Impact of grazing on species composition adding complexity to a generalized model

The impact of grazing widely differs among plant communities. A generalized model published in 1988 proposed that this variation could be accounted for by the interaction between primary productivity and the evolutionary history of grazing. As productivity increased, the model predicted larger changes of species composition. Evolutionary history of grazing interacted with productivity: the changes in low-production systems were smaller if evolutionary history was long, whereas the changes in high-production systems were independent of evolutionary history. In this paper, we focus on: [i] the difficulties of determining the evolutionary history of grazing of a community, and [ii] additional mechanisms, which, as a sequence of filters in the process of community assembly, could be operating across the gradient of primary production. Assigning a given evolutionary history of grazing to a site has been difficult due to the lack of information on the historical population and distribution of herbivores with an adequate spatial and temporal resolution, and the lack of agreement on the size of the relevant evolutionary time window. Regarding the variation through a gradient of primary production, we propose three additional mechanisms coherent with the prediction of the model. First, the regional pool of available species increases with primary production. Second, grazing intensity [consumption as a proportion of above-ground production] also increases with primary production. Third, the strength of interspecific positive biotic interactions that protect plants from herbivores decreases with primary production. We highlight an additional potential mechanism, seed dispersal, whose variation across the gradient of productivity is not yet sufficiently understood. By connecting the logic of environmental filters to explain community assemblage with the original proposition of the generalized model, we suggest a series of research lines that can lead to a better understanding of why different communities respond differently to grazing.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Oesterheld, Martín, Semmartin, María
Format: Texto biblioteca
Language:eng
Subjects:COMMUNITY ASSEMBLY, DISTURBANCE, EVOLUTIONARY HISTORY, PRIMARY PRODUCTIVITY, SUCCESSION, ASSEMBLY RULE, COMMUNITY COMPOSITION, COMPLEXITY, ECOLOGICAL MODELING, EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, GRAZING, HERBIVORE, PLANT COMMUNITY, PRIMARY PRODUCTION, SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS,
Online Access:http://ceiba.agro.uba.ar/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=46608
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id KOHA-OAI-AGRO:46608
record_format koha
institution UBA FA
collection Koha
country Argentina
countrycode AR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
En linea
databasecode cat-ceiba
tag biblioteca
region America del Sur
libraryname Biblioteca Central FAUBA
language eng
topic COMMUNITY ASSEMBLY
DISTURBANCE
EVOLUTIONARY HISTORY
PRIMARY PRODUCTIVITY
SUCCESSION
ASSEMBLY RULE
COMMUNITY COMPOSITION
COMPLEXITY
ECOLOGICAL MODELING
EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
GRAZING
HERBIVORE
PLANT COMMUNITY
PRIMARY PRODUCTION
SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS
COMMUNITY ASSEMBLY
DISTURBANCE
EVOLUTIONARY HISTORY
PRIMARY PRODUCTIVITY
SUCCESSION
ASSEMBLY RULE
COMMUNITY COMPOSITION
COMPLEXITY
ECOLOGICAL MODELING
EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
GRAZING
HERBIVORE
PLANT COMMUNITY
PRIMARY PRODUCTION
SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS
spellingShingle COMMUNITY ASSEMBLY
DISTURBANCE
EVOLUTIONARY HISTORY
PRIMARY PRODUCTIVITY
SUCCESSION
ASSEMBLY RULE
COMMUNITY COMPOSITION
COMPLEXITY
ECOLOGICAL MODELING
EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
GRAZING
HERBIVORE
PLANT COMMUNITY
PRIMARY PRODUCTION
SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS
COMMUNITY ASSEMBLY
DISTURBANCE
EVOLUTIONARY HISTORY
PRIMARY PRODUCTIVITY
SUCCESSION
ASSEMBLY RULE
COMMUNITY COMPOSITION
COMPLEXITY
ECOLOGICAL MODELING
EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
GRAZING
HERBIVORE
PLANT COMMUNITY
PRIMARY PRODUCTION
SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS
Oesterheld, Martín
Semmartin, María
Impact of grazing on species composition adding complexity to a generalized model
description The impact of grazing widely differs among plant communities. A generalized model published in 1988 proposed that this variation could be accounted for by the interaction between primary productivity and the evolutionary history of grazing. As productivity increased, the model predicted larger changes of species composition. Evolutionary history of grazing interacted with productivity: the changes in low-production systems were smaller if evolutionary history was long, whereas the changes in high-production systems were independent of evolutionary history. In this paper, we focus on: [i] the difficulties of determining the evolutionary history of grazing of a community, and [ii] additional mechanisms, which, as a sequence of filters in the process of community assembly, could be operating across the gradient of primary production. Assigning a given evolutionary history of grazing to a site has been difficult due to the lack of information on the historical population and distribution of herbivores with an adequate spatial and temporal resolution, and the lack of agreement on the size of the relevant evolutionary time window. Regarding the variation through a gradient of primary production, we propose three additional mechanisms coherent with the prediction of the model. First, the regional pool of available species increases with primary production. Second, grazing intensity [consumption as a proportion of above-ground production] also increases with primary production. Third, the strength of interspecific positive biotic interactions that protect plants from herbivores decreases with primary production. We highlight an additional potential mechanism, seed dispersal, whose variation across the gradient of productivity is not yet sufficiently understood. By connecting the logic of environmental filters to explain community assemblage with the original proposition of the generalized model, we suggest a series of research lines that can lead to a better understanding of why different communities respond differently to grazing.
