Economics of land degradation in Argentina

Argentina is one of the countries with a vibrant agricultural sector, which provides both economic development opportunities and environmental challenges. Argentina was selected as a case study due to its rich land degradation data, its diverse agroecological systems, and rapid poverty reduction. The country also represents high human development index countries. This study reports the cost ofland degradation, the cost of inaction and cost and benefits of taking action against land degradation. The total loss of ecosystem services due to land-use/cover change (LUCC), wetlands degradation and use of land degrading management practices on grazing lands and selected croplands is about 2007 US$75 billion, which is about 16 % of the country ’s GDP. LUCC accounts for 94 % of the loss, underscoring the need for developing more effective land use planning and incentives land users to protect high value biomes. The returns to taking action against land degradation is about US$4 per US$ invested — justifying the need to take action to improve human welfare and environmental protection. The actions against land degradation include investment in restoration of degraded lands and prevention of land degradation through stricter regulation of agricultural expansion into forests and other higher value biomes. They also include reforestation and other restoration efforts; pro- tection wetlands and restoration of degraded wetlands. The excessive use of agrochemicals also require action to regulate their potential off-site effects. Case studies also show that promotion of rotational grazing, extending conservation agriculture beyond soybean; tillage method and crop-livestock production systems offer promising strategies for addressing land degradation. The world has a lot to learn from Argentina given its rapid poverty reduction and successful adoption rate of conservation agriculture using public-private partnership. If Argentina aims at maintaining its economic and social development, it will need to work harder to address its growth-related environmental challenges that affect the poor the most. Argentina is better prepared to face these challenges. This study will contribute to informing policy makers on the best strategies for taking action against land degradation and the returns to such actions.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bouza, Mariana E., Aranda Rickert, Adriana, Brizuela, María Magdalena, Wilson, Marcelo Germán, Sasal, María Carolina, Sione, Silvana M., Beghetto, Stella, Gabioud, Emmanuel Adrián
Format: Texto biblioteca
Language:eng
Subjects:DEGRADACION DE TIERRAS, ARGENTINA, SOSTENIBILIDAD, PROPIEDADES FISICO - QUIMICAS SUELO,
Online Access:http://ceiba.agro.uba.ar/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=47845
http://ceiba.agro.uba.ar/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=
http://ceiba.agro.uba.ar/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id KOHA-OAI-AGRO:47845
record_format koha
institution UBA FA
collection Koha
country Argentina
countrycode AR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
En linea
databasecode cat-ceiba
tag biblioteca
region America del Sur
libraryname Biblioteca Central FAUBA
language eng
topic DEGRADACION DE TIERRAS
ARGENTINA
SOSTENIBILIDAD
PROPIEDADES FISICO - QUIMICAS SUELO
DEGRADACION DE TIERRAS
ARGENTINA
SOSTENIBILIDAD
PROPIEDADES FISICO - QUIMICAS SUELO
spellingShingle DEGRADACION DE TIERRAS
ARGENTINA
SOSTENIBILIDAD
PROPIEDADES FISICO - QUIMICAS SUELO
DEGRADACION DE TIERRAS
ARGENTINA
SOSTENIBILIDAD
PROPIEDADES FISICO - QUIMICAS SUELO
Bouza, Mariana E.
Aranda Rickert, Adriana
Brizuela, María Magdalena
Wilson, Marcelo Germán
Sasal, María Carolina
Sione, Silvana M.
Beghetto, Stella
Gabioud, Emmanuel Adrián
Economics of land degradation in Argentina
description Argentina is one of the countries with a vibrant agricultural sector, which provides both economic development opportunities and environmental challenges. Argentina was selected as a case study due to its rich land degradation data, its diverse agroecological systems, and rapid poverty reduction. The country also represents high human development index countries. This study reports the cost ofland degradation, the cost of inaction and cost and benefits of taking action against land degradation. The total loss of ecosystem services due to land-use/cover change (LUCC), wetlands degradation and use of land degrading management practices on grazing lands and selected croplands is about 2007 US$75 billion, which is about 16 % of the country ’s GDP. LUCC accounts for 94 % of the loss, underscoring the need for developing more effective land use planning and incentives land users to protect high value biomes. The returns to taking action against land degradation is about US$4 per US$ invested — justifying the need to take action to improve human welfare and environmental protection. The actions against land degradation include investment in restoration of degraded lands and prevention of land degradation through stricter regulation of agricultural expansion into forests and other higher value biomes. They also include reforestation and other restoration efforts; pro- tection wetlands and restoration of degraded wetlands. The excessive use of agrochemicals also require action to regulate their potential off-site effects. Case studies also show that promotion of rotational grazing, extending conservation agriculture beyond soybean; tillage method and crop-livestock production systems offer promising strategies for addressing land degradation. The world has a lot to learn from Argentina given its rapid poverty reduction and successful adoption rate of conservation agriculture using public-private partnership. If Argentina aims at maintaining its economic and social development, it will need to work harder to address its growth-related environmental challenges that affect the poor the most. Argentina is better prepared to face these challenges. This study will contribute to informing policy makers on the best strategies for taking action against land degradation and the returns to such actions.
format Texto
topic_facet DEGRADACION DE TIERRAS
ARGENTINA
SOSTENIBILIDAD
PROPIEDADES FISICO - QUIMICAS SUELO
author Bouza, Mariana E.
