Monitoring and Evaluation in the United States Government

This report is divided into five parts. Following this introduction, Section two provides an overview of the institutions and most important features in the landscape of monitoring and evaluation (M&E) at the federal level in the United States. Section three detailed the actual systems for performance M&E that is now in place in the Executive Branch and coordinated (or led) by the office of management and budget, including a look at their evolution and expected future trends. The focus is on the executive system, because it directly supports management and budgeting decisions, and because it provides a key basis for evaluation and research conducted by other agencies (such as the U.S. Government Accountability Office, or GAO and Congressional Budget Office, or CBO). Section four discusses the strengths and particular challenges faced by these systems, and section five concludes the report with lessons that may be useful to other countries.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mark, Katharine, Pfeiffer, John R.
Format: Working Paper biblioteca
Language:English
en_US
Published: World Bank, Washington, DC 2011-10
Subjects:ABUSE, ACCOUNTABILITY, ACCOUNTING, ACHIEVEMENT, ACTION FRAMEWORK, ACTION PLANS, AGING, ATTENTION, ATTRIBUTION, BEST PRACTICES, CAPABILITIES, CAPACITY BUILDING, CITIES, CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT, CIVIL SERVANTS, CIVIL SOCIETY, COLLABORATION, COLLECTION OF DATA, CONFIDENCE, CREATIVITY, CUSTOMER SATISFACTION, CUSTOMER SERVICE, DATA ANALYSIS, DATA COLLECTION, DATA SOURCES, DECISION MAKERS, DECISION-MAKING, DETAILED INFORMATION, DISCUSSION FORUMS, DONATIONS, E DEVELOPMENT, E PRACTICES, E-MAIL, EARLY CHILDHOOD, EFFECTIVE GOVERNMENT, FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, FINANCIAL SUPPORT, FRAUD, GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY, GOVERNMENT AGENCIES, GOVERNMENT EFFICIENCY, GOVERNMENT INFORMATION, GOVERNMENT POLICIES, HABITS, HOMELAND SECURITY, HUMAN CAPITAL, HUMAN SERVICES, IMPLEMENTATION PLAN, IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS, INFORMATION DISSEMINATION, INFORMATION PRODUCTS, INFORMATION SHARING, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INITIATIVE, INNOVATION, INSTITUTIONAL CHANGE, INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK, INTEGRITY, INTERNAL GOVERNMENT, INVENTORY, INVESTIGATIONS, LAWS, LEADERSHIP, LEARNING, LEGISLATIVE BRANCH, LOCAL GOVERNMENT, MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, NETWORKS, NEW INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, NEW TECHNOLOGIES, ONE-STOP SHOP, PDF, PERFORMANCE INDICATOR, PERFORMANCE MEASURES, POLICE, POLICY DEVELOPMENT, PRIVATE SECTOR, PRIVATE SECTOR PARTNERS, PROBLEM SOLVING, PROCUREMENT, PROGRAMS, PROTOCOLS, PUBLIC ACCESS, PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, PUBLIC AGENCIES, PUBLIC CONFIDENCE, PUBLIC FUNDS, PUBLIC INFORMATION, PUBLIC POLICY, PUBLIC SECTOR, RECOGNITION, RESULT, SERVICE DELIVERY, SERVICE QUALITY, SOCIAL SECURITY, TARGETS, TECHNICAL EXPERTISE, TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENTS, TELEPHONE, TRANSPARENCY, TRIALS, USER, VIDEO, WEB, WEB SITE,
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/472991468142480736/Monitoring-and-evaluation-in-the-United-States-government-an-overview
https://hdl.handle.net/10986/26684
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This report is divided into five parts. Following this introduction, Section two provides an overview of the institutions and most important features in the landscape of monitoring and evaluation (M&E) at the federal level in the United States. Section three detailed the actual systems for performance M&E that is now in place in the Executive Branch and coordinated (or led) by the office of management and budget, including a look at their evolution and expected future trends. The focus is on the executive system, because it directly supports management and budgeting decisions, and because it provides a key basis for evaluation and research conducted by other agencies (such as the U.S. Government Accountability Office, or GAO and Congressional Budget Office, or CBO). Section four discusses the strengths and particular challenges faced by these systems, and section five concludes the report with lessons that may be useful to other countries.