II BRAZILIAN CONSENSUS ON GASTRIC CANCER BY THE BRAZILIAN GASTRIC CANCER ASSOCIATION

II BRAZILIAN CONSENSUS ON GASTRIC CANCER BY THE BRAZILIAN GASTRIC CANCER ASSOCIATION

ABSTRACT Background: Since the publication of the first Brazilian Consensus on Gastric Cancer (GC) in 2012 carried out by the Brazilian Gastric Cancer Association, new concepts on diagnosis, staging, treatment and follow-up have been incorporated. Aim: This new consensus is to promote an update to professionals working in the fight against GC and to provide guidelines for the management of patients with this condition. Methods: Fifty-nine experts answered 67 statements regarding the diagnosis, staging, treatment and prognosis of GC with five possible alternatives: 1) fully agree; 2) partially agree; 3) undecided; 4) disagree and 5) strongly disagree A consensus was adopted when at least 80% of the sum of the answers “fully agree” and “partially agree” was reached. This article presents only the responses of the participating experts. Comments on each statement, as well as a literature review, will be presented in future publications. Results: Of the 67 statements, there was consensus in 50 (74%). In 10 declarations, there was 100% agreement. Conclusion: The gastric cancer treatment has evolved considerably in recent years. This consensus gathers consolidated principles in the last decades, new knowledge acquired recently, as well as promising perspectives on the management of this disease.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: BARCHI,Leandro Cardoso, RAMOS,Marcus Fernando Kodama Pertille, DIAS,André Roncon, ANDREOLLO,Nelson Adami, WESTON,Antônio Carlos, LOURENÇO,Laércio Gomes, MALHEIROS,Carlos Alberto, KASSAB,Paulo, ZILBERSTEIN,Bruno, Ferraz,Álvaro Antônio Bandeira, Charruf,Amir Zeide, Brandalise,André, Silva,André Maciel da, Alves,Barlon, Marins,Carlos Augusto Martinez, Leite,Celso Vieira, Bresciani,Claudio José Caldas, Szor,Daniel, Mucerino,Donato Roberto, Wohnrath,Durval R., Ilias,Elias Jirjoss, Martins Filho,Euclides Dias, Lopasso,Fabio Pinatel, Coimbra,Felipe José Fernandez, Felippe,Fernando E. Cruz, Tomasisch,Flávio Daniel Saavedra, Takeda,Flavio Roberto, Ishak,Geraldo, Laporte,Gustavo Andreazza, Silva,Herbeth José Toledo, Cecconello,Ivan, Rodrigues,Joaquim José Gama, Grande,José Carlos Del, Motta,Leonardo Milhomem da, Ferraz,Leonardo Rocha, Moreira,Luis Fernando, Lopes,Luis Roberto, Toneto,Marcelo Garcia, Mester,Marcelo, Rodrigues,Marco Antônio Gonçalves, Carvalho,Marineide Prudêncio de, Franciss,Maurice Youssef, Forones,Nora Manoukian, Corletta,Oly Campos, Yagi,Osmar Kenji, Castro,Osvaldo Antonio Prado, Malafaia,Osvaldo, Assumpção,Paulo Pimentel, Savassi-Rocha,Paulo Roberto, Colleoni Neto,Ramiro, Oliveira,Rodrigo Jose de, Sallun,Rubens Antonio Aissar, Weschenfelder,Rui, Oliveira,Saint Clair Vieira de, Abreu,Thiago Boechat de, Castria,Tiago Biachi de, Ribeiro Junior,Ulysses, Barra,Williams, Costa Júnior,Wilson Luiz da, Freitas Júnior,Wilson Rodrigues de
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva 2020
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-67202020000200306
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:ABSTRACT Background: Since the publication of the first Brazilian Consensus on Gastric Cancer (GC) in 2012 carried out by the Brazilian Gastric Cancer Association, new concepts on diagnosis, staging, treatment and follow-up have been incorporated. Aim: This new consensus is to promote an update to professionals working in the fight against GC and to provide guidelines for the management of patients with this condition. Methods: Fifty-nine experts answered 67 statements regarding the diagnosis, staging, treatment and prognosis of GC with five possible alternatives: 1) fully agree; 2) partially agree; 3) undecided; 4) disagree and 5) strongly disagree A consensus was adopted when at least 80% of the sum of the answers “fully agree” and “partially agree” was reached. This article presents only the responses of the participating experts. Comments on each statement, as well as a literature review, will be presented in future publications. Results: Of the 67 statements, there was consensus in 50 (74%). In 10 declarations, there was 100% agreement. Conclusion: The gastric cancer treatment has evolved considerably in recent years. This consensus gathers consolidated principles in the last decades, new knowledge acquired recently, as well as promising perspectives on the management of this disease.

Similar Items