Aranda Rickert, Adriana
Brizuela, María Magdalena
Wilson, Marcelo Germán
Sasal, María Carolina
Sione, Silvana M.
Beghetto, Stella
Gabioud, Emmanuel Adrián
author_facet Bouza, Mariana E.
Aranda Rickert, Adriana
Brizuela, María Magdalena
Wilson, Marcelo Germán
Sasal, María Carolina
Sione, Silvana M.
Beghetto, Stella
Gabioud, Emmanuel Adrián
author_sort Bouza, Mariana E.
title Economics of land degradation in Argentina
title_short Economics of land degradation in Argentina
title_full Economics of land degradation in Argentina
title_fullStr Economics of land degradation in Argentina
title_full_unstemmed Economics of land degradation in Argentina
title_sort economics of land degradation in argentina
url http://ceiba.agro.uba.ar/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=47845
http://ceiba.agro.uba.ar/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=
http://ceiba.agro.uba.ar/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=
work_keys_str_mv AT bouzamarianae economicsoflanddegradationinargentina
AT arandarickertadriana economicsoflanddegradationinargentina
AT brizuelamariamagdalena economicsoflanddegradationinargentina
AT wilsonmarcelogerman economicsoflanddegradationinargentina
AT sasalmariacarolina economicsoflanddegradationinargentina
AT sionesilvanam economicsoflanddegradationinargentina
AT beghettostella economicsoflanddegradationinargentina
AT gabioudemmanueladrian economicsoflanddegradationinargentina
_version_ 1813408811157815296
spelling KOHA-OAI-AGRO:478452024-09-11T11:08:50Zhttp://ceiba.agro.uba.ar/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=47845http://ceiba.agro.uba.ar/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=http://ceiba.agro.uba.ar/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=AAGEconomics of land degradation in ArgentinaBouza, Mariana E.Aranda Rickert, AdrianaBrizuela, María MagdalenaWilson, Marcelo GermánSasal, María CarolinaSione, Silvana M.Beghetto, StellaGabioud, Emmanuel AdriántextengArgentina is one of the countries with a vibrant agricultural sector, which provides both economic development opportunities and environmental challenges. Argentina was selected as a case study due to its rich land degradation data, its diverse agroecological systems, and rapid poverty reduction. The country also represents high human development index countries. This study reports the cost ofland degradation, the cost of inaction and cost and benefits of taking action against land degradation. The total loss of ecosystem services due to land-use/cover change (LUCC), wetlands degradation and use of land degrading management practices on grazing lands and selected croplands is about 2007 US$75 billion, which is about 16 % of the country ’s GDP. LUCC accounts for 94 % of the loss, underscoring the need for developing more effective land use planning and incentives land users to protect high value biomes. The returns to taking action against land degradation is about US$4 per US$ invested — justifying the need to take action to improve human welfare and environmental protection. The actions against land degradation include investment in restoration of degraded lands and prevention of land degradation through stricter regulation of agricultural expansion into forests and other higher value biomes. They also include reforestation and other restoration efforts; pro- tection wetlands and restoration of degraded wetlands. The excessive use of agrochemicals also require action to regulate their potential off-site effects. Case studies also show that promotion of rotational grazing, extending conservation agriculture beyond soybean; tillage method and crop-livestock production systems offer promising strategies for addressing land degradation. The world has a lot to learn from Argentina given its rapid poverty reduction and successful adoption rate of conservation agriculture using public-private partnership. If Argentina aims at maintaining its economic and social development, it will need to work harder to address its growth-related environmental challenges that affect the poor the most. Argentina is better prepared to face these challenges. This study will contribute to informing policy makers on the best strategies for taking action against land degradation and the returns to such actions.Argentina is one of the countries with a vibrant agricultural sector, which provides both economic development opportunities and environmental challenges. Argentina was selected as a case study due to its rich land degradation data, its diverse agroecological systems, and rapid poverty reduction. The country also represents high human development index countries. This study reports the cost ofland degradation, the cost of inaction and cost and benefits of taking action against land degradation. The total loss of ecosystem services due to land-use/cover change (LUCC), wetlands degradation and use of land degrading management practices on grazing lands and selected croplands is about 2007 US$75 billion, which is about 16 % of the country ’s GDP. LUCC accounts for 94 % of the loss, underscoring the need for developing more effective land use planning and incentives land users to protect high value biomes. The returns to taking action against land degradation is about US$4 per US$ invested — justifying the need to take action to improve human welfare and environmental protection. The actions against land degradation include investment in restoration of degraded lands and prevention of land degradation through stricter regulation of agricultural expansion into forests and other higher value biomes. They also include reforestation and other restoration efforts; pro- tection wetlands and restoration of degraded wetlands. The excessive use of agrochemicals also require action to regulate their potential off-site effects. Case studies also show that promotion of rotational grazing, extending conservation agriculture beyond soybean; tillage method and crop-livestock production systems offer promising strategies for addressing land degradation. The world has a lot to learn from Argentina given its rapid poverty reduction and successful adoption rate of conservation agriculture using public-private partnership. If Argentina aims at maintaining its economic and social development, it will need to work harder to address its growth-related environmental challenges that affect the poor the most. Argentina is better prepared to face these challenges. This study will contribute to informing policy makers on the best strategies for taking action against land degradation and the returns to such actions.DEGRADACION DE TIERRASARGENTINASOSTENIBILIDADPROPIEDADES FISICO - QUIMICAS SUELOEconomics of land degradation and improvement