format Texto
topic_facet COMMUNITY ASSEMBLY
DISTURBANCE
EVOLUTIONARY HISTORY
PRIMARY PRODUCTIVITY
SUCCESSION
ASSEMBLY RULE
COMMUNITY COMPOSITION
COMPLEXITY
ECOLOGICAL MODELING
EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
GRAZING
HERBIVORE
PLANT COMMUNITY
PRIMARY PRODUCTION
SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS
author Oesterheld, Martín
Semmartin, María
author_facet Oesterheld, Martín
Semmartin, María
author_sort Oesterheld, Martín
title Impact of grazing on species composition adding complexity to a generalized model
title_short Impact of grazing on species composition adding complexity to a generalized model
title_full Impact of grazing on species composition adding complexity to a generalized model
title_fullStr Impact of grazing on species composition adding complexity to a generalized model
title_full_unstemmed Impact of grazing on species composition adding complexity to a generalized model
title_sort impact of grazing on species composition adding complexity to a generalized model
url http://ceiba.agro.uba.ar/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=46608
work_keys_str_mv AT oesterheldmartin impactofgrazingonspeciescompositionaddingcomplexitytoageneralizedmodel
AT semmartinmaria impactofgrazingonspeciescompositionaddingcomplexitytoageneralizedmodel
_version_ 1756046667013947393
spelling KOHA-OAI-AGRO:466082022-08-09T11:17:07Zhttp://ceiba.agro.uba.ar/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=46608AAGImpact of grazing on species composition adding complexity to a generalized modelOesterheld, MartínSemmartin, Maríatextengapplication/pdfThe impact of grazing widely differs among plant communities. A generalized model published in 1988 proposed that this variation could be accounted for by the interaction between primary productivity and the evolutionary history of grazing. As productivity increased, the model predicted larger changes of species composition. Evolutionary history of grazing interacted with productivity: the changes in low-production systems were smaller if evolutionary history was long, whereas the changes in high-production systems were independent of evolutionary history. In this paper, we focus on: [i] the difficulties of determining the evolutionary history of grazing of a community, and [ii] additional mechanisms, which, as a sequence of filters in the process of community assembly, could be operating across the gradient of primary production. Assigning a given evolutionary history of grazing to a site has been difficult due to the lack of information on the historical population and distribution of herbivores with an adequate spatial and temporal resolution, and the lack of agreement on the size of the relevant evolutionary time window. Regarding the variation through a gradient of primary production, we propose three additional mechanisms coherent with the prediction of the model. First, the regional pool of available species increases with primary production. Second, grazing intensity [consumption as a proportion of above-ground production] also increases with primary production. Third, the strength of interspecific positive biotic interactions that protect plants from herbivores decreases with primary production. We highlight an additional potential mechanism, seed dispersal, whose variation across the gradient of productivity is not yet sufficiently understood. By connecting the logic of environmental filters to explain community assemblage with the original proposition of the generalized model, we suggest a series of research lines that can lead to a better understanding of why different communities respond differently to grazing.The impact of grazing widely differs among plant communities. A generalized model published in 1988 proposed that this variation could be accounted for by the interaction between primary productivity and the evolutionary history of grazing. As productivity increased, the model predicted larger changes of species composition. Evolutionary history of grazing interacted with productivity: the changes in low-production systems were smaller if evolutionary history was long, whereas the changes in high-production systems were independent of evolutionary history. In this paper, we focus on: [i] the difficulties of determining the evolutionary history of grazing of a community, and [ii] additional mechanisms, which, as a sequence of filters in the process of community assembly, could be operating across the gradient of primary production. Assigning a given evolutionary history of grazing to a site has been difficult due to the lack of information on the historical population and distribution of herbivores with an adequate spatial and temporal resolution, and the lack of agreement on the size of the relevant evolutionary time window. Regarding the variation through a gradient of primary production, we propose three additional mechanisms coherent with the prediction of the model. First, the regional pool of available species increases with primary production. Second, grazing intensity [consumption as a proportion of above-ground production] also increases with primary production. Third, the strength of interspecific positive biotic interactions that protect plants from herbivores decreases with primary production. We highlight an additional potential mechanism, seed dispersal, whose variation across the gradient of productivity is not yet sufficiently understood. By connecting the logic of environmental filters to explain community assemblage with the original proposition of the generalized model, we suggest a series of research lines that can lead to a better understanding of why different communities respond differently to grazing.COMMUNITY ASSEMBLYDISTURBANCEEVOLUTIONARY HISTORYPRIMARY PRODUCTIVITYSUCCESSIONASSEMBLY RULECOMMUNITY COMPOSITIONCOMPLEXITYECOLOGICAL MODELINGEVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGYGRAZINGHERBIVOREPLANT COMMUNITYPRIMARY PRODUCTIONSPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSISAustral Ecology : a journal of ecology in the southern hemisphere