Acute Blood Pressure Response to Different Resistance Programs in Trained Men

Abstract Background Resistance training is used in different exercise programs, with different objectives and different levels of physical fitness. Training-related variables, such as volume, rest time and intensity, can affect the response of blood pressure (BP), but studies on the effect of these variables on BP are still needed. Objective To evaluate the acute response of BP in trained individuals undergoing two different methods of resistance training. Methods The sample was divided into three groups: (1) the German volume training (GVT) (n= 15), which consisted of 10 series of 10 repetitions at 50% of 1-repetition maximum (RM) with intervals of 30 seconds; (2) the sarcoplasm stimulating training (SST) (n= 16), performed at 8 RM and 85% of 1-RM and interval of 10 seconds until failure, followed by removal of 20% of weight and repetition of the whole series (total of three sets), and the control group (CG) (n= 15) who underwent BP measurements only. The two-way repeated measures ANOVA was used for analysis of variations, and a p< 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results In the within-group analysis, a significant lowering of systolic blood pressure (SBP) was found at 10 minutes (125.4±10.8 mmHg, p= 0.045) and 20 minutes (124.5±8.5 mmHg, p= 0.044) post-training compared with immediately after training. In the between-group comparison, higher SBP values were observed immediately after training in the SST group (142.1±28.2, p= 0.048) compared with the CG. Conclusion High-volume and high-intensity resistance training programs did not cause abnormal changes in blood pressure. (Int J Cardiovasc Sci. 2021; [online].ahead print, PP.0-0)

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Conceição,Ariani França, Muniz,Daniell Lima, Santos,Clarcson Plácido Conceição dos, Queiroz,Ciro Oliveira
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia 2021
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2359-56472021000300294
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S2359-56472021000300294
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S2359-564720210003002942022-02-02Acute Blood Pressure Response to Different Resistance Programs in Trained MenConceição,Ariani FrançaMuniz,Daniell LimaSantos,Clarcson Plácido Conceição dosQueiroz,Ciro Oliveira Resistance Training Exercise Blood Pressure Hypertension Circuit Based Exercise Men Rehabilitation Abstract Background Resistance training is used in different exercise programs, with different objectives and different levels of physical fitness. Training-related variables, such as volume, rest time and intensity, can affect the response of blood pressure (BP), but studies on the effect of these variables on BP are still needed. Objective To evaluate the acute response of BP in trained individuals undergoing two different methods of resistance training. Methods The sample was divided into three groups: (1) the German volume training (GVT) (n= 15), which consisted of 10 series of 10 repetitions at 50% of 1-repetition maximum (RM) with intervals of 30 seconds; (2) the sarcoplasm stimulating training (SST) (n= 16), performed at 8 RM and 85% of 1-RM and interval of 10 seconds until failure, followed by removal of 20% of weight and repetition of the whole series (total of three sets), and the control group (CG) (n= 15) who underwent BP measurements only. The two-way repeated measures ANOVA was used for analysis of variations, and a p< 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results In the within-group analysis, a significant lowering of systolic blood pressure (SBP) was found at 10 minutes (125.4±10.8 mmHg, p= 0.045) and 20 minutes (124.5±8.5 mmHg, p= 0.044) post-training compared with immediately after training. In the between-group comparison, higher SBP values were observed immediately after training in the SST group (142.1±28.2, p= 0.048) compared with the CG. Conclusion High-volume and high-intensity resistance training programs did not cause abnormal changes in blood pressure. (Int J Cardiovasc Sci. 2021; [online].ahead print, PP.0-0)info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedade Brasileira de CardiologiaInternational Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences v.34 n.3 20212021-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2359-56472021000300294en10.36660/ijcs.20190215
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Conceição,Ariani França
Muniz,Daniell Lima
Santos,Clarcson Plácido Conceição dos
Queiroz,Ciro Oliveira
spellingShingle Conceição,Ariani França
Muniz,Daniell Lima
Santos,Clarcson Plácido Conceição dos
Queiroz,Ciro Oliveira
Acute Blood Pressure Response to Different Resistance Programs in Trained Men
author_facet Conceição,Ariani França
Muniz,Daniell Lima
Santos,Clarcson Plácido Conceição dos
Queiroz,Ciro Oliveira
author_sort Conceição,Ariani França
title Acute Blood Pressure Response to Different Resistance Programs in Trained Men
title_short Acute Blood Pressure Response to Different Resistance Programs in Trained Men
title_full Acute Blood Pressure Response to Different Resistance Programs in Trained Men
title_fullStr Acute Blood Pressure Response to Different Resistance Programs in Trained Men
title_full_unstemmed Acute Blood Pressure Response to Different Resistance Programs in Trained Men
title_sort acute blood pressure response to different resistance programs in trained men
description Abstract Background Resistance training is used in different exercise programs, with different objectives and different levels of physical fitness. Training-related variables, such as volume, rest time and intensity, can affect the response of blood pressure (BP), but studies on the effect of these variables on BP are still needed. Objective To evaluate the acute response of BP in trained individuals undergoing two different methods of resistance training. Methods The sample was divided into three groups: (1) the German volume training (GVT) (n= 15), which consisted of 10 series of 10 repetitions at 50% of 1-repetition maximum (RM) with intervals of 30 seconds; (2) the sarcoplasm stimulating training (SST) (n= 16), performed at 8 RM and 85% of 1-RM and interval of 10 seconds until failure, followed by removal of 20% of weight and repetition of the whole series (total of three sets), and the control group (CG) (n= 15) who underwent BP measurements only. The two-way repeated measures ANOVA was used for analysis of variations, and a p< 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results In the within-group analysis, a significant lowering of systolic blood pressure (SBP) was found at 10 minutes (125.4±10.8 mmHg, p= 0.045) and 20 minutes (124.5±8.5 mmHg, p= 0.044) post-training compared with immediately after training. In the between-group comparison, higher SBP values were observed immediately after training in the SST group (142.1±28.2, p= 0.048) compared with the CG. Conclusion High-volume and high-intensity resistance training programs did not cause abnormal changes in blood pressure. (Int J Cardiovasc Sci. 2021; [online].ahead print, PP.0-0)
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia
publishDate 2021
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2359-56472021000300294
work_keys_str_mv AT conceicaoarianifranca acutebloodpressureresponsetodifferentresistanceprogramsintrainedmen
AT munizdanielllima acutebloodpressureresponsetodifferentresistanceprogramsintrainedmen
AT santosclarcsonplacidoconceicaodos acutebloodpressureresponsetodifferentresistanceprogramsintrainedmen
AT queirozcirooliveira acutebloodpressureresponsetodifferentresistanceprogramsintrainedmen
_version_ 1756441640505966592