Economics of land degradation in Argentina
Argentina is one of the countries with a vibrant agricultural sector, which provides both economic development opportunities and environmental challenges. Argentina was selected as a case study due to its rich land degradation data, its diverse agroecological systems, and rapid poverty reduction. The country also represents high human development index countries. This study reports the cost ofland degradation, the cost of inaction and cost and benefits of taking action against land degradation. The total loss of ecosystem services due to land-use/cover change (LUCC), wetlands degradation and use of land degrading management practices on grazing lands and selected croplands is about 2007 US$75 billion, which is about 16 % of the country ’s GDP. LUCC accounts for 94 % of the loss, underscoring the need for developing more effective land use planning and incentives land users to protect high value biomes. The returns to taking action against land degradation is about US$4 per US$ invested — justifying the need to take action to improve human welfare and environmental protection. The actions against land degradation include investment in restoration of degraded lands and prevention of land degradation through stricter regulation of agricultural expansion into forests and other higher value biomes. They also include reforestation and other restoration efforts; pro- tection wetlands and restoration of degraded wetlands. The excessive use of agrochemicals also require action to regulate their potential off-site effects. Case studies also show that promotion of rotational grazing, extending conservation agriculture beyond soybean; tillage method and crop-livestock production systems offer promising strategies for addressing land degradation. The world has a lot to learn from Argentina given its rapid poverty reduction and successful adoption rate of conservation agriculture using public-private partnership. If Argentina aims at maintaining its economic and social development, it will need to work harder to address its growth-related environmental challenges that affect the poor the most. Argentina is better prepared to face these challenges. This study will contribute to informing policy makers on the best strategies for taking action against land degradation and the returns to such actions.
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Texto biblioteca |
Language: | eng |
Subjects: | DEGRADACION DE TIERRAS, ARGENTINA, SOSTENIBILIDAD, PROPIEDADES FISICO - QUIMICAS SUELO, |
Online Access: | http://ceiba.agro.uba.ar/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=47845 http://ceiba.agro.uba.ar/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber= http://ceiba.agro.uba.ar/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber= |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
KOHA-OAI-AGRO:47845 |
---|---|
record_format |
koha |
institution |
UBA FA |
collection |
Koha |
country |
Argentina |
countrycode |
AR |
component |
Bibliográfico |
access |
En linea En linea |
databasecode |
cat-ceiba |
tag |
biblioteca |
region |
America del Sur |
libraryname |
Biblioteca Central FAUBA |
language |
eng |
topic |
DEGRADACION DE TIERRAS ARGENTINA SOSTENIBILIDAD PROPIEDADES FISICO - QUIMICAS SUELO DEGRADACION DE TIERRAS ARGENTINA SOSTENIBILIDAD PROPIEDADES FISICO - QUIMICAS SUELO |
spellingShingle |
DEGRADACION DE TIERRAS ARGENTINA SOSTENIBILIDAD PROPIEDADES FISICO - QUIMICAS SUELO DEGRADACION DE TIERRAS ARGENTINA SOSTENIBILIDAD PROPIEDADES FISICO - QUIMICAS SUELO Bouza, Mariana E. Aranda Rickert, Adriana Brizuela, María Magdalena Wilson, Marcelo Germán Sasal, María Carolina Sione, Silvana M. Beghetto, Stella Gabioud, Emmanuel Adrián Economics of land degradation in Argentina |
description |
Argentina is one of the countries with a vibrant agricultural sector, which provides both economic development opportunities and environmental challenges.
Argentina was selected as a case study due to its rich land degradation data, its diverse agroecological systems, and rapid poverty reduction. The country also represents high human development index countries. This study reports the cost ofland degradation, the cost of inaction and cost and benefits of taking action against land degradation. The total loss of ecosystem services due to land-use/cover change (LUCC), wetlands degradation and use of land degrading management practices on grazing lands and selected croplands is about 2007 US$75 billion, which is about 16 % of the country ’s GDP. LUCC accounts for 94 % of the loss, underscoring the need for developing more effective land use planning and incentives land users to protect high value biomes. The returns to taking action against land degradation is about US$4 per US$ invested —
justifying the need to take action to improve human welfare and environmental protection. The actions against land degradation include investment in restoration of degraded lands and prevention of land degradation through stricter regulation of agricultural expansion into forests and other higher value biomes. They also include reforestation and other restoration efforts; pro-
tection wetlands and restoration of degraded wetlands. The excessive use of agrochemicals also require action to regulate their potential off-site effects. Case studies also show that promotion of rotational grazing, extending conservation agriculture beyond soybean; tillage method and crop-livestock production systems offer promising strategies for addressing land degradation. The world has a lot to learn from Argentina given its rapid poverty reduction and successful adoption rate of conservation agriculture using public-private partnership. If Argentina aims at maintaining its economic and social development, it will need to work harder to address its growth-related environmental challenges that affect the poor the most.
