Agglomeration and Specialization Patterns when Firms and Workers Are Footloose
In new economic geography models, geographic concentration can't arise because of workers' mobility or vertical linkages between firms. We examine a setup that combines those two approaches in conjunction with local congestion costs. We find that, as trade costs are lowered, the geographic concentration of total activity (agglomeration) follows an inverse u-shaped evolution, while the degree of specialization of regions increases. These results shed light on regional development within a country as integration proceeds: when trade costs are high, firms evenly spread between the regions to supply local demand at low costs, hence diversified regions; at intermediate trade costs, we have coexistence of a diversified core and a specialized periphery and at low trade costs, each industry clusters in one region to fully exploit returns to scale externalities. US city centers and non-metropolitan areas during the period 1850-1990 depict such specialization and agglomeration patterns. These results show that a country's effort to improve accessibility across its portfolio of places can favor a win-win regional allocation of firms based on each location's competitive advantage.
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal Article biblioteca |
| Language: | EN |
| Published: |
2008
|
| Subjects: | Size and Spatial Distributions of Regional Economic Activity R120, Other Production and Pricing Analysis R320, |
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10986/5549 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | In new economic geography models, geographic concentration can't arise because of workers' mobility or vertical linkages between firms. We examine a setup that combines those two approaches in conjunction with local congestion costs. We find that, as trade costs are lowered, the geographic concentration of total activity (agglomeration) follows an inverse u-shaped evolution, while the degree of specialization of regions increases. These results shed light on regional development within a country as integration proceeds: when trade costs are high, firms evenly spread between the regions to supply local demand at low costs, hence diversified regions; at intermediate trade costs, we have coexistence of a diversified core and a specialized periphery and at low trade costs, each industry clusters in one region to fully exploit returns to scale externalities. US city centers and non-metropolitan areas during the period 1850-1990 depict such specialization and agglomeration patterns. These results show that a country's effort to improve accessibility across its portfolio of places can favor a win-win regional allocation of firms based on each location's competitive advantage. |
|---|