Why biodiversity increases after variable retention harvesting: A meta-analysis for southern Patagonian forests

Effects of forest harvesting on biodiversity can be varied and complex to understand. We provide a meta-analysis of 553 studies plants, insects and birds to identify the general responses to Variable Retention harvesting (VR) 1–8 years post-harvest in Nothofagus pumilio forests of southern Patagonia. The analysis is focused on: (i) richness and abundance, (ii) origin and habitat (native forest specialist species, native species of other habitats, alien species), and (iii) temporal trends after harvesting. Our objective was to evaluate why biodiversity increases after variable retention harvesting, by assessing the effects on (i) species richness and abundance in general, (ii) native forest specialists, native generalist species and alien species, and (iii) the recovery of biodiversity toward original conditions. Forests managed with VR supported higher overall richness and abundance of plants, insects and birds in aggregate and dispersed retention than unmanaged stands, but with similar values each other. However, origin and habitat of species affected responses to VR. Aggregates support higher native forest specialist plant and lower plants of habitats other than dispersed retention. However, both retention treatments increased alien plants, although its richness and abundance was higher in dispersed retention. Native forest specialist insects were reduced in comparison to unmanaged forest, while insects of other habitats showed a positive response to both aggregate and dispersed retention as well as did for bird species richness and abundance compared to unmanaged forests. We found evidence for recovery of original conditions for native forest specialist plants and insects, and plants of other habitats. In contrast, alien plants and native insects of other habitats increased continuously in the studies included through those representing 8 years post-harvest. Major differences among both retention patterns included significantly higher richness and abundance of alien plants and native insects of other habitats in dispersed retention. Our synthesis shows recovery toward original conditions for some taxa, but demonstrates long-term establishment of alien plants as well as insect species not associated with native N. pumilio forests. These have emerged as a main potential threat to conservation of forests under VR prescription, at least at the stand level. Retention forestry could play a fundamental role for conservation in productive temperate forests, but the influence of retention pattern and aggregate size are still unclear.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Soler Esteban, Rosina Matilde, Schindler, Stefan, Lencinas, María Vanessa, Peri, Pablo Luis, Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José
Format: info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo biblioteca
Language:eng
Published: 2016-06-01
Subjects:Bosques, Biodiversidad, Nothofagus Pumilio, Bosque Primario, Ecosistema, Forests, Biodiversity, Primary Forests, Ecosystems, Región Patagónica, Bosques Nativos,
Online Access:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112716300561
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/3450
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.02.036
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:localhost:20.500.12123-3450
record_format koha
institution INTA AR
collection DSpace
country Argentina
countrycode AR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-inta-ar
tag biblioteca
region America del Sur
libraryname Biblioteca Central del INTA Argentina
language eng
topic Bosques
Biodiversidad
Nothofagus Pumilio
Bosque Primario
Ecosistema
Forests
Biodiversity
Primary Forests
Ecosystems
Región Patagónica
Bosques Nativos
Bosques
Biodiversidad
Nothofagus Pumilio
Bosque Primario
Ecosistema
Forests
Biodiversity
Primary Forests
Ecosystems
Región Patagónica
Bosques Nativos
spellingShingle Bosques
Biodiversidad
Nothofagus Pumilio
Bosque Primario
Ecosistema
Forests
Biodiversity
Primary Forests
Ecosystems
Región Patagónica
Bosques Nativos
Bosques
Biodiversidad
Nothofagus Pumilio
Bosque Primario
Ecosistema
Forests
Biodiversity
Primary Forests
Ecosystems
Región Patagónica
Bosques Nativos
Soler Esteban, Rosina Matilde
Schindler, Stefan
Lencinas, María Vanessa
Peri, Pablo Luis
Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José
Why biodiversity increases after variable retention harvesting: A meta-analysis for southern Patagonian forests
description Effects of forest harvesting on biodiversity can be varied and complex to understand. We provide a meta-analysis of 553 studies plants, insects and birds to identify the general responses to Variable Retention harvesting (VR) 1–8 years post-harvest in Nothofagus pumilio forests of southern Patagonia. The analysis is focused on: (i) richness and abundance, (ii) origin and habitat (native forest specialist species, native species of other habitats, alien species), and (iii) temporal trends after harvesting. Our objective was to evaluate why biodiversity increases after variable retention harvesting, by assessing the effects on (i) species richness and abundance in general, (ii) native forest specialists, native generalist species and alien species, and (iii) the recovery of biodiversity toward original conditions. Forests managed with VR supported higher overall richness and abundance of plants, insects and birds in aggregate and dispersed retention than unmanaged stands, but with similar values each other. However, origin and habitat of species affected responses to VR. Aggregates support higher native forest specialist plant and lower plants of habitats other than dispersed retention. However, both retention treatments increased alien plants, although its richness and abundance was higher in dispersed retention. Native forest specialist insects were reduced in comparison to unmanaged forest, while insects of other habitats showed a positive response to both aggregate and dispersed retention as well as did for bird species richness and abundance compared to unmanaged forests. We found evidence for recovery of original conditions for native forest specialist plants and insects, and plants of other habitats. In contrast, alien plants and native insects of other habitats increased continuously in the studies included through those representing 8 years post-harvest. Major differences among both retention patterns included significantly higher richness and abundance of alien plants and native insects of other habitats in dispersed retention. Our synthesis shows recovery toward original conditions for some taxa, but demonstrates long-term establishment of alien plants as well as insect species not associated with native N. pumilio forests. These have emerged as a main potential threat to conservation of forests under VR prescription, at least at the stand level. Retention forestry could play a fundamental role for conservation in productive temperate forests, but the influence of retention pattern and aggregate size are still unclear.
