Does biological nitrogen fixation modify soybean nitrogen dilution curves?

Biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] represents, on average, 60% of total nitrogen (N) uptake. Nitrogen dilution curves link aboveground crop N concentration (%N) to biomass accumulation (W). It has been reported that BNF is an energy-intensive process that might reduce biomass production per unit of captured N (physiological N use efficiency or NUE). This increased energy cost could lead to a more attenuated N (i.e. less efficient) dilution curve. However, there are no reports comparing N dilution curves for soybean crops differing in N source. Our objectives were to: (i) evaluate the impact of BNF on soybean N dilution curves and how it influences NUE, and (ii) establish independent N dilution curves for soil and atmospheric N. Our working hypothesis is that relying on BNF attenuates the N dilution curve and reduces NUE. The experiment consisted of a control and a fertilized treatment, 0 and 600 kg N ha−1 respectively, applied to four soybean genotypes in order to establish two differential BNF situations. While the control and fertilized treatments had differential N accumulation from BNF, ∼70% and ∼16%, respectively, there were no differences observed in seed yield (∼5000 kg ha−1), NUE (∼36 kg kg−1) and only slight differences in total N uptake (∼365 kg N ha−1 in fertilized treatment compared to ∼389 kg h−1 in the control treatment). Results suggest that reliance on BNF for N does not influence substantially the attenuation of the N dilution curve and has no impact on NUE. The N dilution parameter (“b”) ranged from −0.128 to −0.218 among cultivars and fertilization treatments. The less negative values (more attenuated curve) corresponded to the fertilized plots likely associated with luxury N consumption. Interestingly, dilution curves from soil mineral N showed the typical dilution pattern, while N derived from the atmosphere followed a concentration pattern as the crop developed. This most likely reflects the continuous N flux from BNF to the plant as opposed to the decreasing soil mineral N supply. Recognizing these concentration/dilution curves for atmospheric and soil N has three immediate implications. First, the atmospheric N concentration curve might indicate an upper benchmark for evaluating symbiosis performance during crop development. Second, the concentration pattern observed for BNF could potentially help to reverse the observed decline in seed protein concentration in modern soybean cultivars. Third, the N concentration/ dilution curves for the individual N sources could be incorporated into crop models for estimating BNF at different crop biomass levels during soybean development.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Santachiara, Gabriel, Salvagiotti, Fernando, Gerde, José Arnaldo, Rotundo, José Luis
Format: info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo biblioteca
Language:eng
Published: 2018
Subjects:Soja, Glycine Max, Fijación del Nitrógeno, Rhizobium, Aplicación de Abonos, Nitrógeno, Absorción de Sustancias Nutritivas, Nutrient Uptake, Nitrogen, Fertilizer Application, Nitrogen Fixation, Soybeans, Mineral Soil Absorption,
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/2473
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2018.04.001
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:localhost:20.500.12123-2473
record_format koha
institution INTA AR
collection DSpace
country Argentina
countrycode AR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-inta-ar
tag biblioteca
region America del Sur
libraryname Biblioteca Central del INTA Argentina
language eng
topic Soja
Glycine Max
Fijación del Nitrógeno
Rhizobium
Aplicación de Abonos
Nitrógeno
Absorción de Sustancias Nutritivas
Nutrient Uptake
Nitrogen
Fertilizer Application
Nitrogen Fixation
Soybeans
Mineral Soil Absorption
Soja
Glycine Max
Fijación del Nitrógeno
Rhizobium
Aplicación de Abonos
Nitrógeno
Absorción de Sustancias Nutritivas
Nutrient Uptake
Nitrogen
Fertilizer Application
Nitrogen Fixation
Soybeans
Mineral Soil Absorption
spellingShingle Soja
Glycine Max
Fijación del Nitrógeno
Rhizobium
Aplicación de Abonos
Nitrógeno
Absorción de Sustancias Nutritivas
Nutrient Uptake
Nitrogen
Fertilizer Application
Nitrogen Fixation
Soybeans
Mineral Soil Absorption
Soja
Glycine Max
Fijación del Nitrógeno
Rhizobium
Aplicación de Abonos
Nitrógeno
Absorción de Sustancias Nutritivas
Nutrient Uptake
Nitrogen
Fertilizer Application
Nitrogen Fixation
Soybeans
Mineral Soil Absorption
Santachiara, Gabriel
Salvagiotti, Fernando
Gerde, José Arnaldo
Rotundo, José Luis
Does biological nitrogen fixation modify soybean nitrogen dilution curves?
description Biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] represents, on average, 60% of total nitrogen (N) uptake. Nitrogen dilution curves link aboveground crop N concentration (%N) to biomass accumulation (W). It has been reported that BNF is an energy-intensive process that might reduce biomass production per unit of captured N (physiological N use efficiency or NUE). This increased energy cost could lead to a more attenuated N (i.e. less efficient) dilution curve. However, there are no reports comparing N dilution curves for soybean crops differing in N source. Our objectives were to: (i) evaluate the impact of BNF on soybean N dilution curves and how it influences NUE, and (ii) establish independent N dilution curves for soil and atmospheric N. Our working hypothesis is that relying on BNF attenuates the N dilution curve and reduces NUE. The experiment consisted of a control and a fertilized treatment, 0 and 600 kg N ha−1 respectively, applied to four soybean genotypes in order to establish two differential BNF situations. While the control and fertilized treatments had differential N accumulation from BNF, ∼70% and ∼16%, respectively, there were no differences observed in seed yield (∼5000 kg ha−1), NUE (∼36 kg kg−1) and only slight differences in total N uptake (∼365 kg N ha−1 in fertilized treatment compared to ∼389 kg h−1 in the control treatment). Results suggest that reliance on BNF for N does not influence substantially the attenuation of the N dilution curve and has no impact on NUE. The N dilution parameter (“b”) ranged from −0.128 to −0.218 among cultivars and fertilization treatments. The less negative values (more attenuated curve) corresponded to the fertilized plots likely associated with luxury N consumption. Interestingly, dilution curves from soil mineral N showed the typical dilution pattern, while N derived from the atmosphere followed a concentration pattern as the crop developed. This most likely reflects the continuous N flux from BNF to the plant as opposed to the decreasing soil mineral N supply. Recognizing these concentration/dilution curves for atmospheric and soil N has three immediate implications. First, the atmospheric N concentration curve might indicate an upper benchmark for evaluating symbiosis performance during crop development. Second, the concentration pattern observed for BNF could potentially help to reverse the observed decline in seed protein concentration in modern soybean cultivars. Third, the N concentration/ dilution curves for the individual N sources could be incorporated into crop models for estimating BNF at different crop biomass levels during soybean development.
format info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
topic_facet Soja
Glycine Max
Fijación del Nitrógeno
Rhizobium
Aplicación de Abonos
Nitrógeno
Absorción de Sustancias Nutritivas
Nutrient Uptake
Nitrogen
Fertilizer Application
Nitrogen Fixation
Soybeans
Mineral Soil Absorption
author Santachiara, Gabriel
Salvagiotti, Fernando
Gerde, José Arnaldo
Rotundo, José Luis
author_facet Santachiara, Gabriel
Salvagiotti, Fernando
Gerde, José Arnaldo
Rotundo, José Luis
author_sort Santachiara, Gabriel
title Does biological nitrogen fixation modify soybean nitrogen dilution curves?
title_short Does biological nitrogen fixation modify soybean nitrogen dilution curves?
title_full Does biological nitrogen fixation modify soybean nitrogen dilution curves?
title_fullStr Does biological nitrogen fixation modify soybean nitrogen dilution curves?
title_full_unstemmed Does biological nitrogen fixation modify soybean nitrogen dilution curves?
