Practitioners' Toolkit for Agriculture Public Expenditure Analysis

This toolkit for analyzing public expenditures in agriculture contributes to a broader effort to enhance the focus, quality, and appropriate scaling of public spending in the sector. More specifically, the toolkit has two goals: to provide checklists for practitioners conducting various kinds of agriculture public expenditure analyses, and to provide selected examples on aspects of the checklist to help guide analysis. The toolkit presents a diversity of approaches and describes experiences both positive and negative in conducting agricultural public spending analyses in different settings and with different objectives. It offers checklists of issues and options, rather than a minimum list of issues to be covered. Needs, existing work time, and budget constraints will likely drive the selection of the checklist topics to be covered in any given analysis of public expenditures. The toolkit is organized to facilitate this selectivity of topic, while maintaining a strategic perspective. The supporting examples draw on numerous analyses of public expenditures in agricultures.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: World Bank
Language:English
Published: World Bank 2011-03
Subjects:ACCOUNTABILITY, ACCOUNTABILITY ARRANGEMENTS, ACCOUNTABILITY MECHANISMS, ACCOUNTABILITY OF PUBLIC SPENDING, ACCOUNTING, ANALYSIS OF TRENDS, ANNUAL BUDGET, ANNUAL BUDGET CYCLE, ANNUAL BUDGETARY PROCESS, ANNUAL PLANS, ASYMMETRIC INFORMATION, BASELINE DATA, BENEFITS OF PUBLIC SPENDING, BUDGET ALLOCATION, BUDGET ALLOCATIONS, BUDGET CIRCULAR, BUDGET CONSTRAINTS, BUDGET CYCLE, BUDGET DOES, BUDGET EXECUTION, BUDGET EXPENDITURE, BUDGET FRAMEWORK, BUDGET INITIATIVES, BUDGET MANAGEMENT, BUDGET PLANNING, BUDGET PREPARATION, BUDGET PROCESS, BUDGET SUBMISSION, BUDGET SUPPORT, BUDGET SYSTEM, BUDGETARY ALLOCATION, BUDGETARY ALLOCATIONS, CAPACITY-BUILDING, CAPITAL BUDGET, CAPITAL EXPENDITURE, CAPITAL INVESTMENT, CAPITAL SPENDING, CASH FLOWS, COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE, COMPOSITION OF PUBLIC SPENDING, CONCENTRATION COEFFICIENT, CONCENTRATION COEFFICIENTS, COST EFFECTIVENESS, COST RECOVERY, COST-EFFICIENCY, COUNTRY ECONOMISTS, COUNTRY PROGRAMS, DATA ANALYSIS, DATA AVAILABILITY, DATA COLLECTION, DATA REQUIREMENTS, DECENTRALIZATION, DIAGNOSTIC ASSESSMENT, DIAGNOSTIC TOOL, DISTRIBUTIONAL IMPACTS, DISTRICT, DONOR AGENCIES, DONOR ASSISTANCE, DONOR FINANCING, DONOR FLOWS, DONOR FUNDING, EFFICIENCY GAINS, EFFICIENCY OF PUBLIC SPENDING, EFFICIENCY OF RESOURCE USE, EQUITY OF PUBLIC SPENDING, EXCHANGE RATES, EXPENDITURE DATA, EXPENDITURE GROWTH, EXPENDITURE PER CAPITA, EXPENDITURE REPORTING, EXPENDITURE TRACKING SURVEYS, EXPENDITURES, FIDUCIARY REQUIREMENTS, FINANCIAL ACTIVITIES, FINANCIAL FLOWS, FISCAL COSTS, FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION, FISCAL TRANSFERS, FOREIGN FUNDS, GOVERNMENT BUDGET, GOVERNMENT BUDGET PROCESS, GOVERNMENT PRIORITIES, GOVERNMENT SPENDING, GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT, GROSS NATIONAL PRODUCT, GROWTH RATE, IMPORT TARIFFS, INCOME REDISTRIBUTION, INFLATION, INTEREST RATES, INVESTMENT RETURN, LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT, LEVELS OF EFFICIENCY, LEVELS OF PUBLIC