Road Sector Performance Indicators for African Countries

In developed and developing countries, road systems are central not only to the economic health of the nation, but also to the quality of the environment and, in general, the quality of life. Public awareness of this fact has forced road administrations to be accountable for road system performance. Despite the efforts of many countries, there has been no transparent measurement or comparable evaluation standards for road systems performance. But in 1996 The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) embarked on an international effort involving thirteen countries and created a scientific expert group to develop a set of performance indicators to address this need. Concentrating only on issues related to road systems, they set out to create performance indicators that will be comprehensive, holistic, and will help road administrations to evaluate themselves, respond more effectively to decision makers and constituents, and even allow some comparisons with peer countries. The complete OECD expert group report, 'Performance indicators for the road sector' was published in 1998. The performance indicators in this paper, although slightly different from those proposed by the OECD Group, were developed in consultation with area specialists with the intent that they will apply to African conditions and circumstances. They reflect the comprehensive development framework.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Silva, Samantha de, Kamwendo, Christine
Language:English
Published: World Bank, Washington, DC 2000-03
Subjects:ACCESSIBILITY, ACCIDENT RISK, BRIDGE, BRIDGE DECK, BRIDGES, CAR, COMMUNITY ROADS, CONGESTION, DATA COLLECTION METHODS, DECISION MAKING PROCESSES, ECONOMIC COOPERATION, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, EMISSION, EVALUATION RESULTS, FATALITIES, FATALITY, FREIGHT, FUEL, GRAVEL ROADS, GRAVEL SURFACE, INJURY, INSTITUTION, LEARNING, MOBILITY, MODAL SPLIT, PERFORMANCE INDICATORS, PROBLEM SOLVING, PROJECT MANAGEMENT, PUBLIC PARTICIPATION, RESULT, RESULTS, ROAD, ROAD ADMINISTRATION, ROAD COSTS, ROAD NETWORK, ROAD ROUGHNESS, ROAD SECTOR, ROAD SYSTEM, ROAD SYSTEMS, ROAD TRANSPORT, ROAD USER, ROAD USERS, ROADS, SAFETY, SERVICE DELIVERY, TAX, TRAFFIC, TRAFFIC VOLUMES, TRANSPORT, TRANSPORT PLANNING, TRANSPORT SERVICES, TRANSPORT SYSTEM, TRANSPORT SYSTEMS, TRANSPORTATION, TRANSPORTATION PROFESSIONALS, USER FEEDBACK, USER INTERFACE, VEHICLE, VEHICLE FLEET, VEHICLES, WALKING, WALKING TIME,
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2000/03/12384142/road-sector-performance-indicators-african-countries
https://hdl.handle.net/10986/9845
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In developed and developing countries, road systems are central not only to the economic health of the nation, but also to the quality of the environment and, in general, the quality of life. Public awareness of this fact has forced road administrations to be accountable for road system performance. Despite the efforts of many countries, there has been no transparent measurement or comparable evaluation standards for road systems performance. But in 1996 The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) embarked on an international effort involving thirteen countries and created a scientific expert group to develop a set of performance indicators to address this need. Concentrating only on issues related to road systems, they set out to create performance indicators that will be comprehensive, holistic, and will help road administrations to evaluate themselves, respond more effectively to decision makers and constituents, and even allow some comparisons with peer countries. The complete OECD expert group report, 'Performance indicators for the road sector' was published in 1998. The performance indicators in this paper, although slightly different from those proposed by the OECD Group, were developed in consultation with area specialists with the intent that they will apply to African conditions and circumstances. They reflect the comprehensive development framework.