in terms of harvesting practices and logging damaged to the forest stands.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: 79987 Iskandar, H., 119981 Snook, L.K., 124790 Toma, T., 88945 MacDicken, K.G., 82225 Kanninen, M.
Format: biblioteca
Language:| 0
Published: Amsterdam (Países Bajos): ELSEVIER, 2006
Subjects:AGRICULTURA, DIPTEROCARPACEAE, COSECHA, DAÑOS, DESCENTRALIZACION, GESTION, ZONA TROPICAL,
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.09.079
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id KOHA-OAI-BVE:127787
record_format koha
institution IICA
collection Koha
country Costa Rica
countrycode CR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
En linea
databasecode cat-sibiica
tag biblioteca
region America Central
libraryname Sistema de Bibliotecas IICA/CATIE
language | 0
topic AGRICULTURA
DIPTEROCARPACEAE
COSECHA
DAÑOS
DESCENTRALIZACION
GESTION
ZONA TROPICAL
AGRICULTURA
DIPTEROCARPACEAE
COSECHA
DAÑOS
DESCENTRALIZACION
GESTION
ZONA TROPICAL
spellingShingle AGRICULTURA
DIPTEROCARPACEAE
COSECHA
DAÑOS
DESCENTRALIZACION
GESTION
ZONA TROPICAL
AGRICULTURA
DIPTEROCARPACEAE
COSECHA
DAÑOS
DESCENTRALIZACION
GESTION
ZONA TROPICAL
79987 Iskandar, H.
119981 Snook, L.K.
124790 Toma, T.
88945 MacDicken, K.G.
82225 Kanninen, M.
A comparison of damage due to logging under different forms of resource access in East Kalimantan, Indonesia
description Recent changes in forest resource access arrangements have important implications for the future extent and quality of natural forest in Indonesia. This study quantified and compared total harvested and damaged trees after logging operations carried out in East Kalimantan, Indonesia under two types of arrangements: 20-year commercial selective logging concessions, known as Hak Pengusahaan Hutan (HPH) and 1-year harvest permits intended for local communities, known as Ijin Pemungutan dan Pemanfaatan Kayu (IPPK). Sample plots of 20 ha were established in areas previously harvested by HPH and IPPK. Harvest levels were lower than those documented in other logging studies in Borneo, although it is possible that missing and therefore uncounted stumps of harvested trees in cleared areas (i.e. log landings and roads) and larger plots size may have underestimated harvest levels. Significant differences were found between HPH selective logging and IPPK permit holders (1 trees ha−1 and 4 trees ha−1, respectively). It was found that IPPK permit holders harvested a larger percentage of trees below 50 cm dbh than did HPH logging (>25% as compared to 3%, respectively). IPPK permit holders operations also damaged twice as many residual trees below 50 cm dbh per unit area as did HPH harvests. However, HPH produced higher levels of damage per unit volume and number trees harvested, in terms of skid trail length, number of trees damaged, and canopy opening. The sum of the harvested and damaged trees, which may be lost from future harvest due to rot and mortality after harvesting, was significantly different under short-term permit holders and selective logging concessionaires (28 trees ha−1 versus 9 trees ha−1 in primary forest; 39 trees ha−1 versus 28 trees ha−1 in logged-over forest). Future harvest potential of the forest may be significantly lower with the influence of IPPK logging system, in terms of harvesting practices and logging damaged to the forest stands.
format
topic_facet AGRICULTURA
DIPTEROCARPACEAE
COSECHA
DAÑOS
DESCENTRALIZACION
GESTION
ZONA TROPICAL
author 79987 Iskandar, H.
119981 Snook, L.K.
124790 Toma, T.
88945 MacDicken, K.G.
82225 Kanninen, M.
author_facet 79987 Iskandar, H.
119981 Snook, L.K.
124790 Toma, T.
88945 MacDicken, K.G.
82225 Kanninen, M.
author_sort 79987 Iskandar, H.