SPENDING, LOCAL GOVERNMENTS, MACROECONOMIC POLICIES, MACROECONOMIC STABILITY, MARKET FAILURE, MARKET PRICES, MATCHING GRANTS, MEASURABLE RESULTS, MEDIUM-TERM ALLOCATIONS, MEDIUM-TERM EXPENDITURE, MEDIUM-TERM EXPENDITURE FRAMEWORK, MEDIUM-TERM EXPENDITURE FRAMEWORKS, MEDIUM-TERM SPENDING PROJECTIONS, MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, NATIONAL ACCOUNTS, NATIONAL BUDGET, NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS, NATIONAL STRATEGY, NATURAL RESOURCES, NEGATIVE EXTERNALITIES, OPERATING EXPENSES, PERFORMANCE DATA, POLICY ENVIRONMENT, POLICY PRIORITIES, POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS, POVERTY REDUCTION, POVERTY REDUCTION STRATEGY, PRIVATE INVESTMENT, PRIVATE SECTOR, PRIVATE SECTOR INVESTMENT, PROGRAM DESIGN, PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION, PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT, PROGRAM OBJECTIVES, PROGRAMS, PROVINCIAL ADMINISTRATIONS, PUBLIC BUDGET, PUBLIC ENTITIES, PUBLIC EXPENDITURE, PUBLIC EXPENDITURE ANALYSIS, PUBLIC EXPENDITURE DATA, PUBLIC EXPENDITURE REVIEW, PUBLIC EXPENDITURE TRACKING, PUBLIC FINANCES, PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, PUBLIC GOODS, PUBLIC INVESTMENT, PUBLIC INVESTMENTS, PUBLIC RESOURCES, PUBLIC SECTOR, PUBLIC SECTOR MANAGEMENT, PUBLIC SPENDING, PUBLIC SPENDING PATTERNS, QUALITY OF SERVICES, QUALITY STANDARDS, RECURRENT EXPENDITURE, RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, SECTOR BUDGET, SECTOR CEILINGS, SECTOR EXPENDITURE, SECTOR MINISTRIES, SECTOR POLICIES, SECTOR POLICY, SECTORAL EXPENDITURE, SECTORAL OBJECTIVES, SERVICE DELIVERY, SERVICE PROVIDERS, SOCIAL OUTCOMES, SOCIAL SAFETY NETS, SPENDING LEVELS, STRATEGIC CHOICES, SUBNATIONAL, SUBNATIONAL GOVERNMENTS, TAX, TAX BREAKS, TAX EXEMPTIONS, TAXATION, TAXPAYERS, TOTAL EXPENDITURE, TOTAL PUBLIC SPENDING, TOTAL SPENDING, TRANSPARENCY,
Online Access:http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/main?menuPK=64187510&pagePK=64193027&piPK=64187937&theSitePK=523679&menuPK=64187510&searchMenuPK=64187283&siteName=WDS&entityID=000356161_20120215232808
https://hdl.handle.net/10986/2822
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This toolkit for analyzing public expenditures in agriculture contributes to a broader effort to enhance the focus, quality, and appropriate scaling of public spending in the sector. More specifically, the toolkit has two goals: to provide checklists for practitioners conducting various kinds of agriculture public expenditure analyses, and to provide selected examples on aspects of the checklist to help guide analysis. The toolkit presents a diversity of approaches and describes experiences both positive and negative in conducting agricultural public spending analyses in different settings and with different objectives. It offers checklists of issues and options, rather than a minimum list of issues to be covered. Needs, existing work time, and budget constraints will likely drive the selection of the checklist topics to be covered in any given analysis of public expenditures. The toolkit is organized to facilitate this selectivity of topic, while maintaining a strategic perspective. The supporting examples draw on numerous analyses of public expenditures in agricultures.