format info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
topic_facet Bosques
Biodiversidad
Nothofagus Pumilio
Bosque Primario
Ecosistema
Forests
Biodiversity
Primary Forests
Ecosystems
Región Patagónica
Bosques Nativos
author Soler Esteban, Rosina Matilde
Schindler, Stefan
Lencinas, María Vanessa
Peri, Pablo Luis
Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José
author_facet Soler Esteban, Rosina Matilde
Schindler, Stefan
Lencinas, María Vanessa
Peri, Pablo Luis
Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José
author_sort Soler Esteban, Rosina Matilde
title Why biodiversity increases after variable retention harvesting: A meta-analysis for southern Patagonian forests
title_short Why biodiversity increases after variable retention harvesting: A meta-analysis for southern Patagonian forests
title_full Why biodiversity increases after variable retention harvesting: A meta-analysis for southern Patagonian forests
title_fullStr Why biodiversity increases after variable retention harvesting: A meta-analysis for southern Patagonian forests
title_full_unstemmed Why biodiversity increases after variable retention harvesting: A meta-analysis for southern Patagonian forests
title_sort why biodiversity increases after variable retention harvesting: a meta-analysis for southern patagonian forests
publishDate 2016-06-01
url https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112716300561
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/3450
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.02.036
work_keys_str_mv AT solerestebanrosinamatilde whybiodiversityincreasesaftervariableretentionharvestingametaanalysisforsouthernpatagonianforests
AT schindlerstefan whybiodiversityincreasesaftervariableretentionharvestingametaanalysisforsouthernpatagonianforests
AT lencinasmariavanessa whybiodiversityincreasesaftervariableretentionharvestingametaanalysisforsouthernpatagonianforests
AT peripabloluis whybiodiversityincreasesaftervariableretentionharvestingametaanalysisforsouthernpatagonianforests
AT martinezpasturguillermojose whybiodiversityincreasesaftervariableretentionharvestingametaanalysisforsouthernpatagonianforests
_version_ 1756007257614581760
spelling oai:localhost:20.500.12123-34502018-09-24T11:46:21Z Why biodiversity increases after variable retention harvesting: A meta-analysis for southern Patagonian forests Soler Esteban, Rosina Matilde Schindler, Stefan Lencinas, María Vanessa Peri, Pablo Luis Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José Bosques Biodiversidad Nothofagus Pumilio Bosque Primario Ecosistema Forests Biodiversity Primary Forests Ecosystems Región Patagónica Bosques Nativos Effects of forest harvesting on biodiversity can be varied and complex to understand. We provide a meta-analysis of 553 studies plants, insects and birds to identify the general responses to Variable Retention harvesting (VR) 1–8 years post-harvest in Nothofagus pumilio forests of southern Patagonia. The analysis is focused on: (i) richness and abundance, (ii) origin and habitat (native forest specialist species, native species of other habitats, alien species), and (iii) temporal trends after harvesting. Our objective was to evaluate why biodiversity increases after variable retention harvesting, by assessing the effects on (i) species richness and abundance in general, (ii) native forest specialists, native generalist species and alien species, and (iii) the recovery of biodiversity toward original conditions. Forests managed with VR supported higher overall richness and abundance of plants, insects and birds in aggregate and dispersed retention than unmanaged stands, but with similar values each other. However, origin and habitat of species affected responses to VR. Aggregates support higher native forest specialist plant and lower plants of habitats other than dispersed retention. However, both retention treatments increased alien plants, although its richness and abundance was higher in dispersed retention. Native forest specialist insects were reduced in comparison to unmanaged forest, while insects of other habitats showed a positive response to both aggregate and dispersed retention as well as did for bird species richness and abundance compared to unmanaged forests. We found evidence for recovery of original conditions for native forest specialist plants and insects, and plants of other habitats. In contrast, alien plants and native insects of other habitats increased continuously in the studies included through those representing 8 years post-harvest. Major differences among both retention patterns included significantly higher richness and abundance of alien plants and native insects of other habitats in dispersed retention. Our synthesis shows recovery toward original conditions for some taxa, but demonstrates long-term establishment of alien plants as well as insect species not associated with native N. pumilio forests. These have emerged as a main potential threat to conservation of forests under VR prescription, at least at the stand level. Retention forestry could play a fundamental role for conservation in productive temperate forests, but the influence of retention pattern and aggregate size are still unclear. EEA Santa Cruz Fil: Soler Esteban, Rosina Matilde. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Cientificas; Argentina Fil: Schindler, Stefan. Universidad de Viena. Department of Conservation Biology, Vegetation & Landscape Ecology; Austria. Universidad de Porto. Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos; Portugal. Environment Agency Austria. Biodiversity & Nature Conservation; Austria Fil: Lencinas, María Vanessa. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Cientificas; Argentina Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santa Cruz; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Cientificas; Argentina 2018-09-24T11:44:59Z 2018-09-24T11:44:59Z 2016-06-01 info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112716300561 http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/3450 0378-1127 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.02.036 eng info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess application/pdf Forest Ecology and Management 369 : 161-169 (June 2016)