title A comparison of damage due to logging under different forms of resource access in East Kalimantan, Indonesia
title_short A comparison of damage due to logging under different forms of resource access in East Kalimantan, Indonesia
title_full A comparison of damage due to logging under different forms of resource access in East Kalimantan, Indonesia
title_fullStr A comparison of damage due to logging under different forms of resource access in East Kalimantan, Indonesia
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of damage due to logging under different forms of resource access in East Kalimantan, Indonesia
title_sort comparison of damage due to logging under different forms of resource access in east kalimantan, indonesia
publisher Amsterdam (Países Bajos): ELSEVIER,
publishDate 2006
url https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.09.079
work_keys_str_mv AT 79987iskandarh acomparisonofdamageduetologgingunderdifferentformsofresourceaccessineastkalimantanindonesia
AT 119981snooklk acomparisonofdamageduetologgingunderdifferentformsofresourceaccessineastkalimantanindonesia
AT 124790tomat acomparisonofdamageduetologgingunderdifferentformsofresourceaccessineastkalimantanindonesia
AT 88945macdickenkg acomparisonofdamageduetologgingunderdifferentformsofresourceaccessineastkalimantanindonesia
AT 82225kanninenm acomparisonofdamageduetologgingunderdifferentformsofresourceaccessineastkalimantanindonesia
AT 79987iskandarh comparisonofdamageduetologgingunderdifferentformsofresourceaccessineastkalimantanindonesia
AT 119981snooklk comparisonofdamageduetologgingunderdifferentformsofresourceaccessineastkalimantanindonesia
AT 124790tomat comparisonofdamageduetologgingunderdifferentformsofresourceaccessineastkalimantanindonesia
AT 88945macdickenkg comparisonofdamageduetologgingunderdifferentformsofresourceaccessineastkalimantanindonesia
AT 82225kanninenm comparisonofdamageduetologgingunderdifferentformsofresourceaccessineastkalimantanindonesia
_version_ 1764981080876646400
spelling KOHA-OAI-BVE:1277872023-04-30T12:50:38ZA comparison of damage due to logging under different forms of resource access in East Kalimantan, Indonesia 79987 Iskandar, H. 119981 Snook, L.K. 124790 Toma, T. 88945 MacDicken, K.G. 82225 Kanninen, M. Amsterdam (Países Bajos): ELSEVIER,2006| 0pdfRecent changes in forest resource access arrangements have important implications for the future extent and quality of natural forest in Indonesia. This study quantified and compared total harvested and damaged trees after logging operations carried out in East Kalimantan, Indonesia under two types of arrangements: 20-year commercial selective logging concessions, known as Hak Pengusahaan Hutan (HPH) and 1-year harvest permits intended for local communities, known as Ijin Pemungutan dan Pemanfaatan Kayu (IPPK). Sample plots of 20 ha were established in areas previously harvested by HPH and IPPK. Harvest levels were lower than those documented in other logging studies in Borneo, although it is possible that missing and therefore uncounted stumps of harvested trees in cleared areas (i.e. log landings and roads) and larger plots size may have underestimated harvest levels. Significant differences were found between HPH selective logging and IPPK permit holders (1 trees ha−1 and 4 trees ha−1, respectively). It was found that IPPK permit holders harvested a larger percentage of trees below 50 cm dbh than did HPH logging (>25% as compared to 3%, respectively). IPPK permit holders operations also damaged twice as many residual trees below 50 cm dbh per unit area as did HPH harvests. However, HPH produced higher levels of damage per unit volume and number trees harvested, in terms of skid trail length, number of trees damaged, and canopy opening. The sum of the harvested and damaged trees, which may be lost from future harvest due to rot and mortality after harvesting, was significantly different under short-term permit holders and selective logging concessionaires (28 trees ha−1 versus 9 trees ha−1 in primary forest; 39 trees ha−1 versus 28 trees ha−1 in logged-over forest). Future harvest potential of the forest may be significantly lower with the influence of IPPK logging system, in terms of harvesting practices and logging damaged to the forest stands.Incluye 25 referencias bibliográficas en la página 93Recent changes in forest resource access arrangements have important implications for the future extent and quality of natural forest in Indonesia. This study quantified and compared total harvested and damaged trees after logging operations carried out in East Kalimantan, Indonesia under two types of arrangements: 20-year commercial selective logging concessions, known as Hak Pengusahaan Hutan (HPH) and 1-year harvest permits intended for local communities, known as Ijin Pemungutan dan Pemanfaatan Kayu (IPPK). Sample plots of 20 ha were established in areas previously harvested by HPH and IPPK. Harvest levels were lower than those documented in other logging studies in Borneo, although it is possible that missing and therefore uncounted stumps of harvested trees in cleared areas (i.e. log landings and roads) and larger plots size may have underestimated harvest levels. Significant differences were found between HPH selective logging and IPPK permit holders (1 trees ha−1 and 4 trees ha−1, respectively). It was found that IPPK permit holders harvested a larger percentage of trees below 50 cm dbh than did HPH logging (>25% as compared to 3%, respectively). IPPK permit holders operations also damaged twice as many residual trees below 50 cm dbh per unit area as did HPH harvests. However, HPH produced higher levels of damage per unit volume and number trees harvested, in terms of skid trail length, number of trees damaged, and canopy opening. The sum of the harvested and damaged trees, which may be lost from future harvest due to rot and mortality after harvesting, was significantly different under short-term permit holders and selective logging concessionaires (28 trees ha−1 versus 9 trees ha−1 in primary forest; 39 trees ha−1 versus 28 trees ha−1 in logged-over forest). Future harvest potential of the forest may be significantly lower with the influence of IPPK logging system, in terms of harvesting practices and logging damaged to the forest stands.AGRICULTURA DIPTEROCARPACEAECOSECHADAÑOSDESCENTRALIZACIONGESTIONZONA TROPICALForest Ecology and Management (EUA)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.09.079