Argentina is better prepared to face these challenges. This study will contribute to informing policy makers on the best strategies for taking action against land degradation and the returns to such actions. |
format |
Texto |
topic_facet |
DEGRADACION DE TIERRAS ARGENTINA SOSTENIBILIDAD PROPIEDADES FISICO - QUIMICAS SUELO |
author |
Bouza, Mariana E. Aranda Rickert, Adriana Brizuela, María Magdalena Wilson, Marcelo Germán Sasal, María Carolina Sione, Silvana M. Beghetto, Stella Gabioud, Emmanuel Adrián |
author_facet |
Bouza, Mariana E. Aranda Rickert, Adriana Brizuela, María Magdalena Wilson, Marcelo Germán Sasal, María Carolina Sione, Silvana M. Beghetto, Stella Gabioud, Emmanuel Adrián |
author_sort |
Bouza, Mariana E. |
title |
Economics of land degradation in Argentina |
title_short |
Economics of land degradation in Argentina |
title_full |
Economics of land degradation in Argentina |
title_fullStr |
Economics of land degradation in Argentina |
title_full_unstemmed |
Economics of land degradation in Argentina |
title_sort |
economics of land degradation in argentina |
url |
http://ceiba.agro.uba.ar/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=47845 http://ceiba.agro.uba.ar/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber= http://ceiba.agro.uba.ar/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber= |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT bouzamarianae economicsoflanddegradationinargentina AT arandarickertadriana economicsoflanddegradationinargentina AT brizuelamariamagdalena economicsoflanddegradationinargentina AT wilsonmarcelogerman economicsoflanddegradationinargentina AT sasalmariacarolina economicsoflanddegradationinargentina AT sionesilvanam economicsoflanddegradationinargentina AT beghettostella economicsoflanddegradationinargentina AT gabioudemmanueladrian economicsoflanddegradationinargentina |
_version_ |
1813408811157815296 |
spelling |
KOHA-OAI-AGRO:478452024-09-11T11:08:50Zhttp://ceiba.agro.uba.ar/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=47845http://ceiba.agro.uba.ar/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=http://ceiba.agro.uba.ar/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=AAGEconomics of land degradation in ArgentinaBouza, Mariana E.Aranda Rickert, AdrianaBrizuela, María MagdalenaWilson, Marcelo GermánSasal, María CarolinaSione, Silvana M.Beghetto, StellaGabioud, Emmanuel AdriántextengArgentina is one of the countries with a vibrant agricultural sector, which provides both economic development opportunities and environmental challenges. Argentina was selected as a case study due to its rich land degradation data, its diverse agroecological systems, and rapid poverty reduction. The country also represents high human development index countries. This study reports the cost ofland degradation, the cost of inaction and cost and benefits of taking action against land degradation. The total loss of ecosystem services due to land-use/cover change (LUCC), wetlands degradation and use of land degrading management practices on grazing lands and selected croplands is about 2007 US$75 billion, which is about 16 % of the country ’s GDP. LUCC accounts for 94 % of the loss, underscoring the need for developing more effective land use planning and incentives land users to protect high value biomes. The returns to taking action against land degradation is about US$4 per US$ invested — justifying the need to take action to improve human welfare and environmental protection. The actions against land degradation include investment in restoration of degraded lands and prevention of land degradation through stricter regulation of agricultural expansion into forests and other higher value biomes. They also include reforestation and other restoration efforts; pro- tection wetlands and restoration of degraded wetlands. The excessive use of agrochemicals also require action to regulate their potential off-site effects. Case studies also show that promotion of rotational grazing, extending conservation agriculture beyond soybean; tillage method and crop-livestock production systems offer promising strategies for addressing land degradation. The world has a lot to learn from Argentina given its rapid poverty reduction and successful adoption rate of conservation agriculture using public-private partnership. If Argentina aims at maintaining its economic and social development, it will need to work harder to address its growth-related environmental challenges that affect the poor the most. Argentina is better prepared to face these challenges. This study will contribute to informing policy makers on the best strategies for taking action against land degradation and the returns to such actions.Argentina is one of the countries with a vibrant agricultural sector, which provides both economic development opportunities and environmental challenges. Argentina was selected as a case study due to its rich land degradation data, its diverse agroecological systems, and rapid poverty reduction. The country also represents high human development index countries. This study reports the cost ofland degradation, the cost of inaction and cost and benefits of taking action against land degradation. The total loss of ecosystem services due to land-use/cover change (LUCC), wetlands degradation and use of land degrading management practices on grazing lands and selected croplands is about 2007 US$75 billion, which is about 16 % of the country ’s GDP. LUCC accounts for 94 % of the loss, underscoring the need for developing more effective land use planning and incentives land users to protect high value biomes. The returns to taking action against land degradation is about US$4 per US$ invested — justifying the need to take action to improve human welfare and environmental protection. The actions against land degradation include investment in restoration of degraded lands and prevention of land degradation through stricter regulation of agricultural expansion into forests and other higher value biomes. They also include reforestation and other restoration efforts; pro- tection wetlands and restoration of degraded wetlands. The excessive use of agrochemicals also require action to regulate their potential off-site effects. Case studies also show that promotion of rotational grazing, extending conservation agriculture beyond soybean; tillage method and crop-livestock production systems offer promising strategies for addressing land degradation. The world has a lot to learn from Argentina given its rapid poverty reduction and successful adoption rate of conservation agriculture using public-private partnership. If Argentina aims at maintaining its economic and social development, it will need to work harder to address its growth-related environmental challenges that affect the poor the most. Argentina is better prepared to face these challenges. This study will contribute to informing policy makers on the best strategies for taking action against land degradation and the returns to such actions.DEGRADACION DE TIERRASARGENTINASOSTENIBILIDADPROPIEDADES FISICO - QUIMICAS SUELOEconomics of land degradation and improvement |