title_sort does biological nitrogen fixation modify soybean nitrogen dilution curves?
publishDate 2018
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/2473
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2018.04.001
work_keys_str_mv AT santachiaragabriel doesbiologicalnitrogenfixationmodifysoybeannitrogendilutioncurves
AT salvagiottifernando doesbiologicalnitrogenfixationmodifysoybeannitrogendilutioncurves
AT gerdejosearnaldo doesbiologicalnitrogenfixationmodifysoybeannitrogendilutioncurves
AT rotundojoseluis doesbiologicalnitrogenfixationmodifysoybeannitrogendilutioncurves
_version_ 1756007132237398016
spelling oai:localhost:20.500.12123-24732019-01-24T18:36:25Z Does biological nitrogen fixation modify soybean nitrogen dilution curves? Santachiara, Gabriel Salvagiotti, Fernando Gerde, José Arnaldo Rotundo, José Luis Soja Glycine Max Fijación del Nitrógeno Rhizobium Aplicación de Abonos Nitrógeno Absorción de Sustancias Nutritivas Nutrient Uptake Nitrogen Fertilizer Application Nitrogen Fixation Soybeans Mineral Soil Absorption Biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] represents, on average, 60% of total nitrogen (N) uptake. Nitrogen dilution curves link aboveground crop N concentration (%N) to biomass accumulation (W). It has been reported that BNF is an energy-intensive process that might reduce biomass production per unit of captured N (physiological N use efficiency or NUE). This increased energy cost could lead to a more attenuated N (i.e. less efficient) dilution curve. However, there are no reports comparing N dilution curves for soybean crops differing in N source. Our objectives were to: (i) evaluate the impact of BNF on soybean N dilution curves and how it influences NUE, and (ii) establish independent N dilution curves for soil and atmospheric N. Our working hypothesis is that relying on BNF attenuates the N dilution curve and reduces NUE. The experiment consisted of a control and a fertilized treatment, 0 and 600 kg N ha−1 respectively, applied to four soybean genotypes in order to establish two differential BNF situations. While the control and fertilized treatments had differential N accumulation from BNF, ∼70% and ∼16%, respectively, there were no differences observed in seed yield (∼5000 kg ha−1), NUE (∼36 kg kg−1) and only slight differences in total N uptake (∼365 kg N ha−1 in fertilized treatment compared to ∼389 kg h−1 in the control treatment). Results suggest that reliance on BNF for N does not influence substantially the attenuation of the N dilution curve and has no impact on NUE. The N dilution parameter (“b”) ranged from −0.128 to −0.218 among cultivars and fertilization treatments. The less negative values (more attenuated curve) corresponded to the fertilized plots likely associated with luxury N consumption. Interestingly, dilution curves from soil mineral N showed the typical dilution pattern, while N derived from the atmosphere followed a concentration pattern as the crop developed. This most likely reflects the continuous N flux from BNF to the plant as opposed to the decreasing soil mineral N supply. Recognizing these concentration/dilution curves for atmospheric and soil N has three immediate implications. First, the atmospheric N concentration curve might indicate an upper benchmark for evaluating symbiosis performance during crop development. Second, the concentration pattern observed for BNF could potentially help to reverse the observed decline in seed protein concentration in modern soybean cultivars. Third, the N concentration/ dilution curves for the individual N sources could be incorporated into crop models for estimating BNF at different crop biomass levels during soybean development. Fil: Santachiara, Gabriel. Universidad Nacional de Rosario. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Salvagiotti, Fernando. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Oliveros; Argentina Fil: Gerde, Jose Arnaldo. Universidad Nacional de Rosario. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Rotundo, José Luis. Universidad Nacional de Rosario. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina 2018-05-23T18:30:58Z 2018-05-23T18:30:58Z 2018 info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/2473 0378-4290 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2018.04.001 eng info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess application/pdf Field crops research 223 : 171–